The Specific Hypocrisy of the Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison and The Contradiction of the Black-Trump Voter By William Thorpe

To let the Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison tell it, all the contradiction of a Black-Trump voter has to do in defense of their support for the black-antagonist Donald Trump is present the "bible" as reason. [Note Trumps bigotry, paternalism, racism towards black people are thoroughly archived and documented]

Now let me say this: In Meeke Addison's self-assertion, her life is principled and based on "biblical application" to wit the eponymous Paul aka Saul and his opportunistic self-righteous writings. I need not point out the hypocrisy imbued in her "biblical application," but to cite and para-phrase Meeke Addison's self-proclaimed arch-nemesis Karl Marx, there isn't a specific injustice we lay claim but to a historical and general injustice, so likewise there isn't a specific hypocrisy of Meeke Addison but a historical and general one which in her Evangelical zealousness she describes on the one hand as her sinful nature per virtue of her humanness, but on the other and here lies the general contradiction of her theology, which is, the cross-death of the Nazarene has absolved her historic sinful nature so even though she is without sin, yet repentance is her overarching operative.

This Evangelical-Apologetic sophistry is truly child-like in its presumptions, because Evangelicals particularly "white" Evangelicals and their lackey Meeke Addison are incapable of recognizing its anthropomorphism. In other words they casually gloss over why they emphasize certain biblical aspects at the expense of the rest as mere expression of their petty, social and political-economic interest, and its pursuit.

Meeke  Addison in accord with her "white" Evangelical glibness focuses her criticisms on anything that causes her "white" masters distress and discomfort, which translates into race relations and any hint of highlighting the nation's historical and continuing inconsistencies and injustices. So the formulating basis of any utterance by Meeke Addison has to be constantly mocked and scorned because not only is it intellectually-liberal but it is patently deceptive.

The contradiction of a black person voting for Donald Trump irrespective of whether its based on whatever suppositionary understanding had of the bible doesn't deny the fact it continues that very dynamic of the genesis of blackness as a social and political fact. So naturally, it is illogical.

We wouldn't have a human condition and history if there isn't and hasn't been significant events of betrayals of logical self-interest. So Meeke Addison would have us ignore the fact that black women die during childbirth, the infant mortality rate of black babies leads the nation and instead of elevating this narrative, demanding its accountability with her commercialized and monstized. The Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison instead, indulges in the diversion, away from those social justice remedies, the predominant mortality of black women during childbirth demands, practiced historically by "white" Evangelicals with the idealistic focus on abortion, on homosexuality, on bathroom use and what is noteworthy, all of the histrionics are not elevated even within the bible on its finite terms. Yet the expression of self-interest betrayal by the black-Trump voter is explained away with the idiocy, Trump is anti-abortion.

 By William Thorpe

The Pharisee Meeke Addison and The Heretic Robert Oscar Lopez By William Thorpe

Hey Meeke Addison where in the, your bible, more specifically, where do we find your field marshall, the usurper Paul aka Saul reducing sin to a mere and simple "confusion"? So why are you huffing and puffing over the firing of the heretic Robert Oscar Lopez? Isn't it heresy for an Evangelical to reduce the sin of sexual immorality to a mere confusion?

If as you, Meeke Addison and your opportunistic field marshall the usurper Paul aka Saul elevate sexual immorality to exclusively mean homosexuality, as pursued by contemporary American Evangelicals, more specifically "white" Evangelicals at the expense of fornication and lust as the preeminent sin. Then the firing of the Heretic Robert Oscar Lopez by the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary because of antagonisms he had with his former employer, to barrow Meeke Addisosns phraseology was "biblical."

Look, the evangelical Achilles Heel isn't it's fundamental contradiction of the cross-death of the Nazarene being an absolution for the human continuum of sin, yet seeking repentance of sin. If such tautology was proffered in any courtroom not only would it be mocked but scorned. Because the Evangelical Achilles Heel is that age-old nemesis, an inability and unwillingness to have a measure for self-scrutiny without the apology of the purported theology whose genealogy, its attribution is as clouded and obscure as tracing one's lineage to a distant uncle who slew a Saber-Tooth Tiger that was terrorizing his clan.

By William Thorpe

GOPcrisy

SPEECH By William Thorpe

Consumer Behavior and Thinking Aloud

SPEECH By William Thorpe

Comments On The Book "Black Wave" By An Authors Whose Name Is Irrelevant

The problem with writers of books as "The BlackWave" critical of Iran and it's Islamic Revolution is, it does it from the narrative of the loser, the opposition to the revolution and its narrative.

What the "Black Wave's" author, whose name is irrelevant, glosses over is, the Iranian Revolution as all revolutions including the American, which should correctly be described as a National War of the Independence, didn't occur in a vacuum. The World Pre-Iranian Revolution wasn't all peaches and cream and all of a sudden Shia Ayatollahs and Mullahs ruined it.

There has been one historical line of attack and criticism of the Iranian Revolution, but with two diverging points:

• It is Islamic and its diverging points are: 

1. It is a Terrorist state
2. It is a Totalitarian and a theologic dictatorship

But the true nature of the Iranian critique, the only nature of the critique is Iran and its militancy dare challenge the Zionist narrative of Israel and its logic of seizing Palestinian Patrimony and to the ends of this conflict, all sorts and levels of propaganda are wielded and brought to bear against the perogatives and speech of the Iranian Revolution, of which the "Black Wave" is another labor.

Notwithstanding the presumptions of the Zionist and Iranian positions, whatever contradictions that are inherent within Iranian Theocracy can only be resolved from the perspective of the social fact of Iranian speech and not whatever antagonisms it has with the suppositions of the "Black Wave" and it's author whose name is irrelevant, and its narrative masters.

Look, critics of the Mullahs, if such critics are Muslims should war within Islam for its reform and Islam is no stranger to reform, and not simply present and represent a Eurocentric supremacy critique of Iran. Let's not forget that there is nothing unique and exclusive to the critique leveled against Iran by Eurocentric supremacy and its Zionist ward. Europe and America are not heaven. The only difference between eurocentric supremacy and Iranian militancy is we know all about the former and less about the later.

To claim as the author of the "BlackWave" whose name is irrelevant does and I paraphrase, that the emergence of Shia Iran has caused panic in the surrounding Sunni states is petty intellectual-liberalism giving us not one illuminating ray of insight and with these comments, I remind the author whose name is irrelevant, that her "BlackWave" work mocks the purported ends, her Pakistani protagonist beseeched, that of choice and it is in pursuit of choice those vanguards and supporters of the Iranian Revolution aspired.

By William Thorpe

Make Ameri-KKK Again

Contra-Donald Trump and The Resurrection of Walter Cronkite Editorializing By William Thorpe

A seminal moment in American media was the journalist Walter Cronkite transforming the act of editorializing into journalistic purity with the revelation, that the government was lying to the American people on the nature, development, and circumstance of the Vietnam War.

Critics of Walter Cronkite and his televised editorializing were the usual suspects, that reactionary minority who for their own wretched ends and pathetic interest were threatened by the revelations of Walter Cronkite televised editorializing.

Since Walter Cronkite dared challenge the oppositionary status quo with his televised revealing editorials. Academia has lionized the act while culturally it is iconic.

So fast forward to another war, the one currently being waged by Donald J. Trump against the nation and its hard-won truths, that directly poses the question: Who amongst the non-Fox News legatees of Walter Cronkite have the resolve to advance Cronkites notion that editorializing is not only required but demanded when the pursuit of journalistic equivalency is not only morally and professionally repugnant, but not doing it is crass and abject cowardice.

Secondly, the reminder that accountability isn't a Paul aka Saul declarative, descending from the "grace" of the Nazarene on cherubic and seraphic wings, nor will it emerge from heroic but gelded impeachment push. But there are enough accumulated archival facts of malfeasance, moral turpitude, mendacity and base corruption of Donald J. Trump's actions and behavior to interrupt the robotic delivery by any of the non-Fox News anchors with the televised resurrection of their Walter Cronkite moment, shaking and rousing the nation from the stupor of the unimaginable.

Reference
H.Res.755 - Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors

Critical Race Theory and The Philistine Meeke Addison By William Thorpe

Okay we will play along and act like the Philistine Meeky Addison's disdain for Critical Race Theory is something more than just another pathetic intellectual-liberal example of the house negro apology and mock it on her evangelical-apologetic terms. Which then simply amounts to, there cannot be a continuum of American injustice embodied by it's white subjective within the evangelical Christian context because; the redemptive Christ has cleansed sin, hence racism as expression of sin is mooted.

Now such sophistry worthy of the eponymous past master himself Paul aka Saul demands consistency, a consistency the pharisaism of Meeky Addison is incapable of delivering. Because if all socio-critique and pursuit of justice are viewed through the evangelical-apologetics dicta, then why do we even have social-remonstrance if the redemptive Christ has relieved us of sin and its continuum? But the fact is Meeky Addison's disdain and ire for Critical Race Theory is, it simply destabilizes her world view because it is the mirror reflecting her inferiority and house negro self-loathing and no amount of religiosity and its jealous-resentment of secularism will redeem this bad fact.

Critical Race Theory is a statement of the obvious: The effects of the continuum of white privilege and its wake upon American justice which, whether or not Meeky Addison recognizes if the very ground her evangelical-apologetics stands and teeters on.

Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey, Wanna Protest? Protest American Injustice

Biblical Moral Authority: Evangelicals

Free Speech, Dan Cathy of Chic-fil-a..And God Said Or The Bible Says and History Will Erect Tombstones

The Implicit activity of free speech is it anticipates antithesis, it recognizes there will be opposition.  Couching theological liberties as free speech is either the work of a lazy and feeble mind or at its very core an effort to reassert idealistic dicta.

Dan Cathy of Chic-fil-a Restaurants as most Republican-Conservatives when confronted with the reactionary nature and backwardness of their thought and world view find refuge under the banner of...and God said or the Bible says.  So when Dan Cathy touched off a recent firestorm with his anti-gay comments, he was quick, along with his supporters and defenders to claim free speech because it was his religious belief and liberty.

The Issue and the problem with... and God said or the Bible says, as free speech is we cannot argue with God, we cannot debate God, even the Devil isn't truly antithetical to God.  So... And God said or the Bible says for purposes of free speech definitions is as idealistic as the notion of "being outside of history" which is what Dan Cathy and his ilk would always demand of the Human Condition and it's dialectical-materialist reality.

The United States Constitution articulates religious freedoms as specifically being without the dicta of the state and its bias.  Free speech is subsequently defined antithetically to religion because free speech is the activity of thought, mental labor.  Religion isn't an idea to its believers, it's rather a suspension, suppression, and repression of ideas, it frowns on the activity of free speech.

So for the very elements, free speech warns us against to conceal their reactionary practice under its mantle hints at two occurrences, either we have become militantly decadent or we have lost the Jacobin edge of polemics.

Dan Cathy, his reaction, and backwardness can and will invoke God as a medium of their idealistic intolerance and history will erect tombstones to their failure.

By William Thorpe Imprisoned at Red Onion State Prison

Evangelicals Apologist

American Exceptionalism Circa 1776

Donald Trumps Casting Couch

Shaka Zulu

SHAKA ZULU

SEPTEMBER 22, 1828

BAYETE!

