To all those "Gone With the Wind" and "Birth of a Nation" sympathizer legatees moonlighting as Non-Partisan critics of Obama's Economic thought and it's practice. If as they giddily put it that Obama is saddling generations 4 and 5 removed in the future with the yoke of unfathomable debt because of Deficit spending.
The argument is misplaced, misdirected, idealistic and does nothing to move forward and advance the analysis of how to discern and correct the inherent abstraction and antagonism upon human life of the objectivity of value and it's expressed medium as money.
Critics of deficit spending think the invocation of the idea of futuristic generations paying for the sins of their parents spending wins them the argument conclusively. They are wrong and it only reveals that after millennia of mans efforts, attempts and labor at realizing a medium of value expression that doesn't distort the value expression and it's transactional-relationship, Man's propensity for and instinctual ignorance has only managed to maintain a system that has nothing to do with the circumstance of the human condition and it's objective need for value expression.
The entire construct of Political-Economy and it's money expression assumes a premise, a presupposition that value and it's practicality is relegated to the basics of what is necessary for the re-creation of the human condition. The idea however that the human condition is based on re-creation is correct. But the critique of it's value expression has been and is wrong and has actively been at odds with the re-creation dynamic of the human condition.
The un-stated premise of the Obama Presidency is American Political-Economy has tilted so severely, on the side of speculation and Imperialism and it's antagonisms that nothing short of it's re-start holds any promise for the survivability of the union. This is the backdrop which to some seems as Apocalyptic sums of money are being printed saddling their Grandkids with debt. The reality is they are wrong. Deficit spending or it's absence has nothing to do with the quality of life anticipated by future generations.
.
By Apropos
Monday, August 31, 2009
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Traditions, Culture and the Anti-Progress Critique
There is this classical false premise assertion that archaic traditions and cultural habits and practices cannot and should not be examined and criticized on the merits, lest the critic and polemicist comes across as elitist and imperialist in all the various critical forms. So the consequences is a sort of manipulative collusion by international and the specific nation status quo with on the one hand reactionary and anti-progress traditions and culture are defended and tolerated as national pride for the subjects as a means of defiance against their lot, while on the other the internationalist on both sides of the dynamic conveniently exploit the rewards of progress under the guise of facilitating the means of business.
There is a typical refrain in the so-called under-developed Third-World as it clings to reactionary traditions and cultural-impracticalities as Polemic against the industrialized West and it's legacy of stunting, stymying and retarding the self-deterministic dynamic of the Third World: That anything Western is wrong and any member of it's citizenry pursuing Western applications is a national traitor.
This mindset and it's dynamic is the dialectical bane of the Human-Condition on both sides of it's determination. Because it conditionalizes progress in a manner that not only is it anti-but it supports backwardness and it's myriad expressions of prejudice in a manner that enables Imperialism and it's exploitation.
By Apropos
There is a typical refrain in the so-called under-developed Third-World as it clings to reactionary traditions and cultural-impracticalities as Polemic against the industrialized West and it's legacy of stunting, stymying and retarding the self-deterministic dynamic of the Third World: That anything Western is wrong and any member of it's citizenry pursuing Western applications is a national traitor.
This mindset and it's dynamic is the dialectical bane of the Human-Condition on both sides of it's determination. Because it conditionalizes progress in a manner that not only is it anti-but it supports backwardness and it's myriad expressions of prejudice in a manner that enables Imperialism and it's exploitation.
By Apropos
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Town Halls of 2009, Ignorance, Bigotry and Republican-Conservatism
Liberals, Progressives, Practical-Minded People, Empiricist, Dialectical-Materialist Theorist and Democrats have all in one form or the other expressed disdain and outrage at the ignorance and Intellectual-Liberalism expressed exhibited and on full display during these Town Halls of 2009 and the sessions of Open Political-Activity of the Health Care Reform struggle.
Its as if half of the nation awakened one morning to the stupefying spectacle of ruddy faced adults displaying the most base form of ignorance, that of illiteracy and bigotry. It's as if the classical period of Enlightenment and the Renaissance was hypothesis in a Liberal-Arts curriculum and an entire one-half of the American population never realized that something as facts exist and regardless of objective, Facts are Bias Neutral.
What is quite amusing about the spectacle of illiteracy on display at the Town-Halls of 2009 is how synonymous Republican-Conservatism has become with ignorance and bigotry. The task facing the nation and it's Progressive imperative is applying zero-tolerance for the sort of ignorance, Republican-Conservatism seems to instigate and revel in.
By Apropos
Its as if half of the nation awakened one morning to the stupefying spectacle of ruddy faced adults displaying the most base form of ignorance, that of illiteracy and bigotry. It's as if the classical period of Enlightenment and the Renaissance was hypothesis in a Liberal-Arts curriculum and an entire one-half of the American population never realized that something as facts exist and regardless of objective, Facts are Bias Neutral.
What is quite amusing about the spectacle of illiteracy on display at the Town-Halls of 2009 is how synonymous Republican-Conservatism has become with ignorance and bigotry. The task facing the nation and it's Progressive imperative is applying zero-tolerance for the sort of ignorance, Republican-Conservatism seems to instigate and revel in.
By Apropos
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Republican-Conservatism: It's Anti-Big Government Spending Polemics and Nancy Pelosi
Republican-Conservatism and it's pathological practice of disinformation and demagoguery never shys away from exploiting it's tried and proven weapon: it's historical anti-big Government spending polemic. The irony is it historically supports the type of Governmental spending that necessitates and inflates the printing of money, that of the military-industrial symbiosis and it's exploitation.
The continued success of the anti-big Government spending and it's deficit money polemic is simple: the masses of the human condition and it's American Political-Economy variant are amazingly ignorant to the application of speculative-value and it's Venetian money dynamic.
