The Reactionary Glenn Beck and The Exploitation Of Reaction

The media personality Glenn Beck is just another typical idealistic, simple-minded reactionary who has gleefully stumbled across how easy it is to "get" money by bedazzling the stunted-stupefied brains amongst us.

What this speaks to isn't brilliance but the mediocrity and abject poverty of the standard the Glenn Beck class surmounts in amassing value and it's speculations.

Lest we are remiss the adage "in the land of the blind the one-eyed is king" anticipated the reactionary Glenn Beck and the exploitation of reaction.

By Apropos

Seattle Seahawks Richard Sherman And The Humility, Boasting And Hubris Critique

2014 Superbowl XLVIII bound Seattle Seahawks all pro corner, Stanford Grad Richard Sherman is the most recent casualty.

Post Game 1/19/14; triumph over the hated rival San Francisco 49ers and the correctly described mediocre receiver Michael Crabtree. Richard Sherman correctly reiterated his professional superiority as being the best defender of the fade route---to which crass haters of all stripes, bigots, their perpetual fears and ignorance and the so-claimed genteel amongst us ranted cacophonous babel with the humility, boasting and hubris critique---that Richard Sherman wasn't humble, he was boastful and full of hubris.

This humility, boasting and hubris critique demands this: So it's socially wrong and unacceptable to verbally boast but it's socially mandatory we boast with durable commodity acquisitions i.e. Homes, Cars, brand name things.  But we are social losers if our Women are without a Hermes scarf.

In a world where 85 persons own equaled wealth to 3.5 billion persons, umbrage at and assault on Richard Sherman, a football player boasting because of a job well done reveals psychosis of our human condition and the audacity of it's hypocrisy.

By Apropos

CNN Cares More About Killer Whales Than The Middle-Class

CNN showed it's concern for the barbaric treatment of killer whales by SeaWorld with the recent broadcast of the documentary Blackfish.  Which took a historical journey into the genesis of enslaved killer whales in water parks i.e. SeaWorld.

If CNN can educate us of the injustice of enslaving killer whales, when will CNN show us how Ronald Reagan, modern Republican-Conservatism and it's Reaganomics Intellectual-Liberalism has systematically and methodically, complicit with the Bill Clinton Democrat destroyed the middle-class?

By Apropos

On The Question of State Secrets and A Right To Know

On the question of State Secrets: It is first and foremost that of who does "what" to know "what."

Then the question becomes why is "what" being done.

A nation, the general public doesn't have a right to the disclosure of tactics it's intelligence and organized violence institutions use in pursuit of national strategies.  The only national right is an understanding of the suppositions in support of the strategies.

This is one aspect on the question of State Secrets and a right to know, naturally there are others.

By Apropos

Star Jones, Kimberly Keller, Two Examples, Miley Cyrus and Trayvon Martin

Hypocrisy and stupidity always exist as examples and recently we have been assaulted and insulted by two.

Considering that hypocrisy and stupidity are examples of reaction, the recent Miley Cyrus MTV Awards twerking incident engaged it.

• Star Jones A flotsam of The View, told CNN's Piers Morgan that besides in her disassembled view, twerking being "impolite" it should be done by African Women in the Bushes of Africa-Now not only is this an unforgiven example of cultural delusion on African Femininity, but it reminds us of the schizophrenic context the self-loathing Black Women of the American Diaspora of African ancestry (of which Star Jones regretfully is) has towards Africa. 

• Kimberly Keller A suburban White Woman dealing with the alienation of her existence reminded us that examples of stupidity are also a painful idealistic corollary of hypocrisy.  Because in the enfeebled world view of Kimberly Keller, Miley Cyrus twerking is more destructive developmentally on her one-dimensional kids than the example of George Zimmerman hunting and killing the teenage Treyvon Martin and the acquittal under the bigoted logic that it was an "unfortunate" incident.

By Apropos

Police Departments, Fire Departments and The Right To Privacy Argument As Defense Against Their Law Violating Activites

Not a single Police Department, Fire Department in the nation supports the fact: Because firearms kill so carrying them, using firearms in the course of their work violates one's right to life, liberty e.t.c.

Yet Police Departments, Fire Departments presents as argument against using video recording devices during the course of their work, their interactions and contact with the general public that such devices violate the public and individuals right to privacy.

The reality however is Police Departments, Fire Departments hate and are morbidly against any mechanism and means that holds their behavior accountable and exposes their law violating activities and video recording devices do that.  Lest we forget Rodney King and the LAPD.

By Apropos

Scandal, Corporate Media, The Moribund Political-Economy and The Virtual Sexual Deviant Behavior Of Anthony Weiner

, member of the United States House of Representatives. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

How do we define scandal?  Is it's exposure therapeutic pretext?  For too long certain minds and hearts particularly those in corporate media have explained, justified and attempted to defend their pursuits of scandal with: "It's what the public wants".  Quietly omitting that the public is a beast fed on the repetition of what corporate media serves.

On 7/24/13; President Barack Obama gave a major speech on the moribund Political-Economy outlining it's national and international definitions.  The speech and it's focus was contextually and provisionally significant because it filled the moribund Political-Economy space.  Considering that the economy and it's politics is the fundamental lattice on which America is realized therefore it's status is paramount.

On 7/24/13; CNN and it's corporate media ilks after transient commentary on the Obama speech went right back to the business as usual of defining scandal as the virtual sexual deviant behavior of the 2013 New York City Mayoral Candidate Anthony Weiner.

This begs this question: Has Anthony Weiner's virtual sexual deviant behavior with the ingenue Sydney Leathers resulted in the nations unemployment crisis?  Does it respond to the bankruptcy of Detroit, does it account for the illiteracy and backwardness of the nations elected officials?  So are the corporate masters of CNN and it's ilk, telling us that in a nation where under every rock slithers a "christian", a set of beliefs that ask he who hath no sin cast the first stone, that the hypocricy of Klieg Light lit faces, mantra like casting stones at and chanting the sins of Anthony Weiner trumps the scandal of the nations moribund Political-Economy?

 By Apropos

Republican-Conservatism, it's Intellectual-Liberalism, Austerity, Deprivation and Welfare Programs

Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism presents as it's motive that, economic energy is wholly compelled by austerity, austere conditions and catalysed by deprivation.  So poverty and socio-marginalization isn't seen by Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism as a negative and destructive.  Instead it's perceived in it's most germane expression as "good" because poverty and deprivation impels the Human Condition to realize "better".

Idealistically the described world view of Republican-Conservatism seems to present a fact of the Human Condition and we see it played out in the anti-government activity polemicized by the Republican Party against Welfare programs.

It's not my intention to philosophize.  A catalog and bibliography refuting this Republican-Conservatism world view has occupied 90% of the Human Conditions mental labor.

We at Apropos state: The Human Condition is s soupy approximation historically spiced with austerity and deprivation.  A fact stated by milleania of it's historicity but without the commensurate "better" the idealism of Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism would have us accept as dialectical synthesis.

By Apropos

The LL Cool J's Of The World, George Orwell's Animal Farm, Snivelling Metamorphosis and The Narrative Of Speculative-Value Production

What the LL Cool J's of the world present is this: They begin by being in opposition to the operative narrative of their existence.

Then as in George Orwell's Animal Farm we observe them as pigs walking on their hind legs aping all that is idealistic and antagonistic of the narrative that defined their assembly.  A snivelling metamorphosis.

So as the inevitable disassembly begins we are humored by the zeal with which these Orwellian LL Cool J's discover artful ways to rationalize and defend the flotsam narrative that circumscribed their pre Orwellian metamorphosis existence.

Still we pay attention to the markers of the LL Cool J's of the world who as the narrative of Speculative-Value production reveals, lost the totemic battle, metamorphosizing the antagonisms that circumscribed their beginnings.

George Orwell's Animal Farm is your ode' 'nuff said.

By Apropos

Intelligence Gathering Activities, Surveillance Machinations By The United States, Eric Snowden, The Treason Critique and Political Economy

The idea that the recent revelation of intelligence gathering activities and surveillance machinations by the United States and it's global rule presumption by Eric Snowden a former NSA (National Security Agency) contractor is an act of treason only reveals the idealistic imperative of contemporary American governance and it's Political-Economy.

If the United States per virtue of it's of it's Political-Economy world view lays claim to the practice that no corner of the globe is off limits and sovereign, then there is nothing treasonous if Eric Snowden reveals to the world, intelligence gathering activities and surveillance machinations by the United States.

As the United States Navy recruits with the slogan "A global force for good" and whether the slogan is semantically speculative and the organized violence dicta of the United States is global rule presumptive.  Then unless the claim is that Eric Snowden revealed intelligence gathering activities and surveillance machinations to extraterrestrial invaders then the treason critique is comical and idealistic in it's straw grasping.

By Apropos

Gretchen Wilson, Redneck Woman Defensive

Cover of Gretchen Wilson

CBS's The Talk Sheryl Underwood recently asked Country Singer Gretchen Wilson, if she had the Redneck spirit, because Gretchen Wilson once had a hit "Redneck Woman".

Gretchen Wilson reflexively got defensive, her face closed and she rhetorically pleaded and (I paraphrase) I Don't know what you mean by Redneck...

I found this humorous and abjectedly pitiful, a psychological abscessed scab painfully exposed in full view as if Gretchen Wilson epitomized an anxiety suppressed so firmly that her recourse was to disavow a cultural state was affirmatively iconic in her life...Redneck Woman.

The obscenity of the spectacle was Gretchen Wilson perceived her relationship to Redneck via the narrative of it's critics.

So what then does this mean: That despite the up yours to the Redneck critique, Gretchen Wilson is secretly susceptible?
By Apropos

The National Debt, Deficits, Republican Party and Speculative Power

If consequences of the National Debt, deficits are cataclysmically dire and it's critique isn't idealistic and polemical gambit wielded by the Republican Party in pursuit of speculative power.

Then the solution is practically easy and Conservatively status-quo.  The 2% (two percent) of the population who are it's beneficiaries and hold in accumulation it's realized value, shouldn't have any problem and reservation in settling it because they stand to lose their accumulation and gains, if the debt, deficits narrative is objective fact as the critique purports and not a Republican Party gambit in pursuit of speculative power.

By Apropos

Ideas, Inventions For The Underdeveloped and Third World That Distract From Practical Development

The problem with ideas and inventions intended for the underdeveloped and Third World and it's Political-Economy is such ideas and inventions objectively underline and entrench, enabling the continuity of the structural basis of the underdeveloped in the first place.

The underdeveloped and Third World and it's Political-Economy doesn't exist in a parallel universe whose conditions and environment is antithetical to the industrialized and developed world, as a matter of fact the industrialization of the developed world is a fact of the unity of conditions, environment and the relationships existing betwixt developed and underdeveloped worlds---so the pursuit of what is development in the underdeveloped  and Third World is analogous to what is development in the developed world minus the idealistic ideas and inventions targeting the underdeveloped and Third World that distract from practical development.

By Apropos

Why Do We Fight and The Valuation Of Our Existence

Why do we fight

Because we disagree.

Why do we disagree

Because of our worldview.

Why do we have disagreeable worldviews?

Because we clash in the pursuit of resources necessary for the valuation of our existence.

By Apropos

Schizophrenia and Hypocricy Of The Non-Regulated Global Economy

Recently corporate media has inundated our challenged attention span with news of a 1,000 dead persons, workers at a Bangladesh Garment Factory, victims of the schizophrenic and hypocritical non-regulated global economy narrative.


The corporate media storylines of the 4/24/13; Bangladesh Garment Factory catastrophe has been a stylized focus on the human tragedy, an underlining of the humaness of the dead workers.

In this contemporary social zeitgeist, more is owed the dead workers by those who death trumpet their humaness, but in life exploited and insulted their humaness by keeping silent on the conditions and practices that cumulated in and catalyzed their death.

The resulting editorializing and commentaries on the non-regulated and criminally deplorable Bangladesh Garment Factory work conditions by corporate media post mortem 4/24/13; should have been done pre 4/24/13; with equal zeal.  But considering that the consumers of corporate media benefit from the schizophrenia and hypocricy of the non-regulated global economy which Bangladesh and it's cheap and poorly paid garment factory workers play their umpa lumpa  roles, it wasn't 2.0 worthy of hors d'oeuvre chatter to recognize the humaness of Bangladesh moreorless critique their work conditions.

By Apropos

A Nations Decline, Idealistic-Violence, Wendy Walsh School Prayer and Religion

A nations decline isn't borne on the wings of decadence and a generalized corruption as historians have classically pronounced.  Unless the corruption is that of a lazy mind.  But a nations decline reflects to what extent, idealism and it's delusions are disseminated as practical responses to problems.

Lately the nation has been grappling with the question of idealistic-violence.  Idealistic in the sense that the violence doesn't further the objective-narrative of progress of the Human Condition.

So into this dialectical struggle steps Wendy Walsh, a self described behavior expert.  Which as professional designation highlights the very nature of a nations decline; with purported analytical response.  Wendy Walsh declared with full entire weight of human history and it's accumulated cognition on her delusional shoulders.  That lack of school prayer, absence of religion are to blame for violence and depravity.

Contrary to the delusions of Wendy Walsh and her idealistic ravings, the violent speech of Religion bears as much responsibility for idealistic-violence as the psychosis of idealism.

By Apropos

Surveillance Totalitarianism, Circa Post 9-11 and State Security

Leading up to the revision of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact, the United States and it's NATO Alliance used to level a polemic of Surveillance Totalitarianism against it as indictment of Socialism and it's Communist anticipations requiring Surveillance Totalitarianism.

The Soviets and their Warsaw Pact allies responded with: National meddling, interference and sabotage from the United States and it's NATO Alliance warranted such Surveillance Totalitarianism from the state security apparatus.  The United States and it's NATO naturally scoffed.

Fast Forward to circa post 9-11 and what we now have is the United States and the NATO Alliance applying Surveillance Totalitarianism in a manner the Soviets and Warsaw Pact couldn't have imagined nor dreamed of which confirms the maxim: The naivete of Communist idealism is no match for the repression of Capitalist Facism.

If the state security rationale wasn't good for the Soviets and it's Warsaw Pact goose, then it most definitely isn't for the United States and it's NATO allies gander circa post 9-11 practicing Surveillance Totalitarianism.

By Apropos

Republicans, The Campaign Disclosure Act, The U.S. Constitution and Progress

Republicans in the U.S. Senate in July 2012 voted down the Campaign Disclosure Act which would have required full disclosure of donor activity to campaigns, under the premise it restricted free speech.

The metrics wielding in contemporary right wing Republican Conservatism politics turns on the head the motivational impetus of the nations Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and replaces it's progress with reaction.  A reaction which true to the Intellectual-Liberalism of it's Conservatism is status quo and elitist in nature.

