Obama's Economic Thought, The Human Condition and Deficit Spending and the Objectivity of Value Critique

To all those "Gone With the Wind" and "Birth of a Nation" sympathizer legatees moonlighting as Non-Partisan critics of Obama's Economic thought and it's practice. If as they giddily put it that Obama is saddling generations 4 and 5 removed in the future with the yoke of unfathomable debt because of Deficit spending.

The argument is misplaced, misdirected, idealistic and does nothing to move forward and advance the analysis of how to discern and correct the inherent abstraction and antagonism upon human life of the objectivity of value and it's expressed medium as money.

Critics of deficit spending think the invocation of the idea of futuristic generations paying for the sins of their parents spending wins them the argument conclusively. They are wrong and it only reveals that after millennia of mans efforts, attempts and labor at realizing a medium of value expression that doesn't distort the value expression and it's transactional-relationship, Man's propensity for and instinctual ignorance has only managed to maintain a system that has nothing to do with the circumstance of the human condition and it's objective need for value expression.

The entire construct of Political-Economy and it's money expression assumes a premise, a presupposition that value and it's practicality is relegated to the basics of what is necessary for the re-creation of the human condition. The idea however that the human condition is based on re-creation is correct. But the critique of it's value expression has been and is wrong and has actively been at odds with the re-creation dynamic of the human condition.

The un-stated premise of the Obama Presidency is American Political-Economy has tilted so severely, on the side of speculation and Imperialism and it's antagonisms that nothing short of it's re-start holds any promise for the survivability of the union. This is the backdrop which to some seems as Apocalyptic sums of money are being printed saddling their Grandkids with debt. The reality is they are wrong. Deficit spending or it's absence has nothing to do with the quality of life anticipated by future generations.
.
By Apropos

Traditions, Culture and the Anti-Progress Critique

There is this classical false premise assertion that archaic traditions and cultural habits and practices cannot and should not be examined and criticized on the merits, lest the critic and polemicist comes across as elitist and imperialist in all the various critical forms. So the consequences is a sort of manipulative collusion by international and the specific nation status quo with on the one hand reactionary and anti-progress traditions and culture are defended and tolerated as national pride for the subjects as a means of defiance against their lot, while on the other the internationalist on both sides of the dynamic conveniently exploit the rewards of progress under the guise of facilitating the means of business.

There is a typical refrain in the so-called under-developed Third-World as it clings to reactionary traditions and cultural-impracticalities as Polemic against the industrialized West and it's legacy of stunting, stymying and retarding the self-deterministic dynamic of the Third World: That anything Western is wrong and any member of it's citizenry pursuing Western applications is a national traitor.

This mindset and it's dynamic is the dialectical bane of the Human-Condition on both sides of it's determination. Because it conditionalizes progress in a manner that not only is it anti-but it supports backwardness and it's myriad expressions of prejudice in a manner that enables Imperialism and it's exploitation.

By Apropos

Town Halls of 2009, Ignorance, Bigotry and Republican-Conservatism

Liberals, Progressives, Practical-Minded People, Empiricist, Dialectical-Materialist Theorist and Democrats have all in one form or the other expressed disdain and outrage at the ignorance and Intellectual-Liberalism expressed exhibited and on full display during these Town Halls of 2009 and the sessions of Open Political-Activity of the Health Care Reform struggle.

Its as if half of the nation awakened one morning to the stupefying spectacle of ruddy faced adults displaying the most base form of ignorance, that of illiteracy and bigotry. It's as if the classical period of Enlightenment and the Renaissance was hypothesis in a Liberal-Arts curriculum and an entire one-half of the American population never realized that something as facts exist and regardless of objective, Facts are Bias Neutral.

What is quite amusing about the spectacle of illiteracy on display at the Town-Halls of 2009 is how synonymous Republican-Conservatism has become with ignorance and bigotry. The task facing the nation and it's Progressive imperative is applying zero-tolerance for the sort of ignorance, Republican-Conservatism seems to instigate and revel in.

By Apropos

Republican-Conservatism: It's Anti-Big Government Spending Polemics and Nancy Pelosi

Republican-Conservatism and it's pathological practice of disinformation and demagoguery never shys away from exploiting it's tried and proven weapon: it's historical anti-big Government spending polemic. The irony is it historically supports the type of Governmental spending that necessitates and inflates the printing of money, that of the military-industrial symbiosis and it's exploitation.

The continued success of the anti-big Government spending and it's deficit money polemic is simple: the masses of the human condition and it's American Political-Economy variant are amazingly ignorant to the application of speculative-value and it's Venetian money dynamic.

So arguments like the nation is in debt and the Chinese will stop loaning money, suffice to brow beat ignorance into the middle-class and the working poor that their insufferable lot is due to Nancy Pelosi and her "San Francisco" Big Government spending ways while omitting the fact, that "San Francisco" Liberals and their Progressive values liberates the nations creativity and technological ingenuity, providing the necessary jobs for the middle-class, the working poor and their Reagan Democrats gullible receptiveness to Conservative Polemics and it's reaction.

By Apropos

What is Invaluable Satisfaction, What is the Money Dynamic and Mediocrity

Invaluable Satisfaction is the innately-objective human state of firstly, cognition, secondly creativity and industriousness and money as the sole approximate expression of this value dialectic has been a ploy foisted on the Human Condition by less creative, less industrious minds in the attempt at fettering it's art and physics to their mediocrity.

Are there not two classes of human work? The first class is creativity and inventiveness. The second is the replication and mass production of invention as a practical fact.

If the Invaluable Satisfaction of both classes of work is unique to it's activity isn't it then an antagonistic contradiction to assume the money dynamic by it's mere convenience as mode of expression should then assume fiat like dicta ursurping the apriori of Invaluable Satisfaction?

By Apropos

Hostages, Captives and the Contradiction of the Prisoner Dialectic

This fails me. There is the ubiquitous parade of Psychologist and so-called experts each dispensing "expert" advice on the Psychological trials and adjustment deficit for released former hostages and captives. Statistics are hurled about showing the Socio-Dysfunctional rates of former hostages and captives, be it Divorce, Suicides or physical trauma and the qualifier is the statistics represent persons detained as hostages, held captive for ransom for the various reasons. Consequently private and public resources are expended in efforts of support for and rehabilitation of the former hostages and captives.

On the average Tens of Thousands of Prisoners held in American Jails and Prisons under relatively similar conditions as hostages and captives are released yearly without an assessment of their experience within the linguistic and critical framework of released hostages and captives. This begs this question is inhumane, and barbaric treatment of a detained human being in all it's sensory deprivation and physical mistreatment dependent only on the clinical and academic distinction of legal and illegal?

Is the existential reality of the detained subjects experience of injustice, inhumanness, and barbarity a contradiction mitigated or aggravated by the mere means of it's procedural application?

By Apropos

The Iran Nuclear Program, The Obama Presidency and Agent Provocateurs

If there isn't a cabal that is conspiratorially-molelike, laboring , undermining whatever potential might exist for a form of resolution to the Iran Nuclear Program by the Obama Presidency that will allow Iran to enter the Nuclear Club, there should be. Because since commencement of the Obama Presidency and the realization by Israel, it's sympathizers, Zionism and it's cabal that the Obama Presidency would allow Iran membership into the Nuclear Club. The world has been introduced to all sorts of ploys, gimmicks and gambits wielded by those opposing Iran's possession of Nuclear technology with their efforts at sabotaging Iranian institutions, infrastructure, stirring and supporting Political instability in Iran. Everything is being done to muddy the waters, so to speak, discrediting any means and opportunity available to the Obama Presidency on the Iran Nuclear program.

This latest episode of Three Semitic-Americans arrested in Iran for violating it's borders is interestingly-Bizarre. Are we to accept that there are supposedly reasonably minded Americans who are down right stupid and reckless enough to place themselves on the Iranian border?

The only logical conclusion is the three Semitic-Americans are Agent Provocateurs destined by their arrest to create an International incident that will further discredit maneuvering by the Obama Presidency on the Iran Nuclear Program question.

If the ploy is bizarre it only reveals the desperation of the cabal that instigated it.

By Apropos

Deflationary, Recessionary, High-Unemployment Economy and Republican-Conservatism: Governmental Spending and Invaluable Satisfaction

What exactly does Republican critique against Governmental spending in a deflationary, recessionary high unemployment economy mean? It simply means the middle class rationalizes thrift and the working poor-underclass rededicate theirself to the theological dicta of suffering in principle and in deed.

The idea that in a deflationary, recessionary, high-unemployment economy, governmental spending distorts and increases inflation by deflating value is an insidious mischaracterization, a misrepresentation of empirical circumstances and an outright lie intended to satisfy political opportunity.

If as Republican anti-governmental spending economic thought goes that compelling people to spend what money they are holding, by withholding the government purse is how to reawaken a stagnant economy it then ignores the reality that it is an unconscionable and needless hardship which serves no other purpose than the pursuit of theological ideas and a human conditional historicity that is based in ignorance.

Thrift in a deflationary, recessionary, high-unemployment economy is another means of removing money from the retail function of the economy and making it accessible to the speculative-derivative paradigm of risk as a capitalist function. What matters is there has to be a positive circulation of money regardless of source. Republican-Conservatism and it's resentment-judgemental coefficient would rather people suffered needlessly under archaic empirical distortion of suffering as dialectical truism of the human condition and it's political economy, a dialectical synthesis which as a historical attribute must be embraced or else fire and brimstone will fall from the Heavens. But with the dialectical-materialist anticipation of Value and it's money medium of which governmental spending enables the redemptive realization of mans invaluable satisfaction. Governmental spending attempts to achieve and does accomplish the potential of man's creative realizations and in the socialized industries of the worlds developed economies we see the existence of pockets of this reality.

