To The God Believers, Specific-Interest, Erin Burnett of CNN and Schizophrenic Greed

To The God Believers, the only approximate absolute is organic needs.  To emprio-science the only approximate absolute is cause and effect.  With this in mind why do we tolerate the narrative of specific-interest as analysis of our relationship with the general principle when the consequences are final  and organically irreversible?

Why do we on one hand proclaim the sovereignty of the individual, then abridge it in the next breath with the idealism of for example Erin Burnett of CNN and her specific-interest value speculation narrative?

To the Erin Burnett's who quake at the prospect of a type of resolve, settling accounts with specific interest, the Human Condition isn't the sum of superlative distortions, conveniently presented at the behest of schizophrenic greed masquerading as progress.

By Apropos

West Virginia and Mother's Day: Musings

Really of all the backwards and reactionary positions in West Virginia's history, it is refreshing in a way to learn that West Virginia was the first state to recognize Mothers Day officially.

To all the Moms out there and to be---Yes on paper, in an archive some where, the dusty shelf of a clueless bureaucrat, Mothers Day is a Sunday in May, but for all you do, WE KNOW EVERYDAY IS YOUR DAY.

By Apropos

The Idealism Of The Reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld

A status quo and it's reactionaries always explains away at the expense of the narrative of it's existence.

So we can have a Thomas Jefferson penning articles of liberty at the expense of depriving human beings he held as slaves, theirs.

The idealism of the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld always suppose that the detail and approximate specificity is at odds with the general approximation so instead of the rule, what the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld idealistically instruct is the suppositions of the exception.

The work of idealism and it's mental labor is always that of foolishly distorting empiricism.  Because what the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld conveniently and with intellectual dishonesty glibly ignore is: achieving the American "dream" or economic stability isn't affirmative critique of the national Political-Economy narrative in itself, which still has the question of genocide, slavery and presumptive discrimination to resolve.  But it is simply a statement that the functioning element has submitted to the status quo narrative bias and the idealism of the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld is it's indulgence.

By Apropos

The Narrative Of The Dictatorship Of Value And The Idealism Of The Nazarene

The only dogma with honest historicity is the narrative of the dictatorship of value and it's variegated expressions and not even the idealism of the Nazarene stands in inquisition.

"Give unto Ceaser..." is as inexorable as Chaka's Mfecane and justice is what is the social-contract mitigating the narrative of the dictatorship of value.

By Apropos

The Reactionary Glenn Beck and The Exploitation Of Reaction

The media personality Glenn Beck is just another typical idealistic, simple-minded reactionary who has gleefully stumbled across how easy it is to "get" money by bedazzling the stunted-stupefied brains amongst us.

What this speaks to isn't brilliance but the mediocrity and abject poverty of the standard the Glenn Beck class surmounts in amassing value and it's speculations.

Lest we are remiss the adage "in the land of the blind the one-eyed is king" anticipated the reactionary Glenn Beck and the exploitation of reaction.

By Apropos

Seattle Seahawks Richard Sherman And The Humility, Boasting And Hubris Critique

2014 Superbowl XLVIII bound Seattle Seahawks all pro corner, Stanford Grad Richard Sherman is the most recent casualty.

Post Game 1/19/14; triumph over the hated rival San Francisco 49ers and the correctly described mediocre receiver Michael Crabtree. Richard Sherman correctly reiterated his professional superiority as being the best defender of the fade route---to which crass haters of all stripes, bigots, their perpetual fears and ignorance and the so-claimed genteel amongst us ranted cacophonous babel with the humility, boasting and hubris critique---that Richard Sherman wasn't humble, he was boastful and full of hubris.

This humility, boasting and hubris critique demands this: So it's socially wrong and unacceptable to verbally boast but it's socially mandatory we boast with durable commodity acquisitions i.e. Homes, Cars, brand name things.  But we are social losers if our Women are without a Hermes scarf.

In a world where 85 persons own equaled wealth to 3.5 billion persons, umbrage at and assault on Richard Sherman, a football player boasting because of a job well done reveals psychosis of our human condition and the audacity of it's hypocrisy.

