What Speculative-Value, It's speculators, the Intellectual-Liberalism of anti-deficit, governmental spending critique ignore is this: When we return to the primitive basics of Political-Economy and money and it's currency means is removed from the Human Condition. What we find is an absence of the investor class or venture capitalist as deceptively currently described by the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism, job creators. Because in the absence of money and it's currency means, the realization of value in the Human Condition is by the producer and creator-inventor class or farmers and artisans. This class and it's social-activity objectifies value by it's productivity. For example the farmer produces food, the cattle rancher domesticates cattle for human consumption, the artisan creates and manipulates metal. All this activity appears and happens in the absence of money and it's currency means.
Money and it's currency means happens as a specific mechanism to facilitate stability of expressed relations, conveying produced value in the Human Condition. What this means is the emergence of money and it's currency means occurs when government or governance is developed. So with the appearance of money and it's currency means do we see the emergence of speculative-value, speculators, the investor class or venture capitalist as Political-Economy phenomena fact in the Human Condition, specifically to profit.
The fundamentals of the Human Condition as we find it is the producer and artisan-inventor class interacting directly with the natural material environment without money and it's currency means objectifying value.
The creation of money, it's currency means is a result of government and governance and not in spite of it. Speculative-Value, speculators, the investor class or venture capitalist contrary to the sophistry of Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism owe their existence to government and governance. What this means is the anti-government critique as formulated by Republican-Conservatism and it's various stooges is simply a diversionary gambit and a distortive tactic to win elections.
By Apropos
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Jake Tapper of ABC News, The Vote and His Purported Professional Ethic
Jake Tapper of ABC News has said he doesn't vote in national election because he wants to be objective and uninfluenced in his reporting and journalism. This position and it's sophistry is indicative of the pretentiousness squeezing the credibility and objectivity out of corporate media.
Whether or not Jake Tapper honors his civic duty and vote has nothing to do with whether he has the intellectual-honesty and the purported professional ethic to require politicians define the national society and Political-Economy correctly.
When Jake Tapper starts doing this the antagonism between his civic duty of voting and his professional duty will cease.
By Apropos
Whether or not Jake Tapper honors his civic duty and vote has nothing to do with whether he has the intellectual-honesty and the purported professional ethic to require politicians define the national society and Political-Economy correctly.
When Jake Tapper starts doing this the antagonism between his civic duty of voting and his professional duty will cease.
By Apropos
Sunday, October 28, 2012
The Stooge Vivek Wadhwa and American Material
The author stooge Vivek Wadhwa, a Duke University Professor in his new book Exodus: Why immigrants are returning home, continues that paternalistic sophistry, the supposition that America as material object is realized opportunity and the world's educated should immigrate to it's shores at the expense of the corruption and backwardness of their natal homelands.
Seldom does the paternalism advanced by stooge Vivek Wadhwa critique the state of the human condition, the relations with the rest of the world's nations from the point that the internationalist nature of American Political-Economy has everything to do with the corruption and backwardness of the developing and underdeveloped world which is then conveniently utilized as polemic justifying immigration to the exceptionalism which is America as material object.
The mental labor of the likes of the stooge Vivek Wadhwa would do us good were the critique honestly directed at those sets of relations being exploited by American Political-Economy in opposition to the positive development of the developing and undeveloped world.
Because in the absence of such critical honesty the nature of our developed American exceptionalism is always at the mercy of the paternalist hypocrisy spewed by the one dimensional gibberish by the likes of the stooge Vivek Wadhwa.
By Apropos
The mental labor of the likes of the stooge Vivek Wadhwa would do us good were the critique honestly directed at those sets of relations being exploited by American Political-Economy in opposition to the positive development of the developing and undeveloped world.
Because in the absence of such critical honesty the nature of our developed American exceptionalism is always at the mercy of the paternalist hypocrisy spewed by the one dimensional gibberish by the likes of the stooge Vivek Wadhwa.
By Apropos
Thursday, October 11, 2012
The Republican Party, Conservatism, The Obama Administration and American Power
This contemporary Republican Party and it's practice of Conservatism has a stupid and reckless way of critically dumbing down politically anything their political opposition does. So what we now have after the recent 9/11/12; attack on the U.S. Libya embassy and killing of Ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 other support staffers by supposed Libyan partisans is the Republican Party and Congressional Republican making the Intellectual-Liberal argument that anti-American protest and embassy breeches in the Middle-East are happening because extremist are not scared of America, with inference that the Obama Administration has weakened and diminished American power and might.
