IN 999 AD SPANISH WARRIORS HAD ENOUGH MOTIVE FORCE TO TIE EL CID, THEIR DEAD KING TO HIS HORSE, TO LEAD THEM VICTORIOUS IN BATTLE OVER THEIR ENEMIES..... WHILE IN 2024 A TYPE OF DEMOCRAT IS MAKING ILL-THOUGHT ARGUMENTS REJECTING THEIR ALIVE LEADER, PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN By William Thorpe

Okay, where should I start, is it with the astoundingly unstated proposition that millions of Americans who claim to hate crime will glibly vote for an individual who has been adjudged a rapist and is a 34 count convicted felon, Yeah the former President of The United States, Donald J.Trump. An unprecedented two-time impeached President during an open and shut one 4yr.term.Which also included an insurrection, the construction of a scaffold to execute members of the Nations Government and an attack on The U.S Congress, because that is what Democrats as Adam Smith, Michael Bennett to name a few under the leadership of the instigator in chief, the insidious NEW YORK TIMES are hard at work implying. I mean it isn't that any of this are strange and peculiar occurrences in our human condition. But the context reeks, which is simply this, The Democratic Party is craven for all sorts of reasons that I can easily defend my stating such. The Democratic Party, plyed the most childish of moves, it exploited a circumstance that had always existed, then it embellished the metric of exploitation, forgetting that, yes as people we are stupid, but our stupidity is complex. So for example, we might not dig too deep into why for example The New York Times has dusted off the same play book it deployed against the ex-Barry Goldwater gal, Hillary Clinton, during her bid for the Presidency, by yapping incessantly about her alleged misuse of a private computer server. By again hammering at Joe Biden's CNN hosted and shopped 6/27/24 debate performance. To which right on cue Meerkat-like Democrats emerged with pointy noses and chinless jowels, to unconscionably tell us that The President's debate performance was so beyond the pale that, excuse the pun, it trumped the fact that President Joe Biden's opponent on the debate stage was a criminal, not metaphorically but literally and the way the President spoke so whispery is the crime and not Donald J. Trump, whom the State of New York has spent millions prosecuting for his craven crimes. Now what do I mean by those meerkat-democrats exploited a situation that had always existed Biden didn't just turn 81, during the CNN 6/27/24 debate, nor did he just start eating his words, the man has historically been making word salads. Hell has anyone listened to how the lot of politicians talk, hell not just politicians even those propagandist slaving for The New York Times, all they do is talk in circles because they obfuscate, if they ain't talking to us as if we're Gerber kids, they talk to us with the dumbing down qualifier of, "I don't want to get into the weeds" or,"this is inside the belt way, Washington talk, folks in the heartland, are not concerned with this". Well if we don't care, if it's in the weeds, if its beltway talk, then what the hell are we basing our votes on? Now this is what is violently insulting, as a matter of fact, assaultive. The New York Times and its Democratic stooges, its useful idiots, have assumed they have the right to veto the imperative and will of all those millions of primary voters who expended their motive force voting for Biden-Harris as the only elements worthy of representing them. Those primary voters knew that Joe Biden is 81yrs, they had seen all the anti-Biden psy-ops memes ,they had encountered all of the Biden bashing propaganda, while giving the convicted felon Trump, a pass. Yet they voted for him in the primaries and now The New York Times is dismissing their votes, their motive force?

By William Thorpe

ONE OF THE UNHINGED "WHITE-EVANGELICALS" ON THE ETHNO-NATIONALIST AMERICAN FAMILY RADIO, JUST COULDNT HELP HIMSELF AND HE HAD TO CRITICIZE THE DEAD REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR By William Thorpe

Here I am on July the 4th, 2024, trying to find NPR on the FM dial and I hear the voice of one of the provocateurs on the American Family Radio, station, saying he had people say to him that because The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. helped his fellow man, which were his works must be in heaven. Man oh man, I said to myself, this will be good ha-ha-ha because he was teeing of, setting it up to criticize the Rev. and of course in extension, the civil rights narrative, which is like cat nip to "white evangelicals", they despise the fact that Black People dare criticize and indict White America over the Black American experience as Brother FREDERICK DOUGLAS resolutely gave us in his, 'WHAT TO THE SLAVE IS THE 4TH OF JULY"... ha-ha-ha, so yes I knew it'd be another one of those indefensible apologies. Well it didn't take much for the voice to, first of all I assume in his, stuck in his antebellumnesque reaction proclaim his Bonafide's as basis to tell us, because I gotta suppose that he has peered into" heaven "and again I suppose with the exact sort of eyes of those 4 creatures of Revelation's throne room and its sea of crystals "seen "that Brother Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. is no where to be found. Because he starts by declaring, Yup that's the only way I can put it, the American Family Radio voice declared that he has read, Yup read and studied (now let me digress a bit because I find it extremely oxymoronic that a ethno nationalist, American white-evangelical not only studies but is capable of studying, because isn't the whole idea behind studying is so we won't make the same tired and indefensible mistakes our ancients made? And the only thing our ethno nationalist white evangelicals are hell bent on doing is making those silly mistakes our ancients made as if their  "God " given brain realizes and redeems itself by the flagellation of that adage of insanity) yeah I digressed a bit but back to our American Family Radio voice and his intimate study of as he put it all of The dead Rev.'s works, oh the voice even said he studied The Rev.'s handwritten works (man is the voice laboring mightily just to discredit civil rights!, but then when ones only claim to having occupied cubic space on earth is ethno-nationalism and its " supremacist futility", you'd also be reduced to being a voice on American Family Radio. So the voice reaches the apogee of his intended destruction of Martin Luther King Jr. by declaring that The ole Rev. wasn't a Christian after all because his writings were Buddhist.....hmmm, now this is where I said man this voice is making all of my take on the reactionary world view of the white evangelical, for me which is, all we gotta do is let em talk because once they open their mouth they impress us with its arbitrary construct. So the voice's critique stood its Florida ground, ain't that what it is stand your ground? On EPHESIANS 2:8-10 (FOR BY GRACE YOU HAVE BEEN SAVED THROUGH FAITH, AND THAT NOT OF YOURSELVES: IT IS THE GIFT OF GOD, NOT OF WORKS, LEST ANYONE SHOULD BOAST.FOR WE ARE HIS WORKMANSHIP, CREATED IN CHRIST JESUS FOR GOOD WORKS, WHICH GOD PREPARED BEFOREHAND THAT WE SHOULD WALK IN THEM...NKJV) I've excerpted what the voice stood his ground on, which is the critique that Paul aka Saul critiques "works" as being at odds with salvation right? Which is then to say, THE REV.MARTIN LUTHER KING JR's works hell might as well been the devils work or "dirty deeds done dirt cheap".Isn't The Great Commission "work"?

By William Thorpe

WHAT IS THE FUHRER GAMBIT? By William Thorpe

I have described the tumult from Joe Biden's CNN 6/27/24 debate with the notorious criminal Donald Trump, as contrived and THE FUHRER GAMBIT. A gambit, to put it, is a tactic, a maneuver, a move towards a concealed strategy. Ever since Black South Carolinians rescued Joe Biden's presidential ambitions, thereby enabling his seemingly improbable 2021 Presidential win against the now convicted felon, former president Donald Trump (who was performing to perfection, the useful idiot role, for "Capital" and its neo-feudalist formulation) "that" reactionary historical supremacist presumption has shrieked in terror, that Joe Biden, trounced their useful idiot in 2021.As such, "that historical supremacist presumption "has demanded that its Fourth Columnites, The New York Times, CNN, The Washington Post, USA Today, Chicago Herald, LA Times, The Detroit News, Politico, FOX and some of the minor players, earn their keep by lambasting and undercutting Biden. Because what exactly are we being asked to determine? That a 81yr.old Man doesn't have vigorous speech? If vigor of speech indicated critical thinking and a motive force of action, then Parrots, Parakeets, Ravens, Magpies and all those birds of mimicry would be marshalling divisions and battle orders against imbecile humans. Because whether Biden had a slack look on his face aghast at the craven and brazen lies being spewed by the notorious criminal Donald "orange Jumpsuit# olelabrateyes" Trump during the CNN 6/27/24 Debate has nothing to do with his motive force. Let's ask all of those dead Russians, who met their Russian Orthodox Church Heaven on Ukrainian earth by means of Biden provided American steel and percussive or all of those slaughtered Palestinian Women, Children and Men again by Biden provided to Zionist Israelis, American munition or Biden's check on The Chinese Communist Party and its Peoples Republic Strategies or Biden's work at maintaining the international lattice integral to the realization of goods and services. The point is all of those provocateurs yelling the loudest for Biden to exit stage, left, The Krugman's, Friedmans, Remnicks, McCaskills, Jones have all increased their wealth and purchasing power under the "senile" stewardship of Biden. They live in comfort, under the safety provided by their lambasted senile Biden ain't it .Let's take all of these Palestinians killed, slaughtered and murdered under this American real politik with Zionist Israelis as directed by this American President, Joe Biden and as a result is literally under the prospect of losing a substantial portion of his Democratic base, the same people he needs for his reelection but who are diametrically and radically opposed to his support of Zionist Israel because the dying Palestinians not only are human beings but are their family members, literally not metaphorically, but literally and regardless of the simple logic of the Zionist imperative ,which is, seizure of what was once Palestinian land. Just as White Europeans, invaded Native American lands and seized it resulting into what is now These United States. The point is no one and I mean no one has made the point that senility, cognitive decline, dementia and all the ageist, speculative accusations are basis for and what is fueling Joe Biden's handling of the myriad domestic and international issues. If anything his handling of the various issues specifically the Palestinian-Gaza war with Zionist Israel, then on immigration has garnered the criticism of heartlessness and heartlessness sure as hell isn't synonymous with senility and doddering. The idea that The New York Times circumscribes ones motive force on vigor of speech is straw grasping.

By William Thorpe

FIRST 2024 BIDEN,TRUMP POST-DEBATE FUROR IS A SIMPLE FUHRER GAMBIT By William Thorpe

Our politics to wit, history isn't complicated, just as life and our human condition. So with this out of the way, let me begin, politics is first and foremost speech and if our ancients correctly recognized that, "war is not an independent phenomenon...but the continuation of politics by different means",viz, politics then is war, meaning it is always about speech and speech at times presents itself kinetically others inertly. The current President,Joe Biden is 81yrs.old, the one challenging him is currently America's notorious criminal, a sexual assault adjudged and 34 felony count convicted former president Donald "orangejumpsuit, #olelabrateyes" Trump and he is 78 yrs.old. Both Men are relative octogenarians and we've already had The North Koreans name call and characterize, Donald Trump, a"dotard", during the Nation's, Bozo indulgence, Trump's disastrous presidency. On June, 27/2024,CNN sold ad.time (in other words, made money) under guise of showcasing a "presidential" debate between the octogenarians vying to be called "President". Now let me make this point, according to the nations jurisprudence"every person" is responsible for their conduct, and as plainly stated under the Nations legal structure, corporations are persons, then CNN as person and host of the purported 2024 presidential debate is responsible for conduct, which by all measures was indefensible in its permissiveness of allowing a notorious criminal, Donald Trump to mock that colloquial "faith glue", holding and maintaining the integrity of the Social Contract. 

