The Killing Of The Suspect Eric Harris By The 73yr. Old Reserve Cop Robert Bates Of Tulsa County, Oklahoma

The command "roll over on your Stomach" given by the Tulsa County, Oklahoma undercover cops during a drugs and guns sting operation which resulted in the killing of the suspect Eric Harris by the 73 yr. old reserve cop Robert Bates, was in itself tactically flawed and wrong.

The suspect Eric Harris was shot and killed by the 73 yr. old reserve cop Robert Bates under the pretext that the suspect Eric Harris, by allegedly refusing to roll over from his stomach could have had a weapon thus jeopardizing the safety of cops who were already on his back and neck.

But if the command given by cops who had subdued the suspect Eric Harris by being on his back and neck was specifically intended to neutralize threats posed by possible weapons under the suspects stomach, then telling the suspect Eric Harris to roll over on his back would have enabled and actualized the threat.

The only tactically correct thing those Tulsa County, Oklahoma sting operation cops could have done was maintain the suspect Eric Harris on his stomach, then grabbing his wrist pull his arms out.  Thereby absolutely neutralizing the supposed threat.

Arresting a suspect by police should not be experimental exercises subject to the practical limitations and moral suppositions of police.  Arresting authority and it's exercise is dictated by the United States Constitution, which is the only arbiter of acceptable national socialization.  So when the police practice cavalier as evidenced in the killing of the suspect Eric Harris by the 73 yr. old reserve cop Robert Bates, the national socialization and the social-contract becomes a tyrannical practice, an unjust and idealistic proposition defined only by the resource of organized violence.

The killing of the suspect Eric Harris by the 73 yr. old reserve cop Robert Bates is another ripple in the tyrannical practice of the national socialization and the social-contract as an unjust and idealistic proposition.

By Apropos

The Culture Wars, "Death to America" and Silicon Valley

The contradictions that exist between the U.S. and it's external enemies on the base-criticism of cultural decadence, deviancy and immortality, is the identical contradiction that also exist nationally in the U.S, culture wars. Specifically, in it's anti-abortion and ant-gay rights formulations.

The contradictions existing between the U.S. and it's external enemies on the base-criticism of cultural decadence, deviancy and immorality is idealistically evident when on the one hand the external enemies of the U.S. chant "Death To America".While on the other hand do all that they can to acquire and avail theirself of the innovative, technological and infrastructural consequences of the U.S. culture.  The same culture the "Death To America" chanters deride as decadent, deviant and immoral.

So we find the same identical contradiction evidenced in the national culture wars, with Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism criticizing it's Liberal Democratic-Progressive opposition as culturally decadent, deviant and immoral while dupliciously utilizing and exploiting the innovation and technological infrastructure created by Liberal Democratic-Progressive culture.

The Stars and Bars doesn't fly over Silicon Valley.

By Apropos

Speech and The Emperor Has No Clothes

Logo used by Wikileaks (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

There was Wikileaks a romantic practioner of the type of speech that secrets of government should be availed to it's citizens.  Naturally government responded with it's organized violence and Wikileaks was suppressed.  In it's settling dust appeared the vitamin D deficient Eric Snowden and his type of speech, who laid bare governmental secrets and innards so purposefully naked that government's response was to dialectically proclaim it's naked innards as well garbed in homage to The Emperor Has No Clothes.

By Apropos

The Rich and Wealthy Accused, Money and A Jury's Suppositionary Bias

Contrary to popular belief and conventional acceptance, money or wealth does not get rich and wealthy accused out of legal jams.  But the suppositionary bias held by a jury about wealth and money is what enables, allows and permits the rich and wealthy accused to elude and evade convictions.

The argument will be made that this is a distinction without consequence because the basis for the jury's suppositionary bias is still the jury's assumption about money and wealth.

The counter and response is simple:  The rich and wealthy accused does not say to the jury "I should be acquitted because I'm rich and wealthy".  On the contrary the rich and wealthy accused downplays the ornate capricies of money and wealth and instead plays to the idealistic self-consciousness of the jury and it's suppositionary bias, because the rich and wealthy recognizes, the jury wants to be him.

It is lazy analysis to be critical of the double standard in the justice system by blaming the rich and wealthy.  When we should challenge the supremacy of suppositionary biases in our Political-Economy that allows the truly criminal to escape while punishing the hapless and desperate.

By Apropos

Stephen A. Smith, Karen Hunter, Crystal Wright and Van Jones Are Republican-Fifth Column Collaborators, Black American Politics and Django Unchained

To Those Black voices clamoring that Black people vote Republican because Democrats take the Black vote for granted are insidiously doing the Black community a disservice.

Look, if Stephen A. Smith, Karen Hunter, Crystal Wright and Van Jones to name a few of the Republican-Fifth Column collaborators are good intended in their political critique of Black America. The analysis would instead comprehensively identify that.

• Political power is an activity of economic stability and expression.
• Deterministic political expression is a local, state then lastly a national activity

What this means:  If Black people want affirmative politics and laws that reflect their specific interest, Black politics has to assert itself and dominate local politics, namely school boards,the courts, the police and sheriff departments, mayoral and county administrations.  Then Black America can be an organic force in state politics and only when this is stabilized will national or Presidential election be consequential.

But the afore-mentioned Republican-Fifth Column collaborators of Stephen A. Smith, Karen Hunter, Crystal Wright and Van Jones are not giving us this analysis.  They are instead demanding that if Black people have been stupid, voting Democrat then they should lose their mind and vote Republican.

