IN 999 AD SPANISH WARRIORS HAD ENOUGH MOTIVE FORCE TO TIE EL CID, THEIR DEAD KING TO HIS HORSE, TO LEAD THEM VICTORIOUS IN BATTLE OVER THEIR ENEMIES..... WHILE IN 2024 A TYPE OF DEMOCRAT IS MAKING ILL-THOUGHT ARGUMENTS REJECTING THEIR ALIVE LEADER, PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN By William Thorpe

Okay, where should I start, is it with the astoundingly unstated proposition that millions of Americans who claim to hate crime will glibly vote for an individual who has been adjudged a rapist and is a 34 count convicted felon, Yeah the former President of The United States, Donald J.Trump. An unprecedented two-time impeached President during an open and shut one 4yr.term.Which also included an insurrection, the construction of a scaffold to execute members of the Nations Government and an attack on The U.S Congress, because that is what Democrats as Adam Smith, Michael Bennett to name a few under the leadership of the instigator in chief, the insidious NEW YORK TIMES are hard at work implying. I mean it isn't that any of this are strange and peculiar occurrences in our human condition. But the context reeks, which is simply this, The Democratic Party is craven for all sorts of reasons that I can easily defend my stating such. The Democratic Party, plyed the most childish of moves, it exploited a circumstance that had always existed, then it embellished the metric of exploitation, forgetting that, yes as people we are stupid, but our stupidity is complex. So for example, we might not dig too deep into why for example The New York Times has dusted off the same play book it deployed against the ex-Barry Goldwater gal, Hillary Clinton, during her bid for the Presidency, by yapping incessantly about her alleged misuse of a private computer server. By again hammering at Joe Biden's CNN hosted and shopped 6/27/24 debate performance. To which right on cue Meerkat-like Democrats emerged with pointy noses and chinless jowels, to unconscionably tell us that The President's debate performance was so beyond the pale that, excuse the pun, it trumped the fact that President Joe Biden's opponent on the debate stage was a criminal, not metaphorically but literally and the way the President spoke so whispery is the crime and not Donald J. Trump, whom the State of New York has spent millions prosecuting for his craven crimes. Now what do I mean by those meerkat-democrats exploited a situation that had always existed Biden didn't just turn 81, during the CNN 6/27/24 debate, nor did he just start eating his words, the man has historically been making word salads. Hell has anyone listened to how the lot of politicians talk, hell not just politicians even those propagandist slaving for The New York Times, all they do is talk in circles because they obfuscate, if they ain't talking to us as if we're Gerber kids, they talk to us with the dumbing down qualifier of, "I don't want to get into the weeds" or,"this is inside the belt way, Washington talk, folks in the heartland, are not concerned with this". Well if we don't care, if it's in the weeds, if its beltway talk, then what the hell are we basing our votes on? Now this is what is violently insulting, as a matter of fact, assaultive. The New York Times and its Democratic stooges, its useful idiots, have assumed they have the right to veto the imperative and will of all those millions of primary voters who expended their motive force voting for Biden-Harris as the only elements worthy of representing them. Those primary voters knew that Joe Biden is 81yrs, they had seen all the anti-Biden psy-ops memes ,they had encountered all of the Biden bashing propaganda, while giving the convicted felon Trump, a pass. Yet they voted for him in the primaries and now The New York Times is dismissing their votes, their motive force?

By William Thorpe