To opponents, foes, critics of the construct, Politically Correct: what sort of speech do you exactly want to have that construct Politically Correct impedes you from having?By Apropos
Reviews, opinions, comments, polemics, dialectics and all sorts of musings. Everything that is relevant.
To opponents, foes, critics of the construct, Politically Correct: what sort of speech do you exactly want to have that construct Politically Correct impedes you from having?
When will we learn and accept the fact that the need for charity and charity giving is not our better selves exemplified. But it represents and is indicative of the idealistic construct of our human condition, akin to a health care worker purposefully making one sick, enabling one's ill-health to attempt a cure.
So the takeaway is PeytonManning is great and a Demi-God when defenses are mediocre and cooperate by being patsies. But as soon as defenses put on gladiatorial and Impi like comprehensive performances the apotheosized Demi-God Peyton Manning comes crashing down to earth as the impetuous Icarus who dared to fly.
If we know that the existence of "A" will inevitably, abjectly create "B" yet we are apathetic to the genesis of "A" even to the point of mockery and derision and we know for a fact "B" will happen because of "A".
Isn't it odd or even cynically weird that despite all the various government safety net programs, all the Constitutionally mandated welfare programs, the infinitude of ubiquitous charities across the nation, churches, various religious groups claiming to provide charity to those on hard times---there is still "Need"?
On 12/14/14; Brian Stelter host of CNN's Reliable Sources was his usual confused self struggling to make us think. Along for the ride he had the inferiority complexed CNN Anchor Don Lemon and the profile in irrelevance Andrew Wallenstein Co-Editor of Variety Magazine engaging in a debutante-like
conversation on the ethics of publishing the hacked Sony Internal Emails. Typical of what passes for contemporary mental labor, what Brian Stelter, Don Lemon and Andrew Wallenstein exposed us to was the bankruptcy of passe' reasoning and the stale nature of their world view.
The incredulity of debating the ethics of publishing the contents of hacked Sony internal emails as if the activity of publishing the Sony internal emails is different from if the contents of those emails had been scooped by a journalist from a disgruntled source and published---so what then is the ethical dilemma and question? The contents of the hacked Sony emails are specifically valuable because it exposes the hypocrisy and sanctimony of those who would claim status quo realization over the rest of us. Whatever claims to privacy is proximity-relative. So besides the epic embarrassment of hollywood elites, What is the ethical issue.| No. 50 The Seven Vices: Injustice (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
| Office on Violence Against Women logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |