Yaa Asantewaa

 SHE LIVES!

Yaa Asantewaa

The U.S. Constitution Is Silent On Abortion Viz Health By William Thorpe

The Idiot Justice Clarence Thomas with the Typical forked tongue conservatism and it's Republican intellectual-liberalism claimed that the U.S. Constitution is silent on abortion viz health.

Really?

[The Constitution of the United States of America]

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." [My emphasis]

Article I Section 8; 

"The Congress shall have power to.....Provide for the.....General Welfare of the United States....."

Black's Law Dictionary Defines;

General Welfare: The publics health, peace, morals, and safety.

Public Health:

(1) The health of the community at large

(2) The healthful of the sanitary condition of the general body of people or the community en masse; esp. the methods of maintaining the health of the community, as by preventative medicine and organized care for the sick.

Health:            

(1) The state of being sound or whole in body, mind, or soul

(2) Freedom from pain or sickness

Abortion is Materially a Health Issue

The entire abortion question is one of health. The Woman's health. Regardless of its formulation abortion remains a health issue. Whether or not the state recognizes its practice or renders it illicit, Women will do it as eve taught them to [yes for you Evangelicals kooks, because if as you believe that Eve as Genesis 3:6-7 narrates, became like God, knowing, then it goes to say abortion and it's how to was the first order of Buisness]

The Federalist Society in its "useful idiot" role can make it's bigoted and one-dimensional assertions about the Constitution all it wants and it cannot change nor distort the "General Welfare" text of the Constitution. The Clarence Thomases and Samuel Alito's will scheme and pervert and consequently, we will mock them and relegate them as in 2020 America status are toppled without as much a requiem.

By William Thorpe

What Is Going On In Uganda That Humans Are On The Chimpanzee Menu and Diet?

What is going on in Uganda that humans are on the chimpanzee menu and diet? Chimpanzees in Uganda are allowed to prey on children, disembowel, and eat their kidneys without response from the government.

What is the purpose of the Ugandan government if it is incapable of protecting its citizens from monstrous maurading Chimpanzees. In a typical voyeuristic National Geographic essay titled "I am scared all the time." In its August 2020 issue, we are reminded of the indifference and dismissiveness by Western Imperialist of Black and African village life. Imagine this Apology from the writer, David Quammen: 

"Most cases involve chimps that are reckless at one fateful moment, not repeatedly" [NG - 8/20 pp131]

Really? We are told by Mr. David Quammen and his National Geographic enablers that over the past decades over forty (40) Chimpanzee attacks on children have not only happened but tolerated with the casual and sterile characterization of:  

"Many more reported attacks are unverified" [ibid  pp130]

Now let's imagine wolves in America's Yellowstone National Park preying on children and National Geographic dismissively characterization the predation as: 

"Most cases involved [Wolves] that are reckless at one fateful moment, not repeatedly."

People behave strangely. A British Biologist Matt Mclennan who has been in Uganda among the monstrous children eating Chimpanzees describes children eating Ugandan Chimpanzees as:

"The chimps at Bulindi are coping - for now." [ibio]

So disemboweling children, smashing children's heads in, ripping children's arms off  are calmly described as "coping."

Mr. David Quammen along with his National Geographic enablers tells us:

"Sometimes the Bulindi Chimps carry higher levels of stess-related hormones.....Does that mean their piratical way of life, staying close to humans and foraging for their food is inherently stressful? [ibid pp 134-136]

This is head-scratching. Chimps are disemboweling Black children, eating their Kidney's and National Geographic is telling us about Chimp stress-related hormones? Preying on children is euphemistically characterized as: 

"A piratical way of life?"