So arguments like the nation is in debt and the Chinese will stop loaning money, suffice to brow beat ignorance into the middle-class and the working poor that their insufferable lot is due to Nancy Pelosi and her "San Francisco" Big Government spending ways while omitting the fact, that "San Francisco" Liberals and their Progressive values liberates the nations creativity and technological ingenuity, providing the necessary jobs for the middle-class, the working poor and their Reagan Democrats gullible receptiveness to Conservative Polemics and it's reaction.
By Apropos
The continued success of the anti-big Government spending and it's deficit money polemic is simple: the masses of the human condition and it's American Political-Economy variant are amazingly ignorant to the application of speculative-value and it's Venetian money dynamic.
So arguments like the nation is in debt and the Chinese will stop loaning money, suffice to brow beat ignorance into the middle-class and the working poor that their insufferable lot is due to Nancy Pelosi and her "San Francisco" Big Government spending ways while omitting the fact, that "San Francisco" Liberals and their Progressive values liberates the nations creativity and technological ingenuity, providing the necessary jobs for the middle-class, the working poor and their Reagan Democrats gullible receptiveness to Conservative Polemics and it's reaction.
By Apropos
Sunday, August 16, 2009
What is Invaluable Satisfaction, What is the Money Dynamic and Mediocrity
Invaluable Satisfaction is the innately-objective human state of firstly, cognition, secondly creativity and industriousness and money as the sole approximate expression of this value dialectic has been a ploy foisted on the Human Condition by less creative, less industrious minds in the attempt at fettering it's art and physics to their mediocrity.
Are there not two classes of human work? The first class is creativity and inventiveness. The second is the replication and mass production of invention as a practical fact.
If the Invaluable Satisfaction of both classes of work is unique to it's activity isn't it then an antagonistic contradiction to assume the money dynamic by it's mere convenience as mode of expression should then assume fiat like dicta ursurping the apriori of Invaluable Satisfaction?
By Apropos
Are there not two classes of human work? The first class is creativity and inventiveness. The second is the replication and mass production of invention as a practical fact.
If the Invaluable Satisfaction of both classes of work is unique to it's activity isn't it then an antagonistic contradiction to assume the money dynamic by it's mere convenience as mode of expression should then assume fiat like dicta ursurping the apriori of Invaluable Satisfaction?
By Apropos
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Hostages, Captives and the Contradiction of the Prisoner Dialectic
On the average Tens of Thousands of Prisoners held in American Jails and Prisons under relatively similar conditions as hostages and captives are released yearly without an assessment of their experience within the linguistic and critical framework of released hostages and captives. This begs this question is inhumane, and barbaric treatment of a detained human being in all it's sensory deprivation and physical mistreatment dependent only on the clinical and academic distinction of legal and illegal?
Is the existential reality of the detained subjects experience of injustice, inhumanness, and barbarity a contradiction mitigated or aggravated by the mere means of it's procedural application?
By Apropos
Monday, August 10, 2009
The Iran Nuclear Program, The Obama Presidency and Agent Provocateurs
If there isn't a cabal that is conspiratorially-molelike, laboring , undermining whatever potential might exist for a form of resolution to the Iran Nuclear Program by the Obama Presidency that will allow Iran to enter the Nuclear Club, there should be. Because since commencement of the Obama Presidency and the realization by Israel, it's sympathizers, Zionism and it's cabal that the Obama Presidency would allow Iran membership into the Nuclear Club. The world has been introduced to all sorts of ploys, gimmicks and gambits wielded by those opposing Iran's possession of Nuclear technology with their efforts at sabotaging Iranian institutions, infrastructure, stirring and supporting Political instability in Iran. Everything is being done to muddy the waters, so to speak, discrediting any means and opportunity available to the Obama Presidency on the Iran Nuclear program.
This latest episode of Three Semitic-Americans arrested in Iran for violating it's borders is interestingly-Bizarre. Are we to accept that there are supposedly reasonably minded Americans who are down right stupid and reckless enough to place themselves on the Iranian border?
The only logical conclusion is the three Semitic-Americans are Agent Provocateurs destined by their arrest to create an International incident that will further discredit maneuvering by the Obama Presidency on the Iran Nuclear Program question.
If the ploy is bizarre it only reveals the desperation of the cabal that instigated it.
By Apropos
This latest episode of Three Semitic-Americans arrested in Iran for violating it's borders is interestingly-Bizarre. Are we to accept that there are supposedly reasonably minded Americans who are down right stupid and reckless enough to place themselves on the Iranian border?
The only logical conclusion is the three Semitic-Americans are Agent Provocateurs destined by their arrest to create an International incident that will further discredit maneuvering by the Obama Presidency on the Iran Nuclear Program question.
If the ploy is bizarre it only reveals the desperation of the cabal that instigated it.
By Apropos
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Deflationary, Recessionary, High-Unemployment Economy and Republican-Conservatism: Governmental Spending and Invaluable Satisfaction
What exactly does Republican critique against Governmental spending in a deflationary, recessionary high unemployment economy mean? It simply means the middle class rationalizes thrift and the working poor-underclass rededicate theirself to the theological dicta of suffering in principle and in deed.
The idea that in a deflationary, recessionary, high-unemployment economy, governmental spending distorts and increases inflation by deflating value is an insidious mischaracterization, a misrepresentation of empirical circumstances and an outright lie intended to satisfy political opportunity.
If as Republican anti-governmental spending economic thought goes that compelling people to spend what money they are holding, by withholding the government purse is how to reawaken a stagnant economy it then ignores the reality that it is an unconscionable and needless hardship which serves no other purpose than the pursuit of theological ideas and a human conditional historicity that is based in ignorance.
