Katie Couric, Sarah Palin, Sex and Those Amongst Us Who Would presume Leadership

Image via Wikipedia

Katie Couric famously asked Sarah Palin for examples of what she read.  to which Sarah Palin presented Saturday Night Live with a wealth of material.

Imagine if the questions were:  Did Sarah Palin enjoy giving or receiving oral sex and how often did she engage in oral sex?

Imagine the potential voter learning if Sarah Palin preferred her sex in the spoon, the buck, the missionary or peeing moose?  Or whether her vagina was shaven or trimmed.  Imagine what we would learn about the personalities and character inclinations from the sexual realizations of those amongst us who would presume leadership.

By Apropos

Lapel Pins, Motif Totems of American Organized Violence and Slavery Circa 1619

The maker of Lapel Pins worn by Madeleine Albright, Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin and their ilk, prostitutes of the Mint Julep, city on a shining hill farcial narrative of America the myth.  Brimming with pride declared on the 12/12/2010; Chris Wallace Show on FOX that her lapel pins, Motif Totems of American Organized Violence were the American symbols.

The idealistic effrontery of the declaration it's impudent revision and omission of the true Motif Totems of American Organized Violence is glaring.  Infantile yet insidious, provencially naive in it's assumptions that American Motif Totems ends with the "Support the Troops" theology and it's all done straight faced at the expense of the binding shackles, yokes, lash and creaky ships of American Slavery circa 1619, which coupled with the concertina wire of modern American Super Prisons are the true Motif Totems, The American Symbols of it's Political-Economy.

By Apropos

Equity, Fairness, The Misery Loves Company Dialectic, Deficit Spending and Classes the Super Rich Prey On

There is a naive misunderstanding of nuances of the human sense of equity and fairness by Republican-Conservatism.  Despite the fact that Republican Conservatism and it's Tea Partyism dupe insidiously exploits it as the misery loves company dialectic.

This naive misunderstanding is what is driving the debate on Deficit Spending and Bush Tax Cuts for the super rich.  If as Dick Cheney famously and correctly stated that Deficit Spending is irrelevant to the macro-economic dynamic of any mature industrialized Political-Economy.  Then considering the nuanced reality of the human sense of equity and fairness and if: there is an actual debate on the meaning of macro-economic deficit spending, why shouldn't the majority of America then feel that it is appropriate for George Bush and Republican-Conservatism with it's Tea Partyism dupe to Deficit Spend with tax cuts for the super rich under all of the above of speculative narrative.  Why then shouldn't there be Deficit Spending for programs that support the classes the super rich fleece and prey on.

By Apropos

Michele Rhee, The Education Question and The Status Quo Narrative aspect of American Political-Economy

Michele Rhee misses the fundamental crux of the education question.  Which specifically is: a certain narrative aspect of American Political-Economy status quo does not perceive the nature of the nations intermediate education as appalling and destructive because those members of American society subject to the education dynamic in question are appendages, inconsequential and irrelevant to the realization fact of American Political-Economy.

Simply put American Political-Economy as understood by that status quo narrative aspect does not understand the relevancy of human beings it considers as inconsequential and irrelevant so their education is a mere academic, idealistic and speculative exercise.

This is the reality Michele Rhee and her imperative is up against.  This is the crux of the matter.  If education and literacy is to take on the utility of the Michele Rhee imperative there has to be a transformational narrative grasp of American Political-Economy.

By Apropos

"Shock and Awe", George W. Bush, Iraq War Military-Adventurism and The Naivete of the American Social-Being

This post "Shock and Awe" reflection and it's revisionist lessons learned with focus on the naivete of the initial supposition that the George W. Bush and Neo-Conservatism Iraq War military-adventurism would be a clean sort of War permits and allows the crucial point of the War to be ignored.

The Iraq War military-adventurism was purposefully sold to an American public and it's intelligentsia that lacks (then and now) the dialectical tools to analyze and respond in kind to it's Political-Economy realities.  War, as Von Clausewitz instructs is politics, reflects the objective realizations of Man the social being.  Consequently George W. Bush and Neo-Conservatism by the Iraq military-Adventurism exposed the naivete of the American social-being

By Apropos

Related articles

• Von Clausewitz, War on Terror, Israel as Model and the Cynicism of the Premise (wwwapropos.blogspot.com)

The Tiger Woods Sex-Scandal, The Human Condition and It's Immoral Critique

Image via WikipediaThe Tiger Woods experience post sex-scandal is another interesting insightful facet of The Human Condition.  Specifically the unity of it's opposites.  The pre sex-scandal Tiger Woods was a winner exacting triumph on the field, his foes in crushing fashion.

The case can and should be vigorously made that those scandalous facts objectifying the Tiger Woods sex-scandal are what made him the indomitable winner he was which is the sole arbiter and only basis for Tiger Woods the phenomenon.

This raises an interesting question and incident of The Human Condition.  If the sordid scandalous facts objectifying the Tiger Woods sex-scandal are what enabled the "good" and morally socio-positive aspect of the phenomenal Tiger Woods, the indomitable Golfer, What does it's immoral critique mean?

By Apropos

Related articles

• Hypocrisy, Stephen A. Smith and Tiger Woods (wwwapropos.blogspot.com)
• Tiger Woods, Adultery, Jaded Cynicism and the Right and Wrong Side of History Critique(wwwapropos.blogspot.com)

George W. Bush, Saddam Hussein's Gun and The Prohibition Against Trophy's

Why isn't George W. Bush criticized for keeping as trophy Saddam Hussein's gun? The pistol (gun) Saddam Hussein had during his purported capture.  The gun which seems to be a prized and defining memento of the George W. Bush Presidency will be on display at the George W. Bush Library at SMU (Southern Methodist University).

Keeping the gun as trophy cheapens and demeans the will of the nation to undertake and wage war.  It undermines the much preached and pursued morale and unit cohesiveness of the nations defense on the specifics that the U.S. military prohibits and frowns on it's members claiming trophy's.  The President of the United States in the role Commander in Chief of the U.S. Military is also subject and bound to the prohibition against trophy's.

George W. Bush should surrender Saddam Hussein's gun which is trophy to a relevant museum or subjected to legal action by the Attorney General of the United States.

By Apropos