This begs this when are radicals, extremist, rebels ever scared of the status quo and it's organized violence?
So the position of these opportunistic Republicans is the Taliban and Al Qaeda slaughter of U.S. military forces in Afghanistan and Iraq is happening because U.S. military force isn't scary enough? The tortures at Abu Ghraib, Bagram Base Guantanamo Bay and renditions to C.I.A secret sites are not moral hazards enough to dissuade rebellion? Have attacks on American interest nationally and internationally i.e.Oklahoma City and U.S.S. Cole occurred because the perpetrators thought twice about American Power? The U.S .S. Cole was a war ship, a war machine, the epitome of organized violence and relative power yet it was attacked.
The response Congressional Republicans and their opposition to the policies of the Obama Administration present is per virture of their opposition to the Obama Administration anything and everything happening under it's tenure has to be viewed through an antagonistic prism.
So American governance in the 21st century as strategized by the Republican Party and its Intellectual-Liberalism is the reckless dictatorship of Conservatism.
By Apropos
This begs this when are radicals, extremist, rebels ever scared of the status quo and it's organized violence?
So the position of these opportunistic Republicans is the Taliban and Al Qaeda slaughter of U.S. military forces in Afghanistan and Iraq is happening because U.S. military force isn't scary enough? The tortures at Abu Ghraib, Bagram Base Guantanamo Bay and renditions to C.I.A secret sites are not moral hazards enough to dissuade rebellion? Have attacks on American interest nationally and internationally i.e.Oklahoma City and U.S.S. Cole occurred because the perpetrators thought twice about American Power? The U.S .S. Cole was a war ship, a war machine, the epitome of organized violence and relative power yet it was attacked.
The response Congressional Republicans and their opposition to the policies of the Obama Administration present is per virture of their opposition to the Obama Administration anything and everything happening under it's tenure has to be viewed through an antagonistic prism.
So American governance in the 21st century as strategized by the Republican Party and its Intellectual-Liberalism is the reckless dictatorship of Conservatism.
By Apropos
Charity, Winnipeg, Canada, Shoes, Mayor Sam Katz and Superficial Act Of Humaness
What is wrong with the human condition that a Winnipeg, Canada bus driver's recent charity of giving his shoes to a barefoot homeless person is seen as representing compassion, goodness and all the aspirational idealistic heights of the human condition.
Instead of celebrating the Winnipeg, Canada bus driver's act of giving his shoes to a barefoot homeless person as Mayor Sam Katz would have us do we should rather collectively be ashamed that the human condition we have created and constructed has resulted in homelessness and the need for others to donate their shoes to others.
A civilized society isn't measured by the idealistic and superficial individual acts of humaness. Instead it should be objectified by the actuality of a national infrastructure that provides the basic essentials for it's citizens to function without the tyranny and intrusions of idealistic and superficial individual act of humaness.
If the Intellectual-Liberalsim of Republican-Conservatism is to be taken on it's word that we are beholden to none other than ourselves, then the ideas of charity, compassion and conditional social safety nets are intellectually dishonest and hypocritical. Because who then is the arbiter of who is deserving and needy of charity and compassion, save the tyranny of ones presumtions, biases and suppositions. Which in practice becomes a tyrannical perverse triage.
So if we advocate and defend the human condition as that of free and informed people then it's realization requires access to basic resources essentially necessary for primary function and if society is to be a just and honest one will only be provided by the collective us.
The practice of charity as compassion, charity as goodness, charity as humaness is a reactionary construct specifically in the employ of Speculative-Value and it's antagonisms.
We polemicize in contra.
By Apropos
Instead of celebrating the Winnipeg, Canada bus driver's act of giving his shoes to a barefoot homeless person as Mayor Sam Katz would have us do we should rather collectively be ashamed that the human condition we have created and constructed has resulted in homelessness and the need for others to donate their shoes to others.
A civilized society isn't measured by the idealistic and superficial individual acts of humaness. Instead it should be objectified by the actuality of a national infrastructure that provides the basic essentials for it's citizens to function without the tyranny and intrusions of idealistic and superficial individual act of humaness.
If the Intellectual-Liberalsim of Republican-Conservatism is to be taken on it's word that we are beholden to none other than ourselves, then the ideas of charity, compassion and conditional social safety nets are intellectually dishonest and hypocritical. Because who then is the arbiter of who is deserving and needy of charity and compassion, save the tyranny of ones presumtions, biases and suppositions. Which in practice becomes a tyrannical perverse triage.
