Voter Suppression Is Worse Than Drug Dealing and Catherine Englebrecht By William Thorpe

If Christopher Hooks "What if they held an election and everyone came" article in the November 2020 Texas Monthly Magazine is factually accurate and what he raises against Catherine Englebrecht, to wit others, is correct then it's clearly a prima facie expose' of voter suppression and conspiracy to commit voter suppression and it must be investigated and Catherine Englebrecht held to account.

Secondly, the same November 2020 Texas Monthly carrying the Hooks voter suppression in Texas expose' has 90 pages listing the creme de la creme of Texas Attorney's, Texan legal mind, who more than others understand Hook's declaration that:

"If the health of a democracy can be measured by how many citizens participate in the political process Texas has Lupus....."

         AND       

..."The Declaration of Independence avers that a government is only legitimate if it enjoys the"consent of the governed," but for much of the U.S. history, it worked that way

So why then are we assaulted and insulted with 90 pages of smiling predominantly white lawyers proffering a base of social legitimacy whom if Hooks is correct in his voter suppression expose' per virtue of their professional existence have clearly abrogated their civic, ethical and moral duty to call out, disavow and get on the right side of humanness by repudiating the elemental crime and tyranny of voter suppression that taints their very existence as Texan social beings and the unjust privilege, it bestows.

Thirdly, why hasn't texas Black intelligentsia demanded that the likes of Catherine Engelbrecht are investigated. If what Hooks exposes in his is article correct, Engelbrecht then is nothing more than a pining extra from Birth of a Nation a holdover from its stylized supremacist futility. which consequently is more depraved than the activity of a drug dealer whose social existence is effected by the intellectual-liberalism of the likes of Englebrecht and their voter suppression pursuits.

If the vote and the act of voting, in principle and its practice, is the determinant of society and it's basis then anything that violates it is more than anything else criminality of the first degree and highest order and its high time elements as Catherine Englebrecht, if hooks expose pans out are labeled as petty criminals that they are, lower than the drug dealer reprobate

By William Thorpe

Smoking But Not Inhaling and Marijuana Legalization

To those defiers of respiratory physics, Smoking but not Inhaling. To those who for whatever reason defame and extoll the virtue's of Marijuana. To the question of Marijuana Legalization. I have for you one experience, Read, Dope inc. By http://www.lyndonlarouche.org/dope.htm.

"SPEECH BY WILLIAM THORPE"

 

Why Lebron James [King James] is Correct and Voting Is Speech By William Thorpe

photo by Element5 Digital

Voting is Speech. A means, a mechanism of stating intentions, how one wants to live. Revolutions, uprisings also are means and mechanisms of stating intentions of how to live.

What we have been confronted with since the inception of the United States experiment is what has always been the dialectic of the human condition, its antagonisms, and contradictions as dynamic of its various parts. So the United States experiment created the Black American because of enslavement as a political designation meaning a construct of slaveholding law as contradiction to itself, in violation of its "all men are created equal" declarative for independence, but for the enslaved black people subjects, an antagonism.

To Thomas Jefferson who as author of the "all men are created equal" declarative, theoretically speculated on the inalienability of man's liberty while enslaving Black people the declaration was simply a hypocrisy, a contradiction. While for the enslaved black person what was a simple hypocrisy and contradiction which Thomas Jefferson had the intellectual-liberal indulgence of simply ignoring or being anguished by was an antagonistic-subjugated fact of life which could not be resolved with the speech of voting, but only revolution and uprising which the enslaved Nat Turner in 1831 gave us it's practice.

So we fast forward to the 21st century and 2020 where Black America is not subject to the chattel antagonism of slavery but firmly occupying a contradictory relationship within the United States experiment. Just as James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, John Adams and Co. of the dusty dead white men participant in the formation of the United States shared political-economy and social commonalities. They also shard and held contradictory relationships with each other and within their work forming the United States of which Federalist papers reveals. The point being, contradiction as dialectic is the operative with any society and its resolution is point, counterpoint, debate, and argument culminating in voting is speech.

The fact Black America has historically participated in voting is speech, means and mechanism of stating its intentions and how it wants to live while not reaping minuscule reward for its participation and labors is not indictment of voting as impotent and farcial means or an affirmation of a formative dialectic of the nation. Instead what it reveals is an intrinsic absence of motive understanding and grasp of the national contradictions which as it existed between Thomas Jefferson and Co. currently also exist waiting to be resolved, reformed, and exploited by capable and able perspectives.

Currently, there is a reemerging tendency which has parochially existed to the determent of Black America that innocuously states, voting is an exercise in futility. As election day 2020 approaches it's Fifth Column foot soldiers, collaborators i.e The Breakfast Club Show, Sean P. Diddy Combs, elements of a type of Black Nationalist, and the usual cabal opponents of Black America's assertiveness and its objective political-economy are beating their chest, gnashing their teeth, howling that voting is a trick and should be shunned by Black America.