By Apropos

Michael Eric Dyson, Larry Elder and The Black Security Guard of Nixonian-Republican Criminality

The guest on the 7/29/09; Larry King Live on CNN were: Larry Elder, Ben Stein, Joe Brown and Michael Eric Dyson. The topic was Race Relations and American Police, specifically the Henry Louis Gates arrest of 2009.

Michael Eric Dyson reiterated his encapsulating illustration that were Barack Obama, a White President and were Henry Louis Gates the tottering Henry Kissinger who is a White academician and the arresting Police Officer, a Black Officer, the outcome, storyline and narrative of the Henry Louis Gates arrest of 2009 would be different.

Larry Elder true to his status-quo collaborator-apologist inclination protested Michael Eric Dyson's illustration, and I paraphrase: Eric Dyson cannot say that because it hasn't happened. But as it normally is with the work of the collaborator-apologist, revision and outright misinformation is the operative.

I want to remind Larry Elder, that it has already happened. The Watergate Scandal which exposed a sitting President Richard Nixon as another petty-criminal opportunist thus causing his disgraceful resignation and exit from office was caused and initiated by a Black security guard who chanced upon the break-in at the Watergate Hotel. Anticipating Michael Eric Dyson's polemics: That Black security guard because of his actions at the Watergate Hotel, exposing Nixonian-Republican criminality has been relegated imperpetuity beyond the pale of history. That Black security guard lost this job, became homeless, was persecuted because he dared apply law to the status-quo. That Black security guard is the historical refutation to that time worn collaborator-apologist function of the Larry Elders and their one-dimensional critique, which dialectically in turn affirms Michael Eric Dyson's polemic.

By Apropos

George F. Will and His Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism is Wrong, Taxes and the Invaluable-Satisfaction Dialectic

What is wrong with George F. Will? So he writes trite columns for a living, that only establishes he has the necessary objectivity to feed himself. Besides that, his illiteracy under the cloak of Conservatism isn't simply appalling it is insidiously-audacious in the specific sense of it's wormy insinuation into the historical questions of American Political-Economy. George F. Will is wrong on two fronts: Intellectually and philosophically. Conservatism and it's American variant is simply wrong and historically-reactionary.

George F. Will writes in his "The "Tax the Rich!" "Reflex" 7/27/09; essay for Newsweek Magazine...
"tap a typical Democrat... on the knee with a rubber hammer and he or she will say "Tax the Rich!". Well this proposition naturally has it's antithesis, "Tap a typical Republican-Conservative on the with a rubber hammer and he or she will say "Tax Cut". The nature of taxes as George F. Will and his Conservative compatriots see it is the sum total of the Political-Economy dialectic and that closes their intellectual-loop and philosophical circuitry.

American-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism represented by it's George F. Will, Charles Krauthammer, William Kristol and Rush Limbaugh cabal and pantheon misses the question-crux of the human condition and it's Political-Economy which is invaluable-satisfaction. Invaluable-satisfaction, it's means of realization is the Political-Economy dialectic and to reduce it to the taxation irrelevancy reveals quite starkly an ignorance naivete that is flabbergasting.

The question has nothing to do with George F. Will's gibberish verbosity of his 7/27/09 essay which can easily be explained with the simple unfettered idealism. But the question is, does Conservatism and it's Intellectualism posses the requisite auto-criticism to realize that Richard Nixon's abandonment of the Gold Standard and it's paradigm has enabled the revelation of quintessential value. It has anticipated digital-technology and it's productivity and the maturation of speculation despite it's strain again on a sector of the economy has only underscored the fact that the Conservative Political-Economy narrative with it's rote like fixation on taxes, is simply incapable of capturing the invaluable-satisfaction dialectic intrinsic to the human condition. George F. Will and Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism can continue indulgence in the farcial exercise into a nature of the human condition that held true when theology and it's dichotomy held sway with it's dicta that man suffered, because of preordination and not the judgemental resentment of conservative-ignorance and it's reaction. But it is at the expense of contemporary creativity and technological productivity which utterly refutes Conservatism and its Intellectualism and despite George F. Will's assertions that Liberalism and it's intellectual-labor fetters man, the opposite is true and invaluable-satisfaction not taxes is the dynamic.

By Apropos

Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism and Liberal-Intellectualism and Thought

What is Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism: It is that historical practice and tendency irrespective of political milieus, of playing loose with facts, historical revisions, the inclination to arouse, stimulate and incite the base irrationality in people and it's apogee is obfuscation.

While Liberal-Intellectualism and Thought struggles to enlighten and inclusively expand human potential, Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism is reactionary.

By Apropos

Prison Reform, Political-Economy and "Open Political Action"

Is Prison Reform as envisioned by the Barack Obama Presidency and Senator Jim Webb of Virginia a co-opt and preempt of organic Prison Reform?

Historically Prison Reform, which is to mean advocacies by persons and groups towards the purpose of achieving a reform of imprisonment and the way it is used in the United States has floundered and hasn't achieved it's objectives. If some of it's objectives were realized it was concessional ploys by government. Firstly as a means of co-opting reforms evolutionary direction and secondly tactical maneuvering that strengthens the governmental position all the more firmly. A classic example of this is the Anti-Death Penalty position and advocacy, with the way government maneuvered by strengthening that weakness of the governmental position and then enforcing it even more draconically after the revision and correction of that which made Capital Punishment susceptible to attack by it's foes.

Prison as used in the U.S. is a means of controlling elements of society who because of their economical oppression are politically and socially marginalized. What this means in the broad sense is, those members of society who because of their manner of interaction with the economy are without the political and social basis to demand substantial access and positive recognition from society are the ones laws and imprisonment are designed for. It doesn't take much to realize that if an element of society lacks the means to stably interact with it, decisions made and the resulting behavior will run counter to society's laws and as such will result imprisonment. Elements in society who for the most part meet this controlling imperative have been Black people (descendants of enslaved Africans) and the poor blue collar worker or the ubiquitous "working poor".

U.S. society and government does not view it's Black elements and blue collar working poor as productive beings in the Political-Economical sense. But it views the population in question first and foremost as a group to be controlled. This antebellum mind-set dates back to it's feudalistic and royalist origins when common people were to be controlled and rigidly tied to the land by their so-called betters, in a statist undertaking of Political-Economy. Even with the advent of industrial technology and it's socialist production, those societies of which the United States is a historical off spring simply carried over the feudalistic mind-set to socialist industrial production. Of Which even if the so-called commoners, "working poor" of the United States society, Black people and the poor blue collar working Whites are not in practice feudalistically tied to the land they are in principle just as much tied to it due to their lacking of that substantial means of removing theirselves from that imperative of control.

The issue of Prison Reform is also the question of what is the structure and development of the materialist-dialectic of American Political-Economy. In other words if the issue is what is to be done with the predominant imprisonment of Black people and the poor White people, the answer lies with the radical reputation of the American Labor narrative and the speculative-value antagonism. It also lies with a heightened political grasp of the "working poor",to clearly and starkly contrast the divergence of interest within Political-Economy dynamic of their condition. This means not allowing the status-quo and it's support functionaries to describe and define facts as they see fit.

Historically Prison reform holds the position that "open political action" is a specific intellectual activity with the final arbiter the very cause for it's practice and as the Barack Obama Presidency and Senator Jim Webb's initiatives outline the question it preempts organic Prison Reform.

By Apropos

Crispus Attucks and The 2009 Arrest of Henry Louis Gates by The Cambridge, Massachusetts Police

The spirit of Crispus Attucks roams the hills and valleys of Massachusetts in it's eternal embodiment of "Give me liberty or give me death"?

Did Henry Louis Gates, the eternal collaborator embodying the Jeffersonian contradiction of the Crispus Attucks experience of American Blackness, feel Crispus Attucks lament as bigotry and it's repression in the form of the Cambridge, Massachusetts White police officer seizing his liberty remind him of what Crispus Attucks actually died for.

Across the land the classic diatribe swells against the Cambridge Police Department, which with Jeffersonian contradiction was only fulfilling it's historical duty. The 2009 arrest of Henry Louis Gates is only the logical conclusion to a statistical certainty that the Black upper class and it's intelligentsia support functionaries should naturally expect, considering their silence and apathy to the generational pogromization of Black America at the expense of the Crispus Attucks experience ---Henry Louis Gates reaffirms the Jeffersonian contradiction with his 2009 arrest.




By Apropos

Israel and the Blame Game

Why is Israel always ready and quick to blame?

Israel blames Iran, Israel blames Hezbollah, Israel blames Hamas, Israel blames Syria.

Disingenuously Israel blames President Jimmy Carter!!! But the truth is were it not for Jimmy Carter and the billions of dollars deal his administration cut with the Egyptians to elicit the Egyptian status quo's services in securing Israel's flank, Israel might not even be.