By Apropos

CNN Cares More About Killer Whales Than The Middle-Class

CNN showed it's concern for the barbaric treatment of killer whales by SeaWorld with the recent broadcast of the documentary Blackfish.  Which took a historical journey into the genesis of enslaved killer whales in water parks i.e. SeaWorld.

If CNN can educate us of the injustice of enslaving killer whales, when will CNN show us how Ronald Reagan, modern Republican-Conservatism and it's Reaganomics Intellectual-Liberalism has systematically and methodically, complicit with the Bill Clinton Democrat destroyed the middle-class?

By Apropos

On The Question of State Secrets and A Right To Know

On the question of State Secrets: It is first and foremost that of who does "what" to know "what."

Then the question becomes why is "what" being done.

A nation, the general public doesn't have a right to the disclosure of tactics it's intelligence and organized violence institutions use in pursuit of national strategies.  The only national right is an understanding of the suppositions in support of the strategies.

This is one aspect on the question of State Secrets and a right to know, naturally there are others.

By Apropos

Star Jones, Kimberly Keller, Two Examples, Miley Cyrus and Trayvon Martin

Hypocrisy and stupidity always exist as examples and recently we have been assaulted and insulted by two.

Considering that hypocrisy and stupidity are examples of reaction, the recent Miley Cyrus MTV Awards twerking incident engaged it.

• Star Jones A flotsam of The View, told CNN's Piers Morgan that besides in her disassembled view, twerking being "impolite" it should be done by African Women in the Bushes of Africa-Now not only is this an unforgiven example of cultural delusion on African Femininity, but it reminds us of the schizophrenic context the self-loathing Black Women of the American Diaspora of African ancestry (of which Star Jones regretfully is) has towards Africa. 

• Kimberly Keller A suburban White Woman dealing with the alienation of her existence reminded us that examples of stupidity are also a painful idealistic corollary of hypocrisy.  Because in the enfeebled world view of Kimberly Keller, Miley Cyrus twerking is more destructive developmentally on her one-dimensional kids than the example of George Zimmerman hunting and killing the teenage Treyvon Martin and the acquittal under the bigoted logic that it was an "unfortunate" incident.

By Apropos

Police Departments, Fire Departments and The Right To Privacy Argument As Defense Against Their Law Violating Activites

Not a single Police Department, Fire Department in the nation supports the fact: Because firearms kill so carrying them, using firearms in the course of their work violates one's right to life, liberty e.t.c.

Yet Police Departments, Fire Departments presents as argument against using video recording devices during the course of their work, their interactions and contact with the general public that such devices violate the public and individuals right to privacy.

The reality however is Police Departments, Fire Departments hate and are morbidly against any mechanism and means that holds their behavior accountable and exposes their law violating activities and video recording devices do that.  Lest we forget Rodney King and the LAPD.

By Apropos

Scandal, Corporate Media, The Moribund Political-Economy and The Virtual Sexual Deviant Behavior Of Anthony Weiner

, member of the United States House of Representatives. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

How do we define scandal?  Is it's exposure therapeutic pretext?  For too long certain minds and hearts particularly those in corporate media have explained, justified and attempted to defend their pursuits of scandal with: "It's what the public wants".  Quietly omitting that the public is a beast fed on the repetition of what corporate media serves.

On 7/24/13; President Barack Obama gave a major speech on the moribund Political-Economy outlining it's national and international definitions.  The speech and it's focus was contextually and provisionally significant because it filled the moribund Political-Economy space.  Considering that the economy and it's politics is the fundamental lattice on which America is realized therefore it's status is paramount.

On 7/24/13; CNN and it's corporate media ilks after transient commentary on the Obama speech went right back to the business as usual of defining scandal as the virtual sexual deviant behavior of the 2013 New York City Mayoral Candidate Anthony Weiner.