This 2020 version of the tendency is posisted under the banner, Black America should stop voting Democrats because Democrats have not advanced Black America's interest. The only thing this argument reveals and exposes besides its obvious nature as ploy to dissuade Black America voting because the same thing isn't said about Black America and church or religion in general. Because as diligently as Black America goes to church and participates in religion the narrative consistently remains the same and the Democratic Party has produced more advancement for Black America than church and religion. So what we are faced with is the paternalistic condescension of proponents of the anti-Democratic Party arguments. As if the Democratic Party is supposed to in and of itself paternalistically know what is best for Black America without demand and push from rank and file organized advocacy engaged in open political action. Secondly, scheming a disassociation of Black America from the Democratic Party ensures the supremacy of the Republican Party and it's reactionary, retrograde, reprobate, misanthropic policies that only entrench racism and bigotry.

What commentators as The Breakfast Club, Sean P. D. Combs should do is immerse in a study of materialist political-economy then subsequently observe and analyze missteps in and failures of American Foreign Policy because insight will be gained and will shed clarity on how we vote and what we vote for.

Abandoning the vote is a non-starter and is beyond stretching the neck on the guillotine.

By William Thorpe

Where is Black Media and It Isn't The Breakfast Club

Photo by Ben Kolde

Where is the Black Media voices hurling and leading charges that black and latinix communities will not continue tolerating one set of a justice narrative for black drug dealers and another for white Michael T. Flynn's of white supremacy and it's conservatism?

Don Lemon isn't that voice. Nor is Steve Harvey or Rick Smiley or the Breakfast Club.

Black determination needs a voice that calls out names unlike the generalizations of Louis Farrakhan. White supremacy and its conservatism for too long have practiced its reaction under the presumptions of the intellectual-liberalism with status quo anonymity, and there cannot be the scared speech of a Sean "P, Diddy" Combs or a "Jay-Z" Carter.

White supremacy and its conservatism isn't irreproachable call 'em out. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, to name the bigotry pantheon are not defacto American speech. Have we forgotten how to polemicize and mock conservatism and its hypocrisy operative?

By William Thorpe

No Amount Of OM's Regardless of Meditation

By William Thorpe 

The Art of Trump Isn't A Deal But A Demagoguery Deal With The Devil Even Evangelicals Amour Can't Save Him

Why Calls by A Type of White America For A Reopening of the Economy and A Return To Business A Usual Is The New Cross Burning

As soon as it dawned on Republican, Evangelicals, and Conservatives that Covid-19 wasn't killing white people as much as black and latinix, they started protesting for a return to business as usual, a re-opening of the economy. The dismissiveness of the lives and death of all those black Detroiters which the spectacle of Republicans, Evangelicals and Conservatives honking horns, milling about on the state capital grounds as Lansing, demanding that the Governor cater to them couldn't be stated loud and clear had that type of white American went into Detroit and burnt crosses on the graves of all black victims of COVID-19.

So why hasn't the black and latinix community confronted that type of white American protester in the streets and called them out for what they are cross burning, petty racist, reactionaries?

For too long we have allowed a type of white person, the Republican, Evangelical and Conservative to frame issues, from Ronald Reagans welfare queen, through George H. Bush, Willie Hortons's demonization to the Democrat Bill Clinton chastizing Sistah Soul Jah as foil in their exploitation of racist trope suppositions

The Civil rights movement saw Black American will expressed through marching. What this moment requires is black people confronting that type of white American in the streets.

By William Thorpe

You Guessed Life? Well You Guessed Wrong, Evangelicals, Republicans, and Donald Trump Chose Money

Money is man-made, right? And as we are badgered by religious presumptions life is created by God.

So guess which of the two the supposedly God-loving Evangelicals, Republicans, and Donald Trump chose when the rubber of Corona, Covid-19 hit the pandemic road of 2020 in Donald Trumps USA.

You guessed Life? Well, you guessed wrong, Evangelicals, Republicans and Donald Trump chose money.

So all you white Senior Citizens who have been lemming-like voting Republicans an on Sundays practicing your segregated piety, not only was your Make America Great Again delusion reduced to a hashtag, #okayboomer; but your exceptionalism has been reduced to the whimpering of a herd being culled         your presumptive God created life nothing more than a spongy host, defenseless to the boring of a novel Ribonucleic Acid.

