The 81yr.old Joe Biden, during the 6/27/24 CNN hosted debate, behaved exactly as a normal, healthy, octogenarian, who struggles with a stutter and stammer would. In the early moments of the debate, his voice was leathery and muffled. Hell who knows, it all could've been a stunt to ensnare and goad, his opponent, the notorious convicted felon Donald Trump into going on a rampage of lies and craven insults, for an entire Nation, to distinctly and clearly experience and hear of the sorts of language typically reserved for his cultist rallies and true to form,Trump performed and provided enough content for Joe Biden's campaign to mass produce and exploit as type and sorts of speech that passes for political campaigns. So that was the debate. What I find interesting, which is what prompted this work is the response and reaction, post debate and man has it been biblical!! Because the chicken little, sky is falling nature of the response has occurred as if, recruiting certain prairie dogs to provide cover for the insidious work of "It sounds a dreadful thing to say, but these are things that don't necessarily need to be true as long as they're believed" (Alexander Nix unquote) i.e the former U.S Senator from Missouri Claire McCaskill and the birthright for a bowl of potato soup media patsy, Van Jones who can't think themselves out of the proverbial, "wet paper bag" are legitimate critics. These are not ad hominem snides, but come on man who the hell is paying Claire McCaskill and Van Jones to pick "Barabbas"?didn't we see this movie in Mel Gibson's, PASSION OF THE CHRIST? Where Pontius Pilate asked those precursors to our "white"evangelicals", between The Nazarene and Donald Trump's precursor Barabbas, who should he free and to a man they screamed Barabbas? Are we not witnessing and experiencing that same identical drama with this hue and cry for Joe Biden to step aside from his reelection bid? Because during the CNN debate, Biden was his natural 81yr.old self, as if the leathery speech of a 81yr.old voice box is abjectly criminal and socially menacing, than the sex assault adjudged, 34 felony count convicted Donald Trump, who is a pure archetype of the A to Z of human corruption. Yet, what we've experienced is unbridled, umbrage at Joe Biden for daring to remind us that octogenarians exist. This entire hyperventilation over Joe Biden's debate performance is contrived, clearly underpinned by ulterior motives, which must be clearly at odds with the Nations patrimony because, considering the characters involved in the push to have Biden exist stage, hell it could be trapdoored, and there hasn't been none of the usual whisper spillage, that behind the closed doors of the Oval Office away from the moist, liver like lips of a Thomas Friedman, or the affected study of a David Remnick, those self styled gate keepers right? President Joe Biden is a drooling "dotard" a la North Korea reminding Donald Trump, of their proficiency in and command of English lingua which Trump in his illiteracy hadn't a clue in his misfiring neurons, existed. So this brings me to the nerve of THE NEW YORK TIMES, yup that old legion having the gall to presume its deception isn't tired, old (hell if "old" is an accusation, then man o man is the New York Times well deserving!) and worn. Look people way before the debate and Biden's critique The New York Times had been pounding the drum,for him to step aside. The New York Times has expended crazy resources in establishing strawman arguments, a weirdly comical exercise in anti-Biden psy-ops intended to demoralize Biden's base. So this post-debate furor unleashed by The New York Times along with its peon, The Atlanta Journal Constitution clamoring for Biden to hang it up has nothing to do with a droll debate but a Fuhrer gambit.
By William Thorpe
0 comments:
Post a Comment