Thrift in a deflationary, recessionary, high-unemployment economy is another means of removing money from the retail function of the economy and making it accessible to the speculative-derivative paradigm of risk as a capitalist function. What matters is there has to be a positive circulation of money regardless of source. Republican-Conservatism and it's resentment-judgemental coefficient would rather people suffered needlessly under archaic empirical distortion of suffering as dialectical truism of the human condition and it's political economy, a dialectical synthesis which as a historical attribute must be embraced or else fire and brimstone will fall from the Heavens. But with the dialectical-materialist anticipation of Value and it's money medium of which governmental spending enables the redemptive realization of mans invaluable satisfaction. Governmental spending attempts to achieve and does accomplish the potential of man's creative realizations and in the socialized industries of the worlds developed economies we see the existence of pockets of this reality.
By Apropos
The idea that in a deflationary, recessionary, high-unemployment economy, governmental spending distorts and increases inflation by deflating value is an insidious mischaracterization, a misrepresentation of empirical circumstances and an outright lie intended to satisfy political opportunity.
If as Republican anti-governmental spending economic thought goes that compelling people to spend what money they are holding, by withholding the government purse is how to reawaken a stagnant economy it then ignores the reality that it is an unconscionable and needless hardship which serves no other purpose than the pursuit of theological ideas and a human conditional historicity that is based in ignorance.
Thrift in a deflationary, recessionary, high-unemployment economy is another means of removing money from the retail function of the economy and making it accessible to the speculative-derivative paradigm of risk as a capitalist function. What matters is there has to be a positive circulation of money regardless of source. Republican-Conservatism and it's resentment-judgemental coefficient would rather people suffered needlessly under archaic empirical distortion of suffering as dialectical truism of the human condition and it's political economy, a dialectical synthesis which as a historical attribute must be embraced or else fire and brimstone will fall from the Heavens. But with the dialectical-materialist anticipation of Value and it's money medium of which governmental spending enables the redemptive realization of mans invaluable satisfaction. Governmental spending attempts to achieve and does accomplish the potential of man's creative realizations and in the socialized industries of the worlds developed economies we see the existence of pockets of this reality.
By Apropos
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Michael Eric Dyson, Larry Elder and The Black Security Guard of Nixonian-Republican Criminality
The guest on the 7/29/09; Larry King Live on CNN were: Larry Elder, Ben Stein, Joe Brown and Michael Eric Dyson. The topic was Race Relations and American Police, specifically the Henry Louis Gates arrest of 2009.
Michael Eric Dyson reiterated his encapsulating illustration that were Barack Obama, a White President and were Henry Louis Gates the tottering Henry Kissinger who is a White academician and the arresting Police Officer, a Black Officer, the outcome, storyline and narrative of the Henry Louis Gates arrest of 2009 would be different.
Larry Elder true to his status-quo collaborator-apologist inclination protested Michael Eric Dyson's illustration, and I paraphrase: Eric Dyson cannot say that because it hasn't happened. But as it normally is with the work of the collaborator-apologist, revision and outright misinformation is the operative.
I want to remind Larry Elder, that it has already happened. The Watergate Scandal which exposed a sitting President Richard Nixon as another petty-criminal opportunist thus causing his disgraceful resignation and exit from office was caused and initiated by a Black security guard who chanced upon the break-in at the Watergate Hotel. Anticipating Michael Eric Dyson's polemics: That Black security guard because of his actions at the Watergate Hotel, exposing Nixonian-Republican criminality has been relegated imperpetuity beyond the pale of history. That Black security guard lost this job, became homeless, was persecuted because he dared apply law to the status-quo. That Black security guard is the historical refutation to that time worn collaborator-apologist function of the Larry Elders and their one-dimensional critique, which dialectically in turn affirms Michael Eric Dyson's polemic.
By Apropos
Michael Eric Dyson reiterated his encapsulating illustration that were Barack Obama, a White President and were Henry Louis Gates the tottering Henry Kissinger who is a White academician and the arresting Police Officer, a Black Officer, the outcome, storyline and narrative of the Henry Louis Gates arrest of 2009 would be different.
Larry Elder true to his status-quo collaborator-apologist inclination protested Michael Eric Dyson's illustration, and I paraphrase: Eric Dyson cannot say that because it hasn't happened. But as it normally is with the work of the collaborator-apologist, revision and outright misinformation is the operative.
I want to remind Larry Elder, that it has already happened. The Watergate Scandal which exposed a sitting President Richard Nixon as another petty-criminal opportunist thus causing his disgraceful resignation and exit from office was caused and initiated by a Black security guard who chanced upon the break-in at the Watergate Hotel. Anticipating Michael Eric Dyson's polemics: That Black security guard because of his actions at the Watergate Hotel, exposing Nixonian-Republican criminality has been relegated imperpetuity beyond the pale of history. That Black security guard lost this job, became homeless, was persecuted because he dared apply law to the status-quo. That Black security guard is the historical refutation to that time worn collaborator-apologist function of the Larry Elders and their one-dimensional critique, which dialectically in turn affirms Michael Eric Dyson's polemic.
By Apropos
Sunday, August 2, 2009
George F. Will and His Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism is Wrong, Taxes and the Invaluable-Satisfaction Dialectic
What is wrong with George F. Will? So he writes trite columns for a living, that only establishes he has the necessary objectivity to feed himself. Besides that, his illiteracy under the cloak of Conservatism isn't simply appalling it is insidiously-audacious in the specific sense of it's wormy insinuation into the historical questions of American Political-Economy. George F. Will is wrong on two fronts: Intellectually and philosophically. Conservatism and it's American variant is simply wrong and historically-reactionary.
George F. Will writes in his "The "Tax the Rich!" "Reflex" 7/27/09; essay for Newsweek Magazine...
"tap a typical Democrat... on the knee with a rubber hammer and he or she will say "Tax the Rich!". Well this proposition naturally has it's antithesis, "Tap a typical Republican-Conservative on the with a rubber hammer and he or she will say "Tax Cut". The nature of taxes as George F. Will and his Conservative compatriots see it is the sum total of the Political-Economy dialectic and that closes their intellectual-loop and philosophical circuitry.
