Hypocrisy, Stephen A. Smith and Tiger Woods

What hypocrisy exactly is the sports shock jock Stephen A. Smith relative to the Tiger Woods adulterous spectacle ranting about that the American people will not put up with or forgive?

Is it the hypocrisy of a U.S. Constitution that reads and codifies that Black People are "Three Fifths Persons" and to date, despite the Civil War, despite the Fourteenth Amendment, U.S. Presidency of a Black Barack Obama, still reads unchanged, unrevised that Black People are "Three Fifths Persons"?

Is it the hypocrisy of multi-national corporations having moral-clauses in endorsement and sponsorship contracts when the behavior and general practices of the multi-national entities if not specifically misanthropic is generally a crude vulgar exploitation of ends and means?

Is it the hypocrisy of a Stephen A. Smith's pronouncement on the Tiger Woods spectacle at the expense of the salient point that the nations pastime is hypocrisy.  A hypocrisy fueled by the opportunity of an infinitude of motives, which in the Tiger Woods case is money, money, money.  But then again isn't Value and it's money medium the facilitator of the Human Condition?

By Apropos