So if we advocate and defend the human condition as that of free and informed people then it's realization requires access to basic resources essentially necessary for primary function and if society is to be a just and honest one will only be provided by the collective us.
The practice of charity as compassion, charity as goodness, charity as humaness is a reactionary construct specifically in the employ of Speculative-Value and it's antagonisms.
We polemicize in contra.
By Apropos
Monday, October 1, 2012
The United States, Arabs, Muslims, Violence and Savagery
The idea and it's rhetoric that the United States is this haven of civilized behavior and bastion of polite and conscientious politics as idealistic specific contrast and criticism of the recent 9/11/12; violent behavior of Arabs and Muslims in protest over a vulgar, Anti-Mohammed video and United States attitudes towards Islam, ignores the history of these United states and the historicity of it's people.
Violence and savagery in all forms and it's efficient specificity is transcendent in the United States.
Arabs and Muslims are naive Johnny Come Lately's to consequential violence, uncivility and the subsequent social instability and of all the criticisms we can lodge against Arabs and Muslims savagery and uncivility should laughably be the least.
By Apropos
Violence and savagery in all forms and it's efficient specificity is transcendent in the United States.
Arabs and Muslims are naive Johnny Come Lately's to consequential violence, uncivility and the subsequent social instability and of all the criticisms we can lodge against Arabs and Muslims savagery and uncivility should laughably be the least.
By Apropos
Friday, September 28, 2012
Privacy, Kate Middleton Baring Her Breast and The Tower Of London
The Question of privacy should hinge on proximity, it is reactionary and modernly illiterate for Kate Middleton and her husband to suppose and assume entitled to privacy when the supposed entitlement of privacy actually is a gradation of proximity.
What we are saying is: The objectivity of privacy which is what jurisprudence is being asked by Kate Middleton because of her social act of baring her breast, to define, is specifically and objectively an approximation of proximity.
Privacy is an awareness of subjective proximity so we state: Kate Middleton should have had the presence of mind that in the age of digitalized technology, her topless sunbathing nudity which by the way is observable from satellites in orbit cannot claim a presumptive privacy defended by the utility, The Tower Of London claimed in its hey day.
By Apropos
What we are saying is: The objectivity of privacy which is what jurisprudence is being asked by Kate Middleton because of her social act of baring her breast, to define, is specifically and objectively an approximation of proximity.
Privacy is an awareness of subjective proximity so we state: Kate Middleton should have had the presence of mind that in the age of digitalized technology, her topless sunbathing nudity which by the way is observable from satellites in orbit cannot claim a presumptive privacy defended by the utility, The Tower Of London claimed in its hey day.
By Apropos
Friday, September 21, 2012
"Fighting Injustice", "A Global Force For Good" A Perversion of Military Purpose and The Constitution Of The United States
When A nations Military uses slogans like "Fighting Injustice" as the Marines are currently doing or the Navy's "Global Force For Good", the nations decline and dilution of it's motive force is in hand basket mode.
Dwight D. Eisenhower lectured us about the nefarious cabalistic collusion of the military and for profit corporate interest. Because as soon as Industrial Value-Speculation becomes the motive for association with a nations military and it's production of organized violence, a perspective perversion of military purpose occurs and the most crass of straw grasping justification begins to assail the national sensibilities.
So we find justification of production of organized violence and it's trillions dollar national deficit in slogans like "fighting Injustice" or "A Global Force For Good" that have nothing to do with the National Defense mandate dicta of the Constitution Of The United States but everything to do with Industrial Value-Speculation.
By Apropos
Dwight D. Eisenhower lectured us about the nefarious cabalistic collusion of the military and for profit corporate interest. Because as soon as Industrial Value-Speculation becomes the motive for association with a nations military and it's production of organized violence, a perspective perversion of military purpose occurs and the most crass of straw grasping justification begins to assail the national sensibilities.
So we find justification of production of organized violence and it's trillions dollar national deficit in slogans like "fighting Injustice" or "A Global Force For Good" that have nothing to do with the National Defense mandate dicta of the Constitution Of The United States but everything to do with Industrial Value-Speculation.
By Apropos
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Ronald Reagan, Republican-Tea Party, Bob Woodward, Barack Obama, The National Debt and The Intellectual-Liberalism Of Reaction
How many times have we heard the criticism that even Ronald Reagan would be unwelcome in today's Republican-Tea Party. So if Ronald Reagan, of whom the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism apotheosizes isn't, wouldn't be reactionary enough, intransigent enough for today's Republican-Tea Party. On what objective critique is the great Bob Woodward concluding his leadership criticism of President Barack Obama as being lacking during the 2011 National Debt gambit wrought by the Philistines of the Republican-Tea Party in his recent for profit book, The Price Of Politics.
If Bob Woodward expects us to bestow sagism and that ephemeral intellectual value, objectivity on his works, then his mental labor ought to reflect such. Instead of the conventional easy way out perspective of over simplification, which despite the consequential gravity of pro forma petty events, the Intellectual-Liberalism of reaction elevates into crisis.
Claiming as Bob Woodward does in his book The Price Of Politics that Barack Obama should have, was obligated to have solved the gorgon knot intransigence of congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge during the 2011 National Debt gambit is quite frankly naive and idiotic. The entire 2011 National Debt Crisis was a gambit of choice by the Republican Party and it's Tea Party stooge to terroristically exact it's Intellectual-Liberal demands from Barack Obama, the Democrats and the American people. Would Bob Woodward rather have Barack Obama declare and wage war on the third of the U.S.Government? (Congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge).
An objective critique of the 2011 National Debt gambit would be explaining the sequestration ploy as a moral hazard designed specifically to compel congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge to compromise with Barack Obama, Democrats and the American people on the prospective elements of the National Debt.
Bob Woodward fails his posterity. He leaves us wondering that if he represents the elite of the nations intelligentsia then it isn't surprising that the National Political-Economy is in the feckless quandary of the idealism of suppositions and one dimensional critique as consequence of the supremacy of the Intellectual-Liberalism of reaction.
By Apropos
If Bob Woodward expects us to bestow sagism and that ephemeral intellectual value, objectivity on his works, then his mental labor ought to reflect such. Instead of the conventional easy way out perspective of over simplification, which despite the consequential gravity of pro forma petty events, the Intellectual-Liberalism of reaction elevates into crisis.
Claiming as Bob Woodward does in his book The Price Of Politics that Barack Obama should have, was obligated to have solved the gorgon knot intransigence of congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge during the 2011 National Debt gambit is quite frankly naive and idiotic. The entire 2011 National Debt Crisis was a gambit of choice by the Republican Party and it's Tea Party stooge to terroristically exact it's Intellectual-Liberal demands from Barack Obama, the Democrats and the American people. Would Bob Woodward rather have Barack Obama declare and wage war on the third of the U.S.Government? (Congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge).
An objective critique of the 2011 National Debt gambit would be explaining the sequestration ploy as a moral hazard designed specifically to compel congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge to compromise with Barack Obama, Democrats and the American people on the prospective elements of the National Debt.
Bob Woodward fails his posterity. He leaves us wondering that if he represents the elite of the nations intelligentsia then it isn't surprising that the National Political-Economy is in the feckless quandary of the idealism of suppositions and one dimensional critique as consequence of the supremacy of the Intellectual-Liberalism of reaction.
By Apropos
Friday, September 14, 2012
Barack Obama and Nat Turner
Barack Obama Resurrected and saluted Nat Turner the Insurrectionist in his 2/22/12; Dedication of the African-American Museum. Apropos stands in recogition.
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Anti-Taxes Polemic And The Constitution
To the Anti-Taxs polemic that invokes the Constitution of the United States for it's cause, we state this: The Constitution of the United States is taxes progressive. There are progressive and affirmed mentions of taxes in article I section 2, section 7 and in section 8 and it goes without saying that the existence of any mature developed republic requires realized taxes.
By Apropos
By Apropos
Monday, September 10, 2012
Banks And Consumer Fees
The question we present and ask banks specifically the Big Banks, Bank of America and co. as they pursue saddling the American people with consumer fees is: Is Charging fees an entitlement banks will ingeniously extort from the American consumer?
By Apropos
By Apropos
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Peggy Noonan And Who Was "Snake Bit", Barack Obama Or George W. Bush
(Photo credit: kylebogucki)If Barack Obama is "snake bit" jinxed, because of disasters as the BP Gulf Oil Spill. Then What are we to make of President George W. Bush who embarrassingly read kid books during 9-11 Attacks, who gave brownie points while a major U.S., New Orleans drowned during Hurricane Katrina, who drained the National Treasury by his Iraq War adventure just to obtain a pawn shop value faux trophy in Saddam Hussein's Gun?
On George W. Bush's disaster filled 8 years Peggy Noonan is Conservatively silent yet Liberally strident in her idealistic Anti-Obamaism.