Israel with it's treatment of the Palestinian people is gravely miscalculating. Palestinians are not Australia's Aboriginals or Native Americans or even descendants of enslaved Africans. Nor is there some sort of apocalyptic redemption that will in Hitlerite fashion genocidally exterminate the Palestinians so the blame game which Israel, Frat boy like pursues futilely only postpones the inevitable: The affirmative co-existence with Palestinians.

By Apropos

We Are

We are "The Wretched of the Earth",
the suffers of injustice,
the bearers of the yoke of oppression.

We are the down-trodden,
the exploited,
the repressed and we can always rest assured to be manipulated and compromised.

We are The People,
The Populations, The Masses. We build civilizations, we construct edifices and structures attesting to the creativity, ingenuity, and expression of humanity.

We are the basis and foundation that prosperity, wealth, and stability are built on. We surmount the insurmountable. We labor as "Beast of Burden" and the rule is we do all this in the pursuit of anothers interest. We always place anothers welfare above ours. We compromise our lives and settle for wretched existence in consequences of our pursuits of alien ideas.

We are Human Beings. Yet we settle for Civil Rights instead of Human Rights. Some of us claim ignorance as a justifiable reason for subjugated, subservient existence we call our Human Condition.

Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is an exchange of labor for Capital, meaning the dictated means of acquiring and attaining the necessities of life: water, food, shelter, and clothing, experience it's consequences as an inequity of their material realization, an inability to attain that maximal realization of their Human potential.

Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is allegiance to the state, garners you the basics in life experience the injustices and inability of the state to contend and deal with the frailties, whims and caprices of it's human elements, those petty tyrants who at every inch of the way exhibit that rat like frenzy of rats abandoning a sinking ship, grasping and grabbing what their placement within the state machine allows as the wretched masses once again look on
stupefied--- our blood was shed for this?

Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is fiat of theocracy, experience the hypocrisy of human sensuality and sentience totally at odds with the sapient potential of human realization. we persistently encounter that infantile inability of the theological basis to come to terms with the profane cause-effect of the material basis defining and determining that exponential parameter of our lives and condition, which as a result repress and alienates us the masses from our humanness---which in effect produces that one dimensional Human Being we all know so well.

We, "The Wretched of the Earth" have the obligation of understanding that all these factors and conditions that bring us so much despair, grief and anger have no other solution than ourselves. We hold in our hands the turn of our destiny and the relative means to direct our lives upon that path of maximal realization of which the legacy of humanness is our inheritance. The progression of humanness lies with us because we are humanity.

We are the People,
The Populations, The Masses. The frustrations we revel in permitting our articulation of that defeatist slogan "that's the system and that's the way it is", illustrates our continued submission to an existence that takes everything out of us and puts nothing back. It drains us of our humanness and replaces it with the illogical and a humanistic urge of oblivion under the guise of redemption.

By Apropos

Walter Williams, Colonialism and the Black Apologist Dynamic

Walter Williams, Professor of Economics wrote:

"I'll never make an argument for Colonialism but the fact of business is that the average African was better off under Colonialism..."

I have a problem with it and find it extremely irresponsible and criminal that such utter nonsense is spouted under the guise of responsible scholarship.

The fact is the imperialistic designs and Colonial intentions of the Portuguese, Dutch, British, French, Belgian and Italian Colonizers and the conferees of the Berlin Conference , retarded and voided the very essence of the Colonized Africans. Not only are conclusions as Walter Williams derisive of self-determination, but are the death rattle gasp of the Racist paternalist and in this instance Apologist collaborator-lackey.

Prior to the European Colonization of Africa, were the Africans in social and political disarray? Were not the Africans in most parts able to put protracted and in some instances successful resistance and the logistics and psychological effort it demanded a reflection of the well structured polity it represented? Post independent, have the Neo-Colonialist, former Colonies been allowed to chart their own destiny, without meddling from one or all of their former Colonial masters under the Geo-Political logic of "spheres of influence".

Much is always said of how the European Colonizers of Africa, developed comprehensively the infrastructure and organized the Political Economical structures of their respective Colonies and as such matters always are, it's either an outright lie or a well maintained myth.

European Colonizers didn't Colonize Africa because of benevolent intent. Their first order of Business was first and foremost , plunder and exploit. Consequently any and all organizing and infrastructural development was simply that which would facilitate and expedite their business of plunder and looting. Everything and all within the Colonies was organized and structured to maximize the pillage of resources. Naturally the Colonizers had to rigorously and vigorously destroy any and all forms of opposition, which in principle was any conflicting ideas and intentions against their plunder imperative.

This is the back drop in true form to lackey analysis. Walter Williams writes:

"The legacy of Colonialism, used so often as an excuse by Africans is a sham that can't hold waste. After all some of the worlds richest countries like the U.S. Canada, Australia, and N. Zealand ---were Colonies as was Hong Kong, whats true about those ex-Colonies that's untrue about Africa?

Williams as Professor of Economics should answer his own question. I find it profoundly pathetic at the lengths Black collaborator-lackey and Apologist for Colonialism and it's "White Mans burden" dialectic go to in defense of Euro-centric logic. Professor Walter Williams is no different than those historical Wheatley's who pathetically celebrated their enslavement as enlightenment.

Irrespective of Barack Obama's 7/11/09; speech to Ghana's Parliament and it's admonishment. Africans Political-Economy cannot be analysed absent the stench of it's history.

By Apropos

Hugo Chavez, Political Activity, United States, The Honduran Crisis, The Reactionary Dialectic and Henry Ford

Who and what is Hugo Chavez. So the United States and it's imperative (whatever that is) finds Hugo Chavez and his type of Political activity offensive. The obvious conclusion is if the United States, it's imperative and type of Political activity responded and refuted the Polemics and dialectics of Hugo Chavez and his Political activity and imperative, the Chavez circumstance would collapse upon the weight of it's specific and general contradictions.

Simply reducing the Honduran Presidential crisis and it's conditional-coup to the stale , old and tired Neo-Colonial paradigm and it's critique of Communist vs. Capitalist, Left vs. Right, Hugo Chavez as meddler. Lacks the idea of developmental progress and it's consequensential realization of Political-Economy in it's true sense.

The United States, it's imperative and Political activity has historically played a reactionary role in South America. Again the Honduran Coup and the Hugo Chavez dialectic is enabling a reconstitution of United States reaction and it's imperative, despite the fact, this time it is on the side of the legally elected Honduran President, Manuel Zelaya.

The reality for Honduras, The United States if simple: Poverty, Repression, Marginalization, it's dialectics, contradictions and antagonisms never occurs in a vacuum. True to the irrationality of the Human brain it historically requires extreme measures for the practicality of Henry Ford and his $5 maxim to grab the imagination of the petty-reactionary minds who have in their hands the reins of power.

By Apropos

CNN, Iranian Election, Israel and Covert Activities

Listening to the British Spy David Miliband on CNN's GPS with Fareed Zakaria,
go through structured disinformation attempting to stem the Iranian Government's narrative that the recent Election protest on Tehran's streets are results of British Intelligence and Zionist machinations was humorous. For one the British and Zionist are squirming because if the protest reflects a unity of perspective in Iran then the Ayatollahs have no ears for their narrative to fall on.

If the Election was stolen as CNN and the multitudes rioting in Tehran speak with their coverage and actions, even to the theatrics of the U.S. President Barack Obama expressing "outrage" at the level of response from the Iranian Government which is not even comparable to the wanton Israeli destruction upon hapless Palestinians to which by the way none of the imposter's on the global stage express outrage at. Then the breech in Iranian Political civility with the election protest, is the necessary activity that sweeps away the Iranian theocratic apparatus and it's status quo.

To the contrary events in Iran are anything but clear. Were the protest indigenous and organic as it's well-fed sympathizers and supporters ensconced in their Twittering criminal naivete at the machinations unfolding on their high definition screens with the classically duped face of CNN's Christiane Amanpour reporting are made to believe. There would not be the need for the intense sorts of denials from U.S. and British Intelligence complicit with the dare not say anything Israel Mossad.

What is obvious is Israel, desperate to stem the inevitability of it's historicity along with the fifth column activities of disgruntled and gullible Urban Iranians has under the guise of election fraud engaged in covert activities and sabotage against Iranian military and Nuclear facilities in preparation for overt attacks on Iran's Nuclear program.

By Apropos

History It's Repeating ARC, Lebanon, The Iraq War and Ronald Reagan

What will the narrative be. When American forces reposed on their Iraqi bases experience history and it's repeating ARC, as their Marine comrades and brethren during Ronald Reagan's Lebanon adventurism intended as Political-contrast of Republican robustness with the impotence of the preceding Democratic Carter.

Will there be sanctimonious howls of rage and synthetic grief when those sitting duck G.I.'s on their Iraqi bases suffer a blow equal to the truck bombing of the Marine base at Lebanon?

Will there be the irrelevantly typical and idealistic Polemic against Democrats and their mythical National Security Deficit from a Republican Party that hasn't won any meaningful Military undertaking contrary to it's farcial bellicosity since Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War?

Iraq once again is revealing how robustly naive is the legacy of Ronald Reagan.

By Apropos

Democrats and Governmental Deficit Spending

What is wrong with Congressional Democrats, Democratic Analyst and Democratic Polemicist with their tame, weak and effeminate characterization and defense of Governmental Deficit spending?

The Polemic and it's defense is simple and matter of fact straight forward. In the absence of universal employment, universal Political-Economic access of All functioning citizens, Governmental deficit sending is the only progressively practical medium of the social-contract.