And we are given delusional comments by shell-shocked minds as Ms. Lillian Tinkasimire as an insidious attempt at normalizing the unconscionable occurrences when Mr. David Quammen finds it necessary to introduce us to:

"Lillian Tinkasimire, an amiable matriarch whose little redbrick house is graced with Mango tree in front and a Fig tree behind, both of which attract Chimpanzees, takes a steady view. "The chimps are very clever," she said. "If you don't chase them, they will be your friend. If you chase them, you will see fire." Tinkasiimire has preserved much of her forest. Her attitude is, let the chimps live here, let them be, let them visit." [ibid pp136]

 She "takes a steady view"? A steady view, that chimps who have developed a taste for the kidney's of Ugandan children is "let the chimps live there let them be, let them visit"? A steady view that conveniently supports and is sympathetic of the imperialistic - patriarchial view advanced by the speculative International Union for Conservation of Nature, which is primarily a dismissal of the non-white push for political-economic development. So instead of Africans themselves determining responses to monstrous behavior by predatory chimpanzees. White imperialist with lackey-collaborationist, after having exterminated their wildlife in Europe, North-American, Australia, Tasmania and New Zeland demand that feckless African governments of which Uganda is a pathetic example protect children eating Chimpanzees than the traumatized and terrorized Ugandan mother, picking up what pieces her feckless government has deserted her with after her child was hunted stalked, preyed on kidneys ripped out and eaten.

Are there ways Chimpanzees and the varied classes of wild life in Africa, in Uganda can exist, not co-exist, but exist with human existence and development - yes. But it depends firstly, firmly, and primarily on a Black political-economic development and not the clownish, satirical, and idealistic "ecotourism" that we find collaborationist African bureaucrats as the current Ugandan government foist on barefeet African villages in a kowtowing, sniveling display of sucking up to western Imperialist speculations of wild life having dominion and preeminence over the "wretched" African villagers lot. 

In its April 2018 issue, Susan Goldberg, Editor in Chief of National Geographic discussed the magazine's historic and historical challenges with non-white stories and concerns. Affections of supremacy and elitism contrary to convention and irrespective of pattern really isn't an affliction of biology but is a result of economic realities that in an idealistic and undisciplined perception births chauvinism and it's imperial delusions. So instead of resisting the urge, National Geographic, David Quammen, Matt Mclennan, Lillian Tinkasiimire all succumbed to the indulgence of Anthromorphizing the Ugandan Chimpanzees reality of human expansionism and the magazine and its Imperialist pinings chose to sacrifice Black children in extension Black historicity.

By William Thorpe

 

Voter Suppression Is Worse Than Drug Dealing and Catherine Englebrecht By William Thorpe

If Christopher Hooks "What if they held an election and everyone came" article in the November 2020 Texas Monthly Magazine is factually accurate and what he raises against Catherine Englebrecht, to wit others, is correct then it's clearly a prima facie expose' of voter suppression and conspiracy to commit voter suppression and it must be investigated and Catherine Englebrecht held to account.

Secondly, the same November 2020 Texas Monthly carrying the Hooks voter suppression in Texas expose' has 90 pages listing the creme de la creme of Texas Attorney's, Texan legal mind, who more than others understand Hook's declaration that:

"If the health of a democracy can be measured by how many citizens participate in the political process Texas has Lupus....."

         AND       

..."The Declaration of Independence avers that a government is only legitimate if it enjoys the"consent of the governed," but for much of the U.S. history, it worked that way

So why then are we assaulted and insulted with 90 pages of smiling predominantly white lawyers proffering a base of social legitimacy whom if Hooks is correct in his voter suppression expose' per virtue of their professional existence have clearly abrogated their civic, ethical and moral duty to call out, disavow and get on the right side of humanness by repudiating the elemental crime and tyranny of voter suppression that taints their very existence as Texan social beings and the unjust privilege, it bestows.

Thirdly, why hasn't texas Black intelligentsia demanded that the likes of Catherine Engelbrecht are investigated. If what Hooks exposes in his is article correct, Engelbrecht then is nothing more than a pining extra from Birth of a Nation a holdover from its stylized supremacist futility. which consequently is more depraved than the activity of a drug dealer whose social existence is effected by the intellectual-liberalism of the likes of Englebrecht and their voter suppression pursuits.