By Apropos
Monday, August 27, 2012
Barack Obama And Does He Truly Believe That Ronald Reagan Was Good For The Nation
Does Barack Obama truly believe that Ronald Reagan was good for the nation and represented the just side of history narrative? Because Barack Obama has quoted and referenced Ronald Reagan enough for the question to be raised that what might have seemed as a tactical maneuver by Barack Obama squaring the Intellectual-Liberalism of the Political-center and it's embrace of the Ronald Reagan mystification during his quest for the Presidency could be a sincere imperative and world view practically held by Barack Obama.
The reality is Ronald Reagan has always been an insidious and reactionary force in American politics. Representing the opportunistic and unjust historicity of the Human Condition. Activities from his early State Informer betraying his Screen Actors compatriots, through his Facist use of state organized violence against dissent during his stint as Governor of California, while single handedly being responsible for resurrecting the politics of hate and racism in contemporary American politics and as President effecting the destruction of Unions and Organized Labor. Ronald Reagan was and has been a destructive force on the national Political-Economy.
So we state with clear eyed rigor, does Barack Obama truly believe that Ronald Reagan was good for the nation and represented the just side of history narrative?
1969 BERKELEY RIOTS " People's Park" California - Images by Janine wiedel
By Apropos
The reality is Ronald Reagan has always been an insidious and reactionary force in American politics. Representing the opportunistic and unjust historicity of the Human Condition. Activities from his early State Informer betraying his Screen Actors compatriots, through his Facist use of state organized violence against dissent during his stint as Governor of California, while single handedly being responsible for resurrecting the politics of hate and racism in contemporary American politics and as President effecting the destruction of Unions and Organized Labor. Ronald Reagan was and has been a destructive force on the national Political-Economy.
So we state with clear eyed rigor, does Barack Obama truly believe that Ronald Reagan was good for the nation and represented the just side of history narrative?
1969 BERKELEY RIOTS " People's Park" California - Images by Janine wiedel
By Apropos
Friday, August 17, 2012
Republican-Conservatism, Cult Of Personality And Speculative-Value
Lets tell Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism that blaming or celebrating the individual person is worship at the alter of cult of personality.
It is also the default position for a lazy undisciplined and feeble mind, but in American Political-Economy it is lethal polemic wielded by speculative-value and it's exploitation as diversionary practice.
By Apropos
It is also the default position for a lazy undisciplined and feeble mind, but in American Political-Economy it is lethal polemic wielded by speculative-value and it's exploitation as diversionary practice.
By Apropos
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Anti-Government Spending Critique And America's Gullible Appetite
Despite the desperate absurdity of proponents of the argument and anti-government spending critique that the American national-economy is comparable to and has to be analysed through the narrative of the finances of an American family unit.
What is pathetically insulting is America's gullible appetite for the absurdity and it's deceptiveness.
By Apropos
What is pathetically insulting is America's gullible appetite for the absurdity and it's deceptiveness.
By Apropos
Sunday, August 12, 2012
CNN's Soledad O'Brien And Looking And Speaking Black In America
 |
| Soledad O'Brien (Photo credit: jdlasica) |
By Apropos
Sunday, August 5, 2012
Free Speech, Dan Cathy of Chic-fil-a..And God Said Or The Bible Says and History Will Erect Tombstones
Dan Cathy of Chic-fil-a Restaurants as most Republican-Conservatives when confronted with the reactionary nature and backwardness of their thought and world view find refuge under the banner of...and God said or the Bible says. So when Dan Cathy touched off a recent firestorm with his anti-gay comments, he was quick, along with his supporters and defenders to claim free speech because it was his religious belief and liberty.
The Issue and the problem with... and God said or the Bible says, as free speech is we cannot argue with God, we cannot debate God, even the Devil isn't truly antithetical to God. So... And God said or the Bible says for purposes of free speech definitions is as idealistic as the notion of "being outside of history" which is what Dan Cathy and his ilk would always demand of the Human Condition and it's dialectical-materialist reality.
The United States Constitution articulates religious freedoms as specifically being without the dicta of the state and its bias. Free speech is subsequently defined antithetically to religion because free speech is the activity of thought, mental labor. Religion isn't an idea to its believers, it's rather a suspension, suppression, and repression of ideas, it frowns on the activity of free speech.
So for the very elements, free speech warns us against to conceal their reactionary practice under its mantle hints at two occurrences, either we have become militantly decadent or we have lost the Jacobin edge of polemics.
Dan Cathy, his reaction, and backwardness can and will invoke God as a medium of their idealistic intolerance and history will erect tombstones to their failure.
By Apropos
Monday, July 23, 2012
The Reactionary Intellectual-Liberalism Of Republican-Conservatism and It's Tea Party Stooge, Mitt Romney and What is Government
The Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism and it's Tea Party stooge is revealing itself as the infantile idealism Progressive thinkers and Democrats have always knew it to be.
In response, a squirmy reaction to the blistering and withering ridicule-onslaught on Mitt Romney's activities at Bain Investments and it's type of Capitalist practice, from the Barack Obama Campaign. Republican-Conservatism finds itself creating a whole new class of society that is not of nor from the middle and lower class but spontaneously appears as privileged job creators. In it's quagmirely defense of trickle down exploitation practiced by Republican-Conservatism and it's Reaganomics and as rebuttal to the Obama Campaign's polemic that Political-Economy realities are bottoms up phenomena. Republican-Conservatism introduces us to homo jobcreator with a novel social-contract narrative and finds itself walking the plank with the convoluted reasoning that government isn't off, by and for the people but government is something other than people.
So what we have is Erick Erickson editor in chief of redstate.com a foot soldier in the delusions and Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism and it's Tea Party stooge having to deny the quintessential truth that American capitalism exist simply and solely because of the activity of the American Government.
When Progressive Thinkers and Democrats define the world view of Republican-Conservatism as an exercise in Intellectual-Liberalism we highlight it's fascination with the anti-government critique as a fundamental example. Republican-Conservatism behaves as if every election cycle is a new opportunity to relitigate what is the social contrast as if it is the sole monopolistic arbiter of what is government, it's practice and behavior.
The Barack Obama 2012 Campaign is proving itself to be an adroit and worthy adversary as far as it specifically relates to exposing the fact that Mitt Romney's type of Capitalistic practice at Bain Investments is the legatee of the destructiveness of Ronald Reagan's Reaganomics and the reactionary Intellectual-Liberalism of Republcian-Conservatism and it's Tea Party stooge.
By Apropso
In response, a squirmy reaction to the blistering and withering ridicule-onslaught on Mitt Romney's activities at Bain Investments and it's type of Capitalist practice, from the Barack Obama Campaign. Republican-Conservatism finds itself creating a whole new class of society that is not of nor from the middle and lower class but spontaneously appears as privileged job creators. In it's quagmirely defense of trickle down exploitation practiced by Republican-Conservatism and it's Reaganomics and as rebuttal to the Obama Campaign's polemic that Political-Economy realities are bottoms up phenomena. Republican-Conservatism introduces us to homo jobcreator with a novel social-contract narrative and finds itself walking the plank with the convoluted reasoning that government isn't off, by and for the people but government is something other than people.
So what we have is Erick Erickson editor in chief of redstate.com a foot soldier in the delusions and Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism and it's Tea Party stooge having to deny the quintessential truth that American capitalism exist simply and solely because of the activity of the American Government.
When Progressive Thinkers and Democrats define the world view of Republican-Conservatism as an exercise in Intellectual-Liberalism we highlight it's fascination with the anti-government critique as a fundamental example. Republican-Conservatism behaves as if every election cycle is a new opportunity to relitigate what is the social contrast as if it is the sole monopolistic arbiter of what is government, it's practice and behavior.
The Barack Obama 2012 Campaign is proving itself to be an adroit and worthy adversary as far as it specifically relates to exposing the fact that Mitt Romney's type of Capitalistic practice at Bain Investments is the legatee of the destructiveness of Ronald Reagan's Reaganomics and the reactionary Intellectual-Liberalism of Republcian-Conservatism and it's Tea Party stooge.
By Apropso
Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism Is The Classic Snake Oil Salesman
The World View of contemporary Republican-Conservatism is simply "people are too stupid to get out of their own way".
Because Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism can always point to something new, something else as cause of why, for example people don't have jobs. So if it is't Health Care Reform, (derisively labeled Obamacare) as distraction, it's government if too big or government spending or to many regulations against polluters and exploiters or too much uncertainty (as if the Capitalist mantra of taking risk isn't steeped in uncertainty).
So the reality is the average person is averse and would rather be numbed by the distraction of blame and the therapeutic consolation of the misery loves company dialectic and this is what Republican-Conservatism perfects and it's Intellectual-Liberalism plys as the classic snake oil salesman hop skipping it from one election to the other with the anti-taxes slogan.
By Apropos
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