By William Thorpe

Democrats, Progressives Boycott Goods and Produce From Rural Republican Majority Areas

Why are Democrats coddling Republicans i.e Wisconsin? Look if urban areas are majority Democratic and rural areas are majority Republican and due to gerrymandering and dubious U.S. Supreme Court rulings, political districts are Republican biased and as such a Republican worldview with its attendant consequences is killing people. From Women's health to a reckless accessibility to guns and diabolical political-economy scheme that requires a suspension of common sense and intellect for it's existence. Then Democrats and the just minded, Progressives have to pursue the fact that only a radical relationship can exist between urban Democratic majorities and rural Republican majorities.

First of all, we have to affirm a primary reality:

• Rural communities and areas need and depend on urban economics for survival

In light of this affirmation, urban Democratic majorities must reorient an entire set of economic relations that underscores and reminds rural Republican majorities that without urban consumption, their, milk, cheese, eggs, potatoes, e.t.c will have to seek non-Democratic mouths and stomachs to feed.

Democrats and Progressives have to boycott goods and produce from rural Republican majority areas and seek out goods and produce from rural Democratic majority areas.

Why should Progressive and Democratic minds and hearts be developed on the carbohydrate from potatoes grown by an Idaho bigot or the meat of a Texas cattle rancher xenophobes who viscerally despise the multi-culturalism, the let live morality, the Feminist-determination, the anti-racism, the political-economy practicality of organized labor and it's universal deduction of the social contract's accountability ethic of the urban consumer        why?

Look, hidden within this political-economic reality of buying and selling, exchange and trade of goods and produce is the enabling operative supporting and maintaining the Republican narrative that has systematically and systemically destroyed lives and if rural America is it's lackey, it's mechanistic subjective. Then the only relationship we can have with rural Republican majority America is antagonistic.

We stand with blinders off there cannot be any speculation of national unity when the Democrative and Progressive heart and mind does not share in a Republican idea of nation that squats squarely on White supremacy         from the presumptions of Catholicism divvying the world, through European invasions, Colonization and the primitive accumulation of slavery, Imperialism and its capital exploitation to the speculations of wage labor         So in pursuit of open political action, in light of our understanding, the urban Democratic majority must boycott economic activity with rural Republican America.

By William Thorpe

Evangelical Meeke Addison's Sermon at The i.e. A Mount, DAMNATION TO THOSE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS!!!!

SPEECH BY WILLIAM THORPE

Dr. Mehmet Oz and His "Lifestyle" Deflection of Why COVID-19 is Ravaging The Black Community Should Be His Waterloo

Chicago's Mayor Lightfoot said it right and I paraphrase; that racism kills, during her analysis of why, if Black people make up 29% of Chicago's population but are 72% of Corona Virus or COVID-19 death.

Yes, racism kills whether it's COVID-19 or a noose in the hands of an evangelical klansman and Dr. Mehmet Oz's "Lifestyle" deflection trope which is stunningly crass, that Black people are simply existing "Lifestyles" that put them at risk for COVID-19 death should be his waterloo.

The Black community from all its angles should marshal its focus and be like a ton of bricks on Dr. Mehmet Oz.

If Dr. Mehmet Oz wants to peddle in racist trope deflections and mischaracterization, he's at liberty to do so but not on the central, mainstream stage of ABC Television, The eco-sphere of racist and bigots found in the Evangelical radio of American Family Radio, along with Rupert Murdock's Fox Media, The septic tanks of American Enterprise Institute, American Legislative Exchange Council, and Federalist Society will do.

The Black Community, Democrats and Progressives should not wait for allied politicians to take the lead in ridiculing and mocking petty-tyrannical minds and hearts as Dr. Mehmet Oz who only exhibits critical-courage when bashing the lumpen and society's wretched. But there should be a marshalling of speech against reactionaries as Dr. Mehmet Oz and his ilk.

Even the vanquished have agency in the terms of surrender.

By William Thorpe


Further Reading & Listening

• Dr. Gupta reacts to Dr. Oz citing new study on Fox News
• How Fox News is playing fast and loose with American lives, illustrated by one Dr. Oz clip

Peter Cottontail On Lock 2020 Unable to Have His Day In The Sun

Evangelical's Impetus Anti-Social Distancing, Covid 19 Delivering to the Grim Reaper & The Beast

Trump Brain Storming Covid 19 Tweet Session

Evangelical Pro-Death Pipeline From Womb to Gun Shooting Gallery

Trusted Aide Moore Feeding Frenzy With Sessions Idealistic Worldview of Blood & Soil To POTUS

CHINA HAS A NIGHTMARE COVID19

TRUMPS MEIN KAMPF

The Specific Hypocrisy of the Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison and The Contradiction of the Black-Trump Voter By William Thorpe