If the vote and the act of voting, in principle and its practice, is the determinant of society and it's basis then anything that violates it is more than anything else criminality of the first degree and highest order and its high time elements as Catherine Englebrecht, if hooks expose pans out are labeled as petty criminals that they are, lower than the drug dealer reprobate

By William Thorpe

Smoking But Not Inhaling and Marijuana Legalization

To those defiers of respiratory physics, Smoking but not Inhaling. To those who for whatever reason defame and extoll the virtue's of Marijuana. To the question of Marijuana Legalization. I have for you one experience, Read, Dope inc. By http://www.lyndonlarouche.org/dope.htm.

"SPEECH BY WILLIAM THORPE"

 

Why Lebron James [King James] is Correct and Voting Is Speech By William Thorpe

photo by Element5 Digital

Voting is Speech. A means, a mechanism of stating intentions, how one wants to live. Revolutions, uprisings also are means and mechanisms of stating intentions of how to live.

What we have been confronted with since the inception of the United States experiment is what has always been the dialectic of the human condition, its antagonisms, and contradictions as dynamic of its various parts. So the United States experiment created the Black American because of enslavement as a political designation meaning a construct of slaveholding law as contradiction to itself, in violation of its "all men are created equal" declarative for independence, but for the enslaved black people subjects, an antagonism.

To Thomas Jefferson who as author of the "all men are created equal" declarative, theoretically speculated on the inalienability of man's liberty while enslaving Black people the declaration was simply a hypocrisy, a contradiction. While for the enslaved black person what was a simple hypocrisy and contradiction which Thomas Jefferson had the intellectual-liberal indulgence of simply ignoring or being anguished by was an antagonistic-subjugated fact of life which could not be resolved with the speech of voting, but only revolution and uprising which the enslaved Nat Turner in 1831 gave us it's practice.

So we fast forward to the 21st century and 2020 where Black America is not subject to the chattel antagonism of slavery but firmly occupying a contradictory relationship within the United States experiment. Just as James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, John Adams and Co. of the dusty dead white men participant in the formation of the United States shared political-economy and social commonalities. They also shard and held contradictory relationships with each other and within their work forming the United States of which Federalist papers reveals. The point being, contradiction as dialectic is the operative with any society and its resolution is point, counterpoint, debate, and argument culminating in voting is speech.

The fact Black America has historically participated in voting is speech, means and mechanism of stating its intentions and how it wants to live while not reaping minuscule reward for its participation and labors is not indictment of voting as impotent and farcial means or an affirmation of a formative dialectic of the nation. Instead what it reveals is an intrinsic absence of motive understanding and grasp of the national contradictions which as it existed between Thomas Jefferson and Co. currently also exist waiting to be resolved, reformed, and exploited by capable and able perspectives.

Currently, there is a reemerging tendency which has parochially existed to the determent of Black America that innocuously states, voting is an exercise in futility. As election day 2020 approaches it's Fifth Column foot soldiers, collaborators i.e The Breakfast Club Show, Sean P. Diddy Combs, elements of a type of Black Nationalist, and the usual cabal opponents of Black America's assertiveness and its objective political-economy are beating their chest, gnashing their teeth, howling that voting is a trick and should be shunned by Black America.

This 2020 version of the tendency is posisted under the banner, Black America should stop voting Democrats because Democrats have not advanced Black America's interest. The only thing this argument reveals and exposes besides its obvious nature as ploy to dissuade Black America voting because the same thing isn't said about Black America and church or religion in general. Because as diligently as Black America goes to church and participates in religion the narrative consistently remains the same and the Democratic Party has produced more advancement for Black America than church and religion. So what we are faced with is the paternalistic condescension of proponents of the anti-Democratic Party arguments. As if the Democratic Party is supposed to in and of itself paternalistically know what is best for Black America without demand and push from rank and file organized advocacy engaged in open political action. Secondly, scheming a disassociation of Black America from the Democratic Party ensures the supremacy of the Republican Party and it's reactionary, retrograde, reprobate, misanthropic policies that only entrench racism and bigotry.

What commentators as The Breakfast Club, Sean P. D. Combs should do is immerse in a study of materialist political-economy then subsequently observe and analyze missteps in and failures of American Foreign Policy because insight will be gained and will shed clarity on how we vote and what we vote for.

Abandoning the vote is a non-starter and is beyond stretching the neck on the guillotine.

By William Thorpe

Where is Black Media and It Isn't The Breakfast Club

Photo by Ben Kolde

Where is the Black Media voices hurling and leading charges that black and latinix communities will not continue tolerating one set of a justice narrative for black drug dealers and another for white Michael T. Flynn's of white supremacy and it's conservatism?

Don Lemon isn't that voice. Nor is Steve Harvey or Rick Smiley or the Breakfast Club.

Black determination needs a voice that calls out names unlike the generalizations of Louis Farrakhan. White supremacy and its conservatism for too long have practiced its reaction under the presumptions of the intellectual-liberalism with status quo anonymity, and there cannot be the scared speech of a Sean "P, Diddy" Combs or a "Jay-Z" Carter.

White supremacy and its conservatism isn't irreproachable call 'em out. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, to name the bigotry pantheon are not defacto American speech. Have we forgotten how to polemicize and mock conservatism and its hypocrisy operative?

By William Thorpe

No Amount Of OM's Regardless of Meditation

By William Thorpe 

The Art of Trump Isn't A Deal But A Demagoguery Deal With The Devil Even Evangelicals Amour Can't Save Him

Why Calls by A Type of White America For A Reopening of the Economy and A Return To Business A Usual Is The New Cross Burning

As soon as it dawned on Republican, Evangelicals, and Conservatives that Covid-19 wasn't killing white people as much as black and latinix, they started protesting for a return to business as usual, a re-opening of the economy. The dismissiveness of the lives and death of all those black Detroiters which the spectacle of Republicans, Evangelicals and Conservatives honking horns, milling about on the state capital grounds as Lansing, demanding that the Governor cater to them couldn't be stated loud and clear had that type of white American went into Detroit and burnt crosses on the graves of all black victims of COVID-19.

So why hasn't the black and latinix community confronted that type of white American protester in the streets and called them out for what they are cross burning, petty racist, reactionaries?

For too long we have allowed a type of white person, the Republican, Evangelical and Conservative to frame issues, from Ronald Reagans welfare queen, through George H. Bush, Willie Hortons's demonization to the Democrat Bill Clinton chastizing Sistah Soul Jah as foil in their exploitation of racist trope suppositions

The Civil rights movement saw Black American will expressed through marching. What this moment requires is black people confronting that type of white American in the streets.

By William Thorpe

You Guessed Life? Well You Guessed Wrong, Evangelicals, Republicans, and Donald Trump Chose Money

Money is man-made, right? And as we are badgered by religious presumptions life is created by God.

So guess which of the two the supposedly God-loving Evangelicals, Republicans, and Donald Trump chose when the rubber of Corona, Covid-19 hit the pandemic road of 2020 in Donald Trumps USA.

You guessed Life? Well, you guessed wrong, Evangelicals, Republicans and Donald Trump chose money.

So all you white Senior Citizens who have been lemming-like voting Republicans an on Sundays practicing your segregated piety, not only was your Make America Great Again delusion reduced to a hashtag, #okayboomer; but your exceptionalism has been reduced to the whimpering of a herd being culled         your presumptive God created life nothing more than a spongy host, defenseless to the boring of a novel Ribonucleic Acid.

By William Thorpe

Democrats, Progressives Boycott Goods and Produce From Rural Republican Majority Areas

Why are Democrats coddling Republicans i.e Wisconsin? Look if urban areas are majority Democratic and rural areas are majority Republican and due to gerrymandering and dubious U.S. Supreme Court rulings, political districts are Republican biased and as such a Republican worldview with its attendant consequences is killing people. From Women's health to a reckless accessibility to guns and diabolical political-economy scheme that requires a suspension of common sense and intellect for it's existence. Then Democrats and the just minded, Progressives have to pursue the fact that only a radical relationship can exist between urban Democratic majorities and rural Republican majorities.

First of all, we have to affirm a primary reality:

• Rural communities and areas need and depend on urban economics for survival

In light of this affirmation, urban Democratic majorities must reorient an entire set of economic relations that underscores and reminds rural Republican majorities that without urban consumption, their, milk, cheese, eggs, potatoes, e.t.c will have to seek non-Democratic mouths and stomachs to feed.

Democrats and Progressives have to boycott goods and produce from rural Republican majority areas and seek out goods and produce from rural Democratic majority areas.

Why should Progressive and Democratic minds and hearts be developed on the carbohydrate from potatoes grown by an Idaho bigot or the meat of a Texas cattle rancher xenophobes who viscerally despise the multi-culturalism, the let live morality, the Feminist-determination, the anti-racism, the political-economy practicality of organized labor and it's universal deduction of the social contract's accountability ethic of the urban consumer        why?

Look, hidden within this political-economic reality of buying and selling, exchange and trade of goods and produce is the enabling operative supporting and maintaining the Republican narrative that has systematically and systemically destroyed lives and if rural America is it's lackey, it's mechanistic subjective. Then the only relationship we can have with rural Republican majority America is antagonistic.

We stand with blinders off there cannot be any speculation of national unity when the Democrative and Progressive heart and mind does not share in a Republican idea of nation that squats squarely on White supremacy         from the presumptions of Catholicism divvying the world, through European invasions, Colonization and the primitive accumulation of slavery, Imperialism and its capital exploitation to the speculations of wage labor         So in pursuit of open political action, in light of our understanding, the urban Democratic majority must boycott economic activity with rural Republican America.

By William Thorpe

Evangelical Meeke Addison's Sermon at The i.e. A Mount, DAMNATION TO THOSE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS!!!!

SPEECH BY WILLIAM THORPE

Dr. Mehmet Oz and His "Lifestyle" Deflection of Why COVID-19 is Ravaging The Black Community Should Be His Waterloo

Chicago's Mayor Lightfoot said it right and I paraphrase; that racism kills, during her analysis of why, if Black people make up 29% of Chicago's population but are 72% of Corona Virus or COVID-19 death.

Yes, racism kills whether it's COVID-19 or a noose in the hands of an evangelical klansman and Dr. Mehmet Oz's "Lifestyle" deflection trope which is stunningly crass, that Black people are simply existing "Lifestyles" that put them at risk for COVID-19 death should be his waterloo.

The Black community from all its angles should marshal its focus and be like a ton of bricks on Dr. Mehmet Oz.

If Dr. Mehmet Oz wants to peddle in racist trope deflections and mischaracterization, he's at liberty to do so but not on the central, mainstream stage of ABC Television, The eco-sphere of racist and bigots found in the Evangelical radio of American Family Radio, along with Rupert Murdock's Fox Media, The septic tanks of American Enterprise Institute, American Legislative Exchange Council, and Federalist Society will do.

The Black Community, Democrats and Progressives should not wait for allied politicians to take the lead in ridiculing and mocking petty-tyrannical minds and hearts as Dr. Mehmet Oz who only exhibits critical-courage when bashing the lumpen and society's wretched. But there should be a marshalling of speech against reactionaries as Dr. Mehmet Oz and his ilk.

Even the vanquished have agency in the terms of surrender.

By William Thorpe


Further Reading & Listening

• Dr. Gupta reacts to Dr. Oz citing new study on Fox News
• How Fox News is playing fast and loose with American lives, illustrated by one Dr. Oz clip

Peter Cottontail On Lock 2020 Unable to Have His Day In The Sun

Evangelical's Impetus Anti-Social Distancing, Covid 19 Delivering to the Grim Reaper & The Beast

Trump Brain Storming Covid 19 Tweet Session

Evangelical Pro-Death Pipeline From Womb to Gun Shooting Gallery

Trusted Aide Moore Feeding Frenzy With Sessions Idealistic Worldview of Blood & Soil To POTUS

CHINA HAS A NIGHTMARE COVID19

TRUMPS MEIN KAMPF

The Specific Hypocrisy of the Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison and The Contradiction of the Black-Trump Voter By William Thorpe

To let the Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison tell it, all the contradiction of a Black-Trump voter has to do in defense of their support for the black-antagonist Donald Trump is present the "bible" as reason. [Note Trumps bigotry, paternalism, racism towards black people are thoroughly archived and documented]

Now let me say this: In Meeke Addison's self-assertion, her life is principled and based on "biblical application" to wit the eponymous Paul aka Saul and his opportunistic self-righteous writings. I need not point out the hypocrisy imbued in her "biblical application," but to cite and para-phrase Meeke Addison's self-proclaimed arch-nemesis Karl Marx, there isn't a specific injustice we lay claim but to a historical and general injustice, so likewise there isn't a specific hypocrisy of Meeke Addison but a historical and general one which in her Evangelical zealousness she describes on the one hand as her sinful nature per virtue of her humanness, but on the other and here lies the general contradiction of her theology, which is, the cross-death of the Nazarene has absolved her historic sinful nature so even though she is without sin, yet repentance is her overarching operative.

This Evangelical-Apologetic sophistry is truly child-like in its presumptions, because Evangelicals particularly "white" Evangelicals and their lackey Meeke Addison are incapable of recognizing its anthropomorphism. In other words they casually gloss over why they emphasize certain biblical aspects at the expense of the rest as mere expression of their petty, social and political-economic interest, and its pursuit.

Meeke  Addison in accord with her "white" Evangelical glibness focuses her criticisms on anything that causes her "white" masters distress and discomfort, which translates into race relations and any hint of highlighting the nation's historical and continuing inconsistencies and injustices. So the formulating basis of any utterance by Meeke Addison has to be constantly mocked and scorned because not only is it intellectually-liberal but it is patently deceptive.

The contradiction of a black person voting for Donald Trump irrespective of whether its based on whatever suppositionary understanding had of the bible doesn't deny the fact it continues that very dynamic of the genesis of blackness as a social and political fact. So naturally, it is illogical.

We wouldn't have a human condition and history if there isn't and hasn't been significant events of betrayals of logical self-interest. So Meeke Addison would have us ignore the fact that black women die during childbirth, the infant mortality rate of black babies leads the nation and instead of elevating this narrative, demanding its accountability with her commercialized and monstized. The Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison instead, indulges in the diversion, away from those social justice remedies, the predominant mortality of black women during childbirth demands, practiced historically by "white" Evangelicals with the idealistic focus on abortion, on homosexuality, on bathroom use and what is noteworthy, all of the histrionics are not elevated even within the bible on its finite terms. Yet the expression of self-interest betrayal by the black-Trump voter is explained away with the idiocy, Trump is anti-abortion.

 By William Thorpe

The Pharisee Meeke Addison and The Heretic Robert Oscar Lopez By William Thorpe

Hey Meeke Addison where in the, your bible, more specifically, where do we find your field marshall, the usurper Paul aka Saul reducing sin to a mere and simple "confusion"? So why are you huffing and puffing over the firing of the heretic Robert Oscar Lopez? Isn't it heresy for an Evangelical to reduce the sin of sexual immorality to a mere confusion?

If as you, Meeke Addison and your opportunistic field marshall the usurper Paul aka Saul elevate sexual immorality to exclusively mean homosexuality, as pursued by contemporary American Evangelicals, more specifically "white" Evangelicals at the expense of fornication and lust as the preeminent sin. Then the firing of the Heretic Robert Oscar Lopez by the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary because of antagonisms he had with his former employer, to barrow Meeke Addisosns phraseology was "biblical."

Look, the evangelical Achilles Heel isn't it's fundamental contradiction of the cross-death of the Nazarene being an absolution for the human continuum of sin, yet seeking repentance of sin. If such tautology was proffered in any courtroom not only would it be mocked but scorned. Because the Evangelical Achilles Heel is that age-old nemesis, an inability and unwillingness to have a measure for self-scrutiny without the apology of the purported theology whose genealogy, its attribution is as clouded and obscure as tracing one's lineage to a distant uncle who slew a Saber-Tooth Tiger that was terrorizing his clan.

By William Thorpe

GOPcrisy

SPEECH By William Thorpe

Consumer Behavior and Thinking Aloud

SPEECH By William Thorpe

Comments On The Book "Black Wave" By An Authors Whose Name Is Irrelevant

The problem with writers of books as "The BlackWave" critical of Iran and it's Islamic Revolution is, it does it from the narrative of the loser, the opposition to the revolution and its narrative.

What the "Black Wave's" author, whose name is irrelevant, glosses over is, the Iranian Revolution as all revolutions including the American, which should correctly be described as a National War of the Independence, didn't occur in a vacuum. The World Pre-Iranian Revolution wasn't all peaches and cream and all of a sudden Shia Ayatollahs and Mullahs ruined it.

There has been one historical line of attack and criticism of the Iranian Revolution, but with two diverging points:

• It is Islamic and its diverging points are: 

1. It is a Terrorist state
2. It is a Totalitarian and a theologic dictatorship

But the true nature of the Iranian critique, the only nature of the critique is Iran and its militancy dare challenge the Zionist narrative of Israel and its logic of seizing Palestinian Patrimony and to the ends of this conflict, all sorts and levels of propaganda are wielded and brought to bear against the perogatives and speech of the Iranian Revolution, of which the "Black Wave" is another labor.

Notwithstanding the presumptions of the Zionist and Iranian positions, whatever contradictions that are inherent within Iranian Theocracy can only be resolved from the perspective of the social fact of Iranian speech and not whatever antagonisms it has with the suppositions of the "Black Wave" and it's author whose name is irrelevant, and its narrative masters.

Look, critics of the Mullahs, if such critics are Muslims should war within Islam for its reform and Islam is no stranger to reform, and not simply present and represent a Eurocentric supremacy critique of Iran. Let's not forget that there is nothing unique and exclusive to the critique leveled against Iran by Eurocentric supremacy and its Zionist ward. Europe and America are not heaven. The only difference between eurocentric supremacy and Iranian militancy is we know all about the former and less about the later.

To claim as the author of the "BlackWave" whose name is irrelevant does and I paraphrase, that the emergence of Shia Iran has caused panic in the surrounding Sunni states is petty intellectual-liberalism giving us not one illuminating ray of insight and with these comments, I remind the author whose name is irrelevant, that her "BlackWave" work mocks the purported ends, her Pakistani protagonist beseeched, that of choice and it is in pursuit of choice those vanguards and supporters of the Iranian Revolution aspired.

By William Thorpe

Make Ameri-KKK Again

Contra-Donald Trump and The Resurrection of Walter Cronkite Editorializing By William Thorpe

A seminal moment in American media was the journalist Walter Cronkite transforming the act of editorializing into journalistic purity with the revelation, that the government was lying to the American people on the nature, development, and circumstance of the Vietnam War.

Critics of Walter Cronkite and his televised editorializing were the usual suspects, that reactionary minority who for their own wretched ends and pathetic interest were threatened by the revelations of Walter Cronkite televised editorializing.

Since Walter Cronkite dared challenge the oppositionary status quo with his televised revealing editorials. Academia has lionized the act while culturally it is iconic.

So fast forward to another war, the one currently being waged by Donald J. Trump against the nation and its hard-won truths, that directly poses the question: Who amongst the non-Fox News legatees of Walter Cronkite have the resolve to advance Cronkites notion that editorializing is not only required but demanded when the pursuit of journalistic equivalency is not only morally and professionally repugnant, but not doing it is crass and abject cowardice.

Secondly, the reminder that accountability isn't a Paul aka Saul declarative, descending from the "grace" of the Nazarene on cherubic and seraphic wings, nor will it emerge from heroic but gelded impeachment push. But there are enough accumulated archival facts of malfeasance, moral turpitude, mendacity and base corruption of Donald J. Trump's actions and behavior to interrupt the robotic delivery by any of the non-Fox News anchors with the televised resurrection of their Walter Cronkite moment, shaking and rousing the nation from the stupor of the unimaginable.

Reference
H.Res.755 - Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors