Monday, August 11, 2008

The Cold War, Botox and CNN: At least Neanderthals had an Excuse

Does any one remember Nadia Comaneci and Mark Spitz? Two Olympic athletes from the Cold War Era when Botox wasn't something vain crazies puffed their faces up with. But it was something humorless men and women, drones for ideology tinkered with behind blast proof doors, in places germ war thriller fiction writers imagined. When it was Botulism.

What then does the corporate media giant CNN have to do with this? Well it seems nothing is more newsworthy than the fact Nadia Comaneci and Mark Spitz are shrills and peddlers for Botox and CNN reasoned it would justify it's bottom-line quest with, considering the success of the "make-over" phenomena, an infomercial disguised as news.

So on 7/16/08; on it's head-lining morning news was CNN's Alina Cho, concluding her report with (and I'm paraphrasing) What troubles critics is a lot of athletes will see how much money can be made plugging Botox and all sorts of Cold War unmentionables and I guess the Vandals will be at the gates!

The Surreality of what passes as objective necessities of the human condition these days... at least Neanderthals had an excuse! They didn't have Lou Dobbs harrumphing and Rick Sanchez haranguing.

By Apropos

Sunday, August 10, 2008

What is the Black Father and The Black Experience

Jesse Jackson
Cover of Jesse Jackson
Okay so Barack Obama is being critical of parenting in the Black community. Jesse Jackson whispered his intention of castrating Obama to a bewildered face on of all places Bill O'Reily at Fox News Studios. Because in Jackson's view Barack Obama is talking down to Black People. Eric Dyson an ardent Obama supporter apologizes then criticizes Obama's formulation and presentation of a fact, everyone agrees is material and objective.

Eric Dyson's position is , criticism, of what is the Black father in U.S. political-economy is first and foremost that of a status-quo distortion. Because certain studies show that Black fathers are as much involved in the lives of their children, despite the fact it is not universal total involvement because the fathers are not with the mothers, it is still involvement and as such it's critique hints at another motive.

Jesse Jackson's position is Barack Obama's critique is demagoguery and it doesn't expand and effectively lay bare the issue in the context of the effects of U.S. political-economy on the question, What is the Black Father.

The question What is the Black Father automatically anticipates What is the Black Mother.

How was this question formulated during the philosophizing period of Black American self-determination? What was the context of it's impact as it contended with that one and only underlying basis of it's existence, that of historical and specific American injustice?

It is relatively an idealist exercise to statically criticize dynamic elements. Specifically whether it's the idealism of Barack Obama, the reaction of Jesse Jackson and the apologetic-intellectualism of Eric Dyson.

Jesse Jackson's Operation Push hasn't presented the question and it's antagonistic element to the fore of U.S. political-economy, contrary to Jackson's assumptions.

Eric Dyson's writings has simply been preaching to the choir.

So besides the leveraged pabulum spoon fed the Black Condition by minds and hearts that seek manna from skies that can only reflect the steel, glass and concrete of it's contradictions.

What exactly is critique for it's own sake? Where is the formulation and it's organic intent to resolve the What is the Black Father question and the Black experience in U.S. political-economy?

By Apropos

Saturday, August 9, 2008

NuJood Ali, The Ten Year Old Girl who Stood Up to Child Sexual Abuse in Yemen

What is it with Yemen? Are adult females in Yemen that small of stature and stunted in physical development that a ten year old girl, a child, can pass as an adult and is an adequate representation of Yemeni feminine maturity?

A ten year old Yemen girl NuJood Ali was sold for marriage by her family to a thirty something Yemeni man and according to their tradition and culture it was appropriate.
This ten year old girl NuJood Ali was unlike the average Yemeni child. NuJood Ali correctly understood her predicament as child sexual abuse and despite the weight of Yemen tradition and culture rebelled.

NuJood Ali proactively went to the Court House and presented her case to a Judge. On the grounds, her thirty year old so-called husband , beat her, assaulted her and raped her.
The Judge ruled in her favor, annulled the "Marriage" and required ten year old NuJood Ali pay alimony of $200!!!!!!

The relief agency OXFAM claims the majority of Yemen brides are under 18.
Ten year old NuJood stood up to child sexual abuse. Now Yemeni adults have to stand up with her, redirect their Political-Economy and abandon child molestation as Marriage and tradition is not an excuse.

By Apropos

Thursday, August 7, 2008

The $700 Billion Hoodwink, A Tactic for Big Oil

Lately a phrase has been falling from the lips of corporate media parrots, the mind numbing of so-called pundits. The phrase is $700 billion is sent to oil producing nations and it is the greatest transfer of wealth the human condition has ever witnessed. The point, with exception to a few others, is the rapacious Big Oil Companies should be allowed to have their way extracting oil from places opposing analysis say will be harmful to the human condition.

I want to focus on this $700 Billion transfer of paper money idea as having this dire negative consequence. First of all $70 Billion sent by the United States to oil producing nations simply means American industry recoups it and American productivity expands.


Lets take Dubai an oil producing nation and it's hell bent policy of playing with glass and steel. Every single dollar of Dubai oil revenue spent on it's glass and steel infatuation is returned to the United States and other Western industrialized nations, to do what? Buy the necessary technology and know how to erect it's Sky Scrapers.

This simply means companies as Caterpillar in the U.S., Komatsu in Japan and many others are able to keep their production lines churning heavy equipment for Dubai. Meaning job creation and national productivity stability.

Big Oil Companies will stop at nothing in this war for the hearts and minds and any and all skew of political-economy is fair tactic.


By Apropos

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

John McCain, Taxes and the Super Rich: "Straight Talk" in Plunder and Looting

John McCain's argument for continuing George W. Bush extreme tax cuts for the super rich is down right obscene.

If the Bush Administration's economic policy and it's tax cuts for the super rich as supported by John McCain has brought the Nation to this speculators orgy in the oil and real estate industry with it's rat abandoning ship consequences.

If the Bush Economic Policy which stands for the super rich hardly paying any taxes. Has presided over bridges tumbling, crumbling and pot holed roads. Entire cities swamped and flooded and the stand alone, in a class by itself violation of New Orleans because of organizational incompetence, infrastructural neglect and the infamous "Brownie you're doing a heck of a job".

If a primary argument for the rich not paying taxes as supported by John McCain: A less taxed rich is dynamo for job creation. Then why has the outsourcing of a substantial type of American productivity grown exponentially with the rich enjoying tax cuts?

Then what is John McCain saying? That the plunder and looting under George Bush and tax cuts for the super rich hasn't been completed so he is running a Bush third term to complete it?

By Apropos

Sunday, August 3, 2008

Jesus Christ, Mark Twain and the Moral Revision of Steven L. Carter

What exactly would happen were the much idealized by Western Civilization, Jesus Christ, the Son of Man to storm into the New York Stock Exchange and re-create the assault on the New Testament's Temple money changers with another whipping and beating of contemporary speculators? There would naturally be another Crucifixion re-creation.

Fast forward to this moral revisionary excuse of Mark Twain's racism by the Yale Professor of Law. Stephen L. Carter in the 7/14/08; time Magazine. Every time the failings and shortcomings of accomplished human beings are explained either in diminishing posture as Mark Twain's racism or the exaggerations of those history revilies. Contemporary sensibilities and the human condition as a totality is defined fraudulently.

In a preparatory essay for the Obama Presidency. Stephen L. Carter on Mark Twain on the issue of race wrote:

"Twain's racial pitch was not perfect. One is left uneasy, for example, by the lengthy passage in his autobiography about how much he loved what were
called "Nigger Shows" in his youth..."

Carter goes on to pose this question:

Was Twain a racist?... If we read the words and attitudes of the past through the pompous "wisdom" of considered moral judgements of the present, we will find othing but error.

First of all the only error to be found is Stephen L. Carter's pathetic mental cowardice. The oppositionary root to American racism of Mark Twain's period is the contemporary reality of racist and racism being anathema. Carter's "pompous "wisdom" of the present," has nothing to do with historical racism of Mark Twain nor does excuse or mitigate it.

The human condition would be better served with dialectical facts which simply state: A Mark Twain could be a racist and schizophrenic-like, critically satirize it's hypocrisy.

If as Stephen L. Carter proposes that the specific backwardness of racism is a mere relative sensibility. Then religious fundamentalism of all stripes should be given no quarter and ridiculed as mere idealistic exercise devoid and divorced from the objectivity of Carter's "pompous wisdom".

by Apropos

Monday, July 28, 2008

Alhurra Television, Blue Jeans , Apple pie and Genocide

Alhurra Television America's medium of superficiality into Middle Eastern propaganda is a $500 million strategic failure. Still it's a talking point for neo-conservative choir, who harbor delusions of empire by military action.

In response to criticism the Bush Commander-in-Chief governance motive authorized the creation of Alhurra Television to combat what is naively thought as the Middle Eastern and Islamic question formulated in purely public relation terms.

So $500 million produced an hour of focus on blue jeans, that Pax Americana staple. $500 million showcases the 2008 election with naturally extra emphasis on Barack Obama. The symbolic embody of this inclusive Uncle Sam, if you welcome the rain of bombs and Dick Cheney's Halliburton trillion dollar reconstruction.

Despite the Genocide slaughter of Iraqis, the editing trick of a tight shot of freshly baked apple pie and transformational visage of a Barack Obama. The fact remains Alhurra Television is nothing less than the after thought behind scraps tossed to the true believers naivete', a'la Scott McClellan and their bound to happen epiphany.

By Apropos

Friday, July 25, 2008

Hurricane Katrina, The Barack Obama Candidacy and the Million March

Not only did the Hurricane Katrina disaster show governmental injustice but it also revealed the organizational mess of the Black-American center and it's political reality.

Back in the early 1990's Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam led a march of one Million Black Men on Washington D.C. to listen to Thesis on the Masonic and Illuminati Foundation of the United States. The Million Man March begot a Million Women March, all Black assembly, where Winnie Mandela was a keynote speaker. Then the Million Family March followed in New York. The symbolic point that political maturity is the result of an economic foundation, so organize

Then came Katrina and it's devastation and the raw images of that vein of Black American History, once again victimization.

Fast forward to the Barack Obama Presidential Candidacy and it's organizational adroity to amass money and it's lesson as it applies to the Katrina reality. Once again organize! With approximately 1.5 million contributors, the Obama candidacy is well on the path to a $500 million precedent.

The Lesson of the Barack Obama candidacy is : Those symbols of a Million Black Men, Women and family could each have donated a $100 to something with the objective name as "Reconstructive Fund for Black New Orleans and the Lower Ninth Ward" and just as easily accumulated a half-billion dollar fund for Black Self-Determination.


Why the specificity of Black New Orleans? Because specifically Black New Orleans suffered and bore the profane and psychic injustice of the Katrina consequence.

By Apropos

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Hymen Reconstruction and Feminine Freedoms

Maybe the jaded and eclectic American Woman who isn't caught up in the abstraction of tradition, doesn't even know what a hymen is to worry about it's consequence on her marriage. That isn't to mean it's concurrent alienation isn't creeping up and impacting the quality and definition of Feminine Freedom.

Certain contradictions of the human condition glare the most than at the intersection of Feminine Freedoms and sexuality. Mental ignorance and emotional ignorance quickly assert itself when the issue is gender relations.

Historically Femininity has been bound to the chaste ideal and all its presumptions. So it isn't surprising that Hymen-Management is another anti-Feminine reality.

It's a well developed fact that Arabicized-Muslim traditions is brutal on Women and Femininity. So it isn't surprising that Arabicized-Muslim Women are caught in the traditional consequence of hymen-integrity.

Imagine a young Women putting on the marriage planner "to do list", "see Surgeon for Hymen reconstruction".


By Apropos
(NOTE: To view interesting video, click "Watch this report" on the above link.)

Monday, July 21, 2008

Treason and the WNBA: Anne Donovan's attack on Becky Hammond



When the United States kept on losing to the Soviet Union at International and Olympic Basketball. It responded with redefining eligibility for Olympic athletes and the "Dream Team" was born. Which simply meant multi-million dollar earning professional Basketball players made a mockery of the amateur ethos of the Olympic Games. By the way, this also mocked the arbitrary sanctions against Jim Thorpe, one of the worlds greatest athletes. But then Jim Thorpe's experience had more to do with the prejudice of being Native American.
So it's downright interesting listening to Anne Donovan's of U.S. Olympic Basketball attack and characterization of Becky Hammond's decision to represent Russia at the 2008 Beijing Olympics with Becky Hammond is a traitor , unpatriotic and mercenary.
Becky Hammond a U.S. citizen is a WNBA ( Women's National Basketball Association ) All Star Player. She was left off the U.S. Olympic Basketball team. Russia where she makes $2 million playing during WNBA off-season offered her money and lots of it, to play on the Russian Olympic team and she accepted.
Russia is simply redefining Olympic participation as it furthers it's interest. Becky Hammond's action is simple. The Olympic experience and Russian money is too powerful an incentive.
Is this treason and the WNBA? Anne Donovan's attack on Becky Hammond is just another example of contextual fraud.
By Apropos

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Al Qaeda and Evangelicals, Sex and Fear in uncertain and threatening times

What has Al Qaeda begat? Frolicking Evangelicals in the bedroom under the post bed banner of Genesis 2:24..."And they shall be one flesh."

The latest front in American Christianity's battle with Militant Islam is the bedroom. Where parishioners are enthusiastically urged by Pastors and Preachers to use Song Of Solomon 2:3 as guide for oral sex and The New Direction Christian Church, "40 nights of Grrreat Sex" program and it's daily planners with plums like Tuesday: Quickie in any room besides the bedroom. Are among a number of other Evangelical Christian sex instructors.

The new Direction Christian Church of Memphis , Tennessee, The relevant Church of Tampa, Florida and Evangelical-Fundamentalist authors as Tim LaHaye of the best selling Apocalyptic series "Left Behind", are the vanguard elements exhibiting the classic response of Sex as recourse in uncertain and threatening times.

The Boomer Generation lest we forget was the direct result of the uncertainty and threat from Hitler and Nazism, which spilled over into the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

Despite the biblical quotations as exhortations and the Dr. Phil like one-dimensional psychology in LaHaye's , "How to be Happy Through Marriage" book. Evangelical Christians are feeling pretty besieged these days. From their nightmarish honeymoon with George W. Bush and his absurd expedition in Babylonia, unable to tame and bring to heel the whore of war. To the triumph of Gays parading down California streets, marriage License in hand, a mortal blow to 40 years of conservative dictatorial aspiration.

Is it then any surprise that sex is their only refuge, a tether to convention from the fear of an Al Qaeda sought after caliphate.

By Apropos

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Food, Politics and Carol Joynt: The Need to Know is Always on the Menu



What Carol Joynt of Nathan's Cafe at Georgetown, Washington, D.C. is doing should be seriously replicated across the nation. Maybe not in form but in principle. In order for Government to be accountable people must be in proximity to facts as organically as possible. A priori the need to know.

Holding a question and answer session with upper echelon Government functionaries and policy makers, at a restaurant, while patrons sup is practical. Considering the primary culprit of Governmental apathy is disillusioned constituents who impotently opt out of paying attention, thereby leaving governance and it's apparatus to the preaching to the choir practice of base politics.

Carol Joynt, once a Walter Cronkite intern has fused Journalism with food. Patrons at her Restaurant, Nathan's Cafe at Georgetown are treated to in house interviews, questions, and answer sessions with agitators and apologists alike. Victims of perfidy by the Bush Administration, like Valarie Plame and Dan Rather. Have all been on the Politics of the day menu.

By Apropos

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Lev Grossman's Decadent Posture; Panic and the De-Humanizing Motive

Lev Grossman in his 6/23/08; Time Magazine review of the book "Say You're One of them" by Uwem Akpan. A Nigerian Priest concluded with:

"You could read it, but why? Kiss your family, enjoy a hot shower and donate the price of a hardcover book to charity instead."
The book is a horrific composition of narratives by children written by an African Priest speaking African things.
Lev Groomsman's conclusion is decadent posture. To view the human condition as he does with the elite-centric notion that horrific brutality in it's African form is anymore nasty and beyond the pale, that a cheap Irish Spring shower can cleanse the sins of the fathers speaks more of emotional cowardice and mental dwarfism than anything else.
It's one thing to review a work of art on it's creative merits. But it's entirely another to make social-commentary in the derisive context of charity as absolution.
There isn't insight to be found in Grossman's review. But panic of the self-centered, rationalizing in the Colonial de-humanizing motive with it's prey, the dark continent. Nothing less than decadent posture.
By Apropos

Sunday, July 13, 2008

Sex and Free Gas

Is it any surprise that in the gas give away promotion evolution, the "worlds oldest profession" had to get in the game with Sex and Free Gas.

So at the Las Vegas Shady Lady Ranch spent hours gets patrons gallons of free gas.

What a play on spent and gassed!!

By Apropos

Friday, July 11, 2008

Hamas, Hezbollah and the Impending Israel-Iran War

The past week of 6/28/08; has brought disclosures of Israeli deals with Hamas and Hezbollah. Two groups constantly seen by Israel, the U.S. and Europe as Terrorist.

This comes on the heels of Israeli air-war games over the Mediterranean which conventional thinking looks upon as a test run for play on Iranian Nuclear facilities and the impending Israel-Iran War.

Hamas and Hezbollah have been commonly described as Iranian surrogates. If that is correct then this urgency of Israeli deals with both groups should be seen as efforts and attempts to keep both Hamas and Hezbollah on the sidelines when Israel attacks Iran and the ensuing Israel-Iran War.

By Apropos

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

"Gone with the Wind" the Musical rejected by British Culture



Despite British struggles with eugenics and the historic tango with pejorative disdain for Black, Brown and Yellow nationalities of it's Colonial and Neo-Colonial Political-Economy.

Besides the quaint classicism of British society and its tumult with it's now quieting Irish question.

Taking into consideration the British affection with it's irrelevant Monarchy and discordant harmony of it's Parliamentary system. At times the Brits do get it right.

"Gone With the Wind", that blight upon the American cultural landscape has been resoundingly rejected by British Culture. For a brief spell this year while the Brits came to their senses, "Gone With the Wind" the musical had marginal run. Til the Brits recognized and realized that any pining for a way of life that built on hypocrisy and antagonisms as American Southern "gentility," regardless if it's banner proclaimed lineage to the Union Jack had no place in the milieu of humanity digitalized.

By Apropos

Monday, July 7, 2008

George F. Will the Norman Rockwell of Opinions and Barack Obama

At least the hacks on Republican, Right-Wing, Conservative talk radio are straight forward and out in the open with their ire, anguish and jealousy of Barack Obama. John McCain's wake on Fox News is real.

Then is George F. Will the Norman Rockwell of opinions. The Nationally Syndicated Columnist Will, resembles Rockwell solely in affecting an idealistic veneer as substance.

With his chisel and hammer aphorisms, one wonders what exactly doesn't George Will get about Obama's Candidacy for the U.S. Presidency?

Whether it's his criticisms of Obama's campaign procedural platform or it's the humorless and weird reluctance to acknowledge history and it's precedent. In George Will's world view Barack Obama is just another dusty profile in Presidential White Maleness.

By Apropos

Saturday, July 5, 2008

Criminality and the Chicago Police Department: When the Cops are Corrupt

So the Windy City, the City of Big Shoulders, the City of Chicago has over the past five years doled out $155 million to victims of it's Police Department abuses, assaults, indiscretions and out right criminality.

Here is another fact. twenty-one of the twenty-five Commanders of it's Police Department have been replaced.

Then there is Jerry Finnegan, the deviant and corrupt leader of rouge cops in the Chicago Police Department's, Special Operations-SOS Drug Tactical Unit. Who plotted to have four of his compatriots assassinated because they had turned informants. Then he turned informant, when the criminality of the SOS- Special Operations came to light.

Then, Keith Herrera who revealed and exposed the activities of his compatriots in the SOS Unit and now wants criminality to be a cautionary tale to recruits of the Chicago Police.

Chicago's Mayor Daley says thousands of cops go about their duties daily, in a professional and law-abiding manner and the actions of a few shouldn't cast a pall over the city. Granted that thousands of cops pursue their duties professionally and within the law. Still the question is Chicago is Chicago and has been Chicago. It's one thing for it's marginalized and desperate citizenry to violate laws. But it's entirely another for it's Government in the specific form of Police, who having sworn to uphold law, to know law and to behave in a manner that denounces the end justifies the means expedience of policing---violate law.

When twenty-one of twenty-five commanders who are in the leadership. Who are the leadership are replaced, then regardless of the function of the rank and file, the idea and it's practice is policing in Chicago is inherently corrupt.

By Apropos

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Barack Obama's Judgement and the Grievance Narrative of certain Miami Cubans

Some Miami Cubans and the broader Cuban-American community is carrying this grievance narrative of their U.S. citizenship a bit too far. There is this delusional notion that being Cuban emigre' in the U.S. automatically bestows validity, credibility and legitimacy to any kooky and selfish advocacy.

Because how should the 6/20/08; press conference spectacle by certain so-called relatives of Elian Gonzalez, the Cuban boy those very same Miami Cuban opportunist wanted to deprive him of his father be taken. With criticism and calling into question Barack Obama's judgement in it's capacity s candidate for the U.S. Presidency.

The delusional and arrogantly self-described relatives of Elian Gonzalez challenged Barack Obama's judgement because Obama has certain individuals as adviser's who played roles in ensuring that Elian Gonzalez was reunited with his father in Cuba after his mother kidnapped him. So viewing history through that narrow grievance narrative, those Miami Cubans felt they could stand on the construct, we are Miami Cubans and any and all specific and general policy positions and decisions pass the Cuban emigre' test!

Barack Obama is running for the Presidency of the United States and it takes a certain contempt and disdain to casually disregard the reality that a Presidential candidates judgement traverses a much wider and practical spectrum than the inflated, elitist, notions of unique grievance narrative certain members of the Cuban-American community seem to have.

By Apropos

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

The Bush Administration, Due Process and Terrorist

When the Bush Administration and it's neo-con lackey's pursue the policy of denying adversarial and meaningful due process to those it tags as terrorist on the grounds secrets will be revealed, thus jeopardizing the War effort, it's again another in your face example of are these people flat earthers or what.

The argument and it's substance has nothing to do with depriving terrorist of information. Instead it has everything to do with redefining accountability and Governmental transparency. It is also about depriving citizens of State secrets and with that comes intimidation. The less people are aware of State machinations the more intimidated they are.

Just as a substantial amount of the Bush Administration's efforts in it's struggle against rocket grenades improvised-explosives and suicide bombers hasn't been external, but internally and nationally-specifically the attempt at redrawing American freedoms so is the ridiculous idea that Guantanamo Bay, isn't U.S. soil. If it isn't then what is it? Fidel Castro and his acolytes have no control over it.

Terrorist already know what the Bush Administration knows and as a practical fact, they know what it wants to know. If it is a question of what a captured terrorist might have revealed during detention. Any terrorist group worthy of focus of the U.S. political and military leadership is taken as being organized in a manner that automatically assumes captured operatives are compromised and have revealed secrets.

By Apropos

Sunday, June 29, 2008

The Israeli Mind-Set, Bigotry and Palestinian Dress



Besides the logic of the Israeli and Palestinian conflict, one would think Israeli would be the last people on the globe to be obscenely bigoted.

Mickey Rosenfeld, a spokesperson for Israeli's Police defended the savage beating and brutal assault on a Palestinian sheep herder by Israeli settlers at the West Bank with the Palestinian was dressed like a westerner and not the "traditional" dress.
This attitude goes back to Golda Meir's (the first female Prime Minister of Israel) position that Palestinians are animals, implying in principle and deed no treatment is of limits.
The West Bank just as any inch of Palestinian soil is a constant flash point.
B'tselem a Israeli Human Rights Group in response to Palestinian complaints of Israeli settler brutality provided Palestinians with camcorders to record and document encounters with settlers. This latest instance of settler brutality and assault had four young males with their faces covered attacking the Palestinian. So in the acts defense, Mickey Rosenfeld the Police spokesperson proposed the ironic rationale that the Palestinian provoked the attack because he wore a baseball cap, pants and a shirt---and so he was savagely beaten.
The historical irony of this reveals the hubris of the Israeli mind-set. Nazi Germany with it's policy of extermination against the forebearers of Israel also used dress as reason.
It's one thing for a prejudiced settler grasping for any defense to support the obviousness of land grabbing to say that. But for a spokesperson for the Israeli Government to defend settler aggression with Nazi logic shows Fascism has many banners.
By Apropos

Saturday, June 28, 2008

FEMA and $85 Million Worth of Indifference

Is anyone surprised and shocked at the revelations coming out of Spin City (Washington D,C.) that FEMA had $85 million of supplies for Hurricane Katrina disaster survivors and it chose not to give it to those victims?

Regardless of the excuses and spin, which there are more than enough to keep corporate media in business till the next Katrina like deluge.

What I want to know is how will the people of Louisiana respond?

Adding insult to injury FEMA distributed the $85 million worth of indifference to sixteen other states, claiming Louisiana didn't want the stuff. Bayou Mud must have blinded U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu and her Louisiana ilk from seeing the tent city of homeless Katrina survivors under New Orleans highways.



By Apropos

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Surrogate Pregnancy and Marriage

With $25,000 to be made in nine months of carrying a pregnancy to term, surrogate pregnancy is a full-fledged industry.

This isn't a complicated issue for single Women, it's a dollar and cent one. Defining it as prostitution as it's critiqued, is for social-mechanics and confounded feminist. Prostitution as we know is very well an element in relatively most of human affairs.

Still there is an underside to the industrialization of surrogacy that is subversive and it's when married Women opt into it. Specifically, what is a marriage if the wife is renting out her womb, carrying an alien embryo for the specific purpose of money and the accompanying myriad emotions of pregnancy which has to introduce a discordant narrative into the marriage.

A 30 year old married with 2 kids, 6 and 4, Wisconsin Woman described her foray into surrogacy with,"what else am I going to do with my life that means so much". The disconnect in this attitude is ridiculously revealing! Why should carrying someone else's child transcend the totality of her family, her husband and kids? What sort of social realities are inducing or stimulating such down right antagonistic perspectives within a marriage?

By Apropos

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Accountability, responsibility and the Conservative Shrill of Tough Crime

Social and political correctivist of American culture rave the shrillest at the dumbing down of society and as always the criticism is selective. Which is to mean, when it furthers their personal goals and ambitions.

The issue of accountability and responsibility is the red flag waved before the bull of the populace on hot button issues forces for maintaining the status quo, that business as usual utilize in diverting, distracting the collective Democratic focus off the essential issue. That lack of Governmental responsibility which determines the order of life within the Political-Economy.

It should make a difference to those correctivist that emotionalism is substituted for informed reasoning.

It is high time a position is taken against that tendency, that insidious exercise of undermining the concept of justice and the legitimization of vigilantism and vindictivism. Justice isn't simply the eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth rejoinder that is the conservative shrill of tough on crime. Justice in a Democratic pluralistic society has to advance the Republicanism of it's nature, It has to recognize the humanness of it's condition.

Yes society can call in it's accounts but let us dispense with the mystification and demonization.

By Apropos

Sunday, June 22, 2008

The Lobbyist Critique and the Voter

Using lobbying and lobbyist as credible and legitimate examples of corruption in government is either lazy critique or it's disdain and contempt for the public and voter insight.

I mean think about it. The whole argument against lobbyist is built on the presumption of corruptive influence or a sort of nefarious quid pro quo! And it essentially undermines the premise of democracy in a Republic, where voters elect people due to confidence in their judgement. Because an elected official has to be trusted to govern and decline overtures of official has to be trusted to govern and decline overtures of a lobbyist quid pro quo.

What is lobbying? It is simply a presentation of a point of view based on a specific and narrow interest irrespective of means. There is nothing wrong with interest in the general or specific sense and it's defense. It is up to leadership and governing elements to determine what is strategically practical and conductive to the fundamental pursuit of the maximal realization of the human condition. It is up to the social-dynamic to hold government accountable.

The lobbyist critique is a reactionary form of policing that intrinsically accepts that the human condition is incapable of progressive judgement without coercion.

By Apropos

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Gas Pricing and the Colonial paradigm

What is the market and what exactly is accelerating gas prices?

Every single corporate media opinion on the acceleration of gas pricing supports and defends it.
I find that strange as I said in the "Imperialism, the Outsourcing of Manufacturing and the Price of Gas", post. What is so unique about oil as a commodity that supposedly neutral sources should defend and apologize for the dynamics of it's pricing, unless there is collusion. unless there is geo-political reality for movement control in the U.S. Unless there is short term imperative towards exploiting restricted Alaskan oil and gas pricing is a manipulating element in the war for public opinion.

Imperialism in it's Colonial paradigm has long since determined that the American middle isn't necessary towards it's objective of capital acquisition and accumulation. Which is Imperialism only motive and in this regard America's mobility is relatively compromised.

The logic is simple if, the dominant labor in the U.S. is high low end servicing. Why should oil be diverted from China serving it's manufacturing function in the Colonial paradigm to an unproductive middle America.

In the Soviet Union it's citizens had to have internal Visa's to move around within their nation, Americas version is simple, If you can afford gas, you can move around, if not, reinvent the wheel.

By Apropos

Friday, June 20, 2008

Removing, Operating, Returning a Fetus to the Womb and The Potential for Womb Irrelevancy

As if one isn't strange enough, imagine a hundred times a year. Surgeons in the U.S. removing a fetus from the womb operating on it, then returning it to the womb to continue to term.

The McCartney's, a Houston, Texas couple and the birth of their baby Macee Hope on May 7, 2008; are now the latest face of this phenomenal Pediatric procedure.

At six months to term of Teri McCarney's pregnancy, a tumor was discovered which allowed to continue would have been terminal to the fetus. So her doctors decided upon the magical technique of removing the fetus from the womb, removing the tumor and returning the fetus to go to term. Macee Hope a girl was born ten weeks later.

This technique raises the potential for womb irrelevancy as the sole arbiter for the development of the human fetus.

By Apropos

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Hillary Clinton's supporters and Barack Obama

Not giving credibility to the idea, that politics and political activity is wholly emotional. This visceral antipathetic reaction by a majority White Women of a certain advanced age to the Presidential campaign of Barack Obama---one has to wonder whether their mothers or aunties were those jubilant smiling faces we see in those horrific images of lynchings, mutilations and burning of Black Men, Women, Children, Jewish Men, and White Men---of which the U.S. Senate recently went through the motions of an apology.

When Hillary Clinton's supporters say they will vote for John McCain or not vote at all. One has to wonder what does voting in any election even mean to them? If it's not about an issue, if its not about the organized social-contract which is always about how the various social components resolve issues, then what is it about? It's one thing to have been an ardent and fervent Hillary supporter during the Democratic nomination process. It's quite understandable to be aghast at her loss. But this reactive antic to Obama, whom Hillary even now supports is simply infantile.

The Geraldine Ferraro tendency of Hillary's supporters is quite an insight into the human condition. If Gloria Steinem now says that the transcendent national question is sexism. Then where does that leave the Black Woman who not only deals with sexism but also racism. Or has Gloria Steinem in her undisciplined critique' glibly ignored, the whole group who are female non-white but also American.

This mantra like tantrum by Hillary Clinton supporters against Barack Obama's campaign despite politics as it's medium has it's origin in frustrations unrelated to politics.

By Apropos

Monday, June 16, 2008

Peter Beinart, Clinton Apologist: Wedge Issues and the Obama Candidacy

Peter Beinart's comments in May 26, '08; Time, that the viability of the Obama Candidacy has Bill Clinton's Presidency to thank presupposes that politics and it's American variant is static and the American people are an easily manipulated and buffoonish bunch.

Beinart suggests that without the Clinton Presidency removing the wedge issues of Welfare, the Death Penalty and Affirmative Action off the Political table, the Obama Candidacy would have relatively been impossible.

I disagree. Granted that Welfare as an issue, the Death Penalty and Affirmative Action have been in one form or the other issues Republicans and reactionaries have exploited. The fact is just as any other facet in ideology-less politics the body politic would have wised up to the inherent manipulations of it's practitioners.

In non-ideology politics the operative is opportunity. In non-ideology politics one of the means of exploiting opportunity is a complicit media dumbing down the relative facts and as a practice it can only go but so far because at a certain point people will have to remove the blinders from their eyes and start reacting positively to their economic reality.

Wedge issues in American politics exist simply and solely because they present the path of least resistance to political office, because wedge issues are camouflage for that ineffable undercurrent of American Political-Economy, Race, injustice and the concurrent fear that historical injustice has wrought.

It isn't that Clintonism approach to wedge politics which by the way is a misnomer because all politics in one form or the other is wedge, banished those three symbols of American injustice from the landscape. The fact is the Global and National political dynamic is what is making the Obama Candidacy viable.
  • On Welfare: How would Welfare as an issue fare against the present economic reality of those Reagan-Democrats who have been historically susceptible to it's plyings?
  • On the Death Penalty: How will the Death Penalty exposed to serious National critique do in the face of the reality that a number of people sentenced to die have been released due to wrongful convictions.
  • On Affirmative Action: Is America in the milieu of a type of radicalism which during the 1970's and 1980's was a blip on the Cold War radar, confined to pockets, but is now the International reality. Willing to reveal it's or the inherent Racism in Affirmative Action as a debate?
So to imply as Beinart does that the American political environment is static and hermetically sealed perpetually enthralled with idealistic wedge issues is status quo elitist reduction.
By Apropos

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Jimmy Carter, Arab Governments and the Jewish Bomb

The Former President, Jimmy Carter has been receiving much ire lately. His recent comments that Israel has approximately 150 nuclear weapons has resulted in a new level of it. The new logic is Arab Governments will now seize upon Carters revelatory comments as reason to pursue their own nuclearization and once again it is a slight of hand.

U.S. and Israeli fears has nothing to do with Arab Governments seizing upon Carters comments as justification for their purported strategy. The fear instead is Carters comments will destabilize Arab Governments all of whom in one form or the other contribute and do their share in maintaining the industrialized West interest. Arab Governments and the International community have long since known or suspected a Jewish Bomb existed, that Israel is nuclearized. The fear however is the Arab people who chafe under reactionary traditions will demand that their governments go nuclear, a status quo ante which will position Arab Governments at odds with their peoples wishes.

Islamic Militants will then have another political opportunity to broadly paint Arab Governments as lackeys which their militancy already sees them as.

The dance of pacification has always been a tenuous one and one has to be extraordinarily naive to actually think it's conventional tactic on display in Iraq by U.S. and it's shortcomings against cheap improvised explosive devices can stem or turn the tide of a reality that is perpetually tweaking facts on the ground and it's justification?

It was easier for Arab people to accept the suppositions of a Jewish Bomb, because the historical obligation to respond with the logic, what is good for the goose was in the abstract. Carter's comments has obliterated that sophistry.

By Apropos

Friday, June 13, 2008

The Freedmen and Native American Greed

The same greed and larceny which caused Native Americans to lose North America is once again rearing it's sardonic head among some of the Tribes in their dealings with the Freedmen.

Freedmen are those of African and Native American descent, a result of inter-marriage with runaway black slaves and in the case of the Cherokee Freedman, descendant of unions between Cherokee slave holders and their Black slaves.

The greed which in the beginning motivated individual Indians to receive cheap tomahawks, cheap trinkets, blankets and assorted baubles for entire swaths of North America at the expense of knowing that communal ownership of the land, disallowed unilateral transactions with White invader-settlers is again in evidence.

The Cherokee and Seminole tribes to name a couple have undertaken a systematic effort to deprive Freedmen of their Patrimony, which is just as methodical as the White invader-settlers efforts during early U.S. history land confistications.

Ever since native American tribes tasted the financial boon of running Casinos, there has been machinations upon gambits to deprive tribunal members of mixed ancestry their rightful share.

Greed and larceny played equally important roles in Native Americans losing a Continent to invading settlers. It is ironic that greed is once again revealing that certain tribes are just as unjust as those chain of events which led to the Trial of Tears, Wounded Knee, Tecumseh's Despair, Geronimo's Lament and all those other moments in Native American and U.S. history.

By Apropos

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Christian Values, Scott McClellan and Bob Dole

Scott McClellan, White House Press Secretary f...
Scott McClellan, White House Press Secretary for George W. Bush (in office 2003–06). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Why are all the Christians piling on Scott McClellan? Why are all the self-styled defenders of American Christian values pounding on Scott McClellan, all the religion in the Public Square advocates, school prayer ravers, anti-abortion fanatics, self-described law abiding and upstanding citizens damning Scott McClellan?

Who gave former Republican U.S. Senator Bob Dole and the monkey see, monkey do sitting Vice-President Dick Cheney the authority and right to exclude Scott McClellan from the rest of humanity and deny his humanness with describing him as a "miserable creature"? the context of the denigration is obvious, in Bob Dole's and Cheney's agreement, substituting their sapience for the omniscience of the vary god they claim---Scott McClellan is less than human.

These espousers of Christian values in it's American form contradict the very base of their religion that it is extraordinary! If Christianity is the result of the New Testament then it's principals, Peter and Paul (formerly Saul) fit the exact billing of a Scott McClellan!

Peter betrayed Jesus, three consecutive times, Paul the former Saul was the embodiment of the very exegesis of Bob Dole and Dick Cheney and all those enfeebled Republican brains who in default of their faith based values succumb to it's antithesis!

When marginalized Urban and Rural youths vilify informants and snitches as traitors, the Bo Doles sitting of their Pharisee like values campaign against it. When Nancy Reagan taught an entire generation of kids to snitch on their parents---it was ooh and ahhed as Solomonic Wisdom.

When Scott McClellan writes a book detailing Intellectual-Liberalism he's called a snitch and damned to Hell. Where does McClellan's critics get the idea that George W. Bush and Republican hypocrisy is greater than the Presidency and should not be exposed?

This Dan Rathering of speech, annihilating the messenger, where Men, privileged males have no qualms in attacking a Woman in that most effeminate of ways: Rumors and the Valerie Plaming of Politics. Where relics sanctimoniously act as if they always spoke their minds to their

superiors---Bob Dole and his wheezes all done with Republican desperation.


By Apropos.

Monday, June 9, 2008

Lou Dobbs, The Independent Vote and the price of gas

Much is made of the so -called independent vote by Lou Dobbs and Jesse Ventura to name a few and the argument is fraudulent.

The two party system, Democratic and Republican are not the fundamental problem. The fundamental issue is an Electorates inability to hold elected Politicians accountable.

Take for example the gas question: Why does the price of gas go up daily? The answer is simple. Gas station owners are profiteers, exploiting a situation. If a gas station owner, retailing gas when oil was $90 a barrel. Why should the owner mark it up when oil goes up to $130 when it's obvious that his retail stock or volume was purchased at a lesser rate.

So my question is: without the Electorate securing accountability from it's elected officials, whose logic then defines the facts, challenging not simplistic speculation but unbridled profiteering.

So what is the consequence of the independent vote as advocated by Lou Dobbs when the issue isn't a type of vote but principled accountability?

By Apropos

Sunday, June 8, 2008

The Dream and Triumph, Louis Mulkey and Summerville High: Tell my wife " I Love You" (Video included)



The fire which destroyed a Charleston, South Carolina Furniture store claimed the life of a dreamer, but not the dream.

Louis Mulkey, 34 yrs. A White Charleston, South Carolina fire fighter was also a coach of the Summerville High School basketball program a majority Black team which had never won a State Championship. Mulkey had given his players the dream that in their Senior year, Summerville would claim it's first title.

Then that fateful 6/18/07; day and the fire which claimed Louis Mulkey's and the lives of eight other fire fighters. Mulkey's final words, " Tell my wife, I Love you".

Sports at all levels has stories and moments of accomplished dreams and heroic eternities, but what Louis Mulkey's players accomplished on the night of 2/29/08; has all the ingredients of an Urban Legend, with the caveat it happened, that it was true.

With 1.7 second left in the game and Summerville leading by two, 50-48. A Spartanburg player rebounded a careening free-throw and threw up a 65 footer prayer that swooshed a nightmare through the Mulkey dream of a championship. So was that it, an improbable finish to a sequence of events that was becoming unique by the moment?

South Carolina High School athletics doesn't use replays to decide questionable plays and the 65 footer shot which put Spartanburg over Summerville was questionable. Was it timely, before the game clock showed zeros and the referees officiating the game had reason to doubt that. After deliberating which was a life time of anguish for the Summerville players, their fans and Mulkey's wife Lauren Mulkey. The referee stepped on the court and officially declared that Spartanburg's shot was invalid, it was made after regulation and time expired.

So with that, the Mulkey, Summerville dream was now a reality! What started as one of the worst tragedies in American fire-fighter history had redemptively transformed into an improbable triumph 50-48 over Spartanburg! ESPN and other authorities reviewed the questionable shot and concluded that the referees did get it right.

By Apropos

Thursday, June 5, 2008

The Titanic, A Conspiracy: Robert Ballard, The C.I.A. and Hollywood

Who would have thought that the narrative of the Titanic, one of the top grossing movies of all time included a conspiracy of the cloak and dagger type?

Conventional wisdom, meaning the convention of obfuscation is always engaged in denouncing thought patterns that tend to view historical narratives with a healthy skew of cynicism as being kooky conspiracy theorist. But what besides thought patterns that view coincidences as unnatural would have questioned the narrative of Robert Ballard's discovery of the Titanic as anything than on it's face value.

Yet it was. Robert Ballad was initially under the employ of the U.S. navy and C.I.A. to find a couple of lost nuclear Submarines in the Atlantic, the U.S.S. Scorpion and Thrasher. But it's revealed that after discovering the submarines, Robert Ballard used the search patterns to then find the Titanic and the ensuing Hollywood Block-Buster the result.

What other Hollywood fares viewed as incredulous results of screen-writers mind caught in some hallucinogenic loop are based on deeds with secret handshakes, winks, nods, and renditions.
By Apropos



Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Why Global warming means easy access to the 100 Billion tons of Arctic Oil

What does Ny Alesund, an insignificant Arctic Island and Russia's 8-20-07; flag planting on the floor of the Arctic Ocean have to do with each other?

What is going on in closed conference rooms and whispered conversations in Gas intoxicated Limousines hurtling down asphalt arteries of China, S. Korea, India, Gr. Britain, Canada and the U.S. by oil operatives and Bureaucrats?

What does the speculated 100 Billion tons of Oil under the Global Warming induced melting Arctic have to do with the definitions and parameters of Global Warming?

The reality is all of the above. It barely made news when Russia planted it's flag on the Arctic Ocean's floor staking claim to the Arctics resource potential. The suspected 100 Billion tons of Arctic Oil and other minerals has if anything introduced a new metric into the Global Warming equation.

Global Warming, and the melting of Arctic ice isn't being seen as a liability by oil executives and governmental bureaucrats. Instead the melting Arctic ice is now seen as a practical ally in exploiting resources which without it would be prohibitively expensive. But the Global Warming debate for obvious reasons is at the expense of this fact.

By Apropos

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Part II The Collaborator Felicia J Nu'Man

In the first part of the work, "The collaborator Felicia J Nu'Man..." I summed up with the question: Why are two-thirds of criminal defendants in Louisville, Kentucky Black.

Nu'Man, as those of her ilk stranded in the abstractions of American Political-Economy with no where to go find recriminative solace with Cosbyesque rants and diatribic skews of organic social phenomena which when done by their aped status quo masters goes unchallenged but when done by the less fortunate the gall of critique is unleashed.

Nu'Man in her essay, wrote: " My job is not that off a social worker or a social scientist. I was hired to enforce the law as drafted. I have a duty to the citizens of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, including all the Black victims of the drug culture. Felicia Nu'Man is deceptive in her motive. Criminality and deviancy runs the gamut, so why is her focus on the drug culture?

White-collar crime is twice, thrice as destructive on society than the desperation of the drug culture, yet her feigned altruistic fastidiousness seems to ignore it.

With the zeal of the rote trained, Nu'Man declares as if epiphanously that she is not social scientist. What does she think is the determinative definition of which crimes focus should be on, isn't it Sociological? Law, which is essentially the political realities of an environment is intrinsic social science and it does not exist in a vacuum. So to callously deny it because it lays waste her worldview is just as farced as that tired ass, Standard Operating Procedure or I was just following orders, which is what her disingenuous, "I was hired to enforce the law as drafted', is.

Prosecutors wield enormous amount of authority. Their actions almost go unchallenged. Their unjust deeds as just ones are done in the name of the people. Yet the peoples will doesn't play as much a role in the practice of their duties as the utopic fancy of Law and Order propagandizes it. A society with an inordinate and excessive amount of judiciary and policing activity is inherently an unjust one.

Felicia J. Nu'Man as a Black female Prosecutor defending a Political-Economic reality which is at odds with a part of the economical motive of a significant amount of it's citizens is a collaborator.
By Apropos

Saturday, May 31, 2008

The Collaborator Felicia Nu'Man: Why are two-thirds of criminal defendants in Louisville, Kentucky Black?

Why did Felicia J. Nu'Man, a Black female Prosecutor for Louisville, Kentucky decide that writing an essay in Newsweek titled "I am not the enemy: I put people in jail because they break the law not because I'm a puppet of a racist judicial system", was necessary in defending her political and social conduct? Unless somewhere within her social moorings was relative doubt as to being a collaborator.

First of all Nu'Man can take her place in the ranks and files of all the other historical collaborators. Law as any other social- political dynamic is a relative circumstance and any prosecutor is practically collaborating.

One of the primary indictments of the thirteen North American Colonies against Great Britain was the conduct of British and the collaborator- monarchist, prosecutor representing law in Colonies. So once again Felicia Nu'Man is not at all in any unique place---what is infantile and idealistic about her position is it's defense and coquettish presumptions of the status quo narrative.

If Nu'Man is on the right-side of history in all it's dialectical determinants in her performance as a prosecutor for Louisville and the State of Kentucky, then race has nothing to do with it. But if as her essay presents, that the sum value of her practice is realized through race. Then despite her protestations and at times beseeching sympathy, her actions must be viewed through the relativism of the Cold War of American Racism.

Nu'Man , concluded her essay with:

"Of course it's harder to be Black in this country. Of course, Black people are treated unfairly. Of course the inner cities have a decaying infrastructure. But there is absolutely no reason to break a reasonable appropriate law. None. " The alternative is chaos".


Felicia Nu'Man, sounds just like a Kentucky slave holder back in the 1800's; defending a law and it's punishment upon a slave caught stealing a tomato to supplement the gruel mush slave diet. Once again Nu'Man isn't historically unique that's what they all say. Whether it's the status quo actor or as in Nu'Man's case the support lackey collaborator all law has it's relative defense.

Felicia Nu'Man states, within her jurisdiction two-thirds of all criminal defendants are Black. Then she goes on to say it then means "roughly two-thirds of all victims are black", then mocking justice she questions "should law enforcement not prosecute Black criminals and doom all Black victims to the absence of justice? "Assuming Nu'Man isn't some sort of Aunt Jemima lawyering hamster like on the social-contract tread wheel and that flame of humanness despite being a collaborator is still sparking within her--- her question then transforms into why is two-thirds of criminal defendants in her jurisdiction of Louisville, Kentucky Black?


By Apropos

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Hamas and John McCain, A"Swift boat" Politician

If John McCain is the patriot he claims and not an opportunist exploiting a nations sympathy for his Prisoner of War experience during the Vietnam War, then the nation must always come first and so far a number of telling comments and postures is exposing McCain as just another clay foot politician.

As a talking point for his Presidential campaign John McCain has latched onto the fact a Hamas operative stated an Obama Presidency will be favorable. McCain's position is , Hamas has endorsed Barack Obama and it's an Obama liability. The reality is McCain the patriot in ideal has violated that primary tenet of closing ranks against a common foe! If as is generally accepted that Hamas is an organization the U.S. Government has defined as terrorist and an enemy, counter U.S. interest. Then regardless of whether McCain's exploitation of the Hamas question came as a result of a response to a question or not--- McCain should have with patriotic fervor stated unequivocally that foreign agents and actors must stay out and be kept out of American Internal Politics and quotes from foreigners have no place in the debate. Yet in desperation and a pathetic one at that, McCain quickly seized on the Hamas question as it it was in fact a legitimate and valid political point against Barack Obama.

There is a pattern: Those who always beat their chest, proclaiming, The Red, White, and Blue, seem to be the ones who opportunistically compromise it's very core.

What was the legacy from the "Swift Boat" attack on John Kerry in 2003? The most pivotal and strangely enough ignored was John Kerry was attacked primarily on the grounds that his Valor awards and medals were contrived. The implicit premise in the swift boating of Kerry was the U.S. Navy was willing actor in the "fraudulent" Kerry medals. The swift boating of Kerry challenged the very code of conduct of the U.S. Navy, a patriotic institution and Republicans then as now with the McCain attack on Obama over Hamas have no qualms in betraying the Republic when it suits their narrow interest of pursuing the trappings of state power and prestige.

Where was McCain when Ronald Reagan made a back door deal with Iranian captors of American citizens, not to release the captives till his assumptions of the U.S. Presidency?

I guess perfecting the tonality of "My Friends".

By Apropos

Monday, May 26, 2008

Philadelphia Police, Power and it Corrupts

On 5/5/08; like rabid dogs a dozen or more Philadelphia Police were caught on film by T.V. station's helicopter attacking 3 men. Kicking , stomping and just adding to the worlds chronicles another example of why Power corrupts. Whether it's the pre-historical raping and pillaging by members of a dominant group, through the terroristic activities of Colonial forces representing organized violence of various Colonial trading companies, through the unspeakable brutality of slavery in all it's forms, particularly it's practice in the Americas, to the dreaded night knocks on doors by various historical uniforms, Power without accountability corrupts.

Are we to forget that it was also Philadelphia with it's misnomer, "City of Brotherly Love", that it's Government saw fit to drop a bomb on an undesirable type of speech it it's midst during the middle 1980's---specifically 1985 and the Philadelphia Police bombing of the Black American group, Move.

If in theory no one is above the law, then no one is above the law--- Police caught on film acting like a badge makes their reason any more valid than any other reason should not be treated with administrative duty as the cops in question are, as cops always caught behaving like that are. But they should be subjected to what any individual caught kicking and stomping another human being would.

Apologist for cops and the usual Police Union talking head, with effrontery state with a straight face that the Philadelphia 3 (brutally beaten) were suspected of having been involved in a shooting, So?

If laws are supposed to stand independent of reason and rationale, then let the application reflect that, because in it's absence is the deconstruction of the insidious and ridiculous "Don't do as I do, but do as say"
---because the reality is every human activity has a reason yet the social contract of Political-Economy demands a subordination to accountability and Government in all it's practice, particularly where it meets the contradictions and antagonisms of the social contract. i.e Police Officers performing their duties must reflect and represent the aspirations of humanness and that was compromised in Philadelphia.

By Apropos

Friday, May 23, 2008

The "Loan" Brides of Afghanistan

Out in the open in U.S., Afghanistan child molestation thrives as a function of Afghanistan's Heroin and Opium industry.

Girls as young as 9 are forced into sex-slavery as purported marriages by debt collectors. "Loan Brides" is the insulting euphemism, the veneer of a practice were it occurring under any of those governments distasteful to American sensibilities, First Lady Laura Bush and all those other women who love to selectively criticize the sins of the world, would be holding press conferences, taking Hamid Karzai the Afghan President to task over it. But it so happens that this defacto Afghan child molestation, being a result, the maggot infested side of American Democracy in Afghanistan is seemingly shrugged off with silence.


The Valleys of Afghanistan produce approx. 90% of the Globes Heroin and Opium which is the most significant part of Afghan economy. During the Taliban brief control, Poppy (The plant from which Heroin and Opium comes from) production decreased but after 9-11 and defeat, Poppy growth and subsequent production of Heroin has accelerated. In the absence of a stable financial system Afghan Poppy growers barrow money from rich Warlords, drug traffickers and land owners who in default of the loan, demand the Farmers daughter as payment.


They have names like:

  • Khalida Who is 9
  • Gul Ghoti, 16
  • Shaukina, 17
  • Bibi Gula, 13
  • And the lil 3 year old pictured at right, name unknown



By Apropos

Monday, May 19, 2008

Black Gender Relationship and the American Condition

Can there be an objective and practical analysis of Black Gender Relationship without scrutinizing the Political-Economic conditions which originally supports the existence of Black People? This Writer is of the position that such is impossible yet a seeming majority of Black Intelligentsia act as it is and in most cases voluminous analysis have been undertaken in it's pursuit, as if Black Gender Relationship is independent of the American condition and it's dictating forces and can be analyzed separate and apart from the American Condition and it's basis.

Black Gender Relationship and the generality of the Black American social condition, it's health, stability and direction, is like unto any other aspect of the human condition, it develops upon and is affirmed within those conditional basis of how human beings go about re-creating the basis for existence and the subsequent development of their lives. If it is understood that the Black American or descendants of Africans brought to the United Sates in chains are now what they are due to the heritage of slavery, then why is it problematic for any examination of Black Gender relationship to objectively base it's method of analysis from it?

Most Analysis presented always represent one dimension of the Black American condition, it's metaphysical facet and it is always at the expense of the profane substance of Black Life, which allows and enables the metaphysical idea to even exist in the first place. In consequence, if the reason for the gender issue is grasped, those analyst refuse to accept it, discarding it for an idea, their idea of the problem, it's cause and solution that exist only in their heads and the heads of those who hold similar and like views.

If Black Gender Relationship is described as chaotic and unstable it also goes to say, Black Life, which is to say condition of existence for Black people is chaotic and unstable. One crucial factor consistently overlooked and if it is factored, it is done in a static and insignificant manner is the fact of American Slavery.

Africans were brought to the U.S. as Slaves, specifically to satisfy an economical need. The African Slaves then became components of U.S. society, but as Slaves. Their relationship then held with the U.S. economy defined their Political condition. Consequently laws defining the nature of the enslaved social polity were developed. Laws are relative and reflective of Political conditions which in the case of the enslaved Africans objectified the nature of relations with U.S. Political-Economy, which from it's inception has defined and dictated the terms of the Black Condition in the U.S.

Within the pursuits of maintaining the economical imperatives of Slavery a variety and wide array of methods were utilized by U.S. Political-Economy of which that most fundamental ploy of "Divide and Conquer" was one. The Application of the Divide and Conquer maxim was on the one hand objective machinations and on the other subjective manipulation of human psychology. Those enslaved Africans , who through the harsh conditions of the initial capture, to the end of finding themselves on the dusty fields of America, were for the most deeply traumatized. Nonetheless to attain the ends to their investment, Slaveholders had to allow a bit of liberalization and a lessening of the trauma and with that came the accompanying threat of uprising and rebellion.

Once organizers of American Slavery, the Slaveholders and the Political-Economy, found that particular level and point at which Slavery and it's relative control could be maintained without destabilizing the strategic intent: The basis for Black Gender Relationship was laid and structured.

The variegated, maneuvering, manipulations, ploys, gambits and determinations which occurred through out that tenuous relationship we now generally describe as American Slavery were the formative base for all that we now know and view as Black Gender Interactive Behavior. The Black Man and Woman existing as Slaves in principle and in deed developed attitudes and behavior despite it being in reaction to their condition became to be an intrinsic basis for interaction and relationship with each other.

Slavery might not exist as a fact of contemporary U.S. society, but it's dynamic as the structural basis for American Political-Economy reigns supreme in modern American society and in more ways than one, it is experienced as the strain and discord of Black Gender Relationship.

By Apropos

Friday, May 16, 2008

Black Economical Endeavors: The Dearth of Substantial Economical initiative within Black Municipalities

  • How do we explain the dearth of substantial economical initiative within Black municipalities? What I mean by Black Municipalities, is environs controlled politically by African -Americans.
  • How do we explain the economical dysfunction of inner-city, urban areas after white owned industries move out to the suburban areas?
  • Why is it that those upper class and middle class members of Black community who have been able to accumulate a bit of wealth are unable to develop dominant economical projects which can sustain Black life and give it direction?
  • Why is it that the only or dominant type of Black economical endeavors, seem to always be those requiring minimal labor force, when the motive for any community/society's development is the activity of a substantial part of it's members---employed, thereby transforming cash into mature capital---enough African Americans, male and female, graduate from business schools to understand that the problem with African America is a lack of a type of economic activity, the infrastructure building of a society.
  • Why are the so-called Black Leadership always quick to step forward with subjective an metaphysical responses as solutions to the all too graphic objective conditions which dictate , define and determine the substance of Black life?
  • What is that impediment that clouds and distorts the Black collective perception from stating the obvious and coming to terms with the objective activity necessary for the climb out of Black Diaspora. It isn't about Conservative nor Liberal, because tendencies relative the American Politics are valid.
  • Why isn't the connection made with the era of reconstruction when Africans after all the Civil War were dynamic enough to practice and understand the vitality of raw economic activity, that it took the unleashing of Klan terror to cower that dynamic into it's now disorganized character we now experience as the Cold War of American Racism.
By Apropos

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

9-11 A Front in "Charlie Wilson's War"

From 2001: the events of 9-11 has been the motive force for American National and International politics. A movie "Charlie Wilson's War" dramatizing the machinations of Congressman Charlie Wilson tells the tale of geo-politics during the Reagan Administration specifically it's support for Islamic Militants in their fight against the Soviet Union during it's Afghanistan occupation.

"Charlie Wilson's War", as the Movie does, continues in mythicizing the Reagan years of American politics, particularly it's Cold War narrative.

This narrative as defended by Charlie Wilson ridiculously neglects and misdirects it's revisionist gaze from the consequence of it's loose ends, the events of 9-11. Charlie Wilson lays claim to having funneled $1 Billion to Islamic Militants resisting Soviet occupation in Afghanistan, of whom as we now know Osama Bin Laden was a member.

The geo-politics reality is what exactly did Charlie Wilson do during those raining money days to Osama Bin Laden and Co.

What exactly did U.S. intelligence teach it's Islamic militant allies in the Proxy War against the Soviet Union?

In accepting accolades and recognition that his role in the Islamic Militant Movement contributed greatly to the Soviet Unions dissolution, Charlie Wilson must also accept a substantial amount of responsibility for Al Qaeda and 9-11. If as American War strategy now defines, that 9-11 was a front in Islamic Militancy, it's strategy, then the resources Congressman Charlie Wilson provided those actors, by his own admission must bear responsibility for 9-11.

By Apropos

Monday, May 12, 2008

What Barbara Walters past, Oprah Winfrey's presence have for Barack Obama's future

Barbara Walters in her recent book reveals she had a past, an affair with a Black man, a Senator during the early1970's; who happened to be married.

So now that Barbara Walters has come forward with her past, is Oprah Winfrey waiting in the wings to speak on her White past? Maybe a whirlwind with Dr. Phil? Okay maybe pun intended--- but some symmetry is needed, considering both women have their six degrees of association with Barack Obama.

Barbara " I have hobnobbed with the puppets of history so who is Oprah" Walters gushed over Obama on "The View" proclaiming his sexiness which in hindsight is one of those moments in context with her recent revelations.

Oprah "I dethroned Barbara as sovereign of media-verse" Winfrey, single handedly in her endorsement of Barack Obama before the South Carolina primary derailed the inevitability hubris of the other fury, The Hillary anticipation.

The Oprah motive catapulted the history in the making of viability. Barbara's reminiscence seems to accomplish and crown it's fact and the Obama trajectory the consequence.

By Apropos

Sunday, May 11, 2008

First Lady Laura Bush and the Burmese Cyclone

In the wake of the Burmese Cyclone, First Lady Laura Bush held a press conference to politicize the disaster with lecturing the Burma Dictatorship.

I agree that the governance of Burma is criminal. That is not in dispute. But it takes sanctimonious gall for First Lady Laura Bush to politicize the Burmese disaster.

Burma is not existing in a vacuum and the U.S. and other nations have relatively imposed sanctions, even to the latest freeze by the Bush Administration of Burma Sate assets held in U.S. banks.

The issue however is when will Political Economy in it's realized sense mature in that objectivity of what is vital and necessary for the human beings who suffer it's yoke? It's easy to typically tout the formality of elections and referendums, as means and method, an orderly progression when the relentlessness of the imperialistic forces which sustain the brutal extremes of Third World Political-Economy needs it veneer.

The lives and condition of the Burmese victims and all the other global victims are not charity for gall and hypocrisy to manipulate in that service of ego-placation.

By Apropos

The Filthy conditions of a Fort Bragg Barracks

I know there are policy makers in the Bush administration and the ranks of General in the Military, whose initial reaction upon learning that the filthy conditions of a Fort Bragg Barracks had been captured on You Tube by a Distraught father, whose son had just returned from Afghanistan, in all it's expose' of the Flag Pin wearing and Support the Troops farce, was to:

  1. Damn the Digital Revolution
  2. Damn nosy civilians with camcorders
  3. Damn Americans for in Military parlance "being soft" and vow to heretofore ban all barracks visits by civilians.
Thanks to the Frawley's we now have Fort Bragg to add on to Walter Reed apathy. Along with the Minnesota Red Bull insult and the entire Iraq War travesty---We now also know what these "hawks' of War really think about the altruistic who serve in uniform.
By Apropos

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Gun Dealer criticized harshly for going to Virgina Tech to speak

The Question is what exactly is a sellers moral and ethical responsibility for the misuse of a product sold.

The name of the licensed gun dealer who sold the gun to the Virginia Tech killer is
Eric Thompson. He has been criticized harshly and even labeled ethically challenged and insensitive. Some interviewers even went as far as to say he's irresponsible for having went to Virginia Tech to speak this last past April.

Some school faculty, parents and relatives of the victims of the tragedy have denounced him. The criticism opportunistically turned in to anti-gun advocacy.

People I need comments and thoughts on this.

By Apropos

Friday, May 9, 2008

Hillary Clinton and the Anagram: Politics as Psy-Ops

So maybe it's not exactly anagramic, but the Clinton's haven't been too subtle in their intent and ploys that Hillary must be coronated empress after the imperial Presidency of Dubya Bush.

So this refrain of Hillary on the stump, "who will you hire for the Presidency", smells too much of the anagram heir for it ti be coincidental.

But if all of that still flys over the subconsciousness of those white blue collar analog workers, who need Clinton's politics as a cold needs pneumonia. But keep shooting themselves in their collective feet with whatever social-conservatism truly means, or the nihilism of the Reagan Democrat folly at the expense of unionized labor. Then the overt bludgeon of the 2x4 going upside their heads of who will you hire between a black man and a white woman has no subtlety in it's intent of arousing the zeitgeist of "long haired" hippies need not apply desperation.

By Apropos

Sunday, May 4, 2008

What is Political Sex

What is Political Sex? Is it the desperate feet nudging of a Republican U.S. Senator at the piss stained bathroom stall of a Minnesota airport?

Is it the wretched deviancy of a Florida Republican Congressman responsible for protecting kids from child molesters when he is one?

Is it the Blind Democratic Governor of New york whose Adultery eclipsed Casanova, replacing his superior, the prostitute soliciting Democratic Governor on New York, who by the way railed openly against what he did in secret. Come to think of it, how secret was the Watergate Hotel for a forehead like "Spitzer"?

Is it the Republican U.S. Senator from Louisiana betraying his marriage vows with the prostitution services of a madame only to as they all do when caught, drag his shell-shocked wife before the klieg lights of the nations tolerance to the theater of Political Sex.

Is it the Democratic Mayor of San Francisco who had sex with the wife of a member of his campaign?

Is it that sex triangle of Homo-Hetero gymnastics that only New Jersey could introduce the nation to?

Is it the Democratic Mayor of Detroit and his alleged sex text messaging with his Chief of Staff?

So Is Political Sex the curtain dropper of a sitting President, confessing to the Lewinsky Oval Office act. Thanks to the former Democratic President Bill Clinton the Oval Office is now
V-chipped with Parental Guidance.

By Apropos

Friday, May 2, 2008

The 2008 Olympic Torch should've went to Israel

Why is Communist China's political action in Tibet Different from Israels actions in the occupied land of Palestine?

Why is Tibetan activities against the Chinese Communist Party any different than Palestinian
ad hoc resistance to Israel?

The prejudicial distortion of human social circumstances is once again like the perpetual festering scab exposing this contradiction of the State of Israel in it's struggle with Palestinian elements as being just another crude historical actor politicizing conscience and morality.

It would've been quite interesting to see how the 2008 Olympic Torch run would have fared in Israel.

By Apropos

The Legacy of Saddam Hussein and American Freedoms

So the New York Times in it's 4/20/08; expose' on the disinformative role of retired military officers during the campaign actual for Baghdad, has revealed what people should have commonsensically known to be the case.

Cynicism? Yes everyone should have a healthy helping of it.

The New York Times revealed that Donald Rumsfeld the impertinent former Secretary of Defense and a cabal of other operatives, decided upon the course of action to sell the Iraq War was to propagandize it to an American audience.

The irony is this is even news.

In more ways than one Saddam Hussein's legacy as improbable as it seems is an American one.

By Apropos

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Is Ben Stein eccentric or insidious?

His throw back fish head tennis shoes aside, Ben Stein, Writer and Jack of all Trades Joker is in the serious business of distortions and dumbing down the political sharpness of those who consider his pronouncements as relevant social polemics, in that mold of polemics as comedy or comedy as polemics.

Ben Stein is a economic elitist whose latest observation on the Sub Prime Rate impact on society and the economy has nothing to do with humor, unless the humor is that of the well placed Machiavellian exploiting the Rothschildian maxim of money is to be made when blood flows in the streets and the chaos of the Sub prime Rate manipulations sure fits the bill of blood flowing in the streets.

Ben Stein is a hold back to the miscues of economics as a Darwinian struggle when it's used as a controlling imperative.

So what is to be made of Pollyannish Stein crowing that the economy is chugging along nicely, the engine that could distortion, despite the daily tumult of jobs lost, bankruptcy reports and blatant energy price manipulations?

Stein reveals his irrelevance when he says 98% of homes are not in foreclosure and that then begs this: so the default of a measly 2% has caused this national and global recession, where the logic of one oil pipe line destroyed in Nigeria, just one, causes voices to go hoarse in the pit on wall street screaming increase, another record for a barrel of oil.

By Apropos

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Should Barack Obama have made a speech on Class and Religion?

David Brooks of the New York Times on the 4/20/08; NBC's Meet The Press,
(note video clip, Obama: Inspiring and Tough Enough?) said in his view Barack Obama should have made a speech on Class and Religion as he did on Race, over his remarks that small town America is bitter and clinging to guns, religion, antipathy e.t.c.

Yes on face value it does seem like a good idea, Obama giving another dissertation on Class and Culture. But the fact of the matter is Obama's remarks on the play of wedge issues in America politics, which is what his clinging to Guns and Religion was about, has nothing to do with the phenomenon and it's recurrence in politics, which others have documented so well even giving it the classification Reagan Democrats and Cultural Conservatism, being complex and improperly formed to be observed clearly.

Because it's idealistic nature is all to clear. So-called cultural-conservatism is a reaction, an immature social activity which has no other motive than holding in disdain, even to the point of compromising and betraying it's economical needs at the behest of a politics that is oppositionary to it's motive, a specific historic grouping. Whether the question is the rural, urban clash of the 18th century America and it contemporary consequences of a reaction to specifically Black American Self-Determination.

The idealism of American politics regardless of tendency is it's suppositionary rigidity. Obama's speech on race wasn't an eye-opener it simply legitimized critique of dialectical fact of race in all it's suppositions. Class and Religion, it's critique requires ideology.

By
Apropos

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...