The Black community isn't being told that without economic stability and it's expression whatever exercises in political activity are merely speculative indulgencies.  Because there isn't rhyme or reason to the political activity.  The meaning of economic stability and it's expression is : The Black community must be able to create jobs to support a viable critical mass of itself for itself.

The Political-Economy space occupied by Black America is specifically that of realizing money and wealth for the National Political-Economy.  Black America performs a retail consuming function in the National Political-Economy.  What this means is:  The Black American labor mass are employees at the mercy and biases of it's employers.  Also a sizable mass of the Black American labor mass realizes money in the underground activity of the National Political-Economy.  Therefore subject to the criminalizing dynamic of the larger society and this isn't a foundation upon which practical political expression for itself can be built on.

So when Stephen A. Smith, Karen Hunter, Crystal Wright and Van Jones to name a few of the Republican-Fifth Column collaborators clamor that Black people vote for Republican "Angel" you don't know at the expense of the Democrat "Devil" you do know-conveniently omitting that the impotence of Black American political activity is first and foremost, the question of economic stability and it's expression.

We have to ridicule and expose their effort and work as having the pathos and historical lackey-collaborator duty of Samuel L. Jackson's character in Quentin Tarantino's: Django Unchained.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Stephen A. Smith wants all black people to vote Republican in 2016. Um, okay.
• Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Self-Loathing Black People
• Black On Black Crime, 9/11 And Chasing Al Qaeda All Over The Planet

Rush Limbaugh Philistine In Chief and Lynching Black People

Anyone who can find any agreeable hint of reason in Rush Limbaugh's recent comments on the chants of lynching Black People by the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Fraternity chapter at the University of Oklahoma, that, were the chants of Lynching Black people lyrics to a Kanye West song, there wouldn't be this national uproar is either (1) insidiously dismissive of Black People and their American experience and or (2) an idiot

Conservatives and their idealistic reaction or which Rush Limbaugh is their Philistine in Chief confuse a salient point of Black American Experience and it's Black subjective.  The narrative isn't up for debate---the only national discussion on race is America is: What is to be done.

The 13th, 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and subsequent Civil Rights Acts are indicative that the national appetite for what is to be done on race relations is for dismantling it's antagonistic structure and destroying it's support imperatives, which has transformed the race issue as a national question to a specific-contradiction that is to be resolved within the parameters as all other social contradictions.  In this regard pronouncements by Rush Limbaugh Philistine in Chief as his recent comments on lynching Black people, as all things Republican-Conservatism, is exposed as thinly veiled bigotry.

By Apropos
     
Related site @OU_Unheard
Related articles   

• Rush Limbaugh -- Kanye Should Rap Racist Frat Song ... It Would Hit #1
• Black American Monied Class, Cornell West, Tavis Smiley and The Anti-Obama Default Critique
• Oscar Awards Black-Centric Cinema, American-Political Economy and the Black American Experience as Tragedy
• Black American Radio, Politics, Polemical-Commentary On American Political-Economy and Injustice

The Obama Administration, Iran and National Speculative-Power

If the Republican-Conservative argument that the Obama Administration has enabled specifically Iran and it's nuclear pursuits and if nuanced, it is surmised that the Obama Administration doesn't see a nuclear Iran as a strategic and tactical threat, but it sees Iran as a political actor operating under the self preservation organic axiom.

Then the Republican-Conservative argument is a presumption that the Obama Administration is traitorous or more correctly and practically, the reality is the Obama Administration by it's Iran political stance is revealing and exposing that the three decades plus United States antagonistic Iran posture is purely idealistic.  A gambit designed to support a domestic polemic pursuing national-speculative-power.

By Apropos

Related articles

• The Republican Party, Conservatism, The Obama Administration and American Power
• Democratic Tax Payers Propping Up and Supporting Republican Anti-Tax Gimmicks
• The Other 1% And Deficit Spending
• On C.I.A. Torture Program and Atrocities Post 9/11

The Texas Standard Of Knowing Right From Wrong and The Killings of Chad Littlefield and Chris Kyle

The Texas standard of knowing right from wrong during the commission of a crime as measure of mental illness and insanity.  Begs this: When has an insane right deed ever been done?  Where has it been claimed that an altruistic deed was done because one was mentally ill and insane---despite the fact that the insanity of idealistic suppositions defines the Human Condition of which the adage "The road to hell is paved with good intentions".  Has historically cautioned.

The Texas standard of knowing right from wrong during the commission of a crime as measure of mental illness and insanity, is in itself insane.  Because of it's one-dimensional construct and in the 21st century it ranks with the ignorance of bloodletting as distinction of insanity of the Human Condition.

The specific presupposition that doing right despite it's relativity and conditionality as being the purview of a healthy mind belies the obvious that the general narrative of the Human Condition is it's pervasive injustice and wrong doing.

The killings of Chad Littlefield and Chris Kyle by Eddie Ray Routh has once again highlighted the insanity of idealistic suppositions and knowing right from wrong.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Routh Found Guilty in 'American Sniper' Murder Case
• On Death Row In The State Of Texas, Last Meals and Backwards Republican Politicians

Black And Latino News Anchors And Suppositionary-Neutral Reporting

Lets ridicule and denigrate every single Black and Latino news anchor across the nation who reads a teleprompter description of Black and Latino suspects of crime that reinforce and contribute to bigoted-racist suppositions.

News reporting and accounts of crime should be done minus the usual accompanying suppositions that reinforce and contribute to the racist narrative whether intentional or not.  It behooves those Black and Latino news anchors to report the news in that suppositionary-neutral manner that eliminates the racist narrative and we should hold those Black and Latino news anchor accountable by ridicule and denigration.

By Apropos

The Black Community And The Bigot Ben Stein

What does it say about the intellectual space within the Black community that permits, emboldens, enables and allows bigots as Ben Stein to call a substantial amount of Black people pathetic and self-defeatist?

By Apropos

Related articles

• Black On Black Crime, 9/11 And Chasing Al Qaeda All Over The Planet
• Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Self-Loathing Black People
• Aunt Jemima's Like Wendy Williams, The Talk Show Host and Her "Well Spoken" Black Critique
• Black American Monied Class, Cornell West, Tavis Smiley and The Anti-Obama Default Critique
• t

On The Apocalypse and The Religious Pathological Prediliction

Contrary to theologic suppositions the apocalypse or a apocalypse isn't about the transformation of earth to heaven where all cosmologic and metaphysical mysteries are unveiled and found to be a simple pining to be human and exist the Human Condition.

But the apocalypse is as all things religious, a pining and longing for a response to the injusticies  of the Human Condition.  A need to see injusticies by Man to fellow Man receive it's just comeuppance, which to quote the Third Reich-A final solution.  A once and for all annihilation and destruction of the totemic enablers of discriminatory and prejudicial suppositions, hypocricies and idealistic presumptions that crystalize into the injusticies of the Human Conditon.  The apocalypse is also religious sanctimony and it's pathological prediliction for criticism.

The objective-formulation of the apocalypse however is a Political-Economy expression, another construct that reminds us that we would rather bash each others brains in initially then realize we need brains to redeem the justness of our existence.

By Apropos

Related articles

• The Tragic Logic of "A" = "B" and Rent Garments
• Charity, The Human Condition and Ill-Health
• Ideas, Inventions For The Underdeveloped and Third World That Distract From Practical Development
• The Human Capacity For Delusions, Dwight D. Eisenhower, The Third Reich, Depravity and American Slaveryth

The Other 1% And Deficit Spending

The U.S. Department of Defense and it's military-industry cabal directly employs approximately 1% of the U.S. population or three million persons.  But it enables the wage earning ability of 10% or 30 million members of the U.S. population   and all of this expenditure is unrealized currency or deficit spending akin to the monopoly game when you pass go collect $200 disbursement.

By Apropos

Related articles

• CNN's David Gergen's criticism of Barack Obama's Oval Office Speech and the United States Military
• Republicans and What is the Role of the Federal Budget
• Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Dwight Eisenhower, NATO, Germany and Aphorisms that go over well in Kansas

The One-Dimensional Characterization Of Homicide As The Benchmark for Human Wrong Doing and Unaccountable Political-Economy

Lets stop using the one-dimensional characterization of homicide as the benchmark for human wrong doing.  Even the idealistic prohibition of the Judeo-Christian Ten Commandments doesn't rank homicide as the primary Thou shalt not...

We instead excuse away, make light of ignore all the other misdeeds of human activity that are torturously prolonged, inevitably homicidal, just as the one-dimensional characterization of homicide.

In 2008; The National Political_Economy.  Life savings, retirement, homes were lost. People were being laid off to the tune of 700,000 a month.  People died, a veritable economic homicide and lives were destroyed.  This Political-Economy cataclysm was the result of certain specific calculated act by individuals who are integral members of the status quo.

During the same period statistics of the one-dimensional characterization of homicide as the benchmark for human wrong doing clogged up the justice system while those individuals responsible for 2008; collapse of National Political-Economy and it's ensuing cataclysm and economic homicide not only maintained their status quo existence but the national public and society, victims of the National Political-Economy collapse, the veritable economic homicide didn't even understand the situation as being criminal, the quintessential benchmark of human wrong doing.

The new York City Police Department, epitomizes, as all other police jurisdictions across the nation, the practice of measuring it's social-duty and purpose by the after the fact arrest of murders at the expense of ignoring those instigating factors which are direct consequences of the impunitous inequities of the National Political-Economy so for example the ruinous realities of the 2008; Political-Economy cataclysm can happen and the New York City Police Department can with a straight face claim it's policing practices has decreased homicides and this claim assumes convention because society has come to idealistically accept that the benchmark of human wrong doing is homicide while the quintessential human wrong doing which is an accountable Political-Economy is left to determine the totality of the Human Condition and it's activity.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Ronald Reagan's Economy, The Debt Ceiling and Implicit Deficit Spending
• Equity, Fairness, The Misery Loves Company Dialectic, Deficit Spending and Classes the Super Rich Prey On
• Republicans and What is the Role of the Federal Budget

Coach Bill Belichick The Ogre In A Hoodie is Wrong and Quality Of Product Distinction

New England Patriots Head Football Coach Bill Belichick the ogre in a hoodie is wrong.  The most important thing on a football team isn't the payers, it's primarily the scheme or football tactics. Secondarily are team chemistry and execution.

Bill Belichick the orge in a hoodie is wrong by declaring that players are the most important,  Because it's an organic given that to play football there has to be players and if it's at the National Football League level, then those players are the apex atop the football world.

At the National Football League level quality of product distinction meaning success and it's logic is primarily superior scheme and football tactics.  The secondary aspect of chemistry and execution are evolutionary consequences of that same product distinction of success and it's logic.

Bill Belichick the ogre in a hoodie is a tremendously successful NFL coach and extremely adept and adroit with idealistic analysis for the purpose of mocking the important is another example.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Seattle Seahawks Richard Sherman And The Humility, Boasting And Hubris Critique

Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Self-Loathing Black People

Criticizing Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson is a diversionary tactic wielded by status quo reaction and it's collaborating support cabal of self-loathing Black people.  The practice of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson focuses on a fact of the National Political-Economy and their detractors and critics are it's beneficiaries.

If the question is:  Are Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson materialist and Jacobin in their thought.  The answer is no.  Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are idealistic critics of the national Political-Economy giving voice to its victims to the chagrin of collaborators as Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, Tony Herbert of Advocates Without Boarders, and Charles Barkley TNT Basketball analyst to name a few.

Criticizing Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson as race-baiters validates their practice and is tantamount to Southern Slave holders criticizing Northern anti-Slave polemic as carpet bagger agitations.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Sheriff David Clarke says Al Sharpton ought to go back into the gutter he Came From

The Construct Politically Correct and Speech

To opponents, foes, critics of the construct, Politically Correct: what sort of speech do you exactly want to have that construct Politically Correct impedes you from having?

By Apropos

Charity, The Human Condition and Ill-Health

When will we learn and accept the fact that the need for charity and charity giving is not our better selves exemplified.  But it represents and is indicative of the idealistic construct of our human condition, akin to a health care worker purposefully making one sick, enabling one's ill-health to attempt a cure.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Charity, Winnipeg, Canada, Shoes, Mayer Sam Katz and Superficial Act Of Humaness

The Intellectual-Liberalism Of The Louisiana-Republican Representative Steve Scalise and White Supremacy Aspirations

Who are these Democratic strategist and analyst and why are they castigating the Republican Party and it's Intellectual-Liberalism for standing with the Louisiana-Republican Steve Scalise and his racist sympathies?

The Louisiana-Republican Representative Steve Scalise has been exposed for having made a speech 12 years ago at a Louisiana White Supremacy

group associated with the racist David Duke.

Upon revelation of the Louisiana-Republican Representative Steve Scalise addressing the White Supremacy group, the leadership of the Republican Party elements of it's rank and file, the Speaker of the U.S. House Of Representatives John Boehner all rallied in defense of Steve Scalise and declared defiant support for him.  What this also means is: The Republican Party, it's leaders, Speaker John Boehner approve of and support White Supremacy aspirations.

Instead of castigating and criticizing the Republican Party and it's Intellectual-Liberalism for standing with rallying around and supporting White Supremacy aspirations as expressed by the Louisiana-Republican Representative Steve Scalise speaking to the David Duke White Supremacy association-Democratic strategist and analyst should be gleefully hammering away at the Republican Party, painting the entire party and it's Intellectual-Liberalism with the fact that it stands with and supports White Supremacy aspirations.

By Apropos

ESPN Analyst Tim Hasselbeck, Peyton Manning and Icarus Who Dared To Fly

ESPN analyst i.e Tim Hasselbeck have long since apotheosized and made the one win and two loss Super Bowl quarterback Peyton Manning a Demi-God.  As idealistic as all of that, what is comically interesting and buffoon-like is the subsequent analysis and commentary when Peyton Manning loses as he did on 12/22/14; with his 4 turnover performance against the Cincinnati Bengals.  Tim Hasselbeck concluded that the Cincinnati Bengals defense confused Peyton Manning.

So the takeaway is  PeytonManning is great and a Demi-God when defenses are mediocre and cooperate by being patsies.  But as soon as defenses put on gladiatorial and Impi like comprehensive performances the apotheosized Demi-God Peyton Manning comes crashing down to earth as the impetuous Icarus who dared to fly.

By Apropos

Related articles

• J.A. Adande, Around The Horn, Michael Vick and The Cold War of American Racism

The Tragic Logic of "A" = "B" and Rent Garments

If we know that the existence of "A" will inevitably, abjectly create "B" yet we are apathetic to the genesis of "A" even to the point of mockery and derision and we know for a fact "B" will happen because of "A".

Why then do we wring our hands, rent our garments and look ashen when "B" happens?  Our reaction to the tragic logic of "B" in all aspects is more dastardly than whatever desperate "speech" inevitability realized in "B".

By Apropos

Climate Change, Global Warming and A God We Can't See

The so-called climate change, Global Warming debate encapsulates all that is schizophrenic about human ability to reason

Conservatives and their Intellectual-Liberalism who profess to believe in a God they can't see deny deny facts of a climate change, Global Warming on the basis they can't see it.

Progressives and their materialistic-common sense who disbelief a God they can't see at the expense of religiosity and it's logic believe in a climate change, Global Warming they can't see.

By Apropos

The Charity Business Demanding "Need" For Existence As Police Demand Crime, It's Activity For Existence

Isn't it odd or even cynically weird that despite all the various government safety net programs, all the Constitutionally mandated welfare programs, the infinitude of ubiquitous charities across the nation, churches, various religious groups claiming to provide charity to those on hard times---there is still "Need"?

And most importantly the charity business is an industry demanding "Need" for it's existence just as the organized violence of police demand crime and it's activity for existence.

By Apropos

Brian Stelter, Don Lemon, Andrew Wallenstein and A Debutante-Like Conversation on the ethics Of Publishing The Hacked Sony Internal Emails

On 12/14/14; Brian Stelter host of CNN's Reliable Sources was his usual confused self struggling to make us think. Along for the ride he had the inferiority complexed CNN Anchor Don Lemon and the profile in irrelevance Andrew Wallenstein Co-Editor of Variety Magazine engaging in a debutante-like conversation on the ethics of publishing the hacked Sony Internal Emails.  Typical of what passes for contemporary mental labor, what Brian Stelter, Don Lemon and Andrew Wallenstein exposed us to was the bankruptcy of passe' reasoning and the stale nature of their world view.