To let the Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison tell it, all the contradiction of a Black-Trump voter has to do in defense of their support for the black-antagonist Donald Trump is present the "bible" as reason. [Note Trumps bigotry, paternalism, racism towards black people are thoroughly archived and documented]

Now let me say this: In Meeke Addison's self-assertion, her life is principled and based on "biblical application" to wit the eponymous Paul aka Saul and his opportunistic self-righteous writings. I need not point out the hypocrisy imbued in her "biblical application," but to cite and para-phrase Meeke Addison's self-proclaimed arch-nemesis Karl Marx, there isn't a specific injustice we lay claim but to a historical and general injustice, so likewise there isn't a specific hypocrisy of Meeke Addison but a historical and general one which in her Evangelical zealousness she describes on the one hand as her sinful nature per virtue of her humanness, but on the other and here lies the general contradiction of her theology, which is, the cross-death of the Nazarene has absolved her historic sinful nature so even though she is without sin, yet repentance is her overarching operative.

This Evangelical-Apologetic sophistry is truly child-like in its presumptions, because Evangelicals particularly "white" Evangelicals and their lackey Meeke Addison are incapable of recognizing its anthropomorphism. In other words they casually gloss over why they emphasize certain biblical aspects at the expense of the rest as mere expression of their petty, social and political-economic interest, and its pursuit.

Meeke  Addison in accord with her "white" Evangelical glibness focuses her criticisms on anything that causes her "white" masters distress and discomfort, which translates into race relations and any hint of highlighting the nation's historical and continuing inconsistencies and injustices. So the formulating basis of any utterance by Meeke Addison has to be constantly mocked and scorned because not only is it intellectually-liberal but it is patently deceptive.

The contradiction of a black person voting for Donald Trump irrespective of whether its based on whatever suppositionary understanding had of the bible doesn't deny the fact it continues that very dynamic of the genesis of blackness as a social and political fact. So naturally, it is illogical.

We wouldn't have a human condition and history if there isn't and hasn't been significant events of betrayals of logical self-interest. So Meeke Addison would have us ignore the fact that black women die during childbirth, the infant mortality rate of black babies leads the nation and instead of elevating this narrative, demanding its accountability with her commercialized and monstized. The Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison instead, indulges in the diversion, away from those social justice remedies, the predominant mortality of black women during childbirth demands, practiced historically by "white" Evangelicals with the idealistic focus on abortion, on homosexuality, on bathroom use and what is noteworthy, all of the histrionics are not elevated even within the bible on its finite terms. Yet the expression of self-interest betrayal by the black-Trump voter is explained away with the idiocy, Trump is anti-abortion.

 By William Thorpe

The Pharisee Meeke Addison and The Heretic Robert Oscar Lopez By William Thorpe

Hey Meeke Addison where in the, your bible, more specifically, where do we find your field marshall, the usurper Paul aka Saul reducing sin to a mere and simple "confusion"? So why are you huffing and puffing over the firing of the heretic Robert Oscar Lopez? Isn't it heresy for an Evangelical to reduce the sin of sexual immorality to a mere confusion?

If as you, Meeke Addison and your opportunistic field marshall the usurper Paul aka Saul elevate sexual immorality to exclusively mean homosexuality, as pursued by contemporary American Evangelicals, more specifically "white" Evangelicals at the expense of fornication and lust as the preeminent sin. Then the firing of the Heretic Robert Oscar Lopez by the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary because of antagonisms he had with his former employer, to barrow Meeke Addisosns phraseology was "biblical."

Look, the evangelical Achilles Heel isn't it's fundamental contradiction of the cross-death of the Nazarene being an absolution for the human continuum of sin, yet seeking repentance of sin. If such tautology was proffered in any courtroom not only would it be mocked but scorned. Because the Evangelical Achilles Heel is that age-old nemesis, an inability and unwillingness to have a measure for self-scrutiny without the apology of the purported theology whose genealogy, its attribution is as clouded and obscure as tracing one's lineage to a distant uncle who slew a Saber-Tooth Tiger that was terrorizing his clan.

By William Thorpe

GOPcrisy

SPEECH By William Thorpe

Consumer Behavior and Thinking Aloud

SPEECH By William Thorpe

Comments On The Book "Black Wave" By An Authors Whose Name Is Irrelevant

The problem with writers of books as "The BlackWave" critical of Iran and it's Islamic Revolution is, it does it from the narrative of the loser, the opposition to the revolution and its narrative.

What the "Black Wave's" author, whose name is irrelevant, glosses over is, the Iranian Revolution as all revolutions including the American, which should correctly be described as a National War of the Independence, didn't occur in a vacuum. The World Pre-Iranian Revolution wasn't all peaches and cream and all of a sudden Shia Ayatollahs and Mullahs ruined it.