By Apropos

Premature Revolutions, Iran and Who Benefited

History teaches that premature Revolutions and solid-upheavals result in status-quo consolidation with a firm and tight grip on the apparatus of organized violence.

The recent events in Iran pose a simple: Who benefits and who benefited. Obviously Israel and Zionist cabal.

By Apropos

Michael Jackson The Artist

Goodnight........

American Politics, Self-Evident Jeffersonian Truths and I Told You So

American Politics at it's Reactionary-Conservative core anticipates and even welcomes the terrific sort of deviancy in societal relations as a sort of self-flagellatory leverage. A systemic I Told You So's of human nature which then translates into the "Pursuit of Happiness" and it's antagonistic self-evident Jeffersonian truths. This then becomes the controlling and governing imperative of the social-contract and it's symbiotic tyrannies, the individual and masses.

Henry Fairlie, the acerbic Brit labored mightily to William Buckley's angst in positing that American Conservatism and the Republican Party with all respects was not worthy of analysis because it even lacked a cogent thesis of Political-Economy dialectic. The only dynamic left political opportunity and action of such a nature is that one-dimensional and time-worn narrowmindness of religiosity, moral-judgementalism and it's I Told You So's self-righteousness.

By Apropos

Sarah Palin, Barack Obama, What is a Correct Definition of Money Circulation and The Socialist Label

Sarah Palin and the desperate wing of the Republican Party which is to mean the entire Republican-Conservative cabal couples with the hypocrisy and criminal ignorance of Christian -Fundamentalism have gleefully labeled Barack Obama a Socialist.

A corollarial tangent of this argument is what is a correct definition of money circulation. Sarah Palin and the cabal of insidiousness have true to the instincts of illiteracy and it's ineptitude decided on characterizing Barack Obama's money circulatory dynamic as socialistic and deficit spending. With demagogic emphasis on deficit spending as negative.

The irony of this argument is Barack Obama's ascension to the U.S. Presidency and impact on Political-Economy has been the quintessential mega boost to Capitalism, Speculative-Value and the money circulation dynamic.

Beginning with the prodigious amount of money the Obama Presidential campaign raised and thereby infused into the local economies of the campaigns battlegrounds. To the entrepreneurial exploitation of the historical fact of his Presidency and opportunities it has presented Barack Obama has been everything but a Socialist and Socialistic to American Political-Economy.

By Apropos

Bill Maher, Barack Obama, Democrats and Progressive Advocacy

While Bill Maher is correct in the more substantive points of his recent Barack Obama critique and in the recognition that the Democratic Party has conceded the Political-Economic field to Speculative-Value and it's Republican-Conservatism by pursuing a central-right thesis. Still Progressive and Labor ideas and it's proponents are to blame. One after the other Progressive and Labor advocacy proponents have allowed Republican-Conservatism and it's reaction to frame Political-Economy imperatives, stoking social fears and out right distorting information and preserving mass media.

A critique of Barack Obama as not being aggressive enough ignores the fact that grass roots movements with Democratic leanings must aggressively prepare the socio-environment for any activity, reform or radical on Obama's part.

A quick example: Media is full of opposition Ads to Obama's health care reform plan. Yet Democratic grass roots groups who should be leading the way on the health care plan are unconscionably silent in it's defense.

On the farcial point of deficit spending the Democratic Party and Progressive advocacy are unwilling to combat Republican-Conservative tactical distortions and outright declare that empirically Money is intrinsically a deficit creation. As it simply represent value potential and the inflationary and deflationary nemesis have nothing to do with money and it's circulation but everything to do with it's production.

Progressive and Labor advocacy specifically are to blame for every single Progressive default in the Nations Political-Economy. If there is one conclusion it's salient is Speculative-Value and it's Republican-Conservatism medium has functionally checked Progressive advocacy to the point it is a liability and misanthropy is the new Humanness.

By Apropos

Neda

The shrill of Destuction.

She was 16 years old.

Iran's recent Election, Zionist Interest and the Obama Administration

What is happening in Iran and it's recent elections has to do with concerns for the welfare and condition of the Iranian people. The perverted slogans of democracy and freedom are simply tools in the employ of agitators pursuing Israel's and Zionist interest ( United States is under the Zionist Banner).

Whether or not the Iranian Theocracy has played into the hands of Israel and Zionism is besides the point. What matters is this display of real politik C.I.A. and Mossad style. The reemergence of tactics and practice on a grand scale coupled with corporate media fanning the flames of bias burning the constructed straw-man and men of Iran and it's theocracy.

There is an added element. This insistent badgering barrage demanding the Barack Obama come out in strident criticism of the Iranian election is all about having the Obama Administration destroy any ability and credibility it would have resolve the Iranian Nuclear question diplomatically. It is simple if Barack Obama comes out critically against the Iranian election and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad hangs on to the power, the Obama Administration would have boxed itself into a corner with the dilemma of having Political discussions with a government it has preemptively criticized as rouge and illegitimate.

By
Apropos

The Iranian Republic-Islamic fork in U.S. History and Anecdotal Intrigue

The Iranian Republic, it's Islamic Revolution and ensuing Theocracy creates an undeniable fork in U.S. history and Political-Economy. The Results of the recent Iranian elections reflect a long range calculation by U.S. Intelligence and it's anecdotal intrigue, which it's anticipation is four years from now the contradictions and antagonisms of the Ahmadinejad Regime would be at critical mass.

There is a model for this: Iran itself. The collaborator Reza Shah Pahlavi, contemporary models are, Zimbabwe, Georgia, Lebanon, The Palestinian Authority and it's legitimize Israel historical purpose.


The reality is Speculative value and it's nihilism has to resolve it's contradiction to present a dynamic critique of Islamic Theology of which the Iranian-Islamic Republic is it's antagonistic fact and it has to transcend the inevitability of Israel's destiny as operative.


By Apropos

Smoking But Not Inhaling and Marijuana Legalization

To the Smokers, to the Inhalers. To those defiers of respiratory physics, Smoking but not Inhaling. To those who for whatever reason defame and extoll the virtue's of Marijuana. To the question of Marijuana Legalization. I have for you one experience, Read, Dope inc. By Lyndon Larouche.


By Apropos

Health Care and the Cognitive-Deficit Base of Republican-Conservatism

If without Republican-Conservative definition of big government spending, the nations health care chugged speculatively along upon the delusionary free-market dynamic, leaving 40+ million Americans in it's wake, without practical health care on all accounts.

How can Rick Scott of Conservative Patients Rights and his insidious Republican, political acolytes and their easily manipulated base. Yes base as in cognitive-deficit beyond the historical pace, challenge the Barack Obama and congressional Democrats overhaul of the nations health care as big government spending and government intrusion between physician and patient?

By Apropos

Barack Obama, The Democratic Party, Empirical Critique and The Venetian Dynamic

In light of Barack Obama and the Democratic Party's ascendancy certain contradictions and antagonisms within American Political-Economy are being idealistically attacked with the historic-usual revisionist arrogance, specifically in that manner apathy.

The assumption and it's practice that political idealist masquerading as dialectical facts in the U.S. Congress will surmount their illiteracy and malicious ignorance to not only stumble across the right questions but reach progressive answers and resolve the respective Political-Economic realities is an ailment that is truly a nemesis of the Human Condition.

Barack Obama and the Democratic Party's ascendancy have to evolve the political process qualitatively beyond digital adroitness and it's opportunistic exploitations. There has to be a return to Empirical Critique one which, as Barack Obama declared at Denver during his acceptance speech and I paraphrase, politics has to be efficiency oriented at the expense of ideology. This specifically means there must be correct and organic grasp and definition of money and value at the expense of the Historical Venetian Money Dynamic.

Republican-Conservatism,Sonia Sotomayor, Activist Jurisprudence and Status Quo Relativity

Republican-Conservatism, its reactionary thought and hypocrisy will hypocritically make much of Sonia Sotomayor, Barack Obama Supreme Court nominee's comment and commentary that policy is made at the Appellate level. The fact is she is correct. Policy in it's Judicial sense and context is made at the Appellate and Court of Appeals level.

Republican-Conservatism, it's reactionary thought and hypocrisy has for perpetual short term gain, in collusion with Corporate Media commandeered the lexicon diversion and intellectual Liberalization of the distortion, activist jurist and it's jurisprudence. For all practical purposes American Justice and it's jurisprudence is contextually activist.

The Sonia Sotomayor question presents in unambiguous relief the partial continuum of justice, jurisprudence and it's status quo relativity.

By Apropos

Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, Tom Tancredo: Provocateurs for the Democratic Party's Reich-Like Supremacy

There has to be an explanation, a simple cogent one at that of Republican-Conservatism's self-immolation, implosion and concurrent destruction. Because how are we to without that "Emperor Has No Clothes" mortification, savor this one after another consecutive falling domino effect of the Republican Party miscuing it's ablated provincial anthems. It's sanctimonious talking points and it's provocateur actors: Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, Tom Tancredo, Dick Cheney apologetically ensuring the Democratic Party it's Reich-Like supremacy.

By Apropos

The Bush-Cheney Torture Schematic and Intellectual-Realism

The Bush-Cheney torture schematic and it's defense is comical. To let Dick Cheney articulate it, torture is for itself, in pursuit of it's own designs at the expense of why it's proponents advocated it.

If the Bush-Cheney torture schematic and it's mastermind Dick Cheney stood on intellectual-Realism: Why stop at Waterboarding? As Dick Cheney advances it in defense of the Homeland in light of the 3,ooo+ lives lost on 9-11; Waterboarding was the U.S. most prized secret weapon. How humiliating to be reduced to simulating drowning.

By Apropos

(Image Mt. Dew Monkey)

Deficit Spending, Republican-Conservatism and Reactionary Politics

California's voter refutation of the 2009 Tax initiative has nothing to do with Governmental intrusion and deficit spending. Instead it has everything to do with reactionary politics and the immature grasp of Political-Economy.

If Political-Economy and it's manner of progress is removed from the primitive-narcissism of power for the sake of power imperative and the human condition finally recognizes the money dialectic as measure of objective-value as antagonistic.

"What is Money", will practically resolve itself in the empirical realities of it's printing presses and the deficit spending fear mongering instinct of Republican-Conservatism reactionary politics will collapse on it's antithesis that generations in existence when the Sun Super Nova's will bear the burden of repaying the debt of deficit spending.

By Apropos

The Israel-Palestinian Question, Iran's Nuclear Ambition and Reactionary-Arab Status Quo Dictatorship

This purportedly novel Barack Obama engagement with Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu over the Israel-Palestinian question and Iran's nuclear ambitions is an affront and insult.

If the Israel-Palestinian question is that of peace, security and prosperity then the imperative has always rested solely with Israel. If the Israel-Palestinian question is specifically about Zionist-Jewry securing it's historical land seizure of the Palestinian people than the conclusion is a stark irreconcilable antagonistic fact. Either Zionism revises it's position, because it is inevitably untenable.

Banking and placing hopes of Israel's security on the Reactionary-Arab status quo dictatorship only allows and enables a perpetuity of the varied incarnations of Islamic-Radicalism and that ensures the Israeli-Zionist Jew in occupied-Palestine a Darwinian hybridization of frazzled nerves till the Mature logical conclusion of Zionist injustice.

Diverting focus from Zionist injustice with Iran's nuclear ambition that it is a shared security concern with the Reactionary-Arab status quo dictatorship is an amateurish farce unworthy of polemical labor.

By Apropos

The Obesity Conundrum and Store Discounts

Considering much is made of the nations obesity conundrum. Considering Homo Americanus is treated with kid gloves to the extent exercises at schools have been eliminated for fear of legal action by hennish haridans.

Here is an idea to be pondered. How about a form of discounts at stores and service providers is secured with forms of exercises and workouts. For example for a $10.00 discount on a running shoe or an ipod the customer-buyer does 250 jumping jacks or something comparable, 15 reps. of 135lbs. some push ups or pull ups.

By Apropos

Dana Bash, Rick Sanchez, Trojan-Horses, Nancy Pelosi and the Bush Cheney Torture Schematic

Come on Dana Bash, Rick Sanchez of CNN are you Trojan-Horses for the Republican-Conservatism? Because making issues of Nancy Pelosi's double talk on what she knew as ranking Democrat concerning the Bush-Cheney torture schematic only infers perjury. Bashing Nancy Pelosi is diversion from the irrefutable fact that the United States during the Bush-Cheney government has been exposed as a torture nation, another pathetic practioner of getting people to scream, piss and defecate on theirself. All in the employ of the "Pursuit of Happiness".

Torture has a historic face. Trojan-Horse diversions are historic and we are expected to accept that the C.I.A. is telling the truth and Nancy Pelosi is lying? Is the C.I.A. squeamish about lying to the U.S. Congress? When it had no qualms lying about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction?

By Apropos

Instability, Ritualistic-Pageantry and New World Totems

This cacophony of noise, babel of violence and it's instability shrilling out of Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan seems to be designed specifically in defense of a narrative stuck in a paternalistic insidious loop of it's sphere of influence proponents.

After the ritualistic-pageantry of the Berlin Wall broken up by hammer-weilding jacks, chalatan Jacobins. Which was comically recreated and reenacted during the fall of Baghdad. Did both theaters have the same station master? Certain powerful voices in the U.S. Congress lent their voice to second-guessing the relevance of the Central Intelligence Agency in a Cold-
War world melting into a idealistic puddle of the old spy master Bush snr's. "New World order".

Soon after the relevancy of a black budget for the C.I.A. in a Cold-War less world was questioned. Ammonium Nitrate as weapon of choice by Blind Straw-men, targeting New World Totems in New York emerged and it's continuum has conveniently been the diversionary imperative of the asymmetrical war misnomer defending it's instability narrative.

By Apropos

"Spending Less" and the Conservative Prophecy of Inflation, Recession and Depression

If this recent Gallup poll of people "spending less", within the so called relative-means is an indicator of economic trend. Then American Political-Economy, without a clear restructuring and complete revision will self fulfill that Conservative prophecy of inflation, recession and depression.

By Apropos

Dick Cheney and the Photo-Op Ground Zero Fly By

Dick Cheney has been beating the undermining panic drum and pushing the hysteria button, that Barack Obama is making it easy for a 9-11 style attack.

So how subliminally convenient was it for the 4/27/09; Ground Zero Fly By and buzz by a plane of the Presidential fleet accompanied by a fighter jet to insidiously subvert the frazzled psyche of New Yorkers who have literally had fire rain on them.

Are we to accept the Pentagons Photo-Op explanation considering it's bastion of Dick Cheney sympathizers?

By Apropos

Mara Liasson Intellectual-Liberalism and the Fetid-Stench of Ignorance

There is this theme. This recurring theme that keeps coming up in our National discussion and Political-Economy environment. It can be summed up at best as Intellectual-Liberalism at worst illiteracy and ignorance.

Mara Liasson is it's latest example. On the 4/26/09; Chris Wallace on FOX Show, Mara Liasson of National Public Radio declared. Barack Obama's policy agenda of long term infrastructure development in education, health-care and energy as being Conservative ideas, as if the Conservative tag is a imprimatur of approval.

The problem with her declaration and it's fetid-stench of ignorance is this: since when is affirmative and pro-active long term pursuits in education, health-care and energy policy Conservative monopolies?

Despite the Partisan undertone critique of Mara Liasson's declaration and it's irrelevancy. It is extremely impossible to ignore the fetid-stench of it's rank ignorance.

It is crass Intellectual-Liberalism and it's consequence is mediocrity and bigotry. It ignores the objectivity of progress and spews as substitution less government, less taxes, state rights as if it's mantra is somehow realized in the Intellectual-Liberalism of it's hypocrisy.

By Apropos

Republican-Conservatism and Economic-Fascism: An Exercise in Intellectual-Liberalism

The refrain of late from Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-liberalism is Barack Obama's economic policy is Economic-Fascism. Secondly a majority of corporate media affiliations have allowed and permitted this description and characterization of the Obama Administration's economic policy as Economic-Fascism to be aired as if it is legitimate opinion and polemic. I say legitimate critically. because the public domain and it's mediums have the specific responsibility to descriptive -accuracy.

Republican-Conservatism has succumbed to the demagogue dynamic and because of the Intellectual-Liberalism of Conservatism which is inherently reactionary. It's critical platform is to idealistically misinform, distort and pervert and the term Economic-Fascism is it's exercise.

By Apropos

Perez Hilton and Carrie Prejean, Ms. California

Perez Hilton is right. Carrie Prejean, Ms California's response to the question on Gay marriage was thoughtless. Whether or not she was brought up to think marriage is between a Man and a Women has nothing to do with the Socio-Politico-Economical condition marriage. Her response was replete with inaccuracies. Gay marriage is not nationally affirmative.

The question asked Ms. California demanded she transcend the blonde and beauty queen cliche. The question on Gay marriage demanded thinking, not rote rearing which her response implied. The question required Carrie Prejean exhibit a grasp of human historicity.
By Apropos

Enablers of Speculation and American Capitalism

The effeminate, taps on the wrist, the enablers of speculation, specifically Moody's, Standard and Poor and Fitch have received by their peers in response to their role in the nations political-economy mess. Is again indicative of the reactionary motive of thesis, polemics and socio-utility that consistently plagues the laborious process of the human condition and progress.


If there is to be accountability and efficiency it must start with each and every aspect of American Capitalism deconstructed and restructed upon the final resolution to the question "What is Money" and it's realization. A Construct that will sweep away the market place fraud and it's sham boom and bust abstraction.

By Apropos

Dick Cheney, Torture and "The Pursuit of Happiness

Had Dick Cheney kept his mouth shut, kept his self-righteous critique of the Obama Administration inside the pretensions of his megalomania and it's futility. Those little secrets of the Bush-Cheney foray into that typical pastime of human political activity, torture would have been just that another urban myth.

Instead, the Obama Administration responded to the wannabe Cheney with exposing the Bush-Cheney torture schematic and what an expose' of the medieval-trap doors and purification cellars of the Bush-Cheney Republican Neo-Conservative mind.

In Bush-Cheney torture formulations a slapping by American organized violence differs from by a slapping by the Gestapo, KGB, Mossad, within the Machiavellian logic and it's Nixonian application, when America does it , it's "The Pursuit of Happiness"

ByApropos

"Poor Africa" Dambisa Moyo and Her Goldman Sachs and Harvard-Oxford Theology: A Review of the book Dead Aid

So the Phrase "Poor Africa" galls Dambisa Moyo. She who for a decade sashayed around the corridors of Goldman Sachs, a place of speculation and the point can be accurately made has played and plays a serious role in the construction of the objective condition "Poor Africa".

Dambisa Moyo, she who is Harvard and Oxford educated, endowment benefactors of ill-gotten gains. When the "White mans Burden" and it's tangential genociction of African Political-Economy established the "Poor Africa" dealectic.

Dambisa Moyo, this living contradiction author of Dead Aid a thesisitc criticism of a certain type of aid to Africa which she opportunistically scapegoat. If the issue is aid and it's dynamic: I respond with didn't the Marshall Plan Aid to Europe enable it's Phoenix like rebirth from it's Third Reich rubble?

The problem with the Dambisa Moyo's of history in their subservient roles is simple. Envy and self-loathe manipulates their critique. Africa's problems are not a result of Bono, Live Aid or even the idealism of Jefferey Sach and all the other Aid's even the AIDS Plague. Africa's problems are strictly that of regaining it's historic dialectic which has been impaired by Arab and European Imperialism, Slavery and the Colonial dialectic.

Frantz Fanon in Wretched of the Earth presciently tackled the question of an African middle-class without a Political-Economic basis.

Instead of 188 pages worth of Goldman Sachs and Harvard-Oxford theology in her Dead Aid book, Dambisa Moyo should have tackled the matrix of Post-Colonial Africa and it's Neo-Colonial narrative.

As A last word, microfinancing as Political-Economy means and the corruption critique typically raised by African Polemicist which Dambisa Moyo regurgitates has nothing to do with why with the exception of Boer organized Azania, the rest of the African Continent suffers the yoke of "sphere of influence" and Dambisa Moyo's book Dead Aid flatlines.

By Apropos

Tim Tebow, Infallible morality and ESPN

Isn't the Tim Tebow worship a cult? His cartoonish, "no one will..." rant enshrined on a plaque?

Being that Tim Tebow is either a hypocrite or idiot considering history has proven that those who proclaim their faith as infallible morality tend to be.

Will the University of Florida dismantle it's Tim Tebow shrine when a decade of two from now Tebow's proclivities expose him as another historical fraud and how will ESPN spin it?

By Apropos

Newt Gingrich and Lee Poole

Hey Newt Gingrich to paraphrase and quote Lee Poole of Phoenix, Arizona: If you can't get your facts straight about the last century, why should we listen to your suggestions for this one?

By Apropos

Image Purveyors, Moral Charlatans, Chris Brown and the Michael Jackson and Prince Factor

Back when Michael Jackson was Black and his idiosyncrasies had not mutated into Pedophiliac intimations. The Artist, Prince was emerging and the Black community had a hard time figuring out what to make of a high heel wearing neo-androgyny. So it didn't take much for image purveyors and moral charlatans to contrast Michael Jackson, the good against the immoral-evil Prince.

Again Kobe Bryant and Allen Iverson were values in this dynamic. As much as Allen Iverson was made out to be deviant. Kobe Bryant was the one who continued the Michael Jackson and Prince factor with his rape and sexual assault indictment.

Again the image purveyors and moral charlatans were hard at work with Chris Brown till the Rihanna contradiction reminded idealism that to quote Robert Penn in All the Kings Men there is "Always Something" and the Michael Jackson's and Prince factor is it's cold dash of reality.

By Apropos

Political-Pluralism, Megalomania, Revision and Republican-Conservatism

Democracy, Political-Pluralism and dissent isn't reason for Freudian engagement in megalomania.

There is credible megalomania, if it is messianic in it's critique with emphasis on critical-humility. But when megalomania in it's delusionary ideal is foisted as political action and polemics, as an exercise in the most unbridled indulgence of "I think therefore I am" and any and all backwards and charlatanic revisions are resurrected at the expense of accumulated human historicity---then the question is not even a nod to criminal deviance but it becomes one of crass imbecilic indulgence.

Republican-Conservatism shamelessly exploits historic-revision. It flaunts it megalomaniac psychosis. Within it's ranks and files exit futile idealism.

A Sarah Palin a la, a Kafkaesque cretin. The neurotic rapture and passion of a Newt Gingrich. The petty tyrannical tirade of a Rush Limbaugh. The opportunistic exploitation of a right to life ideal at the very expense of a right to the basis for life---the human condition can only chuckle at the Johnny Come Lately of Republican-Conservatism.

By Apropos

China and Over-Supply of U.S. Dollars

If China and it's revisionist Communist Party leadership have a problem with an over-supply of U.S. Dollars. The question their historical duty presents is simple: Develop your national and internal economy.

By Apropos

Drug Testing, Food Stamps and Palinesque Republican-Conservatism

If the anticipation of those idiots whose idea of progress and enlightenment is to propose drug testing recipients of food stamps,Welfare e.t.c. wasn't Draconian. One would simply laugh it off as Palinesque-Republican Provincialism a la Reagan's Welfare Queen gambit.

Did it ever occur to those whose idea of the human condition and it's development is to always revel, writhing away in the slimy, soupy morass of the misery loves company, resentment syndrome of Republican-Conservatism, that whatever impact food stamp recipients have on the illegal drug industry is utterly minuscule. The illegal drug industry is a trillion dollar industry! Would food stamp recipients be on food stamps if they commanded or accessed that amount of cash flow and wealth?


What sort of social organization do we have if activities by the marginalized, underprivileged in all aspects and denizens of abject poverty are able to disrupt and destabilize society as the consistency with which petty tyrants and Republican-Conservatism idiotically scape goat as undermining?



By Apropos

AIG and the Public's Functional Ignorance of the Question What is Money

Should the public accept the idea that AIG and it's speculator cabal never considered the equation that if X amount of home owners had their jobs outsourced there would be X amount of mortgage default?


What AIG and it's speculator cabal gambled on was would the publics functional ignorance of the question what is money enable the real Ponzi Sceme, which has nothing to do with the over sized head of Barry Madoff, but everything to do with the final triumphant expose' of the realization and revelation of what money is.



By Apropos

"Wanting The President to Fail," The Default Polemic of Conservatism to the Barack Obama Presidency

To Republicans and their "Wanting the President to Fail" platform. What is the anticipation? What is the expectation? Because there is only one logical conclusion to this default polemic, "Wanting the President to Fail".

It is a Pandora's Box of extremism. It's antithesis is Democrats when in the minority will want Republican governments to fail and it will become an infernal, perpetual, comedic caduceus, but with Jacobin style of political action as consequence. But then what else is there for Republican-Conservatism when it's voice is that of the Bobby Jindal Brahmin caste antagonism and the Neo-Mussolinism of Rush Limbaugh.

Ideology in politics as a pre-empt, define all omnipotence presupposes omniscience and that in turn negates the objectives. The only field left to ideology is the theocratic farce and if fundamentalist Islam and it's Jihadist presumptions wasn't enough, if historical Judeo- Christianity and it's Zionist perversion didn't present it's Apocalyptic redemptiveness in outlandish relief. Then the irrationality of the boom and bust cycles of an inchoate grasp of politico-economic value and it's medium money should.

"Wanting the President to Fail" as Republican response to the Barack Obama Presidency is the fetid last grasp of the Republican and Conservatism reaction and that proverbial tree of freedom will receive it's epochal libation.

By Apropos

Ariana Huffington, Paul Krugman, Frank Rich and the Venetian Economic Thought and Money Dynamic Bias

Ariana Huffington of the Huffington Post, Paul Krugman, Frank Rich to name a few of the Obama-Geithner Bank Bail Out plan critics, seem to perpetuate this fundamental contradiction.

Obama's economic critique does anticipate a certain amorphous potential, a revision of the Venetian Money Dynamic supposition.

This recent boom, bust, speculative-derivative, Subpime Rate cycle presents within it's emergence, the potential to finally shed the shackles of the archaic Venetian Economic thought as it specifically applied to money and currency.

Yes there is need for debate as Ariana Huffington, Paul Krugman and Frank Rich put it. The debate should revert and orient itself from the position of establishing a new objective calculus of what is money.

For example to point out an aspect of the contradiction. The Market/people are told the economy is in the dumps because of a lack of spending. Yet the market/people are also told to save and stop spending. The market/people are told a surfeit of consumption has an untowards effect on credit, yet without excessive consumption there is job loss.

The wheel wasn't invented and discovered in principle as a means of income and fisical speculation. Instead it was utility. It's invention and discovery was satisfaction in itself and for itself. This is the Obama Political-Economy paradox and the Ariana Huffington, Paul Krugman, And Frank Rich Venetian Economic thought and money dynamic bias.

By Apropos

Barack Obama,Democrats, The Mexican Drug Gangs War and Immigration Policy

Does anyone think Barack Obama and the Democratic status quo are Machiavellian enough to exploit the ongoing Mexican Drug Gangs war, manipulating it into a immigration policy cause of action that enables the Democratic Party to check and mate the Conservative and Republican political point of securing the border.

How to secure the border as a practical and common sense matter is now the third rail of politics. With Hispanics being the fastest growing demographic and violation of the Southern Border a sympathetic constituent issue. Being on it's affirmative side is a virtual guarantee for party, which is to read Democratic supremacy.

The Mexican Drug Gangs War has provided the Democratic Party and the Obama Presidency an expedient means to emerge with quintessential leadership.

By Apropos

Deficit Spending is Deficit Spending Irrelevant of Purpose

If purported effects of Deficit Spending are an economical bane as we are constantly reminded by those who ridiculously equate Grandma's money under her mattress or the Barney fire-like family budget with macro-scale Political-Economy of nations.

If such effects are independent of purpose, meaning Deficit Spending is Deficit Spending irrelevant of purpose and massive amounts of Deficit spending are accepted for Wars and the Industrial Military complex.  Then massive amounts of Deficit Spending should also be accepted for a War on Poverty and a War on Unemployment.

By Apropos

Abuse of Authority and Corruption of Absolute Power

Justice and abuse of authority. Samuel Kent, a Federal Judge in Texas charged with Sex-Crimes.

Sharon Keller, Appellate Judge in Texas. Charged with 5 counts of Dereliction of Duty.

Brent Benjamin, Chief Justice of West Virginia Supreme Court charged with Conflict of Interest.

John Roberts, Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court accused of Conflict of Interest.

Antonin Scalia Justice, U.S. Supreme Court accused of Cronyism.

The Human Condition it's history, records and chronicles is replete with the narrative of abuse of authority and corruption of Absolute Power.

The contemporary politico-economic state of affairs is it's continuation and it's consequence.

By Apropos

Jon Stewart vs.Jim Cramer: Democratic Populism

Jon Stewart, host of The Daily Show was able to remind Jim Cramer, the host of Mad Money on CNBC and all the Jim Cramer's of Republican-Conservatism and their unregulated Political-Economy advocacy. That the trade off with Jacobin Revolution requires public displays of accountability.

For 17 minutes of 3/12/09; Jim Cramer suffered the Jon Stewart inquisition.

Much has been made of Jon Stewart's efforts to reintroduce resolute and specific polemics to American Political-Economy. I say it is Democratic Populism at best.

By Apropos

Healthcare, Reaganomics and Republican-Political opportunity

Where were these critics of the Obama Healthcare Reform Plan. When Reaganomics and it's voodoo enabled the recklessness of the Health Management Organization (HMO) which has had just as much to do wit value-speculation and it's overvaluation of capital as cause for this economic recession and it's depression.

HMO's dictate to doctors what procedures are permissible solely on the basis of the bottomline and profiteering. So if the social-contract of government is to be applied under those same terms Conservatives embrace as the only function of government, national defense and public safety. Then a nationalized healthcare is the efficient conclusion under the Conservative social-contract and the Obama Healthcare Reform Plan notwithstanding it's demonetization by Republican-Political opportunity is tepid, timid and downright Conservative.

If Conservatives and Republicans sleep well with their national and public safety in the care of their big government critique, then they should also live well with their healthcare in the care of the big government critique.

By Apropos

The Human Condition, Barry Madoff and Childish Therapy

Once again the human condition and it's nature is acting and reacting with it's systemic and endemic bovine like tendencies. this collective anger at Barry Madoff and the pathetic glee with which his imprisonment is being defined, is once again indicative of failure to appraise facts of The Human Condition. and it's nature.

Expending mental and emotional energy over Barry Madoff and his money laundering scheme ignores the one and only redemptive fact. Which is: ire and rage should be directed at the Security and Exchange Commission and the appropriate and accountable state and federal officials and authorities who were criminality derelict in their duties and failed the body politic in their Constitutional duties. Losing sight of this and instead indulging in the miserable snickering that an insidious 70 year old man who scammed thousands out of money sitting in jail is pure social diversion and childish therapy spectacle. It disregards the mature question of demanding accountability that only the U.S. Government can fleece a class and group and not any one individual can do so.

By Apropos

Republicans, Conservatism, Minimalist-Government, Mexico and the Drug Cartel Antagonism

To all Republicans: Look across the Southern border to Mexico and it's recent battles and protracted war with drug cartels to see the consequences of Conservatism, hypocrisy and and the maturity and antagonism of minimalist-government.

For decades the Conservative Mexican status quo and governments accepted the Colonial-paradigm of value-speculation and it's practice of fleecing the body-politic and it's minimalist government less taxes and no taxes dynamic.

Republican Conservatism and it's anti-government, anti-tax distortion anticipates the back to the regressive future of feudalism and it's moated castles. Where the governmental imperative and it's function is the organized violence specific of the state security apparatus.

By Apropos

Oprah "I Dethroned Barbara as Sovereign of Mediaverse" Winfrey and Opportunistic Morality

Where was Oprah "I dethroned Barbara as sovereign of Mediaverse" Winfrey when George W. Bush as President of the United States and his impudent neo-con cabal decided it was appropriate to commit violence against a Woman, by Outing Valerie Plame in her employ as covert agent for the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States?

Where has Oprah "I dethroned Barbara as sovereign of mediaverse" Winfrey been on the pertinent and relevant issue of governmental abuse and mistreatment of Women. In the context of abuse of Women held in State Prisons by Prison officials. Human Rights Watch has comprehensively documented this.

Oprah "I dethroned Barbara as sovereign of mediaverse" Winfrey has this tendency expedience, this opportunistic morality. Latching on to social-sermonizing with pharisee-like hypocrisy and rabbinical pomposity when it plays to the resentment syndrome affection of her followers. Her critique and sermonizing on the Chris Brown and Rihanna situation falls into this category. For whatever it is worth Chris Brown is 19 years old. Dehumanizing his humanness comes out of the same play book and agenda of those protagonist and provocateurs of the very interesting Michael Vick incident, not to mention the Plaxico Burress comedy.

Oprah "I dethroned Barbara as sovereign of mediaverse" Winfrey, presented Arnold Schwarzenegger with the platform and forum to rebutt allegations and revise the narrative of his abuse of Women claims. In the James Frye travesty, Oprah initially shrugged it off with her impetuous fiat, "still resonates" till the moral hazard on her financial empire reminded her that despite contemporary antagonisms truth is what resonates regardless of Republican spin and Conservative distortions.

By Apropos

Criticism of Government and The Republican, Conservative Irrelevance

Lets have a new standard. Any criticism of government must have a concurrent suggested solution and to all our Republican and Conservative compatriots who love tax cuts as the cure all. First explain despite the historical tax cuts of the Reagan, Bush I and Bush II years, the phenomenon of over-valued capital and it's subsequent contraction occurred, in it's Subprime Rate, home mortgage default symptom.

Secondly, to all our Republican and Conservative compatriots, explain why Henry Ford's redistribution of wealth catalyzed American Industrial supremacy till the Reagan-Democrat confederacy, worm like undermined Detroit, despite the irrelevance of the legacy argument.

By Apropos

Conservative Nature

The Conservative imperative is reactionary and by nature critically averse to progress and solutions.

By Apropos

Republicans, Conservatives and Fleecing the Popular Vote

There is a reason why Republicans and Conservatives are good at opposing and being in the opposition. Because the Republican-Conservative world view is simply antithetical to progress. It is of the misery loves company dynamic and it's operative, fleecing the popular vote.

While profiteers under the guise of less government equals freedom use the organized violence of government to enable their idealistic and childish views of political-Economy.

By Apropos

New Orleans, "The Big Easy", Katrina and The Bobby Jindal Narrative

Louisiana congressman Bobby Jindal (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

New Orleans, "The Big Easy", is back to it's post Katrina self: that perfidious inability to be objective about it's woes. How else are we to ingest the explanation, that petty crime in New Orleans, "The Big Easy", is to blame for the ludicrous progress of it's recovery from Katrina and her wrath.

Or what about the criminality preposterous account by Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal during his comical 2/24/09; response to President Barack Obama, that New Orleans post Katrina recovery is due to tax cuts...Ha...Ha...Ha!

Man Republicans and tax cuts! The narrative is just pathetic.

By Apropos

Republicans, The Big Goverment critique and the Paris Commune

John Boehner, the House Republican Leader and his routed Republican rank and file. Critique the Obama proposed budget as "the era of big government is back."

This beg this: If the era of big government is back, implying the preceding period, which was the George Bush years must have been small government.


So if the Bush era of small government took the nation on a violent course to the economic cataclysm each day reveals. What then is the Republicans basis for the big government critique?


What was Marx's critique of the Paris Commune?


By Apropos

The Jesuit Order and Machiavellian Intellectualism

The Jesuit Order in Catholicism is proof that Machiavellian Intellectualism is a requisite if ones business is that proverbial "opiate of the masses".


The Catholic Church and it's Jesuit Machiavellis recently denounced the border fence the United States has with Mexico, decrying it's immorality. I wonder if the Hispanic majority demographic of the Catholic Church played any role in the criticism?


By Apropos

Rush Limbaugh, Benito Mussolini, Fascism and the Heil Fuhrer Anticipation

Watching Rush Limbaugh in his Black Fascsita knock off, bounding up and down, clicking his heels at the podium of the 2/28/09; CPAC Republican-Conservative Bacchanalian spectacle, with his comical attempt at revising and modifying the Third Reich salute.

The historical similarities to another Black-Fascista uniform wearing, heel clicking, rocking and bouncing idiot comes to mind.

Benito Mussolini, the Italian Fascist who Rush Limbaugh the demagogue seemed to channel was another pathetic demagogue. But at least he had the Italian people and their general bigotry as motive, as he jack-boot strutted across their conscience.

What Rush Limbaugh also has is the futile bigotry of the Republican-Conservative resentment syndrome, as he matures his modified Third Reich Republican salute to its Heil Fuhrer anticipation.

By Apropos

John McCain's Wet dream, The Sarah Palin Nightmare Gambit

What is the plausibility of Cindy McCain telling the family doctor of her concern for John's health. Because John McCain, her husband and Presidential loser has on occasion since his November fourth repudiation and annihilation woken up in the cold sweat of a nightmare screaming Sarah Palin! "I hate you Sarah Palin!" Or the dirty old-man wet dream murmur, "damn you're hot Palin." The Freudian dialectic of John McCain's Sarah Palin gambit.

By Apropos

Mark Sanford, American Political-Economy and South Carolina's 9+ % Contradiction

Mark Sanford, Republican Governor of South Carolina, a state that is an American Political-Economy eye sore. Has recently been on most talk shows unapologetically braying his mental short-comings and ethic defecit in ridiculous attempts at defending his opposition to the Obama administrations Economic Stimulus Plan.

South Carolina has the nations third highest unemployment at 9+ %. Obama's Economic Stimulus Plan will releive South Carolina of some of that 9+ % contradiction. Yet Mark Sanford and the class he represents insist on rehabilitating it's historical narrative with it's tax-cut opiate. Not to mention that laughable argument that Govermental defecit spending is a burden on generations descendent and removed from their forebearers, being weiled as a last grasp at something once labeled "compassionate conservatism".

By Apropos

Kamikaze Recklessness and the Resentment Syndrome

Those critics of the Obama Home Mortgage Rescue Plan are exhibiting the Kamikaze recklessness of those World War II Japanese Generals who advocated a strategy of National Hara Kiri or Seppuku at the prospect of imminent American invasion.

It is so crudely petulant to hear seeming conscientious and responsible citizens argue that Obama's efforts at stabilizing the housing mess, which by the way is diminishing quality of life, cultivates bad behavior.

What exactly do those idiots think the Economy is? Do they pause for a minute as they huff and puff, laboring in reaction and it's resentment syndrome to realize that every single human activity is the economy even under the hand-out dialectic they decry so naively?

By Apropos

Bankruptcy, Nationalization and Marxist-Practice

These past days has presented us with the clear definition of revisionary ideological-bankruptcy.

Lindsey Graham, the former Navy Lawyer now Republican Senator form the bankrupt and welfare state of South Carolina and Alan Greenspan architect of the Sub-Prime Rate fraud and the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve, to name a few have been calling for the Nationalization of key U.S. banks.

this makes me wonder: when is a little bit of Marxist-Practice, American and Value Revision? Is it when the demagoguery of American Conservative, Evangelical-Christian illiteracy advocates it?

By Apropos

Is Wolf Blitzer A Bigot? Profiling, Bigotry and CNN

CNN Anchor/Reporter Wolf Blitzer (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Is Wolf Blitzer of CNN a Bigot? During the 2/16/09; edition of Situation Room on CNN hosted by Wolf Blitzer. He profiled the husband-suspect in a wife-beating case as a Muslim-executive.

Why would Wolf Blitzer profile the husband-suspect as a Muslim? Why did Wolf Blitzer find it necessary to interject the suspects religion as part of the news? Didn't the Nazi's and their yellow Juden patches teach us the futility of such Bigotry and doesn't the U.S. Constitution Fourteenth Amendment instruct against the Bigotry of Religious Profiling?

By Apropos

Nadya Suleman, Women Rights, The Octuplet Contradiction and Sarah Palin

I have one comment to make in the case of Nadya Suleman the Octuplet mother, who is experiencing the Hypocrisy of the Pro-Life movement and it's Sarah Palin contradiction of crowing the birth of her Down Syndrome child with the reaction against the audacity of a single mother birthing Octuplets.

Women Rights is being set back-critiquing Nadya Suleman's Octuplets birth has allowed the most backwards of revisionist chauvinism another breath, albeit fetid in the sun. With the assertion, Nadya Sulman's sperm donor asked the fertility doctors not to move forward with the pregnancy.

Isn't Women's Rights a fight against having a Male decide for Women?

By Apropos

"What a Farce"

Arlene Specter, Olympia Snow and Susan Collins, Republican Senators from Northern States, Pennsylvania, and Maine respectively. Voted with Senate Democrats against the wishes of their Senate Republican colleagues to pass the $789 Billion Economic Stimulus Package. Their vote however has been farcially described as a Bi-Partisanship undertaking. The truth however is their vote is for their Political survival.

In the Barack Obama Political milieu Northern Republicans are a threshold anomaly signing away to extinction. Bi-Partisan imperative? "What a Farce".

By Apropos

Republicans, Rush Limbaugh and What is Government

Democrats suppose critical thinking is a natural and normal human tendency.

Republicans deny that people think at all and suppose that the Fear Operative inherent in Conservatism is humanness at it's best.

Lately Democrats starting with President Barack Obama have rightly and correctly identified Rush Limbaugh as the Ideological affirmation of the Republican Party and American Conservatism. Rush Limbaugh in his role as demagogue embodies the hollow and vacuous nature of Republicans, the Republican Party and it's platform which even lacks the simple definition and objective description of what is Government.

By Apropos

Notes on the "Miracle on the Hudson"

• Why has the fact that the design of the Airbus plane enabled and allowed the "Miracle on the Hudson' to happen been ignored?
• Is the "Miracle on the Hudson" Mayor Michael Bloomburg's 9-11 and will we hereforever have to be subjected to the Gulianization of social heroics?
• Isn't "Sully" Sullenburger, the pilot of the Airbus plane involved in the "Miracle on the Hudson" participating a bit too eagerly in the mythicizing of what is his duty as a pilot?
• Has the human condition become that jaded that over stating phenomenon is now the operative of miracles? When technology and it's design objectifies it's ideal?

By Apropos

John McCain and The Has Been Syndrome

John McCain's antics over Barack Obama's Economic Stimulus Plan is akin to the scorned wife needling the exposed mistress.

John McCain lost the election to Barack Obama making the same reactionary arguments and his insistence at attempting to rehash the campaign debates which he defacto lost is plain old obstructionism. John McCain's ravings are of the has been syndrome of delusionary relevance and it is quite a spectacle to experience John McCain groveling at it's alter.

By Apropos

Names, Barack and Conventional Familiarity

Absentmindedly watching one of the botton-feeder interactive shows. I over heard a childs name, Nanceo and the mothers explanation that it was a made up name based on her mothers, Nancy.

So I reflected on conventional names and their original odd-sounding discordance. I carried the thought further to what will soon be familiar. The many variations and derivatives of the name Barack.

For starters: Baracky, Baracko, Baracka, Barackson, Barackevich and it's feminization Barackina, Barackanya soon will taste apple-pie familiar.

By Apropos

The Grass root Dialectic and The Obama Operative of Political-Economy Efficiency

Where is the grass root dialectic and it's progressive narrative in seizing the definitions and polemical thrust that will enable the Obama operative of Political-Economy efficiency? Because this sham Republican criticism, where money can be defined as stimulus, only if it is a tax cut and spending if it is program and employment specific has to be unequivocally denounced.

If 90% of the Obama Stimulus Package was devoted to no bid Haliburton contracts, the Republican Caucus and it's illiteracy would be in orgasmic throes! Well the Obama operative of Political-Economy efficiency has to combat this Republican deviancy unconditionally and the "Yes We Can" grass root chorus and it's dialectic must grid it's rank and file, unfurl the banners. What is struggle?

By Apropos

The Bush Adminisration and Consequences

The question of investigating the Bush Administration should conclude with opening the can of worms of Congressional malfeasance. Because both Republicans and Democrats charged with upholding the Constitution and it's separation of powers were also criminally negligent in ensuring that the business of the American people happened as if, consequences were understood.

By Apropos

Whoopi Goldberg, NBC and the PETA Superbowl Ad

The Women of the daytime show, The View, led by Whoopi Goldberg on 1/28/09; ridiculed the NBC rejected PETA Superbowl Ad and it's vegetable themed erotica, that vegetarians have better sex.

Well there is an Ad running on network television that blatantly advocates paedophilia and Whoopi Goldberg and the Women of The View in their infinite wisdom haven't seen fit to castigate.

The Ad, a phone plan Ad, has a barely adolescent girl, clearly underage suggesting forlornness for her mustachioed, Mustang driving boyfriend named Derrick.

The reckless of this Derrick Ad epitomizes all that morally deviant, yet The View in it's surrogate moral cop role opportunistically ignores it to lambast the adult theme of a perfectly justified PETA Ad.





By Apropos

Sarah Palin and Bugs Bunny

Jack Cafferty of CNN's Cafferty Files on 1/29/09; hammered the last and final nail into the Sarah Palin coffin. With his, Sarah Palin has as much chance of becoming President of the United States as Bugs Bunny, in reference the the news Sarah Palin has set up a Political Action Committee as precursor to a 2012 run for the Presidency of the United States.

By Apropos

Bill Cosby, The Black American Experience and Peddling Jello

Bill Cosby rants diatribic Ebonics, yet it's slangz make billions, the infrastructural base of the global cultural economy.

Money gave Bill Cosby the voice to naively criticize.

Bill Cosby said the dirty laundry of the Black American Experience spills out onto urban streets at 2:30 P.M. shaking like the Jello he once made buffoon faces, Bojangles like selling.

Bill Cosby pronounces he can fiat like criticize because he puts his money where his mouth is with donations to the Black Colleges. But the question remains, upon graduation, employment is upon the goodwill whimsy of those very same faces Bill Cosby had to make faces peddling Jello to.

By Apropos