Privacy, Kate Middleton Baring Her Breast and The Tower Of London

The Question of privacy should hinge on proximity, it is reactionary and modernly illiterate for Kate Middleton and her husband to suppose and assume entitled to privacy when the supposed entitlement of privacy actually is a gradation of proximity.

What we are saying is: The objectivity of privacy which is what jurisprudence is being asked by Kate Middleton because of her social act of baring her breast, to define, is specifically and objectively an approximation of proximity.

Privacy is an awareness of subjective proximity so we state:  Kate Middleton should have had the presence of mind that in the age of digitalized technology, her topless sunbathing nudity which by the way is observable from satellites in orbit cannot claim a presumptive privacy defended by the utility, The Tower Of London claimed in its hey day.

By Apropos

"Fighting Injustice", "A Global Force For Good" A Perversion of Military Purpose and The Constitution Of The United States

When A nations Military uses slogans like "Fighting Injustice" as the Marines are currently doing or the Navy's "Global Force For Good", the nations decline and dilution of it's motive force is in hand basket mode.

Dwight D. Eisenhower lectured us about the nefarious cabalistic collusion of the military and for profit corporate interest.  Because as soon as Industrial Value-Speculation becomes the motive for association with a nations military and it's production of organized violence, a perspective perversion of military purpose occurs and the most crass of straw grasping justification begins to assail the national sensibilities.

So we find justification of production of organized violence and it's trillions dollar national deficit in slogans like "fighting Injustice" or "A Global Force For Good" that have nothing to do with the National Defense mandate dicta of the Constitution Of The United States but everything to do with Industrial Value-Speculation.



By Apropos

Ronald Reagan, Republican-Tea Party, Bob Woodward, Barack Obama, The National Debt and The Intellectual-Liberalism Of Reaction

How many times have we heard the criticism that even Ronald Reagan would be unwelcome in today's Republican-Tea Party.  So if Ronald Reagan, of whom the Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism apotheosizes isn't,  wouldn't be reactionary enough, intransigent enough for today's Republican-Tea Party.  On what objective critique is the great Bob Woodward concluding his leadership criticism of President Barack Obama as being lacking during the 2011 National Debt gambit wrought by the Philistines of the Republican-Tea Party in his recent for profit book, The Price Of Politics.

If Bob Woodward expects us to bestow sagism and that ephemeral intellectual value, objectivity on his works, then his mental labor ought to reflect such.  Instead of the conventional easy way out perspective of over simplification, which despite the consequential gravity of pro forma petty events, the Intellectual-Liberalism of reaction elevates into crisis.

Claiming as Bob Woodward does in his book The Price Of Politics that Barack Obama should have, was obligated to have solved the gorgon knot intransigence of congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge during the 2011 National Debt gambit is quite frankly naive and idiotic.  The entire 2011 National Debt Crisis was a gambit of choice by the Republican Party and it's Tea Party stooge to terroristically exact it's Intellectual-Liberal demands from Barack Obama, the Democrats and the American people.  Would Bob Woodward rather have Barack Obama declare and wage war on the third of the U.S.Government?  (Congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge).

An objective critique of the 2011 National Debt gambit would be explaining the sequestration ploy as a moral hazard designed specifically to compel congressional Republicans and their Tea Party stooge to compromise with Barack Obama, Democrats and the American people on the prospective elements of the National Debt.

Bob Woodward fails his posterity.  He leaves us wondering that if he represents the elite of the nations intelligentsia then it isn't surprising that the National Political-Economy is in the feckless quandary of the idealism of suppositions and one dimensional critique as consequence of the supremacy of the Intellectual-Liberalism of reaction.

By Apropos

Barack Obama and Nat Turner

Barack Obama Resurrected and saluted Nat Turner the Insurrectionist in his 2/22/12; Dedication of the African-American Museum.  Apropos stands in recogition.

Anti-Taxes Polemic And The Constitution

To the Anti-Taxs polemic that invokes the Constitution of the United States for it's cause, we state this: The Constitution of the United States is taxes progressive.  There are progressive and affirmed mentions of taxes in article I section 2, section 7 and in section 8 and it goes without saying that the existence of any mature developed republic requires realized taxes.

By Apropos

Banks And Consumer Fees

The question we present and ask banks specifically the Big Banks, Bank of America and co. as they pursue saddling the American people with consumer fees is:  Is Charging fees an entitlement banks will ingeniously extort from the American consumer?

By Apropos