CRITIQUING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS RARELY BEEN FROM THE RECOGNITION THAT CONTRARY TO THE ELITIST CHARACTERIZATION FROM ITS ENEMIES, IT ISNT By William Thorpe

The American Democratic Party once upon a time, as recently as The 1950's represented the interests of the Nations political-economy, meaning it pursued and maintained the necessary marginalizing relations and terms of exploitation that has determined and supported the Nation, till those, (contrary to conventional speculations,) non-ideological dictates of money and its realization became honest enough or should I say mature enough or progressive enough to grasp that its historical marginalizing formulations had instead become impediments, as such required reform and its with this reformative transition did The Democratic Party as currently constituted emerge. Before I continue, let me state this, The American Republican Party, despite its current assertiveness is of an inert and torpid value, as such is conservative and reactionary. In other words it has illogically become that impediment, money and its realization is maturing from. Nonetheless to talk about The Democratic Party and Democrats is also a recognition of the idealistic desperation of The Republican Party and its cling to the archaic immaturity of the Nations formulating political-economy, on whose speculative terms Democrats and The Democratic Party are currently critiqued. The Democratic Party, because of the existence of The Republican Party, isn't critiqued in search of illuminating details that will advance and break that historical cycle of National decline and destruction which all history of our human condition instructs as per course, instead criticism of The Democratic Party is a catalyst, ensuring that this American experiment version of our human condition with its stupendous toll on human life, in all its psychological, emotional, spiritual and physical devastation will simply be that, abject destruction without account, a selfish and stupid enterprise of cataclysmic and apocalyptic indefensible acts. Considering that selfishness is always a value for itself, we understand it in the context that its the default nature and value of our human condition, which as soon as there is social recognition, there is, irrespective of consciousness resistance and it is this resistance The Democratic Party represents. 

 As all things organic, which the Nation and its Social Contract is, its constituent parts and composing details impel, restrain, implode then reappear in their former states or emerge as novel or a new synthesis with an entirely new character, which is what this contemporary Democratic Party is, since shedding its former status quo utility upon claim by its subjective objects and as such its subsequent redirection a death knell to its former function. Nonetheless, there have been two sorts of critiques and attacks lobbed at Democrats and Their Party by its enemies and the natural occurring organizational critique from within its ranks, both lines of critique however are again, expected and anticipated, because they are reflective, regardless of quality, of that inexorable and inevitable struggle between reaction and progress. So firstly we have had the "elitist" attack from enemies of The Democratic Party, which basically is a repurposing of that childish and nothing seems to work so I'll accuse them of being snobs futility. But what this work deals with is the combination of the "elitist" critique and its impact in shaping that natural occurring organizational rank and file introspection. There isn't any debate or dispute that historically the Democratic Party represented, asserted, pursued, supported and defended that quintessential exploitation of fellow human on which the Nations political-economy was structured, a political-economy that in its maturation became mired in suppositions that fundamentally were at odds with and impeded the development of money. Consequently as the development of money imposed its implacable dicta on political-economy, the Republican Party, who had initially been the medium and mechanism for the conveyance of the dicta and the maturation and development of money, in turn and for speculative reasons surrendered their purpose and became that which it initially opposed and struggled against, which The Democratic Party naturally replaced.

The casual and antiseptic descriptive of my former 'The Democratic Party naturally replaced' belies and cloaks the horrific events and metamorphic process of the descriptive 'The Democratic Party naturally replaced'. A lot of people were murdered, a horrendous amount of folks died, lives were ruined, existence was overturned and dramatically altered---the process itself embodied, what I earlier stated as The Democratic Party became the 'resistance', because in its assumptive function of realizing the maturation terms of money, it naturally and consequently opposed the perversions and distortions of The Nation's founding mythology. To explain, regardless of a civilization, the human condition is "social", meaning it is the objectification of expressions and relationships as value and its exchange. The Nation in its creation applied the most oppressive and regressive form of that '.....objectification of expressions and relationships as value and its exchange', notwithstanding its founding precepts and mythology. The point being, despite the negation in practice of those founding precepts, what couldn't be ignored was the essential sophisticated development of  'value and its exchange', commonly known and understood as money, which regardless of the delusions underpinning that 'negation in practice of those founding precepts', that implacable urgings of money demanded and required social honesty, in other words National progress was contingent on the emergence of opposition to those underpinning delusions, which The Democratic Party became. The emergence of The Democratic Party as that accountability medium didn't in itself indicate or imply that reason and enlightenment had suddenly slayed reaction and its delusions, but what it established was that mathematical fact and its proof of the inexorability of progress. As such its enemies in otherwords those embodying the delusions of the Nations archaic and incipient political-economy, incapable of recognizing that the progressive budding and burgeoning direction, were the organic demands of money, that same value they claimed its defense. 

If the highest function of the Human Being or The People of a Social Contract is that 'objectification of expressions and relationships as value and its exchange', then its most realizing means notwithstanding asserted precepts and foundational mythologies, is that colloquial, Progress, its determination and pursuit. In other words, once upon a time, Money stood on the Gold and Silver Standard as definition of our collective grasp, cognition and acceptance of that 'objectification of expressions and relationships as value and its exchange', till we recognized it was analogous and accordingly idealistic in its capture and definition. Still a significant amount of people, despite enjoying the rewards of money's progressive evolution from its analog definitions haplessly maintain the analog narrative, thus rendering them susceptible, a virtual gullibility to the opportunistic and naive criticisms and philistine arguments opposing the evolved definition of what is money, despite the tremendous benefits and this is aptly exemplary of The Democratic Party.As The Democratic Party assumed opposition to the Nations archaic political-economy and its reaction, it became the embodiment of the Human objects, subjects of the oppression of that initial political-economy, subsequently anticipations and expectations of systemic change naturally developed and grew, meaning those newly liberated subjects of the Nations archaic political-economy had intense anticipations of actual and real life existence changes and were demanding it from Democrats and The Democratic Party, while ignoring the fact, (which is what then transformed into that critique from within The Party's ranks) that they were The Democrats, they were The Democratic Party they demanded action of, as such it was themselves they demanded action from and this inability and unwillingness to hold themselves accountable to this recognition, reveals and exposes the fact that despite the "elitist" critique lobbed against The Party by its reactionary enemies who are incapable of contending with the evolution of money and its liberating progression, this static 'inability and unwillingness to hold themselves accountable' to this incontrovertible fact is what ironically enables the "elitist" critique,with the irony being that 'The Democratic Party is made up of the 'newly liberated subjects of the Nations archaic political-economy' who sure as hell are not elite,and this is the basis of this work.Which is, the psychology that permitted their subjugation during'the Nations archaic political-economy' continued and continues through this post 1950's transformed Democratic Party. What I'm stating is, the current mainstream leadership of the Democratic Party is incapable of asserting itself in that Jacksonian manner and fashion that supported, pushed and defended its then constituencies politics and emphasis on the issue of their day, which was, "Preemption and Squatters" rights to access Land,and its passage of the "Log Cabin Bill" of 1841. The constituents and composition of Andrew Jackson's Democratic Party of the 19th century, which pursued the log cabin bill granting land to the "deplorables" of that time were "white" and were subsequently critiqued as, "Those untethered from the land, who formed the ever expanding population of landless squatters heading into the trans-Appalachian West, unleashed mixed feelings. To many minds, the migrant poor represented the United States' re-creation of Britain's most despised and impoverished class vagrants. During the Revolution, under the Articles of Confederation (the first founding document before the Constitution was adopted), Congress drew a sharp line between those entitled to the privileges of citizenship and the "paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice" who stood outside the national community".[excerpted from White Trash by Nancy Isenberg, quoting John R. Van Atta, SECURING THE WEST:POLITICS, PUBLIC LANDS,AND THE FATE OF THE OLD REPUBLIC, 1785-1850.In so many words what we see is a constant, which is when it suits a particular interest, which is that of maintaining political-economy, critique is formulated to attack whatever existing medium or Political Party at the time thats seeking to assert changes to terms of Social Contract. So when 19th century non-privileged and under privileged outside of mainstream "white" people wanted land they were labeled "vagabonds "and consequently this modern or contemporary composition of the Democratic Party of Working Class and Black Women, Men, Hispanic Women, Men, Native Americans, to specify its major groups, [and the reason I distinguish, Black, Hispanic and Native Americans from the real and organic class group Working Class is because they possess and have distinct interest apart from the generalities of the Working Class due to the type of political-economic forces and its tactics that formed and defined them], then the culturally oppressed and members of the Naturalized citizenry and first generation scions of émigrés are cognitive dissonantly criticized as "elitist" and not real Americans as means to dismiss and mock their inevitable demands of a rearrangement of those dishonest and dismissive terms of The Social Contract. So The Democratic Party despite being a major American political Party, representing an electoral majority of the American Population and citizenry, as that Lion in the Wizard of Oz that forgets its a Lion, responds to criticism from its Republican Party enemies and internal critique from its rank and file with that disassembling phenomena, "imposter syndrome" because of my earlier posit that these new constituents, of The Democratic Party, former subjects of the Nations archaic political-economy are still flummoxed and subordinate to the psychology that enabled the subjugation and as such collectively respond to the criticism of their "belonging" with the neurosis of acting and behaving as if the ensuing political conditions are not existentially abject. Despite the fact a sizable amount of Democrats are not necessarily of the subjugated group of the Nations archaic political-economy, still they are also muted and neutered in their assertiveness, as if there is a constant second guessing of whether their analysis and campaigns for that necessary National progress, if the Nation won't be as all those other defunct civilizations, will be embraced by non-Democratic voters. So The Party despite being on the correct and practical side of progress is relatively tepid in its presentation. I started this work with the unequivocal and unambiguous statement that the Democratic Party, contrary to its neo-feudalist insidious critics is anything but "elitist". Then I continued to show how subjugative psychology ails its rank and file from the recognition and its accountability of they are the Democratic Party and their criticism is that craven fools errand and its paternalistic finger pointing a la, Charlemagne Tha God of the Nationally syndicated Radio show, The Breakfast Club at Democratic leadership or its other extreme evidenced by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson in their recent book ABUNDANCE, both purporting critique of National Politics as if it exist independent of reaction.

By William Thorpe

AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM AND PATERNALISM By William Thorpe

I begin with contrasting THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT OF THE BLACK AMERICAN EXPERIENCE with THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT ATTACKING PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN along with THE CLIMATE and PROGRESSIVISM OF THE UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE MOVEMENTS. The context of The Uncommitted, Climate and Universal Health Care movements are PATERNALISTIC. What I mean by the paternalistic anticipations of these three current, non-civil rights movements is this: Instead of The Uncommitted, Climate and Universal Health Care movements actually creating and structuring an organized front, independent of Political Parties, polemicizing and advancing their objectives on their own particular terms, they are relying on tactics of pressuring, in this case THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY who they presume is amenable to their cause and objective. So in the case of THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT and the relative blackmail of President Joe BIDEN, to now include Vice-President Kamala Harris. What we see is a singular focus on President Joe Biden as a paternalistic figure, responsible for a specific politics that is at odds with the objectives of and is offensive to the anticipations of THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT and its defense of The Palestinian People being exterminated by U.S supplied armaments and materiel to the execution of Zionist objectives of the Israeli Government of Benjamin Netanyahu. Now here is a pivotal omission by THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT in its critique, demanding a cease of U.S support of Benjamin Netanyahu's Zionist objectives. Joe Biden isnt the author and progenitor of American-Israel policy.Yes he supports,endorses and defends it comprehensively to the fullest and currently embodies it as an American President. But thats not the point,the issue is America's support for Israel is general, its woven into the fabric of the National narrative as such to elevate the Palestinian part of the dialectic with its undeniable humanness requires a movement comparable to The Civil Rights Movement of The Black American Experience. In other words the sort of parachute in practice of THE UNCOMMITTED Folks, is not only lazy political action but malpractice or the sort of idealistic intellectualism frowned on and castigated by all practical movements.THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT OF THE BLACK AMERICAN EXPERIENCE is a corollary, a proper continuum of America's history and existence. It is an accurate observation and characterization of history being the, account of production and its means.Whether its various formulations and struggles generally polemicized its self-cognition as fact of the nature of production and its means is besides the point, which then makes it applicable to a robust organizing pursuit by THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT were it to glean, then respect, appreciate and learn from the hard won truths of THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT. Criticisms by "progressives" against The Democratic Party establishment on issues of THE CLIMATE and UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, Despite being more mature, developed and practical still have a hint of the indulgence ailing THE UNCOMMITTED, meaning both movements share a pursuit on a reliance on the speculated paternalistic provisions and accommodations of the expected amenability of THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. In so many words, if Government is active speech, a bullhorn available to us all, despite its zero sum dictatorship, then the acceptance that stability and civilization are stipulations of the simple basic relevance of history and its study is the only measure.

By William Thorpe

BIRTH RIGHT? TURNING POINT USA's CHARLIE KIRK By William Thorpe

Of course since The Republican Party, traded places with The Democratic Party, after Democrats under Lyndon B. Johnson, in the 1960's nationalized Black American access to the ballot box, with passage of the Voting Rights Act, hence losing neo-enslavers in its ranks to the misanthropic embrace of The Republican Party as last refuge and haven for reaction and all neo-confederate reactionaries. Its Conventions have always introduced us to another new one from under that proverbial rock, which Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA during this 2024 Republican Convention is the latest rock crawler. Charlie's indentation of SOIL under that rock, which he reminded us is BIRTHRIGHT during his feeble speech is perplexing, because, let's just start with this 21st century. Since 2000 here are BIRTHRIGHT markers, which I doubt Charlie Kirk considered. We've had mass shootings and killings in CHURCHES, SYNAGOGUES, HOSPITALS,  K-12 SCHOOLS, SCHOOLS AND MORE SCHOOLS, UNIVERSITIES, WALMART STORES AND OTHER GROCERY STORES, WARE HOUSES, BASE BALL GAMES AND OTHER ATHLETIC EVENTS,YOGA STUDIOS AND OTHER STUDIOS, NEWSPAPER COMPANIES, PEOPLE ENGAGING IN PUBLIC PROTEST BY MARCHING IN THE STREETS, MALLS, POLITICIANS HAVE BEEN GUNNED DOWN AT CONSTITUENT ACCESSIBILITY EVENTS, INCLUDING DONALD TRUMP'S EXPERIENCE, MOVIE THEATERS, POST OFFICES, now this is our BIRTHRIGHT.

By William Thorpe

REALLY, REALLY CHIP ROY (R), VICE-PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS IS A DEI (DIVERSITY, EQUITY INCLUSION) HIRE? By William Thorpe

The thing with racism and the racist is those filled with it would rather go to hell and back, than simply say you damn right I am. So they gas light themselves with, I'm not against Black Lives Matter but all lives matter or hell, blue lives matters which is to say Cops lives matter. Now the declaration, Black Lives Matter didn't simply appear because some squirmy, demented brain decided to state an obvious, which is if in our human condition, for whatever reason which doesn't factor much into this work, humans are labeled, so the assertion Black Lives Matter is simply, affirming the obvious. As such the question is what the hell is going on in the environment determining Black Life, that the obvious has and must be stated, that Black Lives Matters? Which as declarative, is a mechanism intended to, remove its necessity and within this intention we encounter myriad forms, a one after the other variations of it, equal to all the pretzel twist the racist contort their psyche in its denial. The profane nature of racism is so abjectly self-negating that in its incorrigibility it seeks refuge in the delusional sophistry of euphemisms. Beginning with "supremacy", which then morphs into the racist, playing out a Monty Python skit or a la Don Quixote reduced to attacking, the anti-racism conceptual mechanisms as windmills. Which brings us to the insanity of Chip Roy, a Texas Republican hurling "a DEI hire" (which is one of the anti-racism conceptual mechanisms) as epithet against Vice-President Kamala Harris, who is a Black Woman. Because Chip Roy by attacking DEI wants to be spared the effort and exertion of realizing his humanness by "thinking".Because were he to think he'd realize that the Black American experiential anti-racism critique embodied in DEI isn't an ephemeral idealistic pursuit of retribution, but is a symbiotic revelatory mechanism highlighting the sickness of the mental labor expended in constructing it's expectant paranoia anticipating DEI. Now the DEI apoplexy just as critical race theory that are dually consuming Texas Congressman Chip Roy, including Chris Rufo and their FOX News perdition, reveals something else, which is what is lacking not only domestically but internationally in the Black World is the dearth of INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM for Black people by Black people. People like Chip Roy, Chris Rufo, Ron DeSantis, Donald Trump, Jason Miyares, Glenn Youngkin, Gregg Abbot, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Paul Weyrich, Rick Santelli, Leonard Leo, Dinesh D'Souza, Edward Blum, 50cent (rapper), Jay-Z (rapper), Charlemagne Tha God (radio personality), Steve Harvey (comedian), Terry Crews (actor), just to name a few are the minds and hearts who either actively oppose Black political-economic assertiveness internationally and domestically, along with those who enable the opposition. Investigative journalism will give us the necessary information needed to understand what is what. Let's take the State of Texas, with the largest grouping of Black People, I pose a simple rhetorical question has anyone studied its politics and to what extent is it even playing along that its Black people are visible to it. So it isn't surprising that a Texas politician, Chip Roy dare insults The Vice-President of These United States, Kamala Harris, with the so silly on so many levels that it isn't even original racist epithet of a DEI hire.

By William Thorpe

IN 999 AD SPANISH WARRIORS HAD ENOUGH MOTIVE FORCE TO TIE EL CID, THEIR DEAD KING TO HIS HORSE, TO LEAD THEM VICTORIOUS IN BATTLE OVER THEIR ENEMIES..... WHILE IN 2024 A TYPE OF DEMOCRAT IS MAKING ILL-THOUGHT ARGUMENTS REJECTING THEIR ALIVE LEADER, PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN By William Thorpe

Okay, where should I start, is it with the astoundingly unstated proposition that millions of Americans who claim to hate crime will glibly vote for an individual who has been adjudged a rapist and is a 34 count convicted felon, Yeah the former President of The United States, Donald J.Trump. An unprecedented two-time impeached President during an open and shut one 4yr.term.Which also included an insurrection, the construction of a scaffold to execute members of the Nations Government and an attack on The U.S Congress, because that is what Democrats as Adam Smith, Michael Bennett to name a few under the leadership of the instigator in chief, the insidious NEW YORK TIMES are hard at work implying. I mean it isn't that any of this are strange and peculiar occurrences in our human condition. But the context reeks, which is simply this, The Democratic Party is craven for all sorts of reasons that I can easily defend my stating such. The Democratic Party, plyed the most childish of moves, it exploited a circumstance that had always existed, then it embellished the metric of exploitation, forgetting that, yes as people we are stupid, but our stupidity is complex. So for example, we might not dig too deep into why for example The New York Times has dusted off the same play book it deployed against the ex-Barry Goldwater gal, Hillary Clinton, during her bid for the Presidency, by yapping incessantly about her alleged misuse of a private computer server. By again hammering at Joe Biden's CNN hosted and shopped 6/27/24 debate performance. To which right on cue Meerkat-like Democrats emerged with pointy noses and chinless jowels, to unconscionably tell us that The President's debate performance was so beyond the pale that, excuse the pun, it trumped the fact that President Joe Biden's opponent on the debate stage was a criminal, not metaphorically but literally and the way the President spoke so whispery is the crime and not Donald J. Trump, whom the State of New York has spent millions prosecuting for his craven crimes. Now what do I mean by those meerkat-democrats exploited a situation that had always existed Biden didn't just turn 81, during the CNN 6/27/24 debate, nor did he just start eating his words, the man has historically been making word salads. Hell has anyone listened to how the lot of politicians talk, hell not just politicians even those propagandist slaving for The New York Times, all they do is talk in circles because they obfuscate, if they ain't talking to us as if we're Gerber kids, they talk to us with the dumbing down qualifier of, "I don't want to get into the weeds" or,"this is inside the belt way, Washington talk, folks in the heartland, are not concerned with this". Well if we don't care, if it's in the weeds, if its beltway talk, then what the hell are we basing our votes on? Now this is what is violently insulting, as a matter of fact, assaultive. The New York Times and its Democratic stooges, its useful idiots, have assumed they have the right to veto the imperative and will of all those millions of primary voters who expended their motive force voting for Biden-Harris as the only elements worthy of representing them. Those primary voters knew that Joe Biden is 81yrs, they had seen all the anti-Biden psy-ops memes ,they had encountered all of the Biden bashing propaganda, while giving the convicted felon Trump, a pass. Yet they voted for him in the primaries and now The New York Times is dismissing their votes, their motive force?

By William Thorpe

The White-Evangelical Ethno Nationalist "States Right" To In Dicta Define The Woman Pre-Menopausal Life By William Thorpe

WhereAs pregnancy is the primary purpose of Womans function.

WhereAs Woman has no right to abort the pregnancy.

WhereAs such abortion limitation on the Woman fundamentally distinguishes the Womans life.

WhereAs chattel enslavement of black people, the "state right" to in dicta define the Woman pre-menopausal life as the white-evangelical ethno nationalist apogee in securing Womans pregnancy, purpose and function.

Reacquaint Yourself With the Social-Contract

Awright Women to all of you acting like six stooges on the Supreme Court of the United States haven't declared you outside of history, I know you're reeling but do you have a faint recollection of a much touted and worshipped declaration, something to the effect of "life", liberty and the pursuit of happiness"? Anyway I get it your own sisterhood betrayed you, denied your agency       So here is the inexorable and inevitable logic of Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization 142 S. ct. 2228. What you can/can't eat, can/can't wear, can/can't drink under dicta rubric that you're in your ovulating cycle.

Now let me say this, I know you've heard of CRISPR, the gene scissors. Well on the horizon is the potential to generate eggs and sperm from one individual. Secondly mechanical-womb incubators are already present and surrogacy is mundane as financial enterprise. So considering white-evangelicals and their Roman Catholic enablers are all about pregnancies, the only practical polemic is tell them to avail themselves of emerging bio-technology.

By William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit Willisam Thorpe

 

Even Death Is Politicized By William Thorpe

Is a death under a Socialist political-economy with a Communist Party anymore a death than that under a Capitalist and Statist political-economy?

Human beings are dying senselessly, unjustly, unreasonably regardless of political-economy and political structure.

Is the death of the Cuban due to economic embargo by the United States anymore a death than that of a Black American born in the racist states of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

How about this: Egyptians are murdered, killed so Europeans living in Israel can sunbathe and contract Melanoma which is all based on their religious claims. While religious claims of Native Americans who have been largely exterminated are ignored.

The drowned and bloated bodies of black men, women and children fill the Mediterranean in their separation to escape the slavery and colonialism continuum the European lands they are escaping to wrought on them.

By William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

On Joe Manchin By William Thorpe

Joe Manchin, the retrograde Senator from West Virginia has based his obstructionism to the National Democratic Party, Build Back Better Plan on the idea that his West Virginia constituents don't want it.

Our response is in two parts: If Joe Manchin's West Virginia constituents don't want any part of the Build Back Better idea, then exclude West Virginia from the law.

Secondly Joe Manchin might primarily be a U.S. Senator representing the coal mining state of West Virginia but he does it under the banner, aspirations, plan and program of the Democratic Party of West Virginia which is a member of the National Democratic Party. As such he benefited from the resources and values of the National Democratic Party.

80  million plus voters, voted for the National Democratic Party's platform, in 2020 which included ideas for the Build Back Better program and Joe Biden was elected President of the United States because of it.

Joe Manchin is a beneficiary of the energy of the National Democratic Party, as such he has an obligation to supporting it's national priorities and to insist as he has that his West Virginia constituents who are no more than 2 plus million should have veto over the wishes, desires and wants of 80 million plus voters is beyond insanity.

By William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit WilliamThorpe

Speech By Willaim Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

The U.S. Constitution Is Silent On Abortion Viz Health By William Thorpe

The Idiot Justice Clarence Thomas with the Typical forked tongue conservatism and it's Republican intellectual-liberalism claimed that the U.S. Constitution is silent on abortion viz health.

Really?

[The Constitution of the United States of America]

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." [My emphasis]

Article I Section 8; 

"The Congress shall have power to.....Provide for the.....General Welfare of the United States....."

Black's Law Dictionary Defines;

General Welfare: The publics health, peace, morals, and safety.

Public Health:

(1) The health of the community at large

(2) The healthful of the sanitary condition of the general body of people or the community en masse; esp. the methods of maintaining the health of the community, as by preventative medicine and organized care for the sick.

Health:            

(1) The state of being sound or whole in body, mind, or soul

(2) Freedom from pain or sickness

Abortion is Materially a Health Issue

The entire abortion question is one of health. The Woman's health. Regardless of its formulation abortion remains a health issue. Whether or not the state recognizes its practice or renders it illicit, Women will do it as eve taught them to [yes for you Evangelicals kooks, because if as you believe that Eve as Genesis 3:6-7 narrates, became like God, knowing, then it goes to say abortion and it's how to was the first order of Buisness]

The Federalist Society in its "useful idiot" role can make it's bigoted and one-dimensional assertions about the Constitution all it wants and it cannot change nor distort the "General Welfare" text of the Constitution. The Clarence Thomases and Samuel Alito's will scheme and pervert and consequently, we will mock them and relegate them as in 2020 America status are toppled without as much a requiem.

By William Thorpe

Voter Suppression Is Worse Than Drug Dealing and Catherine Englebrecht By William Thorpe

If Christopher Hooks "What if they held an election and everyone came" article in the November 2020 Texas Monthly Magazine is factually accurate and what he raises against Catherine Englebrecht, to wit others, is correct then it's clearly a prima facie expose' of voter suppression and conspiracy to commit voter suppression and it must be investigated and Catherine Englebrecht held to account.

Secondly, the same November 2020 Texas Monthly carrying the Hooks voter suppression in Texas expose' has 90 pages listing the creme de la creme of Texas Attorney's, Texan legal mind, who more than others understand Hook's declaration that:

"If the health of a democracy can be measured by how many citizens participate in the political process Texas has Lupus....."

         AND       

..."The Declaration of Independence avers that a government is only legitimate if it enjoys the"consent of the governed," but for much of the U.S. history, it worked that way

So why then are we assaulted and insulted with 90 pages of smiling predominantly white lawyers proffering a base of social legitimacy whom if Hooks is correct in his voter suppression expose' per virtue of their professional existence have clearly abrogated their civic, ethical and moral duty to call out, disavow and get on the right side of humanness by repudiating the elemental crime and tyranny of voter suppression that taints their very existence as Texan social beings and the unjust privilege, it bestows.

Thirdly, why hasn't texas Black intelligentsia demanded that the likes of Catherine Engelbrecht are investigated. If what Hooks exposes in his is article correct, Engelbrecht then is nothing more than a pining extra from Birth of a Nation a holdover from its stylized supremacist futility. which consequently is more depraved than the activity of a drug dealer whose social existence is effected by the intellectual-liberalism of the likes of Englebrecht and their voter suppression pursuits.

If the vote and the act of voting, in principle and its practice, is the determinant of society and it's basis then anything that violates it is more than anything else criminality of the first degree and highest order and its high time elements as Catherine Englebrecht, if hooks expose pans out are labeled as petty criminals that they are, lower than the drug dealer reprobate

By William Thorpe

Why Lebron James [King James] is Correct and Voting Is Speech By William Thorpe

photo by Element5 Digital

Voting is Speech. A means, a mechanism of stating intentions, how one wants to live. Revolutions, uprisings also are means and mechanisms of stating intentions of how to live.

What we have been confronted with since the inception of the United States experiment is what has always been the dialectic of the human condition, its antagonisms, and contradictions as dynamic of its various parts. So the United States experiment created the Black American because of enslavement as a political designation meaning a construct of slaveholding law as contradiction to itself, in violation of its "all men are created equal" declarative for independence, but for the enslaved black people subjects, an antagonism.

To Thomas Jefferson who as author of the "all men are created equal" declarative, theoretically speculated on the inalienability of man's liberty while enslaving Black people the declaration was simply a hypocrisy, a contradiction. While for the enslaved black person what was a simple hypocrisy and contradiction which Thomas Jefferson had the intellectual-liberal indulgence of simply ignoring or being anguished by was an antagonistic-subjugated fact of life which could not be resolved with the speech of voting, but only revolution and uprising which the enslaved Nat Turner in 1831 gave us it's practice.

So we fast forward to the 21st century and 2020 where Black America is not subject to the chattel antagonism of slavery but firmly occupying a contradictory relationship within the United States experiment. Just as James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, John Adams and Co. of the dusty dead white men participant in the formation of the United States shared political-economy and social commonalities. They also shard and held contradictory relationships with each other and within their work forming the United States of which Federalist papers reveals. The point being, contradiction as dialectic is the operative with any society and its resolution is point, counterpoint, debate, and argument culminating in voting is speech.

The fact Black America has historically participated in voting is speech, means and mechanism of stating its intentions and how it wants to live while not reaping minuscule reward for its participation and labors is not indictment of voting as impotent and farcial means or an affirmation of a formative dialectic of the nation. Instead what it reveals is an intrinsic absence of motive understanding and grasp of the national contradictions which as it existed between Thomas Jefferson and Co. currently also exist waiting to be resolved, reformed, and exploited by capable and able perspectives.

Currently, there is a reemerging tendency which has parochially existed to the determent of Black America that innocuously states, voting is an exercise in futility. As election day 2020 approaches it's Fifth Column foot soldiers, collaborators i.e The Breakfast Club Show, Sean P. Diddy Combs, elements of a type of Black Nationalist, and the usual cabal opponents of Black America's assertiveness and its objective political-economy are beating their chest, gnashing their teeth, howling that voting is a trick and should be shunned by Black America.

This 2020 version of the tendency is posisted under the banner, Black America should stop voting Democrats because Democrats have not advanced Black America's interest. The only thing this argument reveals and exposes besides its obvious nature as ploy to dissuade Black America voting because the same thing isn't said about Black America and church or religion in general. Because as diligently as Black America goes to church and participates in religion the narrative consistently remains the same and the Democratic Party has produced more advancement for Black America than church and religion. So what we are faced with is the paternalistic condescension of proponents of the anti-Democratic Party arguments. As if the Democratic Party is supposed to in and of itself paternalistically know what is best for Black America without demand and push from rank and file organized advocacy engaged in open political action. Secondly, scheming a disassociation of Black America from the Democratic Party ensures the supremacy of the Republican Party and it's reactionary, retrograde, reprobate, misanthropic policies that only entrench racism and bigotry.

What commentators as The Breakfast Club, Sean P. D. Combs should do is immerse in a study of materialist political-economy then subsequently observe and analyze missteps in and failures of American Foreign Policy because insight will be gained and will shed clarity on how we vote and what we vote for.

Abandoning the vote is a non-starter and is beyond stretching the neck on the guillotine.

By William Thorpe