This begs this question: Has Anthony Weiner's virtual sexual deviant behavior with the ingenue Sydney Leathers resulted in the nations unemployment crisis?  Does it respond to the bankruptcy of Detroit, does it account for the illiteracy and backwardness of the nations elected officials?  So are the corporate masters of CNN and it's ilk, telling us that in a nation where under every rock slithers a "christian", a set of beliefs that ask he who hath no sin cast the first stone, that the hypocricy of Klieg Light lit faces, mantra like casting stones at and chanting the sins of Anthony Weiner trumps the scandal of the nations moribund Political-Economy?

 By Apropos

Republican-Conservatism, it's Intellectual-Liberalism, Austerity, Deprivation and Welfare Programs

Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism presents as it's motive that, economic energy is wholly compelled by austerity, austere conditions and catalysed by deprivation.  So poverty and socio-marginalization isn't seen by Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism as a negative and destructive.  Instead it's perceived in it's most germane expression as "good" because poverty and deprivation impels the Human Condition to realize "better".

Idealistically the described world view of Republican-Conservatism seems to present a fact of the Human Condition and we see it played out in the anti-government activity polemicized by the Republican Party against Welfare programs.

It's not my intention to philosophize.  A catalog and bibliography refuting this Republican-Conservatism world view has occupied 90% of the Human Conditions mental labor.

We at Apropos state: The Human Condition is s soupy approximation historically spiced with austerity and deprivation.  A fact stated by milleania of it's historicity but without the commensurate "better" the idealism of Republican-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism would have us accept as dialectical synthesis.

By Apropos

The LL Cool J's Of The World, George Orwell's Animal Farm, Snivelling Metamorphosis and The Narrative Of Speculative-Value Production

What the LL Cool J's of the world present is this: They begin by being in opposition to the operative narrative of their existence.

Then as in George Orwell's Animal Farm we observe them as pigs walking on their hind legs aping all that is idealistic and antagonistic of the narrative that defined their assembly.  A snivelling metamorphosis.

So as the inevitable disassembly begins we are humored by the zeal with which these Orwellian LL Cool J's discover artful ways to rationalize and defend the flotsam narrative that circumscribed their pre Orwellian metamorphosis existence.

Still we pay attention to the markers of the LL Cool J's of the world who as the narrative of Speculative-Value production reveals, lost the totemic battle, metamorphosizing the antagonisms that circumscribed their beginnings.

George Orwell's Animal Farm is your ode' 'nuff said.

By Apropos

Intelligence Gathering Activities, Surveillance Machinations By The United States, Eric Snowden, The Treason Critique and Political Economy

The idea that the recent revelation of intelligence gathering activities and surveillance machinations by the United States and it's global rule presumption by Eric Snowden a former NSA (National Security Agency) contractor is an act of treason only reveals the idealistic imperative of contemporary American governance and it's Political-Economy.

If the United States per virtue of it's of it's Political-Economy world view lays claim to the practice that no corner of the globe is off limits and sovereign, then there is nothing treasonous if Eric Snowden reveals to the world, intelligence gathering activities and surveillance machinations by the United States.

As the United States Navy recruits with the slogan "A global force for good" and whether the slogan is semantically speculative and the organized violence dicta of the United States is global rule presumptive.  Then unless the claim is that Eric Snowden revealed intelligence gathering activities and surveillance machinations to extraterrestrial invaders then the treason critique is comical and idealistic in it's straw grasping.

By Apropos

Gretchen Wilson, Redneck Woman Defensive

Cover of Gretchen Wilson

CBS's The Talk Sheryl Underwood recently asked Country Singer Gretchen Wilson, if she had the Redneck spirit, because Gretchen Wilson once had a hit "Redneck Woman".

Gretchen Wilson reflexively got defensive, her face closed and she rhetorically pleaded and (I paraphrase) I Don't know what you mean by Redneck...

I found this humorous and abjectedly pitiful, a psychological abscessed scab painfully exposed in full view as if Gretchen Wilson epitomized an anxiety suppressed so firmly that her recourse was to disavow a cultural state was affirmatively iconic in her life...Redneck Woman.