 The 81yr.old Joe Biden, during the 6/27/24 CNN hosted debate, behaved exactly as a normal, healthy, octogenarian, who struggles with a stutter and stammer would. In the early moments of the debate, his voice was leathery and muffled. Hell who knows, it all could've been a stunt to ensnare and goad, his opponent, the notorious convicted felon Donald Trump into going on a rampage of lies and craven insults, for an entire Nation, to distinctly and clearly experience and hear of the sorts of language typically reserved for his cultist rallies and true to form,Trump performed and provided enough content for Joe Biden's campaign to mass produce and exploit as type and sorts of speech that passes for political campaigns. So that was the debate. What I find interesting, which is what prompted this work is the response and reaction, post debate and man has it been biblical!! Because the chicken little, sky is falling  nature of the response has occurred as if, recruiting certain prairie dogs to provide cover for the insidious work of "It sounds a dreadful thing to say, but these are things that don't necessarily need to be true as long as they're believed" (Alexander Nix unquote) i.e the former U.S Senator from Missouri Claire McCaskill and the birthright for a bowl of potato soup media patsy, Van Jones who can't think themselves out of the proverbial, "wet paper bag" are legitimate critics. These are not ad hominem snides, but come on man who the hell is paying Claire McCaskill and Van Jones to pick "Barabbas"?didn't we see this movie in Mel Gibson's, PASSION OF THE CHRIST? Where Pontius Pilate asked those precursors to our "white"evangelicals", between The Nazarene and Donald Trump's precursor Barabbas, who should he free and to a man they screamed Barabbas? Are we not witnessing and experiencing that same identical drama with this hue and cry for Joe Biden to step aside from his reelection bid? Because during the CNN debate, Biden was his natural 81yr.old self, as if the leathery speech of a 81yr.old voice box is abjectly criminal and socially menacing, than the sex assault adjudged, 34 felony count convicted Donald Trump, who is a pure archetype of the A to Z of human corruption. Yet, what we've experienced is unbridled, umbrage at Joe Biden for daring to remind us that octogenarians exist. This entire hyperventilation over Joe Biden's debate performance is contrived, clearly underpinned by ulterior motives, which must be clearly at odds with the Nations patrimony because, considering the characters involved in the push to have Biden exist stage, hell it could be trapdoored, and there hasn't been none of the usual whisper spillage, that behind the closed doors of the Oval Office away from the moist, liver like lips of a Thomas Friedman, or the affected study of a David Remnick, those self styled gate keepers right? President Joe Biden is a drooling "dotard" a la North Korea reminding Donald Trump, of their proficiency in and command of English lingua which Trump in his illiteracy hadn't a clue in his misfiring neurons, existed. So this brings me to the nerve of THE NEW YORK TIMES, yup that old legion having the gall to presume its deception isn't tired, old (hell if "old" is an accusation, then man o man is the New York Times well deserving!) and worn. Look people way before the debate and Biden's critique The New York Times had been pounding the drum,for him to step aside. The New York Times has expended crazy resources in establishing strawman arguments, a weirdly comical exercise in anti-Biden psy-ops intended to demoralize Biden's base. So this post-debate furor unleashed by The New York Times along with its peon, The Atlanta Journal Constitution clamoring for Biden to hang it up has nothing to do with a droll debate but a Fuhrer gambit.

By William Thorpe

Is The Actor Morgan Freeman's Mouth Big Enough For His Foot That He's Shoving In It By William Thorpe

Okay, so Morgan Freeman wants to criticize Black History month, yeah okay that's fine he can do that. If he's inferiority addled over the name AFRICAN-AMERICAN, that's okay too. He isn't the first or the last AFRICAN to self-loathe. But this is where Morgan Freeman's antics turns into cowardice and where he doesn't get a pass. Well, he doesn't have any agency in his blackness, whether he's embraced or shunned he's still black. Now as it is, neo-Jim Crowites are in their zombie virulence, animated by their "barker" in chief, Donald-#olelabrateyes-Trump, so we got, clown Governors in Florida, Arkansas, Texas, Iowa, Virginia, Georgia, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Alabama, Tennessee et al,amnesiac over, Stephen Crane's tears. So Why is Morgan M.I.A?

By William Thorpe

THE COLD WAR OF AMERICAN RACISM AND THE T.V PERSONALITY, DIANE SAWYER By William Thorpe

What exactly is the purpose of this recent Diane Sawyer, O.J.Simpson related interview---what exactly are we supposed to learn from it? Will Diane Sawyer interview Trayvon Martins' Mother? Will she interview Breonna Taylors' Mom? Will Diane Sawyer interview all of The Moms, whose sons, daughters have been killed by Cops and vigilantes? Will Diane Sawyer interview Governor Greg Abbott for his reasons for pardoning a convicted murderer? Will Diane Sawyer interview Speaker of The US House of Representatives, Mike Johnson to explain his unconstitutional presence at the now, 34 count convicted felon Donald Trumps' New York State trial? Will Diane Sawyer interview all of those Republican politicians including the 34 count convicted felon Donald-#olelabrateyes-Trump on account of their anti-semitic endorsement?

By William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

 

Credit William Thorpe

THE MOTIVES OF THE NEW YORK TIMES AND KRYS BOYD OF KERA THINK, GIVING FORUM TO KABIR CHIBBER, MUST BE CALLED TO ACCOUNT AND INTERROGATED By William Thorpe

Think.Kera.org

On 4/24/24 Krys Boyd of KERA's THINK Interviewed Kabir Chibber on his opinion piece, "HOLLYWOOD'S NEW FANTASY A MAGICAL COLORBLIND PAST, which had been published in THE NEW YORK TIMES. First of all I'm detained in solitary confinement and I listen to Krys Boyd's KERA THINK most of the time, some of her content are inane others speak truth, but that's the human condition as such, say what you will but most are intellectually honest. Then there is the 4/24/24, Kabir Chibber interview, which peculiarly on two occasions, Krys Boyd allowed Kabir Chibber to disparage and dismiss The Vice-President of The United States Kamala Harris without context, as a matter of fact Chibber went out of his way to disparage Kamala Harris, underscoring his animus, which after listening to the interview smells like crass jealousy. Now would a man who would presume critique, idealistically of the entire Black historic condition and a cornerstone of the American GDP or Gross National Product, Hollywood be animated by jealousy of a woman, yup.What's that adage, "if it quacks like a duck....,it's a duck? Hell yeah Kabir Chibber is a duck. Look not only is he jealous of Vice-President Harris but ostensibly he's jealous of Black People, because one doesn't arrive at the seething disdain premised, better yet, expressed in his ".....colorblind" work without the sort of slanted eyes of opprobrium to wit jealousy, too much energy was expended by Kabir 'duck' Chibber on a enterprise that no matter how he's given the benefit of doubt, ranks fetid with, intellectual-dishonesty ,infantile sophistry, specious context, farcical excavations and a buffoonish premise. Am I surprised that The New York Times, fell all over itself publishing the idiotic work "HOLLYWOOD'S NEW FANTASY A MAGICAL COLORBLIND PAST"? No. Despite its support for Professor Nikole Hannah Jones 1619 PROJECT, The New York Times is an American establishment and just as we are always reminded of that other axiom, a leopard and spots, The New York Times is incapable of performing, what would be the leopard and its spots alchemy by becoming dialectically objective. Krys Boyd of THINK is also hopelessly subject to the establishment criticism. Now consider any contemporary journalist presented with the opportunity to interview Adolf Hitler or other leadership elements of The Third Reich post its destruction and everything that we now know of it and that journalist indulging in that unconscionable bothsideism of Donald Trump's assertions should be treated equally as Joe Bidens' when we already know the consequence of that world view? Well that is exactly what The New York Times and Krys Boyd of Think done in the matter of Kabir Chibber and his cartoonish neo-Linnaeusism opinion piece. The gist of 'duck 'Chibber's work presents the strawman logic of "colorblind". Then he reveals his 'annoyance' (as if "even the rocks "should commiserate with him) with Hollywood's artistic liberties of portraying Black People in Eurocentric milieus that historically excluded them. Of course he took offense to the movie BLACK PANTHER. Now when challenging intellectually dishonest works most of the time, their premise will at least have a modicum of 'idea' to be dispatched. But 'duck' Chibber doesn't even give us that.I mean really he has issues with a Black Woman playing Queen of a European principality in a cinematic work? Okay so what realism, what historical honesty are we supposed to accept, THE GAME OF THRONES, with its fire breathing dragons on? Now 'duck' Chibber's ironic cloaking of the inherent bigotry of his work, which Krys Boyd, to her credit and despite her compromises during the interview still had an ember of interrogative objective, to smell that it was that tired stench of bigotry fueling, Messer 'duck 'Chibber, to which the old 'duck' recognized with the comical protestation that he isn't, "a racist" .But the thing with life is yes, we can't read the mind but we sure as hell, will see the work and Messer 'duck's' is that old, "thou doth protest too much" ,because if it's okay for White movie makers to give us all sorts of bizarre, outlandish plots, hyper unrealistic dramatizations, taking all sorts of liberties with how we understand 1+1=2, yet Hollywood tells us that not only isn't 1+1 a 2,but we should accept that a bunch of brunettes, blondes and carrot tops were enslaved by other brunettes, blondes and carrot tops in Cecil deMilles TEN COMMANDMENTS. Now if this isn't a prima facie refutation of 'duck 'Chibber's ravings. In other words it's okay for Eurocentrism to give us all sorts of improbabilities and implausibility's at the expense of the old 'duck's Hollywood critique. Hell even that once upon a time "black face" of White actors placing themselves in, according to the old 'duck's mental labors historical implausible realities. I haven't even got to the quintessential repudiation of the 'duck's gibberish which is the fraudulent depiction of Jesus Christ by Eurocentrism as blonde and blue eyed or pick your palette of hair and eye color, but don't stray from Messer Carl Linnaeus, homo sapiens europaeus. So if The New York Times with all its intellectual resources and to a lesser degree Krys Boyd of KERA THINK conveniently ignored the double standard of Kabir Chibber's opinion piece and allowed its intellectual-liberal regurgitations existence. We can only reach one conclusion, that supremacy as Sisyphus is haplessly caught in its wretched futility loop. First of all what does Kabir Chibber know of history? Okay let's indulge him on his terms. How much of history isn't a set of symbiotic relations? What quality of these Americas is unadulterated "White", with whatever White is supposed to mean? I mean 'duck' Chibber, presents such a preposterous speech that incredulity is an understatement. The great schizophrenic, Thomas Jefferson along with his work of authoring, The Declaration enslaved a Black Woman, Sally Hemings whom he serially raped by any and all standards. Yet there are legion among us who deny and decry its history. Dredging up all sorts of nauseous sophistry that Thomas Jefferson and his reprehensible ilk and class should be understood within the prevailing standards of their times and epoch, really? Yet we should celebrate, honor and commemorate what was positive from that history,really? Now if contemporary humanity is the same biologic, mental and emotional beast unchanged for the thousands of years with our proficiency being that of braining each other, why then should our evaluation and accounting of our mutual behavior be according to a subjective and biased "standard", which we know to be nothing more than a justifying gambit? .All we value are actions and activities of our mutual past, yet we indulge in the petty corruption of, we can't dissect our past behavior, which then subjects us to collective schizophrenia as evidenced by Messer Kabir' duck' Chibber and his " colorblind "work. By William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

The Patriarchy Narrative In Hip Hop is a Crucifixion of Agency By William Thorpe

Just as the American Dollar realized quintessential value by shaking off the distortions of the gold standard, Hip Hop in turn qualified humanness by purifying speech. So now in 2023 Hip Hop is marking its jubilee as such we are reminded that Hip Hop as all other organized human inclinations is patriarchal. I don't want to take much of the reader's attention speaking on the patriarchy save to say it's high time we reminded our better halves, our sistahs, these "curves" on this planet with us that subjugation, subservience, is first and foremost a surrender of agency. If my understanding is correct the emergence of Rappers Delight as accepted Hip Hop's first full feature was due to a woman's agency. There is much women can do to assert agency, but the patriarchy critique in Hip Hop as in all our other human realizations is a way out, not only denying agency but mocking it. The consequence of this mockery is we both suffer. As men our value is comparatively compromised relative to woman's unwillingness to firstly define agency. The patriarchy critique is just another expression, another formulation of that last fetid gasp of Southern enslavers of Black people, that Northern abolitionist were the ones inciting the enslaved to resist and pursue Liberty, implying that the enslaved Black man, woman and child had to be roused to assert agency for Liberty. We constantly encounter the compromise of agency as that ring in the oxen's nose serving another's interest. I express my agency with this quote from The Schizophrenic in Chief Thomas Jefferson: "all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed." [unquote The Declaration Of Independence In Congress, July 4,1776,]

By William Thorpe

ESPN NFL Analyst Herm Edwards Educating Us or Is He Selling Us Slavery by William Thorpe