There has been one historical line of attack and criticism of the Iranian Revolution, but with two diverging points:

• It is Islamic and its diverging points are: 

1. It is a Terrorist state
2. It is a Totalitarian and a theologic dictatorship

But the true nature of the Iranian critique, the only nature of the critique is Iran and its militancy dare challenge the Zionist narrative of Israel and its logic of seizing Palestinian Patrimony and to the ends of this conflict, all sorts and levels of propaganda are wielded and brought to bear against the perogatives and speech of the Iranian Revolution, of which the "Black Wave" is another labor.

Notwithstanding the presumptions of the Zionist and Iranian positions, whatever contradictions that are inherent within Iranian Theocracy can only be resolved from the perspective of the social fact of Iranian speech and not whatever antagonisms it has with the suppositions of the "Black Wave" and it's author whose name is irrelevant, and its narrative masters.

Look, critics of the Mullahs, if such critics are Muslims should war within Islam for its reform and Islam is no stranger to reform, and not simply present and represent a Eurocentric supremacy critique of Iran. Let's not forget that there is nothing unique and exclusive to the critique leveled against Iran by Eurocentric supremacy and its Zionist ward. Europe and America are not heaven. The only difference between eurocentric supremacy and Iranian militancy is we know all about the former and less about the later.

To claim as the author of the "BlackWave" whose name is irrelevant does and I paraphrase, that the emergence of Shia Iran has caused panic in the surrounding Sunni states is petty intellectual-liberalism giving us not one illuminating ray of insight and with these comments, I remind the author whose name is irrelevant, that her "BlackWave" work mocks the purported ends, her Pakistani protagonist beseeched, that of choice and it is in pursuit of choice those vanguards and supporters of the Iranian Revolution aspired.

By William Thorpe

Make Ameri-KKK Again

Contra-Donald Trump and The Resurrection of Walter Cronkite Editorializing By William Thorpe

A seminal moment in American media was the journalist Walter Cronkite transforming the act of editorializing into journalistic purity with the revelation, that the government was lying to the American people on the nature, development, and circumstance of the Vietnam War.

Critics of Walter Cronkite and his televised editorializing were the usual suspects, that reactionary minority who for their own wretched ends and pathetic interest were threatened by the revelations of Walter Cronkite televised editorializing.

Since Walter Cronkite dared challenge the oppositionary status quo with his televised revealing editorials. Academia has lionized the act while culturally it is iconic.

So fast forward to another war, the one currently being waged by Donald J. Trump against the nation and its hard-won truths, that directly poses the question: Who amongst the non-Fox News legatees of Walter Cronkite have the resolve to advance Cronkites notion that editorializing is not only required but demanded when the pursuit of journalistic equivalency is not only morally and professionally repugnant, but not doing it is crass and abject cowardice.

Secondly, the reminder that accountability isn't a Paul aka Saul declarative, descending from the "grace" of the Nazarene on cherubic and seraphic wings, nor will it emerge from heroic but gelded impeachment push. But there are enough accumulated archival facts of malfeasance, moral turpitude, mendacity and base corruption of Donald J. Trump's actions and behavior to interrupt the robotic delivery by any of the non-Fox News anchors with the televised resurrection of their Walter Cronkite moment, shaking and rousing the nation from the stupor of the unimaginable.

Reference
H.Res.755 - Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors

Critical Race Theory and The Philistine Meeke Addison By William Thorpe

Okay we will play along and act like the Philistine Meeky Addison's disdain for Critical Race Theory is something more than just another pathetic intellectual-liberal example of the house negro apology and mock it on her evangelical-apologetic terms. Which then simply amounts to, there cannot be a continuum of American injustice embodied by it's white subjective within the evangelical Christian context because; the redemptive Christ has cleansed sin, hence racism as expression of sin is mooted.

Now such sophistry worthy of the eponymous past master himself Paul aka Saul demands consistency, a consistency the pharisaism of Meeky Addison is incapable of delivering. Because if all socio-critique and pursuit of justice are viewed through the evangelical-apologetics dicta, then why do we even have social-remonstrance if the redemptive Christ has relieved us of sin and its continuum? But the fact is Meeky Addison's disdain and ire for Critical Race Theory is, it simply destabilizes her world view because it is the mirror reflecting her inferiority and house negro self-loathing and no amount of religiosity and its jealous-resentment of secularism will redeem this bad fact.

Critical Race Theory is a statement of the obvious: The effects of the continuum of white privilege and its wake upon American justice which, whether or not Meeky Addison recognizes if the very ground her evangelical-apologetics stands and teeters on.

Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey, Wanna Protest? Protest American Injustice

Biblical Moral Authority: Evangelicals

Free Speech, Dan Cathy of Chic-fil-a..And God Said Or The Bible Says and History Will Erect Tombstones

The Implicit activity of free speech is it anticipates antithesis, it recognizes there will be opposition.  Couching theological liberties as free speech is either the work of a lazy and feeble mind or at its very core an effort to reassert idealistic dicta.

Dan Cathy of Chic-fil-a Restaurants as most Republican-Conservatives when confronted with the reactionary nature and backwardness of their thought and world view find refuge under the banner of...and God said or the Bible says.  So when Dan Cathy touched off a recent firestorm with his anti-gay comments, he was quick, along with his supporters and defenders to claim free speech because it was his religious belief and liberty.

The Issue and the problem with... and God said or the Bible says, as free speech is we cannot argue with God, we cannot debate God, even the Devil isn't truly antithetical to God.  So... And God said or the Bible says for purposes of free speech definitions is as idealistic as the notion of "being outside of history" which is what Dan Cathy and his ilk would always demand of the Human Condition and it's dialectical-materialist reality.

The United States Constitution articulates religious freedoms as specifically being without the dicta of the state and its bias.  Free speech is subsequently defined antithetically to religion because free speech is the activity of thought, mental labor.  Religion isn't an idea to its believers, it's rather a suspension, suppression, and repression of ideas, it frowns on the activity of free speech.

So for the very elements, free speech warns us against to conceal their reactionary practice under its mantle hints at two occurrences, either we have become militantly decadent or we have lost the Jacobin edge of polemics.

Dan Cathy, his reaction, and backwardness can and will invoke God as a medium of their idealistic intolerance and history will erect tombstones to their failure.

By William Thorpe Imprisoned at Red Onion State Prison

Evangelicals Apologist

American Exceptionalism Circa 1776

Donald Trumps Casting Couch

Shaka Zulu

SHAKA ZULU

SEPTEMBER 22, 1828

BAYETE!

White Privilege

BREXIT

Modern Pharisees, The Extermination of Native Americans and The Dehumanization of Black People

Evangelicals as all totalitarians and hypocrites suffer from memory loss. Contemporary culture which they have become petty hucksters and hustlers railing against is a reaction to the once upon a time supremacy of a historical "Christian" status quo.

The extermination of Native Americans and the primal seizure of their patrimony and the land, the enslavement, and dehumanization of Black people didn't occur in a porn saturated, LGBTQ-Drag Queen prancing, aborted fetuses galore, disrespect of killer cops, "Godless" Hollywood culture.

Instead the savagery wrought and practiced by "White" European invaders of America, the extermination of Native Americans, the enslavement of Black people happened upon their biblical understandings when it was the dominant cultural organizing force. The sun as witness to "White" European savagery rose and set year after year within the culture apology of the bible.

So what historical biblical moral authority are we being demanded a return to our evangelical compatriots? Weren't enough Native Americans exterminated, haven't Black people been dehumanized enough under their historical biblical morality     that they dare lecture us that modern, contemporary culture is Godless and lacking biblical morality.

When "they" Evangelicals and their modern Pharisees self recognize the fact that the apogee of their biblical moral authority is a carriesque Jesus Christ wearing blood-drenched and soaked garments on a white horse. An image, the fertile image of "Godless" Hollywood is yet to organically conjure, despite carrie, is only a motif of the very culture these modern Pharisees have monetized railing against.

By William Thorpe

Will Become Another Problem Our Sapience Solves - By William Thorpe

They terrorize us in life to scare us with death.

The ability to kill a slave isn't a willingness to kill slaves,

The predator culls the herd otherwise it perish, which is what terrorized life and scared with death experience unknowingly,

"We have nothing to fear but fear itself" was mobilization against the other      Yes "We the people......" Government is only possible, our suppositions, keeping us in file in class war life,

So "Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" So let us truly go there finally, finally experience the recriminative utter silence, primordial silence of annihilation: when trees fall without sound. Where supremacy presumptions stand laid bare coming to terms with "The devil is in the detail" and that usury, it's derivatives and terroristic valuation and the death exploitation will become another problem our sapience solves,

They terrorize us in life to scare us with death.

By William Thorpe

AS NOVEMBER 6th APPROACHES DONALD TRUMP's' NOSE GROWS LONGER

Credit William Thorpe

DECEPTION

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Conservatism Intellectual-Liberalism and Its Bottom Pit Critique and War

For too long American-Conservatism and it's foot soldier have criticized liberalism and the war on poverty as a bottomless pit of spent money.

The Bottomless pit of spent money critique is also used to deride and dismiss demands to fund public education.

Conservatism critique is summed up as despite the amount of money spent on the war on poverty and public education. Issues still persist and exist, so liberalisms approach has been wrong and only conservatism's intellectual-liberalism and its personal responsibility and social engineering narrative will allow redemption for the poor and non-unionized teachers [euphemestically presented as charter schools] will save public education

Our political-economy, however, reminds us that the conservative critique on both accounts is false and outright deceptive.

No one will dare argue that nevertheless the bottomless pit of taxpayer money spent on waging wars. The idea and its practice of waging war is a failure because not only is war still with us but is constant as the sun rising    so we should promptly embark on the ..... Beating swords into plows .....delusion and stop pouring taxpayer money into the bottomless pit of the nations military, intelligence agencies and the state organized violence of law and order which is also another bottomless pit of public expenditure, because nothing seems to indicate that crime is deterred or reformed.

But as soon as the question is: How is value [money] interacted with, who has access to it    we encounter the distortion of what is good for the goose isn't good for the gander or the pot can with a straight face `a la the banal and fatuous pronouncements of Arthur Brooks of the American Enterprise Institute, on work and dignity and Amy Holmes cohost of PBS In Principle. [who hasn't encountered nothing pre-fixed conservatism that doesn't cause her orgasmic swoon] call the kettle black   In furious reaction to any attempt and effort at showing that certain unresolved and unsettled accounts of our political-economy are inherent saboteurs on the question of poverty.

Conservatism and its intellectual-liberalism has long given up any pretense to "thought" and embraced its true calling: the deification cult of the reactionary Ronald Reagan. So it's contemporary practice when not doing 3-legged and sack races with every last slithering denizen from not the mere unjust side of history but the wrong side of it, almost accomplishing the impossible of stepping outside of it   the incredulity of what it has become escape it, as it negates its own dignity, a dignity, to let Authur Brooks lecture us, its lack is what ails American Poverty.

Conservatism has no issue with the antagonism of a national-economy maintained on taxpayer money going to bomb makers, missile makers, handcuffs, and shackles manufacture, police uniforms makers for the primary purpose of money distribution for the employment of a majority white worker. Or taxpayer money subsidizing all sectors and activities of the American political-economy from the industrial-practical to hair-brained enterprise but not limited to charlatan think tanks i.e American Enterprise Institutes, for the specific purpose of money circulation and redistribution. But as soon as the same identical logic of government created money underpins a response in the war on poverty and is circulated to the welfare recipient     [and should be noted has enabled, catalysed and accelerated the wealth accumulation of Walmart Inc. and it's contemporaries catering to the welfare recipient] which by the way is at a far lesser amount than what is given to the bomb-making white worker whose existence as a worker is primarily due to randomness of being born white. Conservatisms intellectual-liberalism emerges in reaction to if not insidiously misanthropic arguments, dubious ones that amount to: The American poor of whom a majority, by the way, work have not embraced enough the Auschwitz Death Camp motto of work will set you free  [which Arthur Brooks of AEI shouldn't have any problem in finding his dignity supposition in it] or the fact adults are reduced to raising families on McDondalds wage isn't basis enough to raise the minimum wage because Conservatism's intellectual-liberalism supposes fast-food wages are intended for teenagers.

Conservatism has been getting away with its snake-oil, charlatan analysis because the Progressive critique and its liberal worldview has yielded one too many times

By Apropos

Related Reading

• Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right

RIP

Credit William Thorpe

 

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Year of the Women

Ode to Donald Trump and Misanthropy

Living in the savagery, I was

Living in the savagery I  was till

I met your civilization and it savaged me.

Living in my ignorance I was

living in my ignorance I was till I met 

your wisdom and it ignored me.

I was living and you said it was 

dystopian-existence and I realized that was yours

By William Thorpe

Related articles

• Bitcoin and Idealistic-Meritocracy
• Robots, Donald Trump and the Atlantic Slave Trade

Bitcoin and Idealistic-Meritocracy

To paraphrase Marx, the emergence of money presents its own set of rules. To wit, bitcoin as an expression of money clearly does.

The problem with bitcoin is: it tilts the value dialectic to an extreme form of meritocracy, an idealistic-meritocracy to be specific. i.e. only the mathematically adept or a comparable digital program can access it, "mine" for it, after solving advanced theoretical mathematics.

Or those with conventional paper money or liquidity can afford its speculated inflated value. Either of bitcoin access points returns us to the antagonisms of old world or analog money.

The truth is bitcoin nor old-world analog money expresses the value dialectic which money is intended to do, minus the Marxian-Contradiction of "its own sets of rules". Thus squarely placing bitcoin as another distortion, another idealistic-Meritocracy that shackles the Human Condition to the suppositions of others and with equally destructive consequences on Human conditional sets of relations as the industrial revolution despite existential progress.

By Apropos

Polly The Parrot and Ann Coulter

If I trained an African Grey Parrot, Polly to do what a call center human does, What Ann Coulter does, but with more healthy meat on her bones than Ann Coulter.

Will that once and for all put to rest this ignorance over what is money, what are taxes and what is deficit and with a Polly beak peck let out the air of Conservatisms polemic-balloon of What is value?

I'm as V.I. Lenin in "The State and Revolution" laying down pen to man the barricade, mocking Ann Coulter    That Polly my African Grey Parrot is a creator of value as opposed to the redistribution narrative of the Ann Coulter's and their anal retentive Ayn Rand zeitgeist intellectual-liberalism

By Apropos

Related articles

• Robots, Donald Trump and the Atlantic Slave Trade
• Solitary Watch and The Antagonism Of Idealistic-Journalism and Accountability
• What We Are About

The Prisoners Wife By Asha Bandele: A Review

The book is supposedly A Love Story. But I don't know what to make of it---It's too full of recriminations, regrets, resentments, and condescension to be a result of love, as love is understood by the human condition.

The setting for this "Love" is Prison, not any prison for that matter but the insidious and
Machiavellian enterprise of an American prison, The Department of Corrections of The State of New York. The story is a reflection of the tumultuous state of American cultural expression and it's subjective, American Hearts and Minds, because if the cultural and emotional expression of the human is simply a sum of character, then love as the ultimate value of emotion and its medium culture will reflect the state and nature of its subjective. Emotion in the most sublime of conditions and environment is still a strange and mysterious beast, add the ingredient of the most alienative and perverted environmental condition known to humanity, prison and what will you have? What you should have is the sum value of human character, that baptism by fire through adversity, that qualitative redemption from the disjointedness of chaotic quantity but Ms. Bandele fails to even have an inkling of the maxim "I'm Solitude made Man" ---- Solitude which in this context is anguish, that accomplice of love, love which she claims.

The author's emotional consciousness is either objectively malnourished or her alienation from the objectivity of her femininity is so complete that she is confused, She mistakes the adventurous inclination of her Eros with that most consuming of emotions, "Love". Whether or not she wants to face up to and has the presence of mind to acknowledge it, she simply had a stimulating adventure with a prisoner, a test in that most simplistic and primitive of human urges, self-gratification in its motive of one-upmanship. As she tongue in cheek, succinctly puts it "I wanted to be important to someone again" [ pp.27]

For starters, Rashid her beloved, lover and subsequent husband is too one-dimensional and acquiescent, an emasculated corollary of collateral damage from the war between the sexes submitting disgracefully to his wife Asha's each and every undisciplined desire an infantile idealism for whatever it is and was, that was between them to be of that higher human emotion, Love, The only excusable rationalization for his behavior is the stimulus of the relationship in-it self and its satisfying impact on his "...Scorched-Earth" [pp.165] psyche was enough to overlook the dominance of his wife and that spells eunuchism.

Asha, on the other hand, would have us, readers believe that her most yearned for desire and sought for reality is to have her imprisoned mate free and with her, yet when she is impregnated, granted the germinating testimonial seed of their love, she has no problem aborting the fetus.

What is striking and revealing is at every turn of the way, their way and obstacles crop up, which in the general sense, with its solution or how they contend with it would enable their humaneness to define and give credibility to the love they purportedly share both fail its qualification pathetically. Rashid the prisoner and husband for being effeminate and obeisant to his wife's each and every indulgence and Asha the wife for misplacing her need for self-affirmation and its redemptive catharsis with love.

The author presents an unstated and treacherous premise that the pursuit of emotional, mental and physical communion between the imprisoned human and a free one is utterly unrealistic, futile and its fidelity is unattainable--- this premise itself raises the question of what role if any those higher sentient and sapient potentials of humanness plays in the condition of love, not as we misconstrue it to be but as we aspire it to be. If as we are wont to say that love has many facets and conditions then Rashid and Asha's rank at that, no greater than the sum of their undeveloped psyches. What then is Ms. Bandele telling us, "that the spirit is willing but the body is weak"? Or the whole relationship was nothing more than an academic project that is now bearing fruit with her writing a book about it.

To make a long story short "The Prisoners Wife" is a story of relationship between male and female and their dishonesty and inability in coBming to terms with the fact that they lacked the manhood and womanhood to develop, nurture and sustain love in that most stifling of environments------Prison.

I close with Asha Bandele invoked Assata Shakur's
"...If I know anything at all
it's that a wall is just a wall
and nothing more at all.

It can be brought down."

And for 219 pages made a mockery of it with erecting that most noxious of walls       
"condescension".

By William Thorpe, I am detained in Solitary Confinement at Virginias Red Onion State Prison

Cold War of American Racism

Credit William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe