Comments On The Book "Black Wave" By An Authors Whose Name Is Irrelevant

The problem with writers of books as "The BlackWave" critical of Iran and it's Islamic Revolution is, it does it from the narrative of the loser, the opposition to the revolution and its narrative.

What the "Black Wave's" author, whose name is irrelevant, glosses over is, the Iranian Revolution as all revolutions including the American, which should correctly be described as a National War of the Independence, didn't occur in a vacuum. The World Pre-Iranian Revolution wasn't all peaches and cream and all of a sudden Shia Ayatollahs and Mullahs ruined it.

There has been one historical line of attack and criticism of the Iranian Revolution, but with two diverging points:

• It is Islamic and its diverging points are: 

1. It is a Terrorist state
2. It is a Totalitarian and a theologic dictatorship

But the true nature of the Iranian critique, the only nature of the critique is Iran and its militancy dare challenge the Zionist narrative of Israel and its logic of seizing Palestinian Patrimony and to the ends of this conflict, all sorts and levels of propaganda are wielded and brought to bear against the perogatives and speech of the Iranian Revolution, of which the "Black Wave" is another labor.

Notwithstanding the presumptions of the Zionist and Iranian positions, whatever contradictions that are inherent within Iranian Theocracy can only be resolved from the perspective of the social fact of Iranian speech and not whatever antagonisms it has with the suppositions of the "Black Wave" and it's author whose name is irrelevant, and its narrative masters.

Look, critics of the Mullahs, if such critics are Muslims should war within Islam for its reform and Islam is no stranger to reform, and not simply present and represent a Eurocentric supremacy critique of Iran. Let's not forget that there is nothing unique and exclusive to the critique leveled against Iran by Eurocentric supremacy and its Zionist ward. Europe and America are not heaven. The only difference between eurocentric supremacy and Iranian militancy is we know all about the former and less about the later.

To claim as the author of the "BlackWave" whose name is irrelevant does and I paraphrase, that the emergence of Shia Iran has caused panic in the surrounding Sunni states is petty intellectual-liberalism giving us not one illuminating ray of insight and with these comments, I remind the author whose name is irrelevant, that her "BlackWave" work mocks the purported ends, her Pakistani protagonist beseeched, that of choice and it is in pursuit of choice those vanguards and supporters of the Iranian Revolution aspired.

By William Thorpe

Make Ameri-KKK Again

Contra-Donald Trump and The Resurrection of Walter Cronkite Editorializing By William Thorpe

A seminal moment in American media was the journalist Walter Cronkite transforming the act of editorializing into journalistic purity with the revelation, that the government was lying to the American people on the nature, development, and circumstance of the Vietnam War.

Critics of Walter Cronkite and his televised editorializing were the usual suspects, that reactionary minority who for their own wretched ends and pathetic interest were threatened by the revelations of Walter Cronkite televised editorializing.

Since Walter Cronkite dared challenge the oppositionary status quo with his televised revealing editorials. Academia has lionized the act while culturally it is iconic.

So fast forward to another war, the one currently being waged by Donald J. Trump against the nation and its hard-won truths, that directly poses the question: Who amongst the non-Fox News legatees of Walter Cronkite have the resolve to advance Cronkites notion that editorializing is not only required but demanded when the pursuit of journalistic equivalency is not only morally and professionally repugnant, but not doing it is crass and abject cowardice.

Secondly, the reminder that accountability isn't a Paul aka Saul declarative, descending from the "grace" of the Nazarene on cherubic and seraphic wings, nor will it emerge from heroic but gelded impeachment push. But there are enough accumulated archival facts of malfeasance, moral turpitude, mendacity and base corruption of Donald J. Trump's actions and behavior to interrupt the robotic delivery by any of the non-Fox News anchors with the televised resurrection of their Walter Cronkite moment, shaking and rousing the nation from the stupor of the unimaginable.

Reference
H.Res.755 - Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors

Critical Race Theory and The Philistine Meeke Addison By William Thorpe

Okay we will play along and act like the Philistine Meeky Addison's disdain for Critical Race Theory is something more than just another pathetic intellectual-liberal example of the house negro apology and mock it on her evangelical-apologetic terms. Which then simply amounts to, there cannot be a continuum of American injustice embodied by it's white subjective within the evangelical Christian context because; the redemptive Christ has cleansed sin, hence racism as expression of sin is mooted.

Now such sophistry worthy of the eponymous past master himself Paul aka Saul demands consistency, a consistency the pharisaism of Meeky Addison is incapable of delivering. Because if all socio-critique and pursuit of justice are viewed through the evangelical-apologetics dicta, then why do we even have social-remonstrance if the redemptive Christ has relieved us of sin and its continuum? But the fact is Meeky Addison's disdain and ire for Critical Race Theory is, it simply destabilizes her world view because it is the mirror reflecting her inferiority and house negro self-loathing and no amount of religiosity and its jealous-resentment of secularism will redeem this bad fact.

Critical Race Theory is a statement of the obvious: The effects of the continuum of white privilege and its wake upon American justice which, whether or not Meeky Addison recognizes if the very ground her evangelical-apologetics stands and teeters on.

Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey, Wanna Protest? Protest American Injustice

Biblical Moral Authority: Evangelicals

Free Speech, Dan Cathy of Chic-fil-a..And God Said Or The Bible Says and History Will Erect Tombstones

The Implicit activity of free speech is it anticipates antithesis, it recognizes there will be opposition.  Couching theological liberties as free speech is either the work of a lazy and feeble mind or at its very core an effort to reassert idealistic dicta.

Dan Cathy of Chic-fil-a Restaurants as most Republican-Conservatives when confronted with the reactionary nature and backwardness of their thought and world view find refuge under the banner of...and God said or the Bible says.  So when Dan Cathy touched off a recent firestorm with his anti-gay comments, he was quick, along with his supporters and defenders to claim free speech because it was his religious belief and liberty.

The Issue and the problem with... and God said or the Bible says, as free speech is we cannot argue with God, we cannot debate God, even the Devil isn't truly antithetical to God.  So... And God said or the Bible says for purposes of free speech definitions is as idealistic as the notion of "being outside of history" which is what Dan Cathy and his ilk would always demand of the Human Condition and it's dialectical-materialist reality.

The United States Constitution articulates religious freedoms as specifically being without the dicta of the state and its bias.  Free speech is subsequently defined antithetically to religion because free speech is the activity of thought, mental labor.  Religion isn't an idea to its believers, it's rather a suspension, suppression, and repression of ideas, it frowns on the activity of free speech.

So for the very elements, free speech warns us against to conceal their reactionary practice under its mantle hints at two occurrences, either we have become militantly decadent or we have lost the Jacobin edge of polemics.

Dan Cathy, his reaction, and backwardness can and will invoke God as a medium of their idealistic intolerance and history will erect tombstones to their failure.

By William Thorpe Imprisoned at Red Onion State Prison

Evangelicals Apologist

American Exceptionalism Circa 1776

Donald Trumps Casting Couch

Shaka Zulu

SHAKA ZULU

SEPTEMBER 22, 1828

BAYETE!

White Privilege

BREXIT

Modern Pharisees, The Extermination of Native Americans and The Dehumanization of Black People

Evangelicals as all totalitarians and hypocrites suffer from memory loss. Contemporary culture which they have become petty hucksters and hustlers railing against is a reaction to the once upon a time supremacy of a historical "Christian" status quo.

The extermination of Native Americans and the primal seizure of their patrimony and the land, the enslavement, and dehumanization of Black people didn't occur in a porn saturated, LGBTQ-Drag Queen prancing, aborted fetuses galore, disrespect of killer cops, "Godless" Hollywood culture.

Instead the savagery wrought and practiced by "White" European invaders of America, the extermination of Native Americans, the enslavement of Black people happened upon their biblical understandings when it was the dominant cultural organizing force. The sun as witness to "White" European savagery rose and set year after year within the culture apology of the bible.

So what historical biblical moral authority are we being demanded a return to our evangelical compatriots? Weren't enough Native Americans exterminated, haven't Black people been dehumanized enough under their historical biblical morality     that they dare lecture us that modern, contemporary culture is Godless and lacking biblical morality.

When "they" Evangelicals and their modern Pharisees self recognize the fact that the apogee of their biblical moral authority is a carriesque Jesus Christ wearing blood-drenched and soaked garments on a white horse. An image, the fertile image of "Godless" Hollywood is yet to organically conjure, despite carrie, is only a motif of the very culture these modern Pharisees have monetized railing against.

By William Thorpe

Will Become Another Problem Our Sapience Solves - By William Thorpe

They terrorize us in life to scare us with death.

The ability to kill a slave isn't a willingness to kill slaves,

The predator culls the herd otherwise it perish, which is what terrorized life and scared with death experience unknowingly,

"We have nothing to fear but fear itself" was mobilization against the other      Yes "We the people......" Government is only possible, our suppositions, keeping us in file in class war life,

So "Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" So let us truly go there finally, finally experience the recriminative utter silence, primordial silence of annihilation: when trees fall without sound. Where supremacy presumptions stand laid bare coming to terms with "The devil is in the detail" and that usury, it's derivatives and terroristic valuation and the death exploitation will become another problem our sapience solves,

They terrorize us in life to scare us with death.

By William Thorpe

AS NOVEMBER 6th APPROACHES DONALD TRUMP's' NOSE GROWS LONGER

Credit William Thorpe

DECEPTION

Speech By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

Conservatism Intellectual-Liberalism and Its Bottom Pit Critique and War

For too long American-Conservatism and it's foot soldier have criticized liberalism and the war on poverty as a bottomless pit of spent money.

The Bottomless pit of spent money critique is also used to deride and dismiss demands to fund public education.

Conservatism critique is summed up as despite the amount of money spent on the war on poverty and public education. Issues still persist and exist, so liberalisms approach has been wrong and only conservatism's intellectual-liberalism and its personal responsibility and social engineering narrative will allow redemption for the poor and non-unionized teachers [euphemestically presented as charter schools] will save public education

Our political-economy, however, reminds us that the conservative critique on both accounts is false and outright deceptive.

No one will dare argue that nevertheless the bottomless pit of taxpayer money spent on waging wars. The idea and its practice of waging war is a failure because not only is war still with us but is constant as the sun rising    so we should promptly embark on the ..... Beating swords into plows .....delusion and stop pouring taxpayer money into the bottomless pit of the nations military, intelligence agencies and the state organized violence of law and order which is also another bottomless pit of public expenditure, because nothing seems to indicate that crime is deterred or reformed.

But as soon as the question is: How is value [money] interacted with, who has access to it    we encounter the distortion of what is good for the goose isn't good for the gander or the pot can with a straight face `a la the banal and fatuous pronouncements of Arthur Brooks of the American Enterprise Institute, on work and dignity and Amy Holmes cohost of PBS In Principle. [who hasn't encountered nothing pre-fixed conservatism that doesn't cause her orgasmic swoon] call the kettle black   In furious reaction to any attempt and effort at showing that certain unresolved and unsettled accounts of our political-economy are inherent saboteurs on the question of poverty.

Conservatism and its intellectual-liberalism has long given up any pretense to "thought" and embraced its true calling: the deification cult of the reactionary Ronald Reagan. So it's contemporary practice when not doing 3-legged and sack races with every last slithering denizen from not the mere unjust side of history but the wrong side of it, almost accomplishing the impossible of stepping outside of it   the incredulity of what it has become escape it, as it negates its own dignity, a dignity, to let Authur Brooks lecture us, its lack is what ails American Poverty.

Conservatism has no issue with the antagonism of a national-economy maintained on taxpayer money going to bomb makers, missile makers, handcuffs, and shackles manufacture, police uniforms makers for the primary purpose of money distribution for the employment of a majority white worker. Or taxpayer money subsidizing all sectors and activities of the American political-economy from the industrial-practical to hair-brained enterprise but not limited to charlatan think tanks i.e American Enterprise Institutes, for the specific purpose of money circulation and redistribution. But as soon as the same identical logic of government created money underpins a response in the war on poverty and is circulated to the welfare recipient     [and should be noted has enabled, catalysed and accelerated the wealth accumulation of Walmart Inc. and it's contemporaries catering to the welfare recipient] which by the way is at a far lesser amount than what is given to the bomb-making white worker whose existence as a worker is primarily due to randomness of being born white. Conservatisms intellectual-liberalism emerges in reaction to if not insidiously misanthropic arguments, dubious ones that amount to: The American poor of whom a majority, by the way, work have not embraced enough the Auschwitz Death Camp motto of work will set you free  [which Arthur Brooks of AEI shouldn't have any problem in finding his dignity supposition in it] or the fact adults are reduced to raising families on McDondalds wage isn't basis enough to raise the minimum wage because Conservatism's intellectual-liberalism supposes fast-food wages are intended for teenagers.

Conservatism has been getting away with its snake-oil, charlatan analysis because the Progressive critique and its liberal worldview has yielded one too many times

By Apropos

Related Reading

• Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right

RIP

Credit William Thorpe