The incredulity of debating the ethics of publishing the contents of hacked Sony internal emails as if the activity of publishing the Sony internal emails is different from if the contents of those emails had been scooped by a journalist from a disgruntled source and published---so what then is the ethical dilemma and question?  The contents of the hacked Sony emails are specifically valuable because it exposes the hypocrisy and sanctimony of those who would claim status quo realization over the rest of us. Whatever claims to privacy is proximity-relative.  So besides the epic embarrassment of hollywood elites,  What is the ethical issue.

By Apropos

On C.I.A. Torture Program and Atrocities Post 9/11

As we marvel at the level of unprecedented accountability exhibited by the U.S. Government in it's 12/11/14; C.I.A. Director John Brennan's press confab on C.I.A. atrocities post 9/11 and it's uniqueness in the world and community nations.

Lets not forget nor  diminish the fact that a Progressive-Democratic President  Barack Obama and Democratic Senator Diane Feinstein made made it possible and were it up to Republicans and their reactionary inclinations, we would never have learned of the Spanish Inquisition like extent of the C.I.A. Torture Program and it's post 9/11 atrocities.

By Apropos

On Injustice

No. 50 The Seven Vices: Injustice (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Injustice exists and is pervasive because it's prey and victims rarely respond in that conclusive and commensurate manner that would give pause to the machinery and medium of injustice.

By Apropos

Violence Against Women and There Really Is A First Time

Office on Violence Against Women logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The violence against Women critique of, if he beat her now he must have beat her in the past, as directive to abused and assaulted Women to get out of negative and unwholesome relationships is lazy reasoning cloaked as commonsensical deductions.  Because the reality is there is always a first time when violence and brutality is expressed in a relationship.

Unless we are saying that there isn't any redemption for perpetrators of violence is a relationship and once that rubicon is crossed the only recourse is the dissolution of the relationship.  Then the practical thing we should do is listen to minds that instruct us that the first and fundamental taboo in an society even taking precedence over the taboo of homicide is:  The male, a Man should never ever under any circumstance assault, batter or dehumanize a female or Women.

By Apropos

Whoopi Goldberg Isn't On The View Because Of Her Insight and Her Bojangles

Whoopi Goldberg isn't on The View because of her insight, wit or commonsense.  Whoopi Goldberg is on The View to represent, ignorance, provincialism, presumptions of the simpleton and the inferiority-complex of the reactionary.

Whoopi Goldberg is the "what the cat dragged in" spectacle on The View--relic from Bojangles speakeasy milieu of entertainment and contrary to whoopi Goldberg's cartoonish declarations.  There are only two Black Women on The View: The indomitable Rosie Perez and the Defiant Rosie O'Donnell.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Whoopi Goldberg, Her Naive and Foolish Opportunity Polemic
• Aunt Jemima's Like Wendy Williams, The Talk Show Host and Her "Well Spoken" Black Critique
• Star Jones, Kimberly Keller, Two Examples, Miley Cyrus and Trayvon Martin
• Surprise: Rosie Perez Off THE VIEW

Whoopi Goldberg, Her Naive and Foolish Opportunity Polemic

Even as Whoopi Goldberg rants about how she worked hard for her money and anyone and everyone else has the same opportunity.  Whoopi Goldberg is naive, foolish and forgetful of the fact that she's been employed by someone else her entire life.

The contradictory fact to Whoopi Goldberg's simplistic opportunity polemic is her existence is based on, contingent on and depends on someone, an employer giving her wages.

Whoopi Goldberg doesn't create value.  She only realizes the valuation of her employer.  So for the specific meaning and utility of working hard, Whoopi Goldberg is no more no less a factory machine producing a certain set of facts.

By Apropos

The American Status Quo, It's Policing Organized Violence, Black Masculinity, Cooperation and Control

The Idea that the American status quo and it's policing organized violence is fearful and threatened by Black masculinity isn't wholly accurate and can be disproven by the level of injustice the American status quo and it's policing organized violence metes out to Black masculinity.  Because if the American status quo and it's policing organized violence was fearful and threatened by Black masculinity, it would be cautious and circumspective in it's blatant and overt practice of injustice, because the prospect of retaliation and retibution would loom large in it's Conservative imperative, but as the murderous practices of it's policing organized violence shows us, it's oblivious.

What however is accurate and correct is Black masculinity, in the calculus of the American status quo is to be controlled and as much as the American status quo and it's policing organized violence denigrates and dehumanizes Black masculinity it requires cooperation from Black masculinity to effect the control.  Meaning the American status quo and it's policing organized violence recognizes the humanity of Black masculinity as a comprehending medium even as it propagandizes the dehumanization of Black masculinity, a recognition that exposes the petty base nature of the controlling dynamic.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Emily Good of Rochester, N.Y; Police Officers, Organized Violence and When Atypical Is Typical
• Police Departments, Fire Departments and The Right To Privacy Argument As Defense Against Their Law Violating Activites
• On Benjamin Watson, The New Orleans Saints Tight End and His Idealistic Posting On Sin, Law and Ferguson, Missouri

Black On Black Crime, 9/11 And Chasing Al Qaeda All Over The Planet

When White Conservatives and their Black stooges respond to the Black community's polemic against White police officers killing Black people---with Black people don't protest Black on Black crime.  The Black community must respond with: On 9/11/01; Al Qaeda attacked the United States and killed over 3,000 + persons, a number today which is but a drop, a blip in the yearly national rate of killing in this interesting nation of ours.

A tremendous amount of treasure and American lives have been spent exacting justice from the ideology that wrought 9/11.  No one has made the argument:  Why are we chasing Al Qaeda all over the planet at the expense of dealing with our yearly outrageous national body count and no one will make such an idealistic argument because even though we kill each other at rates Al Qaeda can only dream of achieving, it is our National Contradiction to resolve.

By Apropos

Jeff Roorda, The St. Louis Rams, Free Speech and The Killing of Michael Brown

The disdain and contempt Jeff Roorda and the St. Louis Police Officers Association hold and have for the St. Louis and Ferguson Black Community is downright psychotically apoplectic that it's seemingly blinded them into making unlawful and unconstitutional demands on a private business enterprise, the St. Louis Rams football team and the NFL.

On 11/30/14; five St. Louis Rams players expressed their lawful and constitutional protected First Amendment Free Speech Right by being in solidarity with the hands up don't shoot movement protesting the killing of the unarmed teenager Michael Brown by Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson.  In response Jeff Roorda and the St. Louis Police Officers Association demanded that the St. Louis Rams and the NFL Punish the five players who were clearly exercising a lawful and constitutionally protected act.

Now should we deduce from this response by Jeff Roorda and the St. Louis Officers Association that the associations blatant disregard for what is clearly a constitutionally protected act by the five St.Louis Rams players is indicative of the lawlessness of police officers daily interactions with the St Louis and Ferguson Black Community and the killing of Michael Brown is its consequential fact.

By Apropos

On Benjamin Watson, The New Orleans Saints Tight End and His Idealistic Posting On Sin, Law and Ferguson, Missouri

Ravings by minds as Benjamin Watson, the New Orleans Saints tight end resonate with White status quo dispensers of injustice and their collaborator support-functionaries because it gives them that moral equivalence cover, that Conservative-Reactionary antithesis to the Progressive-thesis of opposition to injustice.

Benjamin Watson in his recent idealistic, delusionary facebook posting on recent speech and political action by protesters and rioters in Ferguson, Missouri after the no indictment of the White police officer Darren Wilson, whose only historical relevance is he killed the unarmed teenager Michael Brown, thereby securing his place among the fetid ranks of all those who see Black skin and see "Demon", presents the schizophrenic ravings that because he believes in theosophic sin and if we all lived according to biblical gospel Man's oppression of fellow Man would pollyannaishly cease and evaporate only reveals and exposes the stunted development of his mind and it's reactionary inclination.

Benjamin Watson's gibberish that law shouldn't be broken and authority respected is the sort of abysmally pathetic silliness expected of a lobotomized brain and an emasculated psyche

Would the United States even exist hadn't Thomas Paine,  Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, George Washington and Co. violently broken the laws, ignored and disrespected the authority of the British Colonial Master and it's King George sovereign.

Isn't the very biblical gospel which Benjamin Watson rote like references replete with the narrative of laws broken and authority ignored and disrespected?  What does Benjamin Watson think Jesus Christ was doing in the temple?  Jesus beat the money changers in the temple, then he vandalized and destroyed their property, which were unlawful and felonious acts by Jesus Christ.  Didn't Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks and the entire Civil Rights Movement  earn it's historical place because it broke Jim Crow laws and disrespected authority?

If we are to claim sin and it's theosophy as Benjamin Watson would have us do.  That in itself requires we appreciate laws with consequential disdain, if sin and it's theosophical logic is to be exhausted.

Benjamin Watson is blissfully ignorant of the social-contract dynamic and it's tyranny of the individual against the many and the tyranny of the many against the individual.  The realization never occurs to Benjamin Watson that the speech and it's political-action of the Ferguson protesters and rioters is doing exactly what it is intended to do---which is state that law and authority can never be imposed nor dictated, nevertheless of the intractability of it's imposition and regardless of the ferocity and ruthlessness of it's organized violence.

By
Apropos

Democratic Tax Payers Propping Up and Supporting Republican Anti-Tax Gimmicks

Why is the Democratic Government of New York City and it's tax payers propping up and supporting Republican led governments and their anti-tax gimmicks with services those Republican held environments would enjoy if they taxed for the services?

The Special Victims Unit of the New York City police department recently offered assistance to Republican municipalities.  Who because of their ant-tax gimmicks have chosen not to protect their citizens.

By
Apropos

Sharon Osbourne Castigating Mama June On Being Ignorant But The Joke Is On Ozzy

In a Diatribe on the 11/13/14; The Talk, Sharon Osbourne was her typical buffoonish self, castigating MaMa June of Honey Boo Boo infamy for in Sharon Osbourne's words, "being ignorant, uneducated, unworldly" continuing to say she couldn't believe people as Ma Ma June still existed in 2014 America.

How ironic.  The Joke and commentary is on Sharon Osbourne. Because who did she think consummed and watched her reality show, The Osbourne's and the ape like grunting gibberish of her husband Ozzy?

By
Apropos

The Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican Conservatism, Quarantine and The Ebola Disease, The Middle-Class and Chaka Zulu

Considering that the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican Conservatism nationally has recently stumbled across quarantine as social policy response to the scientific fact of the Ebola disease and as typical of the reactionary futility of the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican conservatism, the quarantine practice is being applied arbitrarily.  Because health care workers in the United States who treat Ebola patients are not subject to quarantine but those returning from West Africa are.

If quarantine is to be used in the United States.  The only fact that warrants it is Conservatism. The Intellectual-Liberalism of Conservatism is a scourge, a pestilence that has killed more than all of the great pandemics of the Black Plague and Influenza combined.  Conservatism has laid siege and laid waste to the middle-class in a manner feudal and liege wars never realized and not even the inexorable Mfecane of the warrior King Chaka Zulu anticipated.

So if the logic of quarantine is isolating a scourge, a disease then let the pogromization of conservatives begin.

By
Apropos

Ebola Travel Ban Is Heaven Sent To Africans, The Collaborator Ellen Sirleaf and Imperialism

Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The proposal by the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism that the solution to the West African Ebola outbreak is a travel ban from the affected countries should be heaven sent to Africans and those countries.

Because Africans can now seize and exploit the travel ban into severance of ties with the United States and it's imperialism.  Because if there has been a bane on the African existence, it's the unsolicited, unwanted contact and association with the United States and Western Imperialism that has categorically undermined and perverted African self-determination.

Nothing good has come of Africa's association with Western Imperialism. However there has been unmitigated harm and unimaginably maleficent destruction upon Africa and the Africans.  So if western Imperialism and it's United States medium wants to indulge it's base idealism and again malign Africa with a travel ban.  Then Africa should seize the opportunity, sever absolute ties with Western Imperialism, close it's borders a la' The Peoples Republic of China, rid itself of those African collaborators in it's midst, Liberia's Ellen Sirleaf to name one---cleanse itself of the fetid stench of its interrupted history by the Slave Trade and Western Colonialism and define its Political-Economy valuation on Africa's terms and not the Imperialist construct schemed by Venetian Cabal and it's international monetary fund.

By
Apropos

The Women Of The Talk, Rooty-Gossip and Sarcastic-Desperation

The Women of The Talk are ridiculously confused and idealistic. The Women of The Talk earn their living by rooty-gossiping, dissecting and commenting on other people lives.  So what makes The Women of The Talk think others i.e. ex-boyfriends shouldn't exploit and capitalize ancient relationships in that same rooty-gossipy manner they do?

Particularly Sharon Osbourne, her means of earning a living is prostituting her sarcastic-desperation to be acclaimed, on The Talk.  So why shouldn't her ex-boyfriend do to her what she does daily to others-----Rooty Gossiping.

By Apropos

Peter Thiel, One Dimensional Pronouncements and Darwinism

Peter Thiel, PayPal co-founder and investor in Facebook, a proponent of the indulgence that college is a fraud so he makes available $100,000 to investor college dropouts

Peter Thiel, as many elitist idealist misses the obvious: Every twist and turn of the Human Condition, the diverse and variegated circumstances are what monetizes creates the Value Speculation that very resource that permits his one dimensional pronouncements.

Whether or not one has a formal, stylized college education isn't exclusive of artistry, creativity and industriousness.  Darwinism might have shown the survival of the fittest imperative but it's been at the expense of recognizing the value of it's losers which is what Peter Thiel fetishistically toys with

By
Apropos

Nazi Era Jewry, The Final Solution and The Palestinian People

You have survivors and descendants of Nazi Era Jewry laying claim to property Nazis took and appropriated seventy plus years ago and successfully defending those claims.

Yet the irony of those same Jews contemporaneously seizing and appropriating Palestinian land and murdering Palestinians despite semantics, who dare protest, dare resist, dare disagree---only instructs us that the Palestinian people are not are unlike Colonial Era Native Americans or Australian Tasmanians who accepted historical irrelevance and genocidal extermination---and the irony reinforces the only anticipation: Which is, as idealistic as the Nazis were the Jewish question. The Zionist State of Israel and it's Jews, have replaced Nazi futility with Kabbalistic pretensions and being intoxicated on the antagonisms of hubris have forgotten it's own lessons experienced under the work of the Nazi Final Solution in it's speech with the Palestinian people.

By
Apropos

Civilization, Litigated Progress, Conservatism and It's Right To Be Irrelevant and Castigated

Civilization requires and is a result of litigated progress.  Once the issues are resolved, it's reactionaries become irrelevant and should be treated as such---that's the only Right Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism has, to be irrelevant and castigated.

By Apropos

Conservatism, Political-Economy and Base Selfishness

Conservatism hates to accept blame.  Conservatives exist in a hypocricy of perpetual denial, where the other, the Progressive is always blamed.  If an individual is neurotically and pathologically greedy Conservatism and Conservatives will obfuscate and idealistically reframe and blame "original sin" in biblical sense.

Conservatives are stuck, because of their reactionary imperatives in the hypocricy of contextualizing the Human Condition and Political-Economy in base selfishness.

By Apropos

The Taliban, War As Pornography, Haliburton and Corporate Media

If the Taliban didn't have a legitimate base, a viable organic base that wasn't terrorized into existence but actually supports the Taliban and is the Taliban. If not in deed, in principle.  The United States will not have to recruit and grow an opposition to the Taliban.

If the non-Taliban population of Afghanistan are just as vigorous in opposing the Taliban as the Taliban is aggressive.  The question would then simply be how much War materiel do we give the non-Taliban forces in an Afghan Civil War and it will not be this War as Pornography of U.S. Army field divisions realizing the adolescent wet dreams of the John McCains and their Kelly Ayotte concubine demented delusions.

We triumphed in World War II over Nazism and Fascism, because the ideal and it's efficacy was clear.  But as soon as War is reduced to coups of patrimony we become as Pigs in Orwellian satire, witnesses to a dishonor of U.S. Army field divisions deployed, arrayed in rank and files against rag tag turbans---The mountains of Afghanistan are not germanic black woods of conquering Ceasars, nor are U.S. Regimental Colors, Centurion Eagles swaying in Punic struggles.

If our speech post 9-11 with the Taliban is consequentially a Reaganomic Stimulus for Haliburton and Co. Before the TeaParty stooge woke up to "stimulus" being all that is antagonistic with our Political-Economy as if Reaganomics never happened, then the Corporate Media collaborator should spell such out.

By Apropos

To The God Believers, Specific-Interest, Erin Burnett of CNN and Schizophrenic Greed

To The God Believers, the only approximate absolute is organic needs.  To emprio-science the only approximate absolute is cause and effect.  With this in mind why do we tolerate the narrative of specific-interest as analysis of our relationship with the general principle when the consequences are final  and organically irreversible?

Why do we on one hand proclaim the sovereignty of the individual, then abridge it in the next breath with the idealism of for example Erin Burnett of CNN and her specific-interest value speculation narrative?

To the Erin Burnett's who quake at the prospect of a type of resolve, settling accounts with specific interest, the Human Condition isn't the sum of superlative distortions, conveniently presented at the behest of schizophrenic greed masquerading as progress.

By Apropos

West Virginia and Mother's Day: Musings

Really of all the backwards and reactionary positions in West Virginia's history, it is refreshing in a way to learn that West Virginia was the first state to recognize Mothers Day officially.

To all the Moms out there and to be---Yes on paper, in an archive some where, the dusty shelf of a clueless bureaucrat, Mothers Day is a Sunday in May, but for all you do, WE KNOW EVERYDAY IS YOUR DAY.

By Apropos

The Idealism Of The Reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld

A status quo and it's reactionaries always explains away at the expense of the narrative of it's existence.

So we can have a Thomas Jefferson penning articles of liberty at the expense of depriving human beings he held as slaves, theirs.

The idealism of the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld always suppose that the detail and approximate specificity is at odds with the general approximation so instead of the rule, what the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld idealistically instruct is the suppositions of the exception.

The work of idealism and it's mental labor is always that of foolishly distorting empiricism.  Because what the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld conveniently and with intellectual dishonesty glibly ignore is: achieving the American "dream" or economic stability isn't affirmative critique of the national Political-Economy narrative in itself, which still has the question of genocide, slavery and presumptive discrimination to resolve.  But it is simply a statement that the functioning element has submitted to the status quo narrative bias and the idealism of the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld is it's indulgence.

By Apropos

The Narrative Of The Dictatorship Of Value And The Idealism Of The Nazarene

The only dogma with honest historicity is the narrative of the dictatorship of value and it's variegated expressions and not even the idealism of the Nazarene stands in inquisition.

"Give unto Ceaser..." is as inexorable as Chaka's Mfecane and justice is what is the social-contract mitigating the narrative of the dictatorship of value.

By Apropos

The Reactionary Glenn Beck and The Exploitation Of Reaction

The media personality Glenn Beck is just another typical idealistic, simple-minded reactionary who has gleefully stumbled across how easy it is to "get" money by bedazzling the stunted-stupefied brains amongst us.

What this speaks to isn't brilliance but the mediocrity and abject poverty of the standard the Glenn Beck class surmounts in amassing value and it's speculations.

Lest we are remiss the adage "in the land of the blind the one-eyed is king" anticipated the reactionary Glenn Beck and the exploitation of reaction.

By Apropos

Seattle Seahawks Richard Sherman And The Humility, Boasting And Hubris Critique

2014 Superbowl XLVIII bound Seattle Seahawks all pro corner, Stanford Grad Richard Sherman is the most recent casualty.

Post Game 1/19/14; triumph over the hated rival San Francisco 49ers and the correctly described mediocre receiver Michael Crabtree. Richard Sherman correctly reiterated his professional superiority as being the best defender of the fade route---to which crass haters of all stripes, bigots, their perpetual fears and ignorance and the so-claimed genteel amongst us ranted cacophonous babel with the humility, boasting and hubris critique---that Richard Sherman wasn't humble, he was boastful and full of hubris.

This humility, boasting and hubris critique demands this: So it's socially wrong and unacceptable to verbally boast but it's socially mandatory we boast with durable commodity acquisitions i.e. Homes, Cars, brand name things.  But we are social losers if our Women are without a Hermes scarf.

In a world where 85 persons own equaled wealth to 3.5 billion persons, umbrage at and assault on Richard Sherman, a football player boasting because of a job well done reveals psychosis of our human condition and the audacity of it's hypocrisy.

By Apropos

CNN Cares More About Killer Whales Than The Middle-Class

CNN showed it's concern for the barbaric treatment of killer whales by SeaWorld with the recent broadcast of the documentary Blackfish.  Which took a historical journey into the genesis of enslaved killer whales in water parks i.e. SeaWorld.

If CNN can educate us of the injustice of enslaving killer whales, when will CNN show us how Ronald Reagan, modern Republican-Conservatism and it's Reaganomics Intellectual-Liberalism has systematically and methodically, complicit with the Bill Clinton Democrat destroyed the middle-class?

By Apropos

On The Question of State Secrets and A Right To Know

On the question of State Secrets: It is first and foremost that of who does "what" to know "what."

Then the question becomes why is "what" being done.

A nation, the general public doesn't have a right to the disclosure of tactics it's intelligence and organized violence institutions use in pursuit of national strategies.  The only national right is an understanding of the suppositions in support of the strategies.

This is one aspect on the question of State Secrets and a right to know, naturally there are others.

By Apropos