American-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism represented by it's George F. Will, Charles Krauthammer, William Kristol and Rush Limbaugh cabal and pantheon misses the question-crux of the human condition and it's Political-Economy which is invaluable-satisfaction. Invaluable-satisfaction, it's means of realization is the Political-Economy dialectic and to reduce it to the taxation irrelevancy reveals quite starkly an ignorance naivete that is flabbergasting.
The question has nothing to do with George F. Will's gibberish verbosity of his 7/27/09 essay which can easily be explained with the simple unfettered idealism. But the question is, does Conservatism and it's Intellectualism posses the requisite auto-criticism to realize that Richard Nixon's abandonment of the Gold Standard and it's paradigm has enabled the revelation of quintessential value. It has anticipated digital-technology and it's productivity and the maturation of speculation despite it's strain again on a sector of the economy has only underscored the fact that the Conservative Political-Economy narrative with it's rote like fixation on taxes, is simply incapable of capturing the invaluable-satisfaction dialectic intrinsic to the human condition. George F. Will and Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism can continue indulgence in the farcial exercise into a nature of the human condition that held true when theology and it's dichotomy held sway with it's dicta that man suffered, because of preordination and not the judgemental resentment of conservative-ignorance and it's reaction. But it is at the expense of contemporary creativity and technological productivity which utterly refutes Conservatism and its Intellectualism and despite George F. Will's assertions that Liberalism and it's intellectual-labor fetters man, the opposite is true and invaluable-satisfaction not taxes is the dynamic.
By Apropos
George F. Will writes in his "The "Tax the Rich!" "Reflex" 7/27/09; essay for Newsweek Magazine...
"tap a typical Democrat... on the knee with a rubber hammer and he or she will say "Tax the Rich!". Well this proposition naturally has it's antithesis, "Tap a typical Republican-Conservative on the with a rubber hammer and he or she will say "Tax Cut". The nature of taxes as George F. Will and his Conservative compatriots see it is the sum total of the Political-Economy dialectic and that closes their intellectual-loop and philosophical circuitry.
American-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism represented by it's George F. Will, Charles Krauthammer, William Kristol and Rush Limbaugh cabal and pantheon misses the question-crux of the human condition and it's Political-Economy which is invaluable-satisfaction. Invaluable-satisfaction, it's means of realization is the Political-Economy dialectic and to reduce it to the taxation irrelevancy reveals quite starkly an ignorance naivete that is flabbergasting.
The question has nothing to do with George F. Will's gibberish verbosity of his 7/27/09 essay which can easily be explained with the simple unfettered idealism. But the question is, does Conservatism and it's Intellectualism posses the requisite auto-criticism to realize that Richard Nixon's abandonment of the Gold Standard and it's paradigm has enabled the revelation of quintessential value. It has anticipated digital-technology and it's productivity and the maturation of speculation despite it's strain again on a sector of the economy has only underscored the fact that the Conservative Political-Economy narrative with it's rote like fixation on taxes, is simply incapable of capturing the invaluable-satisfaction dialectic intrinsic to the human condition. George F. Will and Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism can continue indulgence in the farcial exercise into a nature of the human condition that held true when theology and it's dichotomy held sway with it's dicta that man suffered, because of preordination and not the judgemental resentment of conservative-ignorance and it's reaction. But it is at the expense of contemporary creativity and technological productivity which utterly refutes Conservatism and its Intellectualism and despite George F. Will's assertions that Liberalism and it's intellectual-labor fetters man, the opposite is true and invaluable-satisfaction not taxes is the dynamic.
By Apropos
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism and Liberal-Intellectualism and Thought
What is Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism: It is that historical practice and tendency irrespective of political milieus, of playing loose with facts, historical revisions, the inclination to arouse, stimulate and incite the base irrationality in people and it's apogee is obfuscation.
While Liberal-Intellectualism and Thought struggles to enlighten and inclusively expand human potential, Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism is reactionary.
By Apropos
While Liberal-Intellectualism and Thought struggles to enlighten and inclusively expand human potential, Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism is reactionary.
By Apropos
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Prison Reform, Political-Economy and "Open Political Action"
Is Prison Reform as envisioned by the Barack Obama Presidency and Senator Jim Webb of Virginia a co-opt and preempt of organic Prison Reform?
Historically Prison Reform, which is to mean advocacies by persons and groups towards the purpose of achieving a reform of imprisonment and the way it is used in the United States has floundered and hasn't achieved it's objectives. If some of it's objectives were realized it was concessional ploys by government. Firstly as a means of co-opting reforms evolutionary direction and secondly tactical maneuvering that strengthens the governmental position all the more firmly. A classic example of this is the Anti-Death Penalty position and advocacy, with the way government maneuvered by strengthening that weakness of the governmental position and then enforcing it even more draconically after the revision and correction of that which made Capital Punishment susceptible to attack by it's foes.
Prison as used in the U.S. is a means of controlling elements of society who because of their economical oppression are politically and socially marginalized. What this means in the broad sense is, those members of society who because of their manner of interaction with the economy are without the political and social basis to demand substantial access and positive recognition from society are the ones laws and imprisonment are designed for. It doesn't take much to realize that if an element of society lacks the means to stably interact with it, decisions made and the resulting behavior will run counter to society's laws and as such will result imprisonment. Elements in society who for the most part meet this controlling imperative have been Black people (descendants of enslaved Africans) and the poor blue collar worker or the ubiquitous "working poor".
U.S. society and government does not view it's Black elements and blue collar working poor as productive beings in the Political-Economical sense. But it views the population in question first and foremost as a group to be controlled. This antebellum mind-set dates back to it's feudalistic and royalist origins when common people were to be controlled and rigidly tied to the land by their so-called betters, in a statist undertaking of Political-Economy. Even with the advent of industrial technology and it's socialist production, those societies of which the United States is a historical off spring simply carried over the feudalistic mind-set to socialist industrial production. Of Which even if the so-called commoners, "working poor" of the United States society, Black people and the poor blue collar working Whites are not in practice feudalistically tied to the land they are in principle just as much tied to it due to their lacking of that substantial means of removing theirselves from that imperative of control.
The issue of Prison Reform is also the question of what is the structure and development of the materialist-dialectic of American Political-Economy. In other words if the issue is what is to be done with the predominant imprisonment of Black people and the poor White people, the answer lies with the radical reputation of the American Labor narrative and the speculative-value antagonism. It also lies with a heightened political grasp of the "working poor",to clearly and starkly contrast the divergence of interest within Political-Economy dynamic of their condition. This means not allowing the status-quo and it's support functionaries to describe and define facts as they see fit.
Historically Prison reform holds the position that "open political action" is a specific intellectual activity with the final arbiter the very cause for it's practice and as the Barack Obama Presidency and Senator Jim Webb's initiatives outline the question it preempts organic Prison Reform.
By Apropos
Historically Prison Reform, which is to mean advocacies by persons and groups towards the purpose of achieving a reform of imprisonment and the way it is used in the United States has floundered and hasn't achieved it's objectives. If some of it's objectives were realized it was concessional ploys by government. Firstly as a means of co-opting reforms evolutionary direction and secondly tactical maneuvering that strengthens the governmental position all the more firmly. A classic example of this is the Anti-Death Penalty position and advocacy, with the way government maneuvered by strengthening that weakness of the governmental position and then enforcing it even more draconically after the revision and correction of that which made Capital Punishment susceptible to attack by it's foes.
Prison as used in the U.S. is a means of controlling elements of society who because of their economical oppression are politically and socially marginalized. What this means in the broad sense is, those members of society who because of their manner of interaction with the economy are without the political and social basis to demand substantial access and positive recognition from society are the ones laws and imprisonment are designed for. It doesn't take much to realize that if an element of society lacks the means to stably interact with it, decisions made and the resulting behavior will run counter to society's laws and as such will result imprisonment. Elements in society who for the most part meet this controlling imperative have been Black people (descendants of enslaved Africans) and the poor blue collar worker or the ubiquitous "working poor".
U.S. society and government does not view it's Black elements and blue collar working poor as productive beings in the Political-Economical sense. But it views the population in question first and foremost as a group to be controlled. This antebellum mind-set dates back to it's feudalistic and royalist origins when common people were to be controlled and rigidly tied to the land by their so-called betters, in a statist undertaking of Political-Economy. Even with the advent of industrial technology and it's socialist production, those societies of which the United States is a historical off spring simply carried over the feudalistic mind-set to socialist industrial production. Of Which even if the so-called commoners, "working poor" of the United States society, Black people and the poor blue collar working Whites are not in practice feudalistically tied to the land they are in principle just as much tied to it due to their lacking of that substantial means of removing theirselves from that imperative of control.
The issue of Prison Reform is also the question of what is the structure and development of the materialist-dialectic of American Political-Economy. In other words if the issue is what is to be done with the predominant imprisonment of Black people and the poor White people, the answer lies with the radical reputation of the American Labor narrative and the speculative-value antagonism. It also lies with a heightened political grasp of the "working poor",to clearly and starkly contrast the divergence of interest within Political-Economy dynamic of their condition. This means not allowing the status-quo and it's support functionaries to describe and define facts as they see fit.
Historically Prison reform holds the position that "open political action" is a specific intellectual activity with the final arbiter the very cause for it's practice and as the Barack Obama Presidency and Senator Jim Webb's initiatives outline the question it preempts organic Prison Reform.
By Apropos
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Crispus Attucks and The 2009 Arrest of Henry Louis Gates by The Cambridge, Massachusetts Police
The spirit of Crispus Attucks roams the hills and valleys of Massachusetts in it's eternal embodiment of "Give me liberty or give me death"?Did Henry Louis Gates, the eternal collaborator embodying the Jeffersonian contradiction of the Crispus Attucks experience of American Blackness, feel Crispus Attucks lament as bigotry and it's repression in the form of the Cambridge, Massachusetts White police officer seizing his liberty remind him of what Crispus Attucks actually died for.
Across the land the classic diatribe swells against the Cambridge Police Department, which with Jeffersonian contradiction was only fulfilling it's historical duty. The 2009 arrest of Henry Louis Gates is only the logical conclusion to a statistical certainty that the Black upper class and it's intelligentsia support functionaries should naturally expect, considering their silence and apathy to the generational pogromization of Black America at the expense of the Crispus Attucks experience ---Henry Louis Gates reaffirms the Jeffersonian contradiction with his 2009 arrest.
By Apropos
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Israel and the Blame Game
Why is Israel always ready and quick to blame?
Israel blames Iran, Israel blames Hezbollah, Israel blames Hamas, Israel blames Syria.
Disingenuously Israel blames President Jimmy Carter!!! But the truth is were it not for Jimmy Carter and the billions of dollars deal his administration cut with the Egyptians to elicit the Egyptian status quo's services in securing Israel's flank, Israel might not even be.
Israel with it's treatment of the Palestinian people is gravely miscalculating. Palestinians are not Australia's Aboriginals or Native Americans or even descendants of enslaved Africans. Nor is there some sort of apocalyptic redemption that will in Hitlerite fashion genocidally exterminate the Palestinians so the blame game which Israel, Frat boy like pursues futilely only postpones the inevitable: The affirmative co-existence with Palestinians.
By Apropos
Israel blames Iran, Israel blames Hezbollah, Israel blames Hamas, Israel blames Syria.
Disingenuously Israel blames President Jimmy Carter!!! But the truth is were it not for Jimmy Carter and the billions of dollars deal his administration cut with the Egyptians to elicit the Egyptian status quo's services in securing Israel's flank, Israel might not even be.
Israel with it's treatment of the Palestinian people is gravely miscalculating. Palestinians are not Australia's Aboriginals or Native Americans or even descendants of enslaved Africans. Nor is there some sort of apocalyptic redemption that will in Hitlerite fashion genocidally exterminate the Palestinians so the blame game which Israel, Frat boy like pursues futilely only postpones the inevitable: The affirmative co-existence with Palestinians.
By Apropos
Monday, July 20, 2009
We Are
We are "The Wretched of the Earth",
the suffers of injustice,
the bearers of the yoke of oppression.
We are the down-trodden,
the exploited,
the repressed and we can always rest assured to be manipulated and compromised.
We are The People,
The Populations, The Masses. We build civilizations, we construct edifices and structures attesting to the creativity, ingenuity, and expression of humanity.
We are the basis and foundation that prosperity, wealth, and stability are built on. We surmount the insurmountable. We labor as "Beast of Burden" and the rule is we do all this in the pursuit of anothers interest. We always place anothers welfare above ours. We compromise our lives and settle for wretched existence in consequences of our pursuits of alien ideas.
We are Human Beings. Yet we settle for Civil Rights instead of Human Rights. Some of us claim ignorance as a justifiable reason for subjugated, subservient existence we call our Human Condition.
Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is an exchange of labor for Capital, meaning the dictated means of acquiring and attaining the necessities of life: water, food, shelter, and clothing, experience it's consequences as an inequity of their material realization, an inability to attain that maximal realization of their Human potential.
Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is allegiance to the state, garners you the basics in life experience the injustices and inability of the state to contend and deal with the frailties, whims and caprices of it's human elements, those petty tyrants who at every inch of the way exhibit that rat like frenzy of rats abandoning a sinking ship, grasping and grabbing what their placement within the state machine allows as the wretched masses once again look on
stupefied--- our blood was shed for this?
Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is fiat of theocracy, experience the hypocrisy of human sensuality and sentience totally at odds with the sapient potential of human realization. we persistently encounter that infantile inability of the theological basis to come to terms with the profane cause-effect of the material basis defining and determining that exponential parameter of our lives and condition, which as a result repress and alienates us the masses from our humanness---which in effect produces that one dimensional Human Being we all know so well.
We, "The Wretched of the Earth" have the obligation of understanding that all these factors and conditions that bring us so much despair, grief and anger have no other solution than ourselves. We hold in our hands the turn of our destiny and the relative means to direct our lives upon that path of maximal realization of which the legacy of humanness is our inheritance. The progression of humanness lies with us because we are humanity.
We are the People,
The Populations, The Masses. The frustrations we revel in permitting our articulation of that defeatist slogan "that's the system and that's the way it is", illustrates our continued submission to an existence that takes everything out of us and puts nothing back. It drains us of our humanness and replaces it with the illogical and a humanistic urge of oblivion under the guise of redemption.
By Apropos
the suffers of injustice,
the bearers of the yoke of oppression.
We are the down-trodden,
the exploited,
the repressed and we can always rest assured to be manipulated and compromised.
We are The People,
The Populations, The Masses. We build civilizations, we construct edifices and structures attesting to the creativity, ingenuity, and expression of humanity.
We are the basis and foundation that prosperity, wealth, and stability are built on. We surmount the insurmountable. We labor as "Beast of Burden" and the rule is we do all this in the pursuit of anothers interest. We always place anothers welfare above ours. We compromise our lives and settle for wretched existence in consequences of our pursuits of alien ideas.
We are Human Beings. Yet we settle for Civil Rights instead of Human Rights. Some of us claim ignorance as a justifiable reason for subjugated, subservient existence we call our Human Condition.
Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is an exchange of labor for Capital, meaning the dictated means of acquiring and attaining the necessities of life: water, food, shelter, and clothing, experience it's consequences as an inequity of their material realization, an inability to attain that maximal realization of their Human potential.
Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is allegiance to the state, garners you the basics in life experience the injustices and inability of the state to contend and deal with the frailties, whims and caprices of it's human elements, those petty tyrants who at every inch of the way exhibit that rat like frenzy of rats abandoning a sinking ship, grasping and grabbing what their placement within the state machine allows as the wretched masses once again look on
stupefied--- our blood was shed for this?
Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is fiat of theocracy, experience the hypocrisy of human sensuality and sentience totally at odds with the sapient potential of human realization. we persistently encounter that infantile inability of the theological basis to come to terms with the profane cause-effect of the material basis defining and determining that exponential parameter of our lives and condition, which as a result repress and alienates us the masses from our humanness---which in effect produces that one dimensional Human Being we all know so well.
We, "The Wretched of the Earth" have the obligation of understanding that all these factors and conditions that bring us so much despair, grief and anger have no other solution than ourselves. We hold in our hands the turn of our destiny and the relative means to direct our lives upon that path of maximal realization of which the legacy of humanness is our inheritance. The progression of humanness lies with us because we are humanity.
We are the People,
The Populations, The Masses. The frustrations we revel in permitting our articulation of that defeatist slogan "that's the system and that's the way it is", illustrates our continued submission to an existence that takes everything out of us and puts nothing back. It drains us of our humanness and replaces it with the illogical and a humanistic urge of oblivion under the guise of redemption.
By Apropos
Friday, July 17, 2009
Walter Williams, Colonialism and the Black Apologist Dynamic
Walter Williams, Professor of Economics wrote:
"I'll never make an argument for Colonialism but the fact of business is that the average African was better off under Colonialism..."
I have a problem with it and find it extremely irresponsible and criminal that such utter nonsense is spouted under the guise of responsible scholarship.
The fact is the imperialistic designs and Colonial intentions of the Portuguese, Dutch, British, French, Belgian and Italian Colonizers and the conferees of the Berlin Conference , retarded and voided the very essence of the Colonized Africans. Not only are conclusions as Walter Williams derisive of self-determination, but are the death rattle gasp of the Racist paternalist and in this instance Apologist collaborator-lackey.
Prior to the European Colonization of Africa, were the Africans in social and political disarray? Were not the Africans in most parts able to put protracted and in some instances successful resistance and the logistics and psychological effort it demanded a reflection of the well structured polity it represented? Post independent, have the Neo-Colonialist, former Colonies been allowed to chart their own destiny, without meddling from one or all of their former Colonial masters under the Geo-Political logic of "spheres of influence".
Much is always said of how the European Colonizers of Africa, developed comprehensively the infrastructure and organized the Political Economical structures of their respective Colonies and as such matters always are, it's either an outright lie or a well maintained myth.
European Colonizers didn't Colonize Africa because of benevolent intent. Their first order of Business was first and foremost , plunder and exploit. Consequently any and all organizing and infrastructural development was simply that which would facilitate and expedite their business of plunder and looting. Everything and all within the Colonies was organized and structured to maximize the pillage of resources. Naturally the Colonizers had to rigorously and vigorously destroy any and all forms of opposition, which in principle was any conflicting ideas and intentions against their plunder imperative.
Williams as Professor of Economics should answer his own question. I find it profoundly pathetic at the lengths Black collaborator-lackey and Apologist for Colonialism and it's "White Mans burden" dialectic go to in defense of Euro-centric logic. Professor Walter Williams is no different than those historical Wheatley's who pathetically celebrated their enslavement as enlightenment.
Irrespective of Barack Obama's 7/11/09; speech to Ghana's Parliament and it's admonishment. Africans Political-Economy cannot be analysed absent the stench of it's history.
By Apropos
"I'll never make an argument for Colonialism but the fact of business is that the average African was better off under Colonialism..."
I have a problem with it and find it extremely irresponsible and criminal that such utter nonsense is spouted under the guise of responsible scholarship.
The fact is the imperialistic designs and Colonial intentions of the Portuguese, Dutch, British, French, Belgian and Italian Colonizers and the conferees of the Berlin Conference , retarded and voided the very essence of the Colonized Africans. Not only are conclusions as Walter Williams derisive of self-determination, but are the death rattle gasp of the Racist paternalist and in this instance Apologist collaborator-lackey.
Prior to the European Colonization of Africa, were the Africans in social and political disarray? Were not the Africans in most parts able to put protracted and in some instances successful resistance and the logistics and psychological effort it demanded a reflection of the well structured polity it represented? Post independent, have the Neo-Colonialist, former Colonies been allowed to chart their own destiny, without meddling from one or all of their former Colonial masters under the Geo-Political logic of "spheres of influence".
Much is always said of how the European Colonizers of Africa, developed comprehensively the infrastructure and organized the Political Economical structures of their respective Colonies and as such matters always are, it's either an outright lie or a well maintained myth.
European Colonizers didn't Colonize Africa because of benevolent intent. Their first order of Business was first and foremost , plunder and exploit. Consequently any and all organizing and infrastructural development was simply that which would facilitate and expedite their business of plunder and looting. Everything and all within the Colonies was organized and structured to maximize the pillage of resources. Naturally the Colonizers had to rigorously and vigorously destroy any and all forms of opposition, which in principle was any conflicting ideas and intentions against their plunder imperative.
This is the back drop in true form to lackey analysis. Walter Williams writes:
"The legacy of Colonialism, used so often as an excuse by Africans is a sham that can't hold waste. After all some of the worlds richest countries like the U.S. Canada, Australia, and N. Zealand ---were Colonies as was Hong Kong, whats true about those ex-Colonies that's untrue about Africa?
Williams as Professor of Economics should answer his own question. I find it profoundly pathetic at the lengths Black collaborator-lackey and Apologist for Colonialism and it's "White Mans burden" dialectic go to in defense of Euro-centric logic. Professor Walter Williams is no different than those historical Wheatley's who pathetically celebrated their enslavement as enlightenment.
Irrespective of Barack Obama's 7/11/09; speech to Ghana's Parliament and it's admonishment. Africans Political-Economy cannot be analysed absent the stench of it's history.
By Apropos
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Hugo Chavez, Political Activity, United States, The Honduran Crisis, The Reactionary Dialectic and Henry Ford
Who and what is Hugo Chavez. So the United States and it's imperative (whatever that is) finds Hugo Chavez and his type of Political activity offensive. The obvious conclusion is if the United States, it's imperative and type of Political activity responded and refuted the Polemics and dialectics of Hugo Chavez and his Political activity and imperative, the Chavez circumstance would collapse upon the weight of it's specific and general contradictions.
Simply reducing the Honduran Presidential crisis and it's conditional-coup to the stale , old and tired Neo-Colonial paradigm and it's critique of Communist vs. Capitalist, Left vs. Right, Hugo Chavez as meddler. Lacks the idea of developmental progress and it's consequensential realization of Political-Economy in it's true sense.
The United States, it's imperative and Political activity has historically played a reactionary role in South America. Again the Honduran Coup and the Hugo Chavez dialectic is enabling a reconstitution of United States reaction and it's imperative, despite the fact, this time it is on the side of the legally elected Honduran President, Manuel Zelaya.
The reality for Honduras, The United States if simple: Poverty, Repression, Marginalization, it's dialectics, contradictions and antagonisms never occurs in a vacuum. True to the irrationality of the Human brain it historically requires extreme measures for the practicality of Henry Ford and his $5 maxim to grab the imagination of the petty-reactionary minds who have in their hands the reins of power.
By Apropos
Simply reducing the Honduran Presidential crisis and it's conditional-coup to the stale , old and tired Neo-Colonial paradigm and it's critique of Communist vs. Capitalist, Left vs. Right, Hugo Chavez as meddler. Lacks the idea of developmental progress and it's consequensential realization of Political-Economy in it's true sense.
The United States, it's imperative and Political activity has historically played a reactionary role in South America. Again the Honduran Coup and the Hugo Chavez dialectic is enabling a reconstitution of United States reaction and it's imperative, despite the fact, this time it is on the side of the legally elected Honduran President, Manuel Zelaya.
The reality for Honduras, The United States if simple: Poverty, Repression, Marginalization, it's dialectics, contradictions and antagonisms never occurs in a vacuum. True to the irrationality of the Human brain it historically requires extreme measures for the practicality of Henry Ford and his $5 maxim to grab the imagination of the petty-reactionary minds who have in their hands the reins of power.
By Apropos
Sunday, July 12, 2009
CNN, Iranian Election, Israel and Covert Activities
Listening to the British Spy David Miliband on CNN's GPS with Fareed Zakaria,
go through structured disinformation attempting to stem the Iranian Government's narrative that the recent Election protest on Tehran's streets are results of British Intelligence and Zionist machinations was humorous. For one the British and Zionist are squirming because if the protest reflects a unity of perspective in Iran then the Ayatollahs have no ears for their narrative to fall on.
If the Election was stolen as CNN and the multitudes rioting in Tehran speak with their coverage and actions, even to the theatrics of the U.S. President Barack Obama expressing "outrage" at the level of response from the Iranian Government which is not even comparable to the wanton Israeli destruction upon hapless Palestinians to which by the way none of the imposter's on the global stage express outrage at. Then the breech in Iranian Political civility with the election protest, is the necessary activity that sweeps away the Iranian theocratic apparatus and it's status quo.
To the contrary events in Iran are anything but clear. Were the protest indigenous and organic as it's well-fed sympathizers and supporters ensconced in their Twittering criminal naivete at the machinations unfolding on their high definition screens with the classically duped face of CNN's Christiane Amanpour reporting are made to believe. There would not be the need for the intense sorts of denials from U.S. and British Intelligence complicit with the dare not say anything Israel Mossad.
What is obvious is Israel, desperate to stem the inevitability of it's historicity along with the fifth column activities of disgruntled and gullible Urban Iranians has under the guise of election fraud engaged in covert activities and sabotage against Iranian military and Nuclear facilities in preparation for overt attacks on Iran's Nuclear program.
By Apropos
go through structured disinformation attempting to stem the Iranian Government's narrative that the recent Election protest on Tehran's streets are results of British Intelligence and Zionist machinations was humorous. For one the British and Zionist are squirming because if the protest reflects a unity of perspective in Iran then the Ayatollahs have no ears for their narrative to fall on.
If the Election was stolen as CNN and the multitudes rioting in Tehran speak with their coverage and actions, even to the theatrics of the U.S. President Barack Obama expressing "outrage" at the level of response from the Iranian Government which is not even comparable to the wanton Israeli destruction upon hapless Palestinians to which by the way none of the imposter's on the global stage express outrage at. Then the breech in Iranian Political civility with the election protest, is the necessary activity that sweeps away the Iranian theocratic apparatus and it's status quo.
To the contrary events in Iran are anything but clear. Were the protest indigenous and organic as it's well-fed sympathizers and supporters ensconced in their Twittering criminal naivete at the machinations unfolding on their high definition screens with the classically duped face of CNN's Christiane Amanpour reporting are made to believe. There would not be the need for the intense sorts of denials from U.S. and British Intelligence complicit with the dare not say anything Israel Mossad.
What is obvious is Israel, desperate to stem the inevitability of it's historicity along with the fifth column activities of disgruntled and gullible Urban Iranians has under the guise of election fraud engaged in covert activities and sabotage against Iranian military and Nuclear facilities in preparation for overt attacks on Iran's Nuclear program.
By Apropos
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
History It's Repeating ARC, Lebanon, The Iraq War and Ronald Reagan
What will the narrative be. When American forces reposed on their Iraqi bases experience history and it's repeating ARC, as their Marine comrades and brethren during Ronald Reagan's Lebanon adventurism intended as Political-contrast of Republican robustness with the impotence of the preceding Democratic Carter.
Will there be sanctimonious howls of rage and synthetic grief when those sitting duck G.I.'s on their Iraqi bases suffer a blow equal to the truck bombing of the Marine base at Lebanon?
Will there be the irrelevantly typical and idealistic Polemic against Democrats and their mythical National Security Deficit from a Republican Party that hasn't won any meaningful Military undertaking contrary to it's farcial bellicosity since Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War?
Iraq once again is revealing how robustly naive is the legacy of Ronald Reagan.
By Apropos
Will there be sanctimonious howls of rage and synthetic grief when those sitting duck G.I.'s on their Iraqi bases suffer a blow equal to the truck bombing of the Marine base at Lebanon?
Will there be the irrelevantly typical and idealistic Polemic against Democrats and their mythical National Security Deficit from a Republican Party that hasn't won any meaningful Military undertaking contrary to it's farcial bellicosity since Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War?
Iraq once again is revealing how robustly naive is the legacy of Ronald Reagan.
By Apropos
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Democrats and Governmental Deficit Spending
What is wrong with Congressional Democrats, Democratic Analyst and Democratic Polemicist with their tame, weak and effeminate characterization and defense of Governmental Deficit spending?
The Polemic and it's defense is simple and matter of fact straight forward. In the absence of universal employment, universal Political-Economic access of All functioning citizens, Governmental deficit sending is the only progressively practical medium of the social-contract.
By Apropos
The Polemic and it's defense is simple and matter of fact straight forward. In the absence of universal employment, universal Political-Economic access of All functioning citizens, Governmental deficit sending is the only progressively practical medium of the social-contract.
By Apropos
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