The obscenity of the spectacle was Gretchen Wilson perceived her relationship to Redneck via the narrative of it's critics.

So what then does this mean: That despite the up yours to the Redneck critique, Gretchen Wilson is secretly susceptible?
By Apropos

The National Debt, Deficits, Republican Party and Speculative Power

If consequences of the National Debt, deficits are cataclysmically dire and it's critique isn't idealistic and polemical gambit wielded by the Republican Party in pursuit of speculative power.

Then the solution is practically easy and Conservatively status-quo.  The 2% (two percent) of the population who are it's beneficiaries and hold in accumulation it's realized value, shouldn't have any problem and reservation in settling it because they stand to lose their accumulation and gains, if the debt, deficits narrative is objective fact as the critique purports and not a Republican Party gambit in pursuit of speculative power.

By Apropos

Ideas, Inventions For The Underdeveloped and Third World That Distract From Practical Development

The problem with ideas and inventions intended for the underdeveloped and Third World and it's Political-Economy is such ideas and inventions objectively underline and entrench, enabling the continuity of the structural basis of the underdeveloped in the first place.

The underdeveloped and Third World and it's Political-Economy doesn't exist in a parallel universe whose conditions and environment is antithetical to the industrialized and developed world, as a matter of fact the industrialization of the developed world is a fact of the unity of conditions, environment and the relationships existing betwixt developed and underdeveloped worlds---so the pursuit of what is development in the underdeveloped  and Third World is analogous to what is development in the developed world minus the idealistic ideas and inventions targeting the underdeveloped and Third World that distract from practical development.

By Apropos

Why Do We Fight and The Valuation Of Our Existence

Why do we fight

Because we disagree.

Why do we disagree

Because of our worldview.

Why do we have disagreeable worldviews?

Because we clash in the pursuit of resources necessary for the valuation of our existence.

By Apropos

Schizophrenia and Hypocricy Of The Non-Regulated Global Economy

Recently corporate media has inundated our challenged attention span with news of a 1,000 dead persons, workers at a Bangladesh Garment Factory, victims of the schizophrenic and hypocritical non-regulated global economy narrative.


The corporate media storylines of the 4/24/13; Bangladesh Garment Factory catastrophe has been a stylized focus on the human tragedy, an underlining of the humaness of the dead workers.

In this contemporary social zeitgeist, more is owed the dead workers by those who death trumpet their humaness, but in life exploited and insulted their humaness by keeping silent on the conditions and practices that cumulated in and catalyzed their death.

The resulting editorializing and commentaries on the non-regulated and criminally deplorable Bangladesh Garment Factory work conditions by corporate media post mortem 4/24/13; should have been done pre 4/24/13; with equal zeal.  But considering that the consumers of corporate media benefit from the schizophrenia and hypocricy of the non-regulated global economy which Bangladesh and it's cheap and poorly paid garment factory workers play their umpa lumpa  roles, it wasn't 2.0 worthy of hors d'oeuvre chatter to recognize the humaness of Bangladesh moreorless critique their work conditions.

By Apropos

A Nations Decline, Idealistic-Violence, Wendy Walsh School Prayer and Religion

A nations decline isn't borne on the wings of decadence and a generalized corruption as historians have classically pronounced.  Unless the corruption is that of a lazy mind.  But a nations decline reflects to what extent, idealism and it's delusions are disseminated as practical responses to problems.

Lately the nation has been grappling with the question of idealistic-violence.  Idealistic in the sense that the violence doesn't further the objective-narrative of progress of the Human Condition.

So into this dialectical struggle steps Wendy Walsh, a self described behavior expert.  Which as professional designation highlights the very nature of a nations decline; with purported analytical response.  Wendy Walsh declared with full entire weight of human history and it's accumulated cognition on her delusional shoulders.  That lack of school prayer, absence of religion are to blame for violence and depravity.

Contrary to the delusions of Wendy Walsh and her idealistic ravings, the violent speech of Religion bears as much responsibility for idealistic-violence as the psychosis of idealism.

By Apropos