The Running Back position or Half-Back or Full Back in Football is, football. Its integral to football as pigskin and once upon a time mythical Impis as Barry Sanders, The Great Jim Brown, The Battering Rams of Jerome Bettis, John Riggins and of course the improbable Walter "Sweetness" Payton ruled the 120 yards of battlefield, AKA the Gridiron of football war as Running Backs. Yup Running Backs. Now Herm Edwards has seen the bottoms of many runningback cleats and the resulting torn and ripped turf introduced to his face from those cleats to respect and I stress respect those Impis as runningbacks ruling the gridiron. So what's possessed him to now join in enabling  and further advancing the lie and treachery, yes treachery that is specifically in the employ of the billionaire owners of teams in the NFL, that the runningback isn't valuable and the game has passed them a narrative that only has one purpose which is squeezing as much value from the human being as capital, then casting off the exploited and used husk, human beings which in this specific circumstance are runningbacks, yup human beings who are football players. So I ask again what is Herm Edwards in his role as ESPN NFL analyst selling when he argues that modern football is a passing game and as such the runningback isn't integral to its offensive schemes (and I'm paraphrasing) as such should appreciate the pennies tossed their way. But the reality is even if modern football is a passing game, then it all the more emphasizes the runningback in all aspects of its function and purpose: from the pure function of running the ball, to blocking, being a check down safety valve for the quarterback and being the one and only reason, the passing from play action works. Here is an anecdote that I challenge Herm Edwards to refute, Matthew Stafford as the former Detroit Lions Quarterback was traded to The LA Rams and he promptly won a Superbowl, why? With the LA Rams, Stafford was compelled to use his runningback as opposed to his fetishzing the jump ball pass to Calvin Johnson aka Megatron, that only padded stats but nothing to quote Herm Edwards played to win, so what we see is the runningback is as integral to modern football as the position was back during Jim Thorpe's Dog Soldier days on the Gridiron. There isn't any insight I'm providing that isn't obvious to any perfunctory appreciator of the game of football, so it's incomprehensible to hear and have ESPN and its serfs stridently pushing the runningback isn't valuable narrative when we know it's a lie. The devaluation of the runningback position is due to the treachery of the NFL Players Union selling out the runningback position under the gambit of a rookie salary cap. Regardless of the rationale and logic of the rookie salary cap the NFL Players Union should've carved out an exemption for the runningback position from the top end. On the issue of Sequon Barkley selling out I'll leave that to the barbershop to remind him that the ancestors survived slavery so he wouldn't have to kowtow to the New York football Giants, come on man.

By William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

Speech B y William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

The White-Evangelical Ethno Nationalist "States Right" To In Dicta Define The Woman Pre-Menopausal Life By William Thorpe

WhereAs pregnancy is the primary purpose of Womans function.

WhereAs Woman has no right to abort the pregnancy.

WhereAs such abortion limitation on the Woman fundamentally distinguishes the Womans life.

WhereAs chattel enslavement of black people, the "state right" to in dicta define the Woman pre-menopausal life as the white-evangelical ethno nationalist apogee in securing Womans pregnancy, purpose and function.

Reacquaint Yourself With the Social-Contract

Awright Women to all of you acting like six stooges on the Supreme Court of the United States haven't declared you outside of history, I know you're reeling but do you have a faint recollection of a much touted and worshipped declaration, something to the effect of "life", liberty and the pursuit of happiness"? Anyway I get it your own sisterhood betrayed you, denied your agency       So here is the inexorable and inevitable logic of Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization 142 S. ct. 2228. What you can/can't eat, can/can't wear, can/can't drink under dicta rubric that you're in your ovulating cycle.

Now let me say this, I know you've heard of CRISPR, the gene scissors. Well on the horizon is the potential to generate eggs and sperm from one individual. Secondly mechanical-womb incubators are already present and surrogacy is mundane as financial enterprise. So considering white-evangelicals and their Roman Catholic enablers are all about pregnancies, the only practical polemic is tell them to avail themselves of emerging bio-technology.

By William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

William Thorpe

 

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Speech By William Thorpe

 

Credit William Thorpe

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe