Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Democrats, Progressives Boycott Goods and Produce From Rural Republican Majority Areas


Why are Democrats coddling Republicans i.e Wisconsin? Look if urban areas are majority Democratic and rural areas are majority Republican and due to gerrymandering and dubious U.S. Supreme Court rulings, political districts are Republican biased and as such a Republican worldview with its attendant consequences is killing people. From Women's health to a reckless accessibility to guns and diabolical political-economy scheme that requires a suspension of common sense and intellect for it's existence. Then Democrats and the just minded, Progressives have to pursue the fact that only a radical relationship can exist between urban Democratic majorities and rural Republican majorities.

First of all, we have to affirm a primary reality:

  • Rural communities and areas need and depend on urban economics for survival
In light of this affirmation, urban Democratic majorities must reorient an entire set of economic relations that underscores and reminds rural Republican majorities that without urban consumption, their, milk, cheese, eggs, potatoes, e.t.c will have to seek non-Democratic mouths and stomachs to feed.

Democrats and Progressives have to boycott goods and produce from rural Republican majority areas and seek out goods and produce from rural Democratic majority areas.

Why should Progressive and Democratic minds and hearts be developed on the carbohydrate from potatoes grown by an Idaho bigot or the meat of a Texas cattle rancher xenophobes who viscerally despise the multi-culturalism, the let live morality, the Feminist-determination, the anti-racism, the political-economy practicality of organized labor and it's universal deduction of the social contract's accountability ethic of the urban consumer        why?

Look, hidden within this political-economic reality of buying and selling, exchange and trade of goods and produce is the enabling operative supporting and maintaining the Republican narrative that has systematically and systemically destroyed lives and if rural America is it's lackey, it's mechanistic subjective. Then the only relationship we can have with rural Republican majority America is antagonistic.

We stand with blinders off there cannot be any speculation of national unity when the Democrative and Progressive heart and mind does not share in a Republican idea of nation that squats squarely on White supremacy         from the presumptions of Catholicism divvying the world, through European invasions, Colonization and the primitive accumulation of slavery, Imperialism and its capital exploitation to the speculations of wage labor         So in pursuit of open political action, in light of our understanding, the urban Democratic majority must boycott economic activity with rural Republican America.

By William Thorpe



Sunday, April 19, 2020

Dr. Mehmet Oz and His "Lifestyle" Deflection of Why COVID-19 is Ravaging The Black Community Should Be His Waterloo


Chicago's Mayor Lightfoot said it right and I paraphrase; that racism kills, during her analysis of why, if Black people make up 29% of Chicago's population but are 72% of Corona Virus or COVID-19 death.

Yes, racism kills whether it's COVID-19 or a noose in the hands of an evangelical klansman and Dr. Mehmet Oz's "Lifestyle" deflection trope which is stunningly crass, that Black people are simply existing "Lifestyles" that put them at risk for COVID-19 death should be his waterloo.

The Black community from all its angles should marshal its focus and be like a ton of bricks on Dr. Mehmet Oz.

If Dr. Mehmet Oz wants to peddle in racist trope deflections and mischaracterization, he's at liberty to do so but not on the central, mainstream stage of ABC Television, The eco-sphere of racist and bigots found in the Evangelical radio of American Family Radio, along with Rupert Murdock's Fox Media, The septic tanks of American Enterprise Institute, American Legislative Exchange Council, and Federalist Society will do.

The Black Community, Democrats and Progressives should not wait for allied politicians to take the lead in ridiculing and mocking petty-tyrannical minds and hearts as Dr. Mehmet Oz who only exhibits critical-courage when bashing the lumpen and society's wretched. But there should be a marshalling of speech against reactionaries as Dr. Mehmet Oz and his ilk.

Even the vanquished have agency in the terms of surrender.

By William Thorpe


Further Reading & Listening





Monday, February 10, 2020

The Specific Hypocrisy of the Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison and The Contradiction of the Black-Trump Voter By William Thorpe


To let the Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison tell it, all the contradiction of a Black-Trump voter has to do in defense of their support for the black-antagonist Donald Trump is present the "bible" as reason. [Note Trumps bigotry, paternalism, racism towards black people are thoroughly archived and documented]

Now let me say this: In Meeke Addison's self-assertion, her life is principled and based on "biblical application" to wit the eponymous Paul aka Saul and his opportunistic self-righteous writings. I need not point out the hypocrisy imbued in her "biblical application," but to cite and para-phrase Meeke Addison's self-proclaimed arch-nemesis Karl Marx, there isn't a specific injustice we lay claim but to a historical and general injustice, so likewise there isn't a specific hypocrisy of Meeke Addison but a historical and general one which in her Evangelical zealousness she describes on the one hand as her sinful nature per virtue of her humanness, but on the other and here lies the general contradiction of her theology, which is, the cross-death of the Nazarene has absolved her historic sinful nature so even though she is without sin, yet repentance is her overarching operative.

This Evangelical-Apologetic sophistry is truly child-like in its presumptions, because Evangelicals particularly "white" Evangelicals and their lackey Meeke Addison are incapable of recognizing its anthropomorphism. In other words they casually gloss over why they emphasize certain biblical aspects at the expense of the rest as mere expression of their petty, social and political-economic interest, and its pursuit.

Meeke  Addison in accord with her "white" Evangelical glibness focuses her criticisms on anything that causes her "white" masters distress and discomfort, which translates into race relations and any hint of highlighting the nation's historical and continuing inconsistencies and injustices. So the formulating basis of any utterance by Meeke Addison has to be constantly mocked and scorned because not only is it intellectually-liberal but it is patently deceptive.

The contradiction of a black person voting for Donald Trump irrespective of whether its based on whatever suppositionary understanding had of the bible doesn't deny the fact it continues that very dynamic of the genesis of blackness as a social and political fact. So naturally, it is illogical.

We wouldn't have a human condition and history if there isn't and hasn't been significant events of betrayals of logical self-interest. So Meeke Addison would have us ignore the fact that black women die during childbirth, the infant mortality rate of black babies leads the nation and instead of elevating this narrative, demanding its accountability with her commercialized and monstized. The Evangelical-Apologist Meeke Addison instead, indulges in the diversion, away from those social justice remedies, the predominant mortality of black women during childbirth demands, practiced historically by "white" Evangelicals with the idealistic focus on abortion, on homosexuality, on bathroom use and what is noteworthy, all of the histrionics are not elevated even within the bible on its finite terms. Yet the expression of self-interest betrayal by the black-Trump voter is explained away with the idiocy, Trump is anti-abortion.

 By William Thorpe

Friday, February 7, 2020

The Pharisee Meeke Addison and The Heretic Robert Oscar Lopez By William Thorpe



Hey Meeke Addison where in the, your bible, more specifically, where do we find your field marshall, the usurper Paul aka Saul reducing sin to a mere and simple "confusion"? So why are you huffing and puffing over the firing of the heretic Robert Oscar Lopez? Isn't it heresy for an Evangelical to reduce the sin of sexual immorality to a mere confusion?

If as you, Meeke Addison and your opportunistic field marshall the usurper Paul aka Saul elevate sexual immorality to exclusively mean homosexuality, as pursued by contemporary American Evangelicals, more specifically "white" Evangelicals at the expense of fornication and lust as the preeminent sin. Then the firing of the Heretic Robert Oscar Lopez by the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary because of antagonisms he had with his former employer, to barrow Meeke Addisosns phraseology was "biblical."

Look, the evangelical Achilles Heel isn't it's fundamental contradiction of the cross-death of the Nazarene being an absolution for the human continuum of sin, yet seeking repentance of sin. If such tautology was proffered in any courtroom not only would it be mocked but scorned. Because the Evangelical Achilles Heel is that age-old nemesis, an inability and unwillingness to have a measure for self-scrutiny without the apology of the purported theology whose genealogy, its attribution is as clouded and obscure as tracing one's lineage to a distant uncle who slew a Saber-Tooth Tiger that was terrorizing his clan.

By William Thorpe

Monday, January 27, 2020

Comments On The Book "Black Wave" By An Authors Whose Name Is Irrelevant


The problem with writers of books as "The BlackWave" critical of Iran and it's Islamic Revolution is, it does it from the narrative of the loser, the opposition to the revolution and its narrative.

What the "Black Wave's" author, whose name is irrelevant, glosses over is, the Iranian Revolution as all revolutions including the American, which should correctly be described as a National War of the Independence, didn't occur in a vacuum. The World Pre-Iranian Revolution wasn't all peaches and cream and all of a sudden Shia Ayatollahs and Mullahs ruined it.

There has been one historical line of attack and criticism of the Iranian Revolution, but with two diverging points:

  • It is Islamic and its diverging points are: 
  1. It is a Terrorist state
  2. It is a Totalitarian and a theologic dictatorship
But the true nature of the Iranian critique, the only nature of the critique is Iran and its militancy dare challenge the Zionist narrative of Israel and its logic of seizing Palestinian Patrimony and to the ends of this conflict, all sorts and levels of propaganda are wielded and brought to bear against the perogatives and speech of the Iranian Revolution, of which the "Black Wave" is another labor.

Notwithstanding the presumptions of the Zionist and Iranian positions, whatever contradictions that are inherent within Iranian Theocracy can only be resolved from the perspective of the social fact of Iranian speech and not whatever antagonisms it has with the suppositions of the "Black Wave" and it's author whose name is irrelevant, and its narrative masters.

Look, critics of the Mullahs, if such critics are Muslims should war within Islam for its reform and Islam is no stranger to reform, and not simply present and represent a Eurocentric supremacy critique of Iran. Let's not forget that there is nothing unique and exclusive to the critique leveled against Iran by Eurocentric supremacy and its Zionist ward. Europe and America are not heaven. The only difference between eurocentric supremacy and Iranian militancy is we know all about the former and less about the later.

To claim as the author of the "BlackWave" whose name is irrelevant does and I paraphrase, that the emergence of Shia Iran has caused panic in the surrounding Sunni states is petty intellectual-liberalism giving us not one illuminating ray of insight and with these comments, I remind the author whose name is irrelevant, that her "BlackWave" work mocks the purported ends, her Pakistani protagonist beseeched, that of choice and it is in pursuit of choice those vanguards and supporters of the Iranian Revolution aspired.

By William Thorpe

Monday, January 13, 2020

Contra-Donald Trump and The Resurrection of Walter Cronkite Editorializing By William Thorpe


A seminal moment in American media was the journalist Walter Cronkite transforming the act of editorializing into journalistic purity with the revelation, that the government was lying to the American people on the nature, development, and circumstance of the Vietnam War.

Critics of Walter Cronkite and his televised editorializing were the usual suspects, that reactionary minority who for their own wretched ends and pathetic interest were threatened by the revelations of Walter Cronkite televised editorializing.

Since Walter Cronkite dared challenge the oppositionary status quo with his televised revealing editorials. Academia has lionized the act while culturally it is iconic.

So fast forward to another war, the one currently being waged by Donald J. Trump against the nation and its hard-won truths, that directly poses the question: Who amongst the non-Fox News legatees of Walter Cronkite have the resolve to advance Cronkites notion that editorializing is not only required but demanded when the pursuit of journalistic equivalency is not only morally and professionally repugnant, but not doing it is crass and abject cowardice.

Secondly, the reminder that accountability isn't a Paul aka Saul declarative, descending from the "grace" of the Nazarene on cherubic and seraphic wings, nor will it emerge from heroic but gelded impeachment push. But there are enough accumulated archival facts of malfeasance, moral turpitude, mendacity and base corruption of Donald J. Trump's actions and behavior to interrupt the robotic delivery by any of the non-Fox News anchors with the televised resurrection of their Walter Cronkite moment, shaking and rousing the nation from the stupor of the unimaginable.

Reference
H.Res.755 - Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors

Monday, December 30, 2019

Critical Race Theory and The Philistine Meeke Addison By William Thorpe


Okay we will play along and act like the Philistine Meeky Addison's disdain for Critical Race Theory is something more than just another pathetic intellectual-liberal example of the house negro apology and mock it on her evangelical-apologetic terms. Which then simply amounts to, there cannot be a continuum of American injustice embodied by it's white subjective within the evangelical Christian context because; the redemptive Christ has cleansed sin, hence racism as expression of sin is mooted.

Now such sophistry worthy of the eponymous past master himself Paul aka Saul demands consistency, a consistency the pharisaism of Meeky Addison is incapable of delivering. Because if all socio-critique and pursuit of justice are viewed through the evangelical-apologetics dicta, then why do we even have social-remonstrance if the redemptive Christ has relieved us of sin and its continuum? But the fact is Meeky Addison's disdain and ire for Critical Race Theory is, it simply destabilizes her world view because it is the mirror reflecting her inferiority and house negro self-loathing and no amount of religiosity and its jealous-resentment of secularism will redeem this bad fact.

Critical Race Theory is a statement of the obvious: The effects of the continuum of white privilege and its wake upon American justice which, whether or not Meeky Addison recognizes if the very ground her evangelical-apologetics stands and teeters on.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...