The objectivity of progress is contextually to know, to understand more, a full disclosure and exposure of the inner workings of phenomena whether it's the natural world or the machinations of donor activity in modern American Political campaigns.  Only those reactionaries and the Intellectual-Liberalism of their Republican-Conservatism foist the idea that status-quo secrecy is progress and Democratic which is what the defeat by Republicans in the U.S. Senate of the campaign disclosure act in July 2012 ridiculousy claims.

By Apropos

Craig Watkins District Attorney of Dallas County, Texas, The Black Community and The Application of State Organized Violence and It's Justice Ideal

Why isn't Craig Watkins, District Attorney of Dallas County, Texas recognized in a serious way by the Black  community and it's intelligentsia.

During Craig Watkins tenure as District Attorney he has exonerated approximately twenty-one wrongfully convicted persons, one at least thirty years of unlawful imprisonment.  This is extraordinary, an American Prosecutor actually concerned with getting the application of state organized violence and it's justice ideal right.

The undeniable nexus of American society with the Black American Experience is that of state organized violence and it's justice ideal.  Despite the pervasiveness of criminality within American society the sanctioning and imprisonment of back offenders has always exceeded it's per capita ratio.

One would assume that the Black community and it's intelligentsia would exploit the utilitarianism of Craig Watkins as a shaming and critical polemic against other District Attorneys who execute the duties of their office as a mandate to only prosecute and sanction Black people--- idealistically Craig Watkins has been ignored and toils unnoticed.

By Apropos

Anti-Social Security Trust Fund and The Idealistic Conservative Impetus and it's Intellectual-Liberalism Of Control

The Anti-Social Security argument perpetually made by Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism that  for every dollar paid by wage earners into the Social Security Fund, three or more dollars are extracted or paid out unearned.  Has nothing to do with "what is money" and Political-Economy fact but everything to do with the idealistic Conservative impetus and it's Intellectual-Liberalism of controlling the Political-Economy illiterate majority.

If each dollar paid into the government trust fund of Social Security isn't value appreciating parallel with the nations GDP (Gross Domestic Products).  Why then is the same dollar, privately speculated by it's critics, the idealistic Conservative impetus and it's Intellectual-Liberalism, appreciating in it's stock market activity?

By Apropos

"What Do Women Want," Dialectical-Materialism, The Daughter-Relationship and Value Speculation

Idealism poses the question: "What Do Women Want" and responds with it's typical one dimensional impetuous hubris, "Let the Woman decide".

Materialism on the other hand, specifically dialectical-materialism ignores the question and instead observes the subjectivity of it's organic fact, that the response is at the expense of the fact, the quality of the daughter-relationship determines what daughter as Woman will want.

The daughter-relationship more than any other social relationship has within it's circumscription the tensions of immature contradictions and the mature antagonisms of human Political--Economy as organic base. Irrespective of class and nationality.

Recently, the daughter-relationship dialectic has again been examined in a new book "Lean In" by Sheryl Sandberg of Facebook and as expected of a nation flailing under the fog of idealism and the Intellectual-Liberalism of it's conservative ideation, it was welcomed apoplectically.

Dialectical-Materialism reminds us that the vacuous nature of idealism and the Intellectual-Liberalism of it's Conservative ideation would have us observe social relationships and human Political-Economy as existing in a vacuum or biologic inconsistencies and suppositions of cultural biases.  We at Apropos in defense of dialectical-materialism reject that.

We at Apropos state it bluntly: The Daughter-Relationship dialectic and it's "What do Women Want" question is fundamentally that of value and it's speculation.

By Apropos

Barack Obama, Nat Turner, Steve Harvey, "Hoodlum" And The American Experience

From Barack Obama, President of the United States, honoring Nat Turner in his 2/22/12; speech at the African-American Museum to Steve Harvey's the talk show host recognition of his father.  Who Steve Harvey unflappably describes as a "Hoodlum" as being the motive force in his life who inculcated and instilled work ethic in him, to quote "Being a Man," there is a dynamic unfettered in contemporary society that at it's heart has the thrust of the Black Experience on it's own terms, without that axiomatic, apologetic taint of eurocentric understudy.

The usual narrative of the Black Experience meaning it's distortions by eurocentrisim is a pacified, defanged and caricaturized one.  Where a Nat Turner or a "Hoodlum" are valueless and not invaluable as the recognition by Barack Obama, President of the United States and Steve Harvey a successful talk show host imply.

That the Nat Turner, the "Hoodlum," facts of the Black Experience are invaluably on equal terms with all other facts of the American Experience.

If Thomas Jefferson, an owner of Slaves, trader of Slaves is redeemed.  Then we must grasp the one-dimensional nature of all critique hurled at the Black Experience at the idealistic expense of it's organic base the American Experience.

By Apropos

Aunt Jemima's Like Wendy Williams, The Talk Show Host and Her "Well Spoken" Black Critique

Aunt Jemima's like Wendy Williams The Talk Show Host, in their mediocre inability to provide substantial contextual narrative to popular culture are the ones who keep the idealistic futility of stereotyping alive and well.

Wendy Williams will always to a fault critique Black pop culture personalities with the "well spoken" qualifier which she never does with White pop cultural personalities.  The implication being, speaking is something Black people have to do well.

So what is this "well spoken" critique Wendy Williams as Aunt Jemima apologist presents?

The "well spoken" critique is one rank with the stench of self hatred and inferiority loathing.  It simply says Wendy Williams perceives her Blackness and heritage through the "I Am Thy Darker Brother,"  "Gone With The Wind" prism.  Which supposes idealistically that Black people are inarticulate and speak in a peculiarly distinct manner that isn't "White Like" and somehow disqualifys and devalues their cultural vantage narrative.

What the Aunt Jemima mediocrity of the likes of Wendy Williams are incapable of grasping is Value
in it's pop cultural context as in all other social aspects is dialectical. The mere existence of Wendy Williams as Talk Show Host speaks to the dialectic and her "Well Spoken" Black critique only emphasizes the latent inferiority complex of Wendy Williams and her Aunt Jemima inclinations as default.

By Apropos

Wayne LaPierre, Government, Disinformation and What Is Lawful

Wayne LaPierre, executive Vice-President of the NRA is wont to say and we paraphrase:  Government shouldn't dictate what gun owners lawfully use to protect and defend their families.

This exampled Wayne LaPierre paraphrase is typical and endemic of what passes for contemporary public debate, it's discussion and polemic.

The only thing gleaned from Wayne LaPierre's Pro Gun anti-government statement is: It's crass disinformation, intended for the inattentive and gullible ears of the naive and idealistic.

In response to Wayne LaPierre we state: Government doesn't have to dictate what is lawful because it is the arbiter and determinant of what is lawful and unlawful.

By Apropos

Disservice Done By Corporate Media To The Nations Political-Economy and Intentionally Misleading Commentary On Presidential Legacy

A disservice done by corporate media to the nations Political-Economy is with the way it flames national issues and points of discussion.

How often are we told by corporate media journalist as Soledad O'Brien, John King, Gloria Borger et al that there is tension between a Presidents agenda, what a President wants, Presidential legacy and what the party wants or what Congress wants.  This descriptive characterized tension of a Presidents agenda, legacy and what the party Congress wants is a disservice done by corporate media because it is wrong and intentionally misleading.

A Presidents agenda, legacy, a party's platform, what it wants, what Congress wants are reflective of what people, the citizenry want and that is how corporate media journalist as Soledad O'Brien, John King, Gloria Borger et al should describe such Political-Economy activity.  On the contrary what we are told which borders on indoctrination is this false tension between a Presidents agenda, Presidential legacy and what Congress wants.

An aspect of corporate media's historical duty is to illustrate the unity between what citizens vote for and what is accomplished by the political functionaries.  Instead, what Soledad O'Brien, John King, Gloria Borger et al assault our senses with are intentionally misleading commentary that are a disservice to the nations Political-Economy.

By Apropos

Christopher Fountain, The "Media", Selective Critique and Reaction

Christopher Fountain an Attorney Blogger is typical of the morass of Intellectual-Liberalism.  There isn't rhyme or reason to his practice save reaction.  So on 12/27/12; during his interview on CNN's Starting Point  Christopher Fountain stated that the motive force guiding him to release the addresses of journalist at the Journal News a Suburban New York newspaper was he wanted to "hit back" at the "media" and particularly the Journal News for releasing the names of gun permit holders in it's readership area.

Apropos takes no position on the practicality of the Journal News publishing the identities of gun permit holders in it's readership area.  But what we will focus on is the hypocrisy, inconsistency and Intellectual-Liberalism of the Christopher Fountain's who muddy our national reason with their idealism and it's reaction.

Christopher Fountain a Blogger self-styled "publisher" implied that he is the correcting force to the media that runs roughshod over gun owners vis a vis Conservatives.  This explicit criticism is at the expense of Christopher Fountain himself being a member of the "media" per virtue of his practice as a blogger.  His hypocrisy, inconsistency and Intellectual-Liberalism is pathetically glaring with his admitted "two wrongs" reaction to the Journal News identifying gun permit holders.

This selective critique and it's reaction to the euphemistic "media" by certain elements of national polity as represented by Christopher Fountain serves no other purpose than that of backwardness.  A backwardness that has it's fountainhead in shadows long illuminated by progressive thesis in contrast to reaction and it's recklessness.

By Apropos

Production, It's Means, Labor, "Right To Work", The Intellectual-Liberalism Of Republican-Conservatism and Speculative-Value

We know the history of production and it's means, we know the labor, management historical-narrative and both are diversions and distortions from the real work of what is the redemption of Speculative-Value from the alienation of it's idealistic narrative.  Pursuit and existence of the "Right To Work" idea by Intellectual-liberalism of Republican-Conservatism fits this tactical diversion and distortion.

In order for production, it's means and labor to redeem itself from the distortions of Speculative-Value and the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism, the world of Political-Economy, it's facts and laws must be stabilized.

Historically revolutions have attempted to secure the stability of Political-Economy, it's facts and laws at the expense of challenging the Intellectual-Liberalism of Conservatism and it's Speculative-Value supposition.  The result of not challenging the Intellectual-Liberalism of Conservatism and it's Speculative-Value suppositions allows Political-Economy inaccuracies to dominate human existence and the sisyphean re-invention of the wheel.

The "Right To Work" push by Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism and its Speculative-Value suppositions, in absence of the necessary polemic to annihilate the "Right to Work" idealism, organized labor and unions should pursue the tactical statutorial position:  That any publically traded company should set aside 49% of it's gross sales specifically for wages and compensatory purposes.  The stress and tensions exerted on the publically traded company dialectic by speculation and Speculative-Value, it's constructed obligations and anticipations are the source of Political-Economy instability which unionization of organized labor is up against.

With 49% of gross sales set aside for wages and compensations.  Production, it's means and labor will not be short changed due to the constructed obligations and anticipations of speculation and speculative value.

By Apropos

People Nor Guns Kill, Bullets Do and The Second Amendment

Contrary to easy way out reasoning, people nor guns kill, bullets do.  The Second Amendment of The U.S. Constitution is complete and fundamental in all respects.  It secures us the right to gun ownership.  Due to antagonisms in American society gun misuse is a existential-debilitating fact.  In consequence, responses set sights on the Second Amendment reactively.

We at Apropos state this: Gun ownership is a right, but the State should license possession of bullets.  The manufacturing of bullets should require individual bullet casings are embossed with lot identification.  The bullet license is specifically for purpose of gun misuse and retracing the history of the bullet to the licensed buyer.  Licensing and ability to retrace the history of a criminally misused bullet is the least intrusive and compromising of the Second Amendment as the State balances it's duty to the security and safety of it's citizens.

By Apropos

Barack Obama Reelected President Of The United States, Republican-Conservatism Severely Trounced and Speculative-Value and It's Distortions

On Nov 6, 2012; Barack Obama (D) was reelected President of the United States by defeating Mitt Romney (R) in a Electoral College landslide and also winning the Popular vote.

Apropos the Blog of Political-Economy stands in solidarity and witness to the reelection.

This campaign and ensuing reelection was specifically momentous because reaction and it's motive force, Republican-Conservatism was severely trounced at an epic stage in the Imperialistic development of Speculative-Value and it's distortions.

By Apropos

Speculative-Value, Political-Economy, Money and It's Currency Means Is A Result Of Government and Governance

What Speculative-Value, It's speculators, the Intellectual-Liberalism of anti-deficit, governmental spending critique ignore is this: When we return to the primitive basics of Political-Economy and money and it's currency means is removed from the Human Condition.  What we find is an absence of the investor class or venture capitalist as deceptively currently described by the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism, job creators.  Because in the absence of money and it's currency means, the realization of value in the Human Condition is by the producer and creator-inventor class or farmers and artisans. This class and it's social-activity objectifies value by it's productivity.  For example the farmer produces food, the cattle rancher domesticates cattle for human consumption, the artisan creates and manipulates metal.  All this activity appears and happens in the absence of money and it's currency means.

Money and it's currency means happens as a specific mechanism to facilitate stability of expressed relations, conveying produced value in the Human Condition.  What this means is the emergence of money and it's currency means occurs when government or governance is developed.  So with the appearance of money and it's currency means do we see the emergence of speculative-value, speculators, the investor class or venture capitalist as Political-Economy phenomena fact in the Human Condition, specifically to profit.

The fundamentals of the Human Condition as we find it is the producer and artisan-inventor class interacting directly with the natural material environment without money and it's currency means objectifying value.

The creation of money, it's currency means is a result of government and governance and not in spite of it.  Speculative-Value, speculators, the investor class or venture capitalist contrary to the sophistry of Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism owe their existence to government and governance. What this means is the anti-government critique as formulated by Republican-Conservatism and it's various stooges is simply a diversionary gambit and a distortive tactic to win elections.

By Apropos

Jake Tapper of ABC News, The Vote and His Purported Professional Ethic

Jake Tapper of ABC News has said he doesn't vote in national election because he wants to be objective and uninfluenced in his reporting and journalism.  This position and it's sophistry is indicative of the pretentiousness squeezing the credibility and objectivity out of corporate media.

Whether or not Jake Tapper honors his civic duty and vote has nothing to do with whether he has the intellectual-honesty and the purported professional ethic to require politicians define the national society and Political-Economy correctly.

When Jake Tapper starts doing this the antagonism between his civic duty of voting and his professional duty will cease.

By Apropos

The Stooge Vivek Wadhwa and American Material

The author stooge Vivek Wadhwa, a Duke University Professor in his new book Exodus: Why immigrants are returning home, continues that paternalistic sophistry, the supposition that America as material object is realized opportunity and the world's educated should immigrate to it's shores at the expense of the corruption and backwardness of their natal homelands.

Seldom does the paternalism advanced by stooge Vivek Wadhwa critique the state of the human condition, the relations with the rest of the world's nations from the point that the internationalist nature of American Political-Economy has everything to do with the corruption and backwardness of the developing and underdeveloped world which is then conveniently utilized as polemic justifying immigration to the exceptionalism which is America as material object.

The mental labor of the likes of the stooge Vivek Wadhwa would do us good were the critique honestly directed at those sets of relations being exploited by American Political-Economy in opposition to the positive development of the developing and undeveloped world.

Because in the absence of such critical honesty the nature of our developed American exceptionalism is always at  the mercy of the paternalist hypocrisy spewed by the one dimensional gibberish by the likes of the stooge Vivek Wadhwa.

By Apropos

The Republican Party, Conservatism, The Obama Administration and American Power

This contemporary Republican Party and it's practice of Conservatism has a stupid and reckless way of critically dumbing down politically  anything their political opposition does.  So what we now have after the recent 9/11/12; attack on the U.S. Libya embassy and killing of Ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 other support staffers by supposed Libyan partisans is the Republican Party and Congressional Republican making the Intellectual-Liberal argument that anti-American protest and embassy breeches in the Middle-East are happening because extremist are not scared of America, with inference that the Obama Administration has weakened and diminished American power and might.

This begs this when are radicals, extremist, rebels ever scared of the status quo and it's organized violence?

So the position of these opportunistic Republicans is the Taliban and Al Qaeda slaughter of U.S. military forces in Afghanistan and Iraq is happening because U.S. military force isn't scary enough?  The tortures at Abu Ghraib, Bagram Base Guantanamo Bay and renditions  to C.I.A secret sites are not moral hazards enough to dissuade rebellion?  Have attacks on American interest nationally and internationally i.e.Oklahoma City and U.S.S. Cole occurred because the perpetrators thought twice about American Power? The U.S .S. Cole was a war ship, a war machine, the epitome of organized violence and relative power yet it was attacked.

The response Congressional Republicans and their opposition to the policies of the Obama Administration present is per virture of their opposition to the Obama Administration anything and everything happening under it's tenure has to be viewed through an antagonistic prism.

So American governance in the 21st century as strategized by the Republican Party and its Intellectual-Liberalism is the reckless dictatorship of Conservatism.

By Apropos

Charity, Winnipeg, Canada, Shoes, Mayor Sam Katz and Superficial Act Of Humaness

What is wrong with the human condition that a Winnipeg, Canada bus driver's recent charity of giving his shoes to a barefoot homeless person is seen as representing compassion, goodness and all the aspirational idealistic heights of the human condition.

Instead of celebrating the Winnipeg, Canada bus driver's act of giving his shoes to a barefoot homeless person as Mayor Sam Katz would have us do we should rather collectively be ashamed that the human condition we have created and constructed has resulted in homelessness and the need for others to donate their shoes to others.

A civilized society isn't measured by the idealistic and superficial individual acts of humaness.  Instead it should be objectified by the actuality of a national infrastructure that provides the basic essentials for it's citizens to function without the tyranny and intrusions of idealistic and superficial individual act of humaness.

If the Intellectual-Liberalsim of Republican-Conservatism is to be taken on it's word that we are beholden to none other than ourselves, then the ideas of charity, compassion and conditional social safety nets are intellectually dishonest and hypocritical.  Because who then is the arbiter of who is deserving and needy of charity and compassion, save the tyranny of ones presumtions, biases and suppositions.  Which in practice becomes a tyrannical perverse triage.

So if we advocate and defend the human condition as that of free and informed people then it's realization requires access to basic resources essentially necessary for primary function and if society is to be a just and honest one will only be provided by the collective us.

The practice of charity as compassion, charity as goodness, charity as humaness is a reactionary construct specifically in the employ of Speculative-Value and it's antagonisms.

We polemicize in contra.

By Apropos

The United States, Arabs, Muslims, Violence and Savagery

The idea and it's rhetoric that the United States is this haven of civilized behavior and bastion of polite and conscientious politics as idealistic specific contrast and criticism of the recent 9/11/12; violent behavior of Arabs and Muslims in protest over a vulgar, Anti-Mohammed video and United States attitudes towards Islam, ignores the history of these United states and the historicity of it's people.

Violence and savagery in all forms and it's efficient specificity is transcendent in the United States.

Arabs and Muslims are naive Johnny Come Lately's to consequential violence, uncivility and the subsequent social instability and of all the criticisms we can lodge against Arabs and Muslims savagery and uncivility should laughably be the least.
 By Apropos

Privacy, Kate Middleton Baring Her Breast and The Tower Of London

The Question of privacy should hinge on proximity, it is reactionary and modernly illiterate for Kate Middleton and her husband to suppose and assume entitled to privacy when the supposed entitlement of privacy actually is a gradation of proximity.

What we are saying is: The objectivity of privacy which is what jurisprudence is being asked by Kate Middleton because of her social act of baring her breast, to define, is specifically and objectively an approximation of proximity.

Privacy is an awareness of subjective proximity so we state:  Kate Middleton should have had the presence of mind that in the age of digitalized technology, her topless sunbathing nudity which by the way is observable from satellites in orbit cannot claim a presumptive privacy defended by the utility, The Tower Of London claimed in its hey day.

By Apropos

"Fighting Injustice", "A Global Force For Good" A Perversion of Military Purpose and The Constitution Of The United States

When A nations Military uses slogans like "Fighting Injustice" as the Marines are currently doing or the Navy's "Global Force For Good", the nations decline and dilution of it's motive force is in hand basket mode.

Dwight D. Eisenhower lectured us about the nefarious cabalistic collusion of the military and for profit corporate interest.  Because as soon as Industrial Value-Speculation becomes the motive for association with a nations military and it's production of organized violence, a perspective perversion of military purpose occurs and the most crass of straw grasping justification begins to assail the national sensibilities.

So we find justification of production of organized violence and it's trillions dollar national deficit in slogans like "fighting Injustice" or "A Global Force For Good" that have nothing to do with the National Defense mandate dicta of the Constitution Of The United States but everything to do with Industrial Value-Speculation.



By Apropos

Ronald Reagan, Republican-Tea Party, Bob Woodward, Barack Obama, The National Debt and The Intellectual-Liberalism Of Reaction

How many times have we heard the criticism that even Ronald Reagan would be unwelcome in today's Republican-Tea Party.  So if Ronald Reagan, of whom the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism apotheosizes isn't,  wouldn't be reactionary enough, intransigent enough for today's Republican-Tea Party.  On what objective critique is the great Bob Woodward concluding his leadership criticism of President Barack Obama as being lacking during the 2011 National Debt gambit wrought by the Philistines of the Republican-Tea Party in his recent for profit book, The Price Of Politics.

If Bob Woodward expects us to bestow sagism and that ephemeral intellectual value, objectivity on his works, then his mental labor ought to reflect such.  Instead of the conventional easy way out perspective of over simplification, which despite the consequential gravity of pro forma petty events, the Intellectual-Liberalism of reaction elevates into crisis.

Claiming as Bob Woodward does in his book The Price Of Politics that Barack Obama should have, was obligated to have solved the gorgon knot intransigence of congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge during the 2011 National Debt gambit is quite frankly naive and idiotic.  The entire 2011 National Debt Crisis was a gambit of choice by the Republican Party and it's Tea Party stooge to terroristically exact it's Intellectual-Liberal demands from Barack Obama, the Democrats and the American people.  Would Bob Woodward rather have Barack Obama declare and wage war on the third of the U.S.Government?  (Congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge).

An objective critique of the 2011 National Debt gambit would be explaining the sequestration ploy as a moral hazard designed specifically to compel congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge to compromise with Barack Obama, Democrats and the American people on the prospective elements of the National Debt.

Bob Woodward fails his posterity.  He leaves us wondering that if he represents the elite of the nations intelligentsia then it isn't surprising that the National Political-Economy is in the feckless quandary of the idealism of suppositions and one dimensional critique as consequence of the supremacy of the Intellectual-Liberalism of reaction.

By Apropos

Barack Obama and Nat Turner

Barack Obama Resurrected and saluted Nat Turner the Insurrectionist in his 2/22/12; Dedication of the African-American Museum.  Apropos stands in recogition.

Anti-Taxes Polemic And The Constitution

To the Anti-Taxs polemic that invokes the Constitution of the United States for it's cause, we state this: The Constitution of the United States is taxes progressive.  There are progressive and affirmed mentions of taxes in article I section 2, section 7 and in section 8 and it goes without saying that the existence of any mature developed republic requires realized taxes.

By Apropos

Banks And Consumer Fees

The question we present and ask banks specifically the Big Banks, Bank of America and co. as they pursue saddling the American people with consumer fees is:  Is Charging fees an entitlement banks will ingeniously extort from the American consumer?

By Apropos

Peggy Noonan And Who Was "Snake Bit", Barack Obama Or George W. Bush

              (Photo credit: kylebogucki)

The Anachronistic Peggy Noonan infamously said President Barack Obama was "Snake Bit" during the BP Gulf Oil Spill, which is Colloquial for Barack Obama is jinxed.

If Barack Obama is "snake bit" jinxed, because of disasters as the BP Gulf Oil Spill.  Then What are we to make of President George W. Bush who embarrassingly read kid books during 9-11 Attacks, who gave brownie points while a major U.S., New Orleans drowned during Hurricane Katrina, who drained the National Treasury by his Iraq War adventure just to obtain a pawn shop value faux trophy in Saddam Hussein's Gun?

On George W. Bush's disaster filled 8 years Peggy Noonan is Conservatively silent yet Liberally strident in her idealistic Anti-Obamaism.

By Apropos

Barack Obama And Does He Truly Believe That Ronald Reagan Was Good For The Nation

Does Barack Obama truly believe that Ronald Reagan was good for the nation and represented the just side of history narrative?  Because Barack Obama has quoted and referenced Ronald Reagan enough for the question to be raised that what might have seemed as a tactical maneuver by Barack Obama squaring the Intellectual-Liberalism of the Political-center and it's embrace of the Ronald Reagan mystification during his quest for the Presidency could be a sincere imperative and world view practically held by Barack Obama.

The reality is Ronald Reagan has always been an insidious and reactionary force in American politics.  Representing the opportunistic and unjust historicity of the Human Condition.  Activities from his early State Informer betraying his Screen Actors compatriots, through his Facist use of state organized violence against dissent during his stint as Governor of California, while single handedly being responsible for resurrecting the politics of hate and racism in contemporary American politics and as President effecting the destruction of Unions and Organized Labor.  Ronald Reagan was and has been a destructive force on the national Political-Economy.

So we state with clear eyed rigor, does Barack Obama truly believe that Ronald Reagan was good for the nation and represented the just side of history narrative?


1969 BERKELEY RIOTS " People's Park" California - Images by Janine wiedel

By Apropos

Republican-Conservatism, Cult Of Personality And Speculative-Value

Lets tell Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism that blaming or celebrating the individual person is worship at the alter of cult of personality.

It is also the default position for a lazy undisciplined and feeble mind, but in American Political-Economy it is lethal polemic wielded by speculative-value and it's exploitation as diversionary practice.

By Apropos

Anti-Government Spending Critique And America's Gullible Appetite

Despite the desperate absurdity of proponents of the argument and anti-government spending critique that the American national-economy is comparable to and has to be analysed through the narrative of the finances of an American family unit.

What is pathetically insulting is America's gullible appetite for the absurdity and it's deceptiveness.

By Apropos

CNN's Soledad O'Brien And Looking And Speaking Black In America

Soledad O'Brien (Photo credit: jdlasica)

CNN's Soledad O'Brien once posed the question: What does looking and speaking Black in America   mean.  The answer is simple CNN's Soledad O'Brien cannot be Black and doesn't exist it's answer.

By Apropos

Free Speech, Dan Cathy of Chic-fil-a..And God Said Or The Bible Says and History Will Erect Tombstones

The Implicit activity of free speech is it anticipates antithesis, it recognizes there will be opposition.  Couching theological liberties as free speech is either the work of a lazy and feeble mind or at its very core an effort to reassert idealistic dicta.

Dan Cathy of Chic-fil-a Restaurants as most Republican-Conservatives when confronted with the reactionary nature and backwardness of their thought and world view find refuge under the banner of...and God said or the Bible says.  So when Dan Cathy touched off a recent firestorm with his anti-gay comments, he was quick, along with his supporters and defenders to claim free speech because it was his religious belief and liberty.

The Issue and the problem with... and God said or the Bible says, as free speech is we cannot argue with God, we cannot debate God, even the Devil isn't truly antithetical to God.  So... And God said or the Bible says for purposes of free speech definitions is as idealistic as the notion of "being outside of history" which is what Dan Cathy and his ilk would always demand of the Human Condition and it's dialectical-materialist reality.

The United States Constitution articulates religious freedoms as specifically being without the dicta of the state and its bias.  Free speech is subsequently defined antithetically to religion because free speech is the activity of thought, mental labor.  Religion isn't an idea to its believers, it's rather a suspension, suppression, and repression of ideas, it frowns on the activity of free speech.

So for the very elements, free speech warns us against to conceal their reactionary practice under its mantle hints at two occurrences, either we have become militantly decadent or we have lost the Jacobin edge of polemics.

Dan Cathy, his reaction, and backwardness can and will invoke God as a medium of their idealistic intolerance and history will erect tombstones to their failure.

By Apropos

The Reactionary Intellectual-Liberalism Of Republican-Conservatism and It's Tea Party Stooge, Mitt Romney and What is Government

The Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism and it's Tea Party stooge is revealing itself as the infantile idealism Progressive thinkers and Democrats have always knew it to be.

In response, a squirmy reaction to the blistering and withering ridicule-onslaught on Mitt Romney's activities at Bain Investments and it's type of Capitalist practice, from the Barack Obama Campaign.  Republican-Conservatism finds itself creating a whole new class of society that is not of nor from the middle and lower class but spontaneously appears as privileged job creators.  In it's quagmirely defense of trickle down exploitation practiced by Republican-Conservatism and it's Reaganomics and as rebuttal to the Obama Campaign's polemic that Political-Economy realities are bottoms up phenomena. Republican-Conservatism introduces us to homo jobcreator with a novel social-contract narrative and finds itself walking the plank with the convoluted reasoning that government isn't off, by and for the people but government is something other than people.

So what we have is Erick Erickson editor in chief of redstate.com a foot soldier in the delusions and Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism and it's Tea Party stooge having to deny the quintessential truth that American capitalism exist simply and solely because of the activity of the American Government.

When Progressive Thinkers and Democrats define the world view of Republican-Conservatism as an exercise in Intellectual-Liberalism we highlight it's fascination with the anti-government critique as a fundamental example.  Republican-Conservatism behaves as if every election cycle is a new opportunity to relitigate what is the social contrast as if it is the sole monopolistic arbiter of what is government, it's practice and behavior.

The Barack Obama 2012 Campaign is proving itself to be an adroit and worthy adversary as far as it specifically relates to exposing the fact that Mitt Romney's type of Capitalistic practice at Bain Investments is the legatee of the destructiveness of Ronald Reagan's Reaganomics and the reactionary Intellectual-Liberalism of Republcian-Conservatism and it's Tea Party stooge.

By Apropso

Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism Is The Classic Snake Oil Salesman

The World View of contemporary Republican-Conservatism is simply "people are too stupid to get out of their own way".

Because Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism can always point to something new, something else as cause of why, for example people don't have jobs.  So if it is't Health Care Reform, (derisively labeled Obamacare) as distraction, it's government if too big or government spending or to many regulations against polluters and exploiters or too much uncertainty (as if the Capitalist mantra of taking risk isn't steeped in uncertainty).

So the reality is the average person is averse and would rather be numbed by the distraction of blame and the therapeutic consolation of the misery loves company dialectic and this is what Republican-Conservatism perfects and it's Intellectual-Liberalism plys as the classic snake oil salesman hop skipping it from one election to the other with the anti-taxes slogan.

By Apropos

The Human Capacity For Delusions, Dwight D. Eisenhower, The Third Reich, Depravity and American Slavery

When we talk about the human capacity for delusions, Dwight D. Eisenhower's World War II comment on the Third Reich's contributed practice in the annals of human depravity to fellow human comes to mind.

Dwight D. Eisenhower reportedly wrote his wife upon the liberation of one of the Third Reich's death camps that he wasn't aware that such cruelty could exist.

The delusional aspect of this comment is: This observation is being made by an American, a White American, a legatee, a beneficiary of the worst example, the most abjectly depraved reality, the most complete practice of human cruelty to fellow human, as it stands the great institution of American Slavery.

Dwight D. Eisenhower is a member of the beneficiary status quo who owe the American narrative to every filthy, depraved, cruel, inhumane, savaged, barbarous, genocidal, monstrous, bestial, pitiful vestige of American Slavery.  What Dwight D. Eisenhower's comment reminds us of is the human capacity for delusions and idealistic anecdotes.

The Third Reich's depravity is just that another annal in the chronicles of human depravity.

If the Third Reich's attempted extermination of it's subjects is basis, a vantage point of critique of the human ability for epochal violence---then it pales in comparism to it's antecedents.

The Genocidal activities of Cecil Rhodes in southern Africa, The Conquistador scourge in the America's.  The Anglo-Saxon conquest of North America and extermination of Tasmanians, The Japanese slaughter of Chinese and Koreans, Belgium's destruction of the Congo and it's people, to name a few.  But the quintessential and fundamental dynamic of the depravity dialectic is the consequence of the tensions, contradictions, antagonisms and Intellectual-Liberalism of Political-Economy polemics of Capitalism and Communism.

If Dwight D. Eisenhower wasn't caught up in the delusions of the classic indulgence: The "others" depravity is always worse---for the purpose of this contra we ressurect Eisenhower.

by Apropos

J and M, The Phenomena

Mike Tyson                         Ervin Magic Johnson
                      
Michael Jordon                    Jim Morrison
                    
Michael   Jackson                 Lebron James

Janice Joplin                        Jimi Hendrix
                                           (James Marshall Hendrix)

John Lennon                       Paul McCartney
                                          (James Paul McCarney)              

Madonna                             Moses Malone                

Jay-Z                                   Joan Of Arc

Jack Johnson                        Julius Caear      

Mary                                    Jesus Christ

                      
Marilyn Monroe                   Eminem
(Norma Jean Mortenson)      (Marshall Bruce Mathers)

Mohammed                         Mao Tse Tung                               

Karl Marx                            George Jackson                

Jonathan Jackson                 Muhammed Ali                

Marcus Garvey                    Nelson Mandela                              

Joe Louis                             Douglas MacArthur          

Mark Zuckerberg                  Miles Davis

Marvin Gaye                       Michaelangelo

Mona  Lisa                         Niccolo Machiavelli          

James Brown                      Amadeus Mozart

(James Joseph Brown)

Julius Erving                       Jackie Robinson                              

Jim Brown                          Joe Montana                    

Jessee Owens                     Martina Navratilova

Mickey Mantle                    Michael Phelps                                

Charles Manson                  Marco Polo                        

Moses                                Jacob

Martin Luther King Jr.         Martin Luther                                    

Malcom X                          Mansa Musa                    

Thomas Jefferson               John Adams

James Madison                  Steve Jobs

Mya Moore                       Myer Lansky                    

Beverly Johnson                Pete Maravich

Miriam Makeba                  Makeda

Mgobozi                            Margaret Court                  

Billie Jean King                   Mahatma Ghandi

Jessee Jackson                    Jim Thorpe                                      

Mick Jagger                        Vic Marrow

John F. Kennedy                 Andrew Jackson                                      

Richard Jeni                        John Adams                    

Tina Marie                          John Candy

Jeffery Dhamer                    JonBenet Ramsey                            

Jack Kavorkian                    Johnny Ace                        
                                          (John Marshall Alexander Jr.)

Madalyn Murry O'Hair         Marilyn Chambers
           

Jesse James                          Jane Mansfield                  


Marquis Cooper                   Steve McNair

Joan Jett
(Joan Marie Larkin)

Bob Marley                        Maya Angelou
                                         (Marquite Ann Johnson)

And the list goes On!

By Apropos

Republican-Conservatism, It's Intellectual-Liberalism and Black People As Tokens, Symbols, Props and Collaborators

Republicans have strayed so far from their origins, the reason for the Republican Party that contemporary Republican-Conservatism thinks it's problem is a lack of Black people within it's rank and file.

But because of the Intellectual-Liberalism and hypocrisy of that line of analysis, Republican-Conservatism is unable to recognize that it's problem isn't because it lacks plurality of Black people in the Republican Party.  But the way of thinking of contemporary Republican-Conservatism, it's propensity to pursue and elicit the crass and uncouth base of socio-ignorance is diametrically at odds with the world view, aspirations and Political-Economy realities of Black people in America whose primary and fundamental nemesis is the practice of unbridled, unchecked and the unaccountable exploitation of Man by fellow Man.

Pointing to those token Black people in the Republican Party and pursuing Black people simply as symbols, exposes the Intellectual-Liberalism and hypocrisy of Republican-conservatism and the Republican Party that it is aware of it's unjust imperatives and the wrong side of history of it's contemporary polemic.

It also ignores the fact that the aggregate Black community is firmly familiar with those Black people who allow theirself to become tokens, symbols and props for Republican-Conservatism with the simple historical description: Uncle Toms, House Niggers and Collaborators.

Those Black tokens, symbols, props and collaborators of contemporary Republican-Conservatism are the same archetype faces, hearts and minds who initially captured and sold Black America into Slavery and have always collaborated with the application of it's Political-Economy.

By Apropos

The Destructive Narrative Of The National Political-Economy, American Slavery, Contemporary Value-Speculation and What Is Money

Our contemporary narrative and national social reality has realized that penultimate distortion and it's schizophrenia, that even as we are caught sonambulistically in it's quick sand.  We forget the objective facts and cause effects of a National Political-Economy that has long since lost the loco-momentum of it's primitive-capital accumulation, the historic practice of American Slavery accorded it and permitted it.

The practice of contemporary Value-Speculation as a hedge on the National Political-Economy productivity isn't in itself a destructive anomaly, but it is a destructive narrative enabled purely by a national ignorance of what is money.

A resolution of the question what is money will automatically and instantly smash away the Intellectual-Liberalism of Conservatism in all of it's variegated forms.  Value is inherently Liberal, despite the nature of it's existence, value has a liberal imperative because Life as value is a progressive utility.  Liberal, specifically means Progress, which is antithetical to the reaction of Conservatism.

The most basic and clear cut example of the destructive narrative of  the Political-Economy and it's contemporary value-speculation is the assertion that the activity of what is money at the federal level should be akin to the budgetry structure of a mom and pop store or a family at the kitchen table balancing the check book.

This criminal assertion has always been the forte of the mediocrity of Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism.  It has nothing to do with the progress of the Human Condition, it's Life organism and value.

By Apropos

Euro-Centrism, Mediocrity, Failings and Values

Neo Euro-Centrism is giving a pass to it's mediocrity and excusing it's failings while anticipating and demanding par excellence from the diaspora of it's minorities while scape-goating their mediocrity and failings.

This is the dialectic of Neo Euro-Centrism, it's values and socio-critique.

By Apropos

Sarah Palin, God and "Odd Celebrities"

Even as Sarah Palin presumes to speak for God and Down Syndrome, she denys and denounces God in "odd celebrities"

By Apropos

Simplistically "Good", Alexis Ohanian, Karen H. Klein, Charity As Anti-Taxation Polemic, Absolution, Expiation and Injustice

If the American People are inherently simplistically "good" and charitable as the Co-founder  of
 reddit .com    Alexis Ohanian suggest, there wouldn't be Republican-Conservatives and their Intellectual-Liberalism.

In an attempt to explain the recent Karen H Klein  phenomenon, which reddit.com played a role in her receipt of over $500,000 in donations as a result of her being bullied by 7th graders on a Greece, New York school district bus.  Alexis Ohanian expressed the typical supposition that charity is objectively as a Political-Economy fact good and it's practioners good people.

Charity as an objective fact of American Political-Economy has always been a gambit of self-interest and it continues to fulfill it's primary role as an anti-taxation polemic.  As it applys in the Karen H. Klein phenomenon, where the 68 yr. old Karen H. Klein a grandmother was bullied with nasty cliches of core Americana by 7th graders.  We find once again an inability and unwillingness by the status quo narrative to view a phenomenon as being motivated by something other than myths of society, myths in this context of "good".

America is nihilistic and alienated, irrespective of critique and woldview.  Why people have donated over $500,000 to Karen H. Klein isn't quite inherently simplistically "good" and charitable as suggested by Alexis Ohanian, but it's a means a form of absolution and expiation.  The injustice experienced by Karen H. Klein at the hands of those 7th graders of Greece, New York is core Americana, replicated on a daily basis through out our national social strata.

Whether it's President Barack Obama, Democrats and their mortal struggle with Senator Mitch McConnell and Republicans or the Speculative-Value narrative of Reaganomics and it's War with middle-class public workers or the misery loves company dialectic of the hapless ill informed---the dynamic of injustice is bed rock Americana as the Bill of Rights.

Absolution, expiation and tokens of it's expression are as illogical as the logic of paralysis in the face of injustice which then stimulates the need to absolve oneself and atone for the averted eyes, the sealed lips and failure to pay attention and acquire the information necessary to combat the injustices with which we construct our American values.

By Apropos

The Criticism and Oppositionary Polemic Against Governmental Spending For Social Services and No One Human Owns The Creation Of Value

The criticism and oppositionary polemic against governmental spending particularly for social services and general welfare specifically by Conservative idealism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism has everything to do with subjectivity and supposition.  The criticism and it's polemic doesn't have a basis in objectivity of the Human Condition.

The idea of who is deserving of value in the Political-Economy sense has always been an approximation.  Just as no one human can lay claim to the originality of ideas, no one human owns the creation of value.  The Human Condition and it's valuation mechanism is a fact, an expression of continuum of relations.  The quantum process of an idea emerging is one, no one can claim as progenitor because it's dialectic requires exactly that, an activity of opposite.

Value and it's idea is an object of relations.  Relations that exist for a purpose as defined by need and want.  Seth MacFarlane, the creator of Family Guy explained during a recent Piers Morgan CNN interview, that Hollywood is predominantly Liberal and Progressive because and we paraphrase they create for artistic objectivity.

Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism on the other hand distorts by denying artistic objectivity as the essence of value and instead deals in Speculative-Value.

If, the Human Condition is to attain it's aspirational zenith this antagonism has to be resolved and the profane simplicity of the criticism and oppositionary polemic against Governmental spending for social services will not enable it.

By Apropos

Revisionist Narrative, The 2003 Invasion Of Iraq By George W. Bush, The Zionist Collaborator Hosni Mubarak and Gov. Jesse Ventura's Polemic Against Empire

Where is the push back from Democrats, serious thinkers and Progressives on this Revisionist narrative that the 2003 invasion of Iraq by George W. Bush, his military-industry henchmen and their Corporate Media stooge.  Birthed the open political action specifically in Egypt and the demise of the Zionist collaborator Hosni Mubarak, vis-a'-vis what is farcially coined the Arab Spring?

This current claim by the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism that the toppling of North African dictators and their ouster is evidence of the validity of George W. Bush Iraq War military-adventurism is not only abjectedly pathetic, but it is clear proof of the illegitimacy of the Iraq War because of the startling level to which Apologist, sympathizers of the George W. Bush administration reach in revisionist narrative for it's reason.  Despite it's criminal obscenity "Weapons of Mass Destruction" has consequently found it's logic as epithet in Gov. Jesse Ventura's polemic against empires.

By Apropos

Mitt Romney, Business Is For Profit, Job Creation and Revolution As A Specific Type Of Speech

This current debate about Mitt Romney being best suited to be President of the United States because he is an adroit businessman, therefore has this qualitative supposition on job creation has---as of most debates based on Intellectual-Liberalism, wandered far off into the nether plains of American mental labor and as typical of such is mired in the aw shucks Rockwellianism of American Politics.  Meaning it is a sleight of hand in the employ of opportunity and Speculative-value.

First of all the correct purpose-definition of business is for profit.  Easily translated to mean to make money.  No one goes into business with the model or idea pushing employment maximation or job creation.  Employment and job creation as a business corollary is only a means, a tool to maximize profits meaning a businessperson employs people because he/she needs more hands on deck to enable profit realization.

The executive leadership of the Presidency on the other hand is based on an entirely different set of imperatives and it contends with dynamically complex variables that are specifically at odds with the simple business model of for profit specifity.  There is an inherent antagonism in business, which is between managment (ownership) and labor (workers).  An antagonism that cannot be permitted to exist    in a nation, state or society because revolutions and Civil Wars will move into existence.

So if Mitt Romney's claim to the Presidency is based on the antagonism dialectic between managment and labor then the question being posed and presented to the nation is:  Are we ready to reacquaint ourselves with the logic of revolution as a specific type of  speech?

By Apropos

Thomas L. Friedman, civil Rights and It's Re-litigation

The Writer Thomas L. Friedman ignores the fact or is naive to the fact that American Political-Economy post Civil Rights Act has been all about it's re-litigation as pushed by Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism and on this fact the Goldwater Lite of Clintonism continued the treachery of Reagan-Democrats.

By Apropos

Republicans, Class-Warfare and Government

Republicans and the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism does not apologize nor consider it class-warfare for stimulating tension between government-public workers and society at large as if government isn't Off, By and For the People.

By Apropos

Barack Obama, CNN's Piers Morgan and The Bigots of the Health Care Debate of 2010

It takes gall and abject opportunity to criticize Barack Obama by the likes of CNN's Piers Morgan, whose entire world view is shaped by the idealistic anachronistic British caste system.

To Barack Obama's critics viz CNN's Piers Morgan where were you when bigots filled town halls during the farcial Health Care debate of 2010, hijacking the results of the 2008 Presidential elections?

By Apropos