White Privilege

BREXIT

Modern Pharisees, The Extermination of Native Americans and The Dehumanization of Black People

Evangelicals as all totalitarians and hypocrites suffer from memory loss. Contemporary culture which they have become petty hucksters and hustlers railing against is a reaction to the once upon a time supremacy of a historical "Christian" status quo.

The extermination of Native Americans and the primal seizure of their patrimony and the land, the enslavement, and dehumanization of Black people didn't occur in a porn saturated, LGBTQ-Drag Queen prancing, aborted fetuses galore, disrespect of killer cops, "Godless" Hollywood culture.

Instead the savagery wrought and practiced by "White" European invaders of America, the extermination of Native Americans, the enslavement of Black people happened upon their biblical understandings when it was the dominant cultural organizing force. The sun as witness to "White" European savagery rose and set year after year within the culture apology of the bible.

So what historical biblical moral authority are we being demanded a return to our evangelical compatriots? Weren't enough Native Americans exterminated, haven't Black people been dehumanized enough under their historical biblical morality     that they dare lecture us that modern, contemporary culture is Godless and lacking biblical morality.

When "they" Evangelicals and their modern Pharisees self recognize the fact that the apogee of their biblical moral authority is a carriesque Jesus Christ wearing blood-drenched and soaked garments on a white horse. An image, the fertile image of "Godless" Hollywood is yet to organically conjure, despite carrie, is only a motif of the very culture these modern Pharisees have monetized railing against.

By William Thorpe

Will Become Another Problem Our Sapience Solves - By William Thorpe

They terrorize us in life to scare us with death.

The ability to kill a slave isn't a willingness to kill slaves,

The predator culls the herd otherwise it perish, which is what terrorized life and scared with death experience unknowingly,

"We have nothing to fear but fear itself" was mobilization against the other      Yes "We the people......" Government is only possible, our suppositions, keeping us in file in class war life,

So "Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" So let us truly go there finally, finally experience the recriminative utter silence, primordial silence of annihilation: when trees fall without sound. Where supremacy presumptions stand laid bare coming to terms with "The devil is in the detail" and that usury, it's derivatives and terroristic valuation and the death exploitation will become another problem our sapience solves,

They terrorize us in life to scare us with death.

By William Thorpe

AS NOVEMBER 6th APPROACHES DONALD TRUMP's' NOSE GROWS LONGER

Credit William Thorpe

DECEPTION

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Conservatism Intellectual-Liberalism and Its Bottom Pit Critique and War

For too long American-Conservatism and it's foot soldier have criticized liberalism and the war on poverty as a bottomless pit of spent money.

The Bottomless pit of spent money critique is also used to deride and dismiss demands to fund public education.

Conservatism critique is summed up as despite the amount of money spent on the war on poverty and public education. Issues still persist and exist, so liberalisms approach has been wrong and only conservatism's intellectual-liberalism and its personal responsibility and social engineering narrative will allow redemption for the poor and non-unionized teachers [euphemestically presented as charter schools] will save public education

Our political-economy, however, reminds us that the conservative critique on both accounts is false and outright deceptive.

No one will dare argue that nevertheless the bottomless pit of taxpayer money spent on waging wars. The idea and its practice of waging war is a failure because not only is war still with us but is constant as the sun rising    so we should promptly embark on the ..... Beating swords into plows .....delusion and stop pouring taxpayer money into the bottomless pit of the nations military, intelligence agencies and the state organized violence of law and order which is also another bottomless pit of public expenditure, because nothing seems to indicate that crime is deterred or reformed.

But as soon as the question is: How is value [money] interacted with, who has access to it    we encounter the distortion of what is good for the goose isn't good for the gander or the pot can with a straight face `a la the banal and fatuous pronouncements of Arthur Brooks of the American Enterprise Institute, on work and dignity and Amy Holmes cohost of PBS In Principle. [who hasn't encountered nothing pre-fixed conservatism that doesn't cause her orgasmic swoon] call the kettle black   In furious reaction to any attempt and effort at showing that certain unresolved and unsettled accounts of our political-economy are inherent saboteurs on the question of poverty.

Conservatism and its intellectual-liberalism has long given up any pretense to "thought" and embraced its true calling: the deification cult of the reactionary Ronald Reagan. So it's contemporary practice when not doing 3-legged and sack races with every last slithering denizen from not the mere unjust side of history but the wrong side of it, almost accomplishing the impossible of stepping outside of it   the incredulity of what it has become escape it, as it negates its own dignity, a dignity, to let Authur Brooks lecture us, its lack is what ails American Poverty.

Conservatism has no issue with the antagonism of a national-economy maintained on taxpayer money going to bomb makers, missile makers, handcuffs, and shackles manufacture, police uniforms makers for the primary purpose of money distribution for the employment of a majority white worker. Or taxpayer money subsidizing all sectors and activities of the American political-economy from the industrial-practical to hair-brained enterprise but not limited to charlatan think tanks i.e American Enterprise Institutes, for the specific purpose of money circulation and redistribution. But as soon as the same identical logic of government created money underpins a response in the war on poverty and is circulated to the welfare recipient     [and should be noted has enabled, catalysed and accelerated the wealth accumulation of Walmart Inc. and it's contemporaries catering to the welfare recipient] which by the way is at a far lesser amount than what is given to the bomb-making white worker whose existence as a worker is primarily due to randomness of being born white. Conservatisms intellectual-liberalism emerges in reaction to if not insidiously misanthropic arguments, dubious ones that amount to: The American poor of whom a majority, by the way, work have not embraced enough the Auschwitz Death Camp motto of work will set you free  [which Arthur Brooks of AEI shouldn't have any problem in finding his dignity supposition in it] or the fact adults are reduced to raising families on McDondalds wage isn't basis enough to raise the minimum wage because Conservatism's intellectual-liberalism supposes fast-food wages are intended for teenagers.

Conservatism has been getting away with its snake-oil, charlatan analysis because the Progressive critique and its liberal worldview has yielded one too many times

By Apropos

Related Reading

• Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right

RIP

Credit William Thorpe

 

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Year of the Women

Ode to Donald Trump and Misanthropy

Living in the savagery, I was

Living in the savagery I  was till

I met your civilization and it savaged me.

Living in my ignorance I was

living in my ignorance I was till I met 

your wisdom and it ignored me.

I was living and you said it was 

dystopian-existence and I realized that was yours

By William Thorpe

Related articles

• Bitcoin and Idealistic-Meritocracy
• Robots, Donald Trump and the Atlantic Slave Trade

Bitcoin and Idealistic-Meritocracy

To paraphrase Marx, the emergence of money presents its own set of rules. To wit, bitcoin as an expression of money clearly does.

The problem with bitcoin is: it tilts the value dialectic to an extreme form of meritocracy, an idealistic-meritocracy to be specific. i.e. only the mathematically adept or a comparable digital program can access it, "mine" for it, after solving advanced theoretical mathematics.

Or those with conventional paper money or liquidity can afford its speculated inflated value. Either of bitcoin access points returns us to the antagonisms of old world or analog money.

The truth is bitcoin nor old-world analog money expresses the value dialectic which money is intended to do, minus the Marxian-Contradiction of "its own sets of rules". Thus squarely placing bitcoin as another distortion, another idealistic-Meritocracy that shackles the Human Condition to the suppositions of others and with equally destructive consequences on Human conditional sets of relations as the industrial revolution despite existential progress.

By Apropos

Polly The Parrot and Ann Coulter

If I trained an African Grey Parrot, Polly to do what a call center human does, What Ann Coulter does, but with more healthy meat on her bones than Ann Coulter.

Will that once and for all put to rest this ignorance over what is money, what are taxes and what is deficit and with a Polly beak peck let out the air of Conservatisms polemic-balloon of What is value?

I'm as V.I. Lenin in "The State and Revolution" laying down pen to man the barricade, mocking Ann Coulter    That Polly my African Grey Parrot is a creator of value as opposed to the redistribution narrative of the Ann Coulter's and their anal retentive Ayn Rand zeitgeist intellectual-liberalism

By Apropos

Related articles

• Robots, Donald Trump and the Atlantic Slave Trade
• Solitary Watch and The Antagonism Of Idealistic-Journalism and Accountability
• What We Are About

The Prisoners Wife By Asha Bandele: A Review

The book is supposedly A Love Story. But I don't know what to make of it---It's too full of recriminations, regrets, resentments, and condescension to be a result of love, as love is understood by the human condition.

The setting for this "Love" is Prison, not any prison for that matter but the insidious and
Machiavellian enterprise of an American prison, The Department of Corrections of The State of New York. The story is a reflection of the tumultuous state of American cultural expression and it's subjective, American Hearts and Minds, because if the cultural and emotional expression of the human is simply a sum of character, then love as the ultimate value of emotion and its medium culture will reflect the state and nature of its subjective. Emotion in the most sublime of conditions and environment is still a strange and mysterious beast, add the ingredient of the most alienative and perverted environmental condition known to humanity, prison and what will you have? What you should have is the sum value of human character, that baptism by fire through adversity, that qualitative redemption from the disjointedness of chaotic quantity but Ms. Bandele fails to even have an inkling of the maxim "I'm Solitude made Man" ---- Solitude which in this context is anguish, that accomplice of love, love which she claims.

The author's emotional consciousness is either objectively malnourished or her alienation from the objectivity of her femininity is so complete that she is confused, She mistakes the adventurous inclination of her Eros with that most consuming of emotions, "Love". Whether or not she wants to face up to and has the presence of mind to acknowledge it, she simply had a stimulating adventure with a prisoner, a test in that most simplistic and primitive of human urges, self-gratification in its motive of one-upmanship. As she tongue in cheek, succinctly puts it "I wanted to be important to someone again" [ pp.27]

For starters, Rashid her beloved, lover and subsequent husband is too one-dimensional and acquiescent, an emasculated corollary of collateral damage from the war between the sexes submitting disgracefully to his wife Asha's each and every undisciplined desire an infantile idealism for whatever it is and was, that was between them to be of that higher human emotion, Love, The only excusable rationalization for his behavior is the stimulus of the relationship in-it self and its satisfying impact on his "...Scorched-Earth" [pp.165] psyche was enough to overlook the dominance of his wife and that spells eunuchism.

Asha, on the other hand, would have us, readers believe that her most yearned for desire and sought for reality is to have her imprisoned mate free and with her, yet when she is impregnated, granted the germinating testimonial seed of their love, she has no problem aborting the fetus.

What is striking and revealing is at every turn of the way, their way and obstacles crop up, which in the general sense, with its solution or how they contend with it would enable their humaneness to define and give credibility to the love they purportedly share both fail its qualification pathetically. Rashid the prisoner and husband for being effeminate and obeisant to his wife's each and every indulgence and Asha the wife for misplacing her need for self-affirmation and its redemptive catharsis with love.

The author presents an unstated and treacherous premise that the pursuit of emotional, mental and physical communion between the imprisoned human and a free one is utterly unrealistic, futile and its fidelity is unattainable--- this premise itself raises the question of what role if any those higher sentient and sapient potentials of humanness plays in the condition of love, not as we misconstrue it to be but as we aspire it to be. If as we are wont to say that love has many facets and conditions then Rashid and Asha's rank at that, no greater than the sum of their undeveloped psyches. What then is Ms. Bandele telling us, "that the spirit is willing but the body is weak"? Or the whole relationship was nothing more than an academic project that is now bearing fruit with her writing a book about it.

To make a long story short "The Prisoners Wife" is a story of relationship between male and female and their dishonesty and inability in coBming to terms with the fact that they lacked the manhood and womanhood to develop, nurture and sustain love in that most stifling of environments------Prison.

I close with Asha Bandele invoked Assata Shakur's
"...If I know anything at all
it's that a wall is just a wall
and nothing more at all.

It can be brought down."

And for 219 pages made a mockery of it with erecting that most noxious of walls       
"condescension".

By William Thorpe, I am detained in Solitary Confinement at Virginias Red Onion State Prison

Cold War of American Racism

Credit William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

What Difference Would It Make and The Speaking Rock

Were the nation to devolve into civil disorder and the inevitable Civil War; what difference would it make who sat on the Supreme Court?

What difference would it make whether Roe vs. Wade was repealed.

What difference would it make were abortion to become illegal.

What difference would it make were marriage equality were repealed.

What difference would it make were Transgenders deemed second class citizens.

What difference would it make were ObamaCare repealed or it's problems fixed.
What difference would the social-engineering of block grants to states in any form and individual accounts of any purpose mean, whether its health savings or the privatization of Social Security.
After the idea of equality before the law has been shattered and it's practice revealed as speculative and fraudulent.  What difference would it make if kids prayed at schools.
What difference would it make were the entire nation to become right to work charade.
What difference would it make that despite the dogma of vouchers, charters and religious schools we were still illiterate enough to devolve into Civil War?
What difference would it make that the lie is knowingly repeated that taxpayers fund abortions at Planned Parenthood clinics and salvation for our collective sins is defunding planned Parenthood and Woman Health Care apparatus.
What difference would the idealistic and intellectually-Liberal criticism of "political-correctness" mean.
What difference would banning Muslims mean, if the illiteracy bent on degrading, destroying and mocking the idea that holds us one is the clear and present danger our Constitution reminds we remain vigilant against the destruction from within.
What difference does it ever make for Conservatism and it's reaction to reduce progress and it's intrinsic liberty to an intellectually-Liberal critique that ignores the theological dicta that God regardless of name doesn't even have the answers and needs the devil for affirmation.
What difference does it make that the taxation polemic and critique is still formulated upon archaic feudalistic antagonisms at the expense of the fact that the valuation realization of money has long since abandoned idealistic standards of gold and now stands revealed as it should always be: objectivity of art, creativity, ambition and industry.
What difference does it make that we are still clubbed by illiteracy and it's ignorance into accepting hypocrisy as judgment and resentments as enlightenments'
What difference does it make that if government is "off, by and for the people." But we accept the deflection, that government isn't the solution but the problem we are negating our very aspirations as the people.
What different does it make that evangelism demands to fossil fuels we pray, to climate change denying we pray, to ape and Man share not common ancestry we pray at the expense of its New Testament proclaiming even rocks will speak and if such a mystery of the speaking rock is possible why then should evolution be at odds.
What difference does it mean if we buy into a phony critique that Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, Public Employee Pensions, all Welfare programs, ObamaCare are "entitlements" that somehow subscribe to alien behaviors at odds with what money is, even Grandma's money under the mattress.
What difference does it make if we bestow credibility on The American Enterprise Institute recent assertion that poor people are unproductive and irrelevant. As if rich people cannibalize themselves and emerge and exist independent of the function of poor people and the accumulation of Walmart's billions doesn't have a direct line to Welfare allocation and the shopping by Welfare recipients.
What difference does it mean if Black People are told to make your own way, find your own way.  But as soon as White people in fly over country and it's de-industrialized midwest, express angst and exhibit classic symptoms of joblessness. We are told it's the much-maligned government's purpose to provide jobs for them.  Even as those very same White people voted over and over against government and for those speculative models of Republican governance and it's Reaganomics, who's consequence and result is de-industrialization and job losses.
What difference does it make if the rule of law cannot deprive us of life and liberty without it's due process.  But we accept, standard operating procedures, subjective perspective, the ignorance of fear, it's bias of illiteracy as substitution.  A reduction of the rule of law and it's due process to a petty, De Minimus failure of non-immediate, instantaneous compliance with police commands; is a waiver of the right to life and liberty.  It's obscene perversion captured by the utterance of a White juror.  "If my son behaved as the Black victim of a police shooting [non-immediate, instantaneous compliance with police commands] the police are right to kill them.
What difference does it make if prison officials in administrating prisons violate the rule of law that transforms free citizens into prisoners imprisoned, an embodiment of the Nixonian corruption that when the President does it, it is not a crime.
What difference does it make if we understand and know more about God than the money we recreate conditions of our existence with.  That the lies we accept as Political-Economy truth are: national debt and deficit if governmental spending isn't trimmed [which selectively means if Welfare programs are not slashed] will bankrupt us and the suppositionary specter of our proverbial grandkids enslaved by a bank that exist only in the clouds evoked.  So citizens whose literacy of what is money only extends to the antagonisms of their personal micro-relationship with it are alienated from the question: were the nation to devolve into civil disorder and the inevitable Civil War.  What difference would it make if pre-Civil War our national debt was $18 trillion and we have to come to terms with American exceptionalism being simply the literacy of cognition and comprehension that facts are objectivity.  Meaning irrespective of our existence and yes we are privileged with perspectives not in spite of but in affirmation and the averse function of organized violence is that Sword of Damocles reminding us of its Sisyphean futility that after it's all said and done we are homo sapiens and not homo martial and no amount of threats of annihilation and it's fact dislodge the inexorable cognitive principle, to which even the speech of Civil War is its affirmation.
By William Thorpe
&
Apropos

Related articles

• Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism Is The Classic Snack Oil Salesman
• The American Status Quo, It's Policing Organized Violence, Black Masculinity, Cooperation and Control
• Virginia Republicans Are Right On Ousting Virginia's State Inspector General June W. Jennings

The American Status Quo, It's Policing Organized Violence, Black Masculinity, Cooperation and Control

The Idea that the American status quo and it's policing organized violence is fearful and threatened by Black masculinity isn't wholly accurate and can be disproven by the level of injustice the American status quo and it's policing organized violence metes out to Black masculinity.  Because if the American status quo and it's policing organized violence was fearful and threatened by Black masculinity, it would be cautious and circumspective in it's blatant and overt practice of injustice, because the prospect of retaliation and retribution would loom large in it's Conservative imperative, but as the murderous practices of it's policing organized violence shows us, it's oblivious.

What however is accurate and correct is Black masculinity, in the calculus of the American status quo is to be controlled and as much as the American status quo and it's policing organized violence denigrates and dehumanizes Black masculinity it requires cooperation from Black masculinity to effect the control.  Meaning the American status quo and it's policing organized violence recognizes the humanity of Black masculinity as a comprehending medium even as it propagandizes the dehumanization of Black masculinity, a recognition that exposes the petty base nature of the controlling dynamic.

By William Thorpe Held at ROSP in Solitary Confinement

Religion is the New Racism, Intellectual-Liberalism, Charity and it's Political-Economy Contradictions

Religion is the new Racism.  Specifically, it is that old friend tyranny guised up under the Johnny-Come-Lately of the monkey see monkey do banner of that lover of the Human Condition, ignorance.

Racism being intolerance and beyond the pale is understood by the most backwardly naive to the sophisticated cynic.  But religious intolerance in all it's diverse forms thrives from planes slamming into the Twin Towers and Pentagon to the shrilling babel of voices across the land that places of unfamiliar worship and fellowship are sinister and evil.

Intellectual activity during ages past was of reason and enlightenment, laboring for tolerance and selfless apathy.  Intellectual activity in the age of religion is the new Racism labors for intolerance and it's defense.  It is Intellectual-Liberalism resurrecting the most crass, idealistic and misanthropic attitudes.  Religion is the new Racism is selfishness wrapped in the mantle of charity and it's Political-Economy contradictions.

From every religious fundamentalism to it's reaction and intolerance, religion is the new Racism has pathetically shown itself to be the bastion of Farmers Almanac aphorisms, pop psychology, and snake oil charlatans.  Each hypocritically requiring it's purported antithesis for survival and existence.

By Apropos

Our Coat of Many Colors and January 21st

God sees forest,
Fallen Angels see trees.

We are seen as one, alive, dead, dying or living, sitting, standing, we are one in our coat of many colors.

For 8 seconds Barack Obama reminded us of our one coat of many colors    till we remembered it was summer of hypocrisy, so we took off the coat to remind ourselves of the imperfections of our nakedness     scorned blue lacerated red clotting resentment.

And God sees forest,
and Fallen Angels walk among the trees.

Who is right is a cynical comedy of irrelevancies, we chuckle, brows knitted that the seer of forest taught it all came from the wrong of Women anyway.  And January 21st was the anyway.  Our arteries clogged with our Women wronged.  The one coat of many colors shimmering in the prism of honesty without the sophistry of alternative.  That scorn and resentment in its cynical comedy of irrelevancies stitch us one in our one coat of many colors.

And God sees Forest,
And Fallen Angels smelling the lonesomeness, apathetic towards enlightening, walk among trees.

By William Thorpe detained at Red Onion State Prison

Pain Killers, Black, Brown, White America and Illegal Drug Activities

So when will criminal laws on the Federal and State level reflect that Pain Killers prescribed by the nations well fed doctors are now enemy number one in that other war, The War On Drugs?

Or are we to accept the proposition that the war on drugs as all proscriptions and social controls are nothing more than thinly veiled gambits to destabilize Black and Brown America particularly Black and Brown Men because what we see with pain killers medication is it is illegal activity indulged primarily by suburban White America and rural White America.. We don't see monologues in the various political chambers across the land, demanding the sort of Draconian Punishment illegal drug activities practiced by Black and Brown America experiences.  What we do see is the sophistry bias of law, order and justice and it's logic is stacked when the violator is the suburban neighbor or the hunting rifle toting, dysfunctioning family, religious opportunist NASCAR rural America.

By William

ROBOTS, DONALD TRUMP AND THE ATLANTIC SLAVE TRADE

Robots are doing $30 an hour jobs and the best polemic Humans can come up with is to agree with Donald Trump's Carnival Barker critique of trade?  Irrespective of whether its international or national.

Who do these robot displaced Humans think is benefiting from globalization   hell Globalization ha always existed.

What do these racism   addled Humans Donald Trump; sycophantic lemmings think The Atlantic Slave Trade was?

Should we reinvent the wheel of Political-Economics realization gleaned from Venetian Machinations through Stalinist and British Statism  to Nixonism "In God We Trust" what is money truism just to satisfy and reward the irrelevant ignorance of the Reagan Democrats maturing into the Donald Trump's sycophantic lemmings of 2016 and its "Alt" idealistic indulgence?

By Apropos

Professor Marc Lamont Hill, Van Jones, Tara Setmayer, Professor John McWhorter Occupy A Peculiar Space, That Of Subordinated Man

Professor Marc Lamont Hill, Van Jones, Tara Setmayer, Professor John McWhorter to name a few and the rest of all the well compensated Black apologist and obfuscators plying their sniveling impotence with the very zeitgeist they claim to critique, occupy a peculiar space in American history and it's Political-Economy.

One that is on the one hand comical and on the other insidiously sad.  Insidiously sad because whether it is experiencing the cooperative and symbiotic dynamic between slave and master, protagonist and antagonist, condemned and executioner, prisoner and prison guard, capitalist and the poor, communist and bureaucratic tyranny, religion-theology and the stupefied mesmerized or the controlling gambit employed by the status quo dynamic and it's corporate media medium impelled by the subordination imperative.

It is always comical and insidiously sad experiencing the manufacture and production of subordinated-Man and the comedy of crying Uncle, which is what Professor Marc Lamont Hill, Van Jones, Tara Setmayer, Professor John McWhorter are and pathetically do.

By Apropos 

The Baltimore Black Community, The State Of Maryland and Antagonistic Dictatorship

If Homicides and relative criminality in parts of Baltimore have increased post the Freddie Gray

killing and the subsequent indictment of six police officers.  Instead of the situation seen as negative, serious minded Black people who want the best for the Baltimore Black community should see it as opportunity and positive developments.

The narrative being spun by status quo reactionaries who historically are contra and anti the Black communities aspirations and development is: The Baltimore police force has a current hands off policing due to the effontery of the Black District Attorney indicting six of it's members for what the Baltimore police force has come to enjoy as business as usual practices; the terrorizing and summary executions of Black suspects, which resulted in the killing of Freddie Gray.

The more insidious narrative is: When the Baltimore Black community is not repressed with the impunity of heavy handed extra judicial policing criminality runs rampant.

Nevertheless the rampancy of criminality and regardless of its reason.  It, as I have indicted provides serious members of the Baltimore Black community with the opportunity to revise, rewrite and restructure the purported social-contract the Baltimore Black community has with the greater state of Maryland on those objective terms that advance the aspirations and development of the Baltimore Black community on it's own specific terms.  Because if the governing dynamic of the state of Maryland is unwilling and incapable of valuing and providing the necessary space for the full and all around development of the Baltimore Black Community then the state of Maryland has relatively relinquished any prospective compelling dictates it has on controlling the Baltimore Black community and as such the defacto relationship the governing imperative of the state of Maryland has with the Baltimore Black community is that of antagonistic dictatorship.

By Apropos

The Walk of Shame in Baseball, While the Victorious Pitcher Pauses Dismissively

What is worse in sports than the walk of shame back to the dug out after being struck out in Baseball and Softball.  The Character and personality of the pitcher's victim mercilessly revealed in glaring display for Man, Women and Child to observe either with pity or jubilation.

Opponents posterized in Basketball by spectacular plays either ridiculous dunks, blocks or shake and bake, ankle breaking dribbling are not humiliated as the Baseball player's walk of shame to the dug out after the debilitating third strike.

Tackle breaking runs and sensational circus like touchdown catches against against defenses in Football do not humiliate the defense as the singular walk of shame to the dug out with the  displayed of concealed look of stupidity on the victims face.

Neither are adroit dribbling in Soccer, deft puck handling in Hockey, back hand goal scoring flips in Lacrosse and cross court fore hands in Tennis abjectedly demoralizing on the opposition as that solitary naked walk to the dug out of the struck out vanquished hitter in Baseball.

The Boxing knockdown or knockout and submission in Wrestling and mixed Martial Arts contest are not humiliating but rather infuriating technical aspects of a Win.

Nothing in sports is humiliating as the Unitarian construct of the third strike in Baseball and it's walk of shame to the dug out, while Man, Women and Child bear witness to the mortality of the hitter protagonist, while the victorious pitcher pauses dismissively on the mound as a Matador with sword and cape awaiting another turf pawing brutish hitter.

By Apropos

Freddie Gray, Michael Singleton and Toya Graham the Crazy and Backwards Mother

So by invoking the killing of Freddie Gray by Baltimore City police as reason for beating, assaulting and humiliating her son Michael Singleton by saying she doesn't want her son to end up as Freddie Gray.  Toya Graham the crazy and backwards mother who infamously celebrated for beating and assaulting her 15 year old son in public is implicitly castigating and blaming the mother of Freddie Gray for his death.

Adrian Peterson, the Minnesota Vikings all pro running back recently disciplined his son and he was vilified and publicly excoriated by minds and hearts who make their living on FOX News and the Conservative jabbering circuit vilifying and excoriating Black Men and Black people.  But when the backwards and illiterate crazy mother Toya Graham does what fits the reactionary world view of FOX News and it's Republican Intellectual-Liberalism, the crazy and backwards Mother Toya Graham is touted as totemic Black Woman.

This Black Woman, the crazy and backwards Mother Toya Graham who is so deep down the rabbits hole of ignorance that the realization escapes her that by publicly humiliating her son Michael Singleton in this digital age where all things are forever preserved has enabled that eternal tragic-comedic zeitgeist of certain failure for her son, which the beating and assault was intended to prevent.

Michael Singleton will forever be known as the 15 year old Black boy who was publicly beaten and assaulted by his crazy and backwards mother Toya Graham.

By Apropos

Robert Bobby Valentine, Vietnam Vet Of Baltimore and The Social-Contract

Robert Bobby Valentine, Vietnam vet of Baltimore, Maryland isn't heroic of historic, as the distractive imperative of corporate media and its gambit superficiality would have us think.

Robert Bobby Valentine's emergence as advanced by corporate media in the public space because of his status quo bias hodgepodge commentary on what is the formula for the redemption of the Baltimore Black community would be another fleeting installment of socio-white noise, if it wasn't instructive and illustrative  of the sort of beast, broken, emasculated and impotent Man becomes.

The first and basic question social-life presents is the antagonism of the social-contract, specifically the tyranny of the many against the individual and that of the individual against the many.  This question obviously doesn't exist in the stunted and idealistically immature world view of Robert Bobby Valentine,  because how are we to reconcile the probability that pre the 2015 Baltimore uprising.  Robert Bobby Valentine seemingly found nothing antagonistic about the nature of the Baltimore status quo and it's organized violence.

The Robert Bobby Valentine's of the Black American Experience are devoid of progressive speech save reactionary parables of the collaborator

By Apropos

Why CNN Anchor Don Lemon Is An Idiot, The American Economy and Value Speculation

On his 5/2/15; Show CNN Anchor don Lemon played explanatory narrative graphics on the American Economy and it's black and white disparity.  The explanatory narrative graphics was objective but a simplistic but correct illustration of the basic construct of an idea of the American Economy.

Then why CNN Anchor Don Lemon is an idiot reared it's silly head with his inane characterization that the explanatory narrative graphics and I paraphrase, isn't about politics, it isn't about right or left, this characterization presumption is exactly why CNN Anchor Don lemon is an idiot.

The narrative of the American Economy as any other economy is always political and politics.  It is about the Idealistic-Liberalism of the right and it's Republican-Conservatism and the materialist-common sense of the left and its Democrats-Progressive.

What Don Lemon for whatever reason ignores is the political difference between the right and left, Republican-Conservatism, it's Intellectual-Liberalism and the Democrats-Progressive, it's materialist-common sense is the how those elements depicted in his explanatory narrative graphics on the American Economy are understood and accounted for in the American Political-Economy.

The mistake that Don Lemon makes due to his idiocy and misunderstanding of what is politics and what is economics, with his ridiculous assertion that the narrative of American Economy isn't politically right or left ends up obfuscating the very reason, purpose and intent of his explanatory narrative graphics---because as I have shown the right and left of American politics are a result of the struggle between what is the correct narrative of the American Economy and it's idealistic deceptive distortions by a faction of society, specifically Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism that needs the idealistic deceptive distortion of  the narrative of the American Economy for existence as it pursues the economic exploitation of value speculation.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Brian Stelter, Don Lemon, Andrew Wallenstein and A Debutante-Like Conversation on the ethics Of Publishing The Hacked Sony Internal Emails (wwwapropos.blogspot.com)

Barack Obama, The Sarah Palin Narrative of American Politics and Bill Clinton

Republican and their allies, domestic and foreign have never passed up on the opportunity to label and claim Barack Obama incompetent and the worst President ever.

The problem with this critique is: it's idealistic and wrong.  It only reveals that Barack Obama has effectively resisted and thwarted their business as usual gambits by not being their flunky and lackey as Bill Clinton was during his Presidency.

Barack Obama by being a two term President has practically shown that a Democrat, Liberal and Progressive can take on and trounce the Sarah Palin narrative of American politics that's been peddled since Royalist and their Jim Crow brethren saw the sun set on the Union Jack and the Bars and Stars---and a Democrat doesn't have to acquiesce to the Walmart and Koch Brothers polemic to assume speculative-power as Bill Clinton pathetically did during his Presidency.

By Apropos

Professor Marc Lamont Hill The Go To Apologist Foil for Corporate Media and The Great South African Reactionary Nelson Mandela

Professor Marc Lamont Hill, the go to apologist foil for corporate media and it's educating the electorate charade is earning his keep as the eager beaver of Black Intelligentsia.  A Don Quixote, emblematic of the impotence of The Black American Experience polemic and it's speculative politics Playing his jousting role with the idiot Don Lemon of CNN and comically speaking uncomfortable truths a la Satchmo-like in Shirley Templesque comfort, to the status quo narrative that needs the historical collaboration of the Marc Lamont Hill's for it's dialectic.

Even The Great South African Reactionary Nelson Mandela recognized that a Political-Economy requires a polemic equal to it's purpose.  So other than an indulgence in that historical exercise of intellectualism for its idealistic sake.  If not a apologist collaborator what we to make of Marc Lamont Hill.

By Apropos

The Killing Of The Suspect Eric Harris By The 73yr. Old Reserve Cop Robert Bates Of Tulsa County, Oklahoma

The command "roll over on your Stomach" given by the Tulsa County, Oklahoma undercover cops during a drugs and guns sting operation which resulted in the killing of the suspect Eric Harris by the 73 yr. old reserve cop Robert Bates, was in itself tactically flawed and wrong.

The suspect Eric Harris was shot and killed by the 73 yr. old reserve cop Robert Bates under the pretext that the suspect Eric Harris, by allegedly refusing to roll over from his stomach could have had a weapon thus jeopardizing the safety of cops who were already on his back and neck.

But if the command given by cops who had subdued the suspect Eric Harris by being on his back and neck was specifically intended to neutralize threats posed by possible weapons under the suspects stomach, then telling the suspect Eric Harris to roll over on his back would have enabled and actualized the threat.

The only tactically correct thing those Tulsa County, Oklahoma sting operation cops could have done was maintain the suspect Eric Harris on his stomach, then grabbing his wrist pull his arms out.  Thereby absolutely neutralizing the supposed threat.

Arresting a suspect by police should not be experimental exercises subject to the practical limitations and moral suppositions of police.  Arresting authority and it's exercise is dictated by the United States Constitution, which is the only arbiter of acceptable national socialization.  So when the police practice cavalier as evidenced in the killing of the suspect Eric Harris by the 73 yr. old reserve cop Robert Bates, the national socialization and the social-contract becomes a tyrannical practice, an unjust and idealistic proposition defined only by the resource of organized violence.

The killing of the suspect Eric Harris by the 73 yr. old reserve cop Robert Bates is another ripple in the tyrannical practice of the national socialization and the social-contract as an unjust and idealistic proposition.

By Apropos