Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism and Liberal-Intellectualism and Thought

What is Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism: It is that historical practice and tendency irrespective of political milieus, of playing loose with facts, historical revisions, the inclination to arouse, stimulate and incite the base irrationality in people and it's apogee is obfuscation.

While Liberal-Intellectualism and Thought struggles to enlighten and inclusively expand human potential, Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism is reactionary.

By Apropos

Prison Reform, Political-Economy and "Open Political Action"

Is Prison Reform as envisioned by the Barack Obama Presidency and Senator Jim Webb of Virginia a co-opt and preempt of organic Prison Reform?

Historically Prison Reform, which is to mean advocacies by persons and groups towards the purpose of achieving a reform of imprisonment and the way it is used in the United States has floundered and hasn't achieved it's objectives. If some of it's objectives were realized it was concessional ploys by government. Firstly as a means of co-opting reforms evolutionary direction and secondly tactical maneuvering that strengthens the governmental position all the more firmly. A classic example of this is the Anti-Death Penalty position and advocacy, with the way government maneuvered by strengthening that weakness of the governmental position and then enforcing it even more draconically after the revision and correction of that which made Capital Punishment susceptible to attack by it's foes.

Prison as used in the U.S. is a means of controlling elements of society who because of their economical oppression are politically and socially marginalized. What this means in the broad sense is, those members of society who because of their manner of interaction with the economy are without the political and social basis to demand substantial access and positive recognition from society are the ones laws and imprisonment are designed for. It doesn't take much to realize that if an element of society lacks the means to stably interact with it, decisions made and the resulting behavior will run counter to society's laws and as such will result imprisonment. Elements in society who for the most part meet this controlling imperative have been Black people (descendants of enslaved Africans) and the poor blue collar worker or the ubiquitous "working poor".

U.S. society and government does not view it's Black elements and blue collar working poor as productive beings in the Political-Economical sense. But it views the population in question first and foremost as a group to be controlled. This antebellum mind-set dates back to it's feudalistic and royalist origins when common people were to be controlled and rigidly tied to the land by their so-called betters, in a statist undertaking of Political-Economy. Even with the advent of industrial technology and it's socialist production, those societies of which the United States is a historical off spring simply carried over the feudalistic mind-set to socialist industrial production. Of Which even if the so-called commoners, "working poor" of the United States society, Black people and the poor blue collar working Whites are not in practice feudalistically tied to the land they are in principle just as much tied to it due to their lacking of that substantial means of removing theirselves from that imperative of control.

The issue of Prison Reform is also the question of what is the structure and development of the materialist-dialectic of American Political-Economy. In other words if the issue is what is to be done with the predominant imprisonment of Black people and the poor White people, the answer lies with the radical reputation of the American Labor narrative and the speculative-value antagonism. It also lies with a heightened political grasp of the "working poor",to clearly and starkly contrast the divergence of interest within Political-Economy dynamic of their condition. This means not allowing the status-quo and it's support functionaries to describe and define facts as they see fit.

Historically Prison reform holds the position that "open political action" is a specific intellectual activity with the final arbiter the very cause for it's practice and as the Barack Obama Presidency and Senator Jim Webb's initiatives outline the question it preempts organic Prison Reform.

By Apropos

Crispus Attucks and The 2009 Arrest of Henry Louis Gates by The Cambridge, Massachusetts Police

The spirit of Crispus Attucks roams the hills and valleys of Massachusetts in it's eternal embodiment of "Give me liberty or give me death"?

Did Henry Louis Gates, the eternal collaborator embodying the Jeffersonian contradiction of the Crispus Attucks experience of American Blackness, feel Crispus Attucks lament as bigotry and it's repression in the form of the Cambridge, Massachusetts White police officer seizing his liberty remind him of what Crispus Attucks actually died for.

Across the land the classic diatribe swells against the Cambridge Police Department, which with Jeffersonian contradiction was only fulfilling it's historical duty. The 2009 arrest of Henry Louis Gates is only the logical conclusion to a statistical certainty that the Black upper class and it's intelligentsia support functionaries should naturally expect, considering their silence and apathy to the generational pogromization of Black America at the expense of the Crispus Attucks experience ---Henry Louis Gates reaffirms the Jeffersonian contradiction with his 2009 arrest.




By Apropos

Israel and the Blame Game

Why is Israel always ready and quick to blame?

Israel blames Iran, Israel blames Hezbollah, Israel blames Hamas, Israel blames Syria.

Disingenuously Israel blames President Jimmy Carter!!! But the truth is were it not for Jimmy Carter and the billions of dollars deal his administration cut with the Egyptians to elicit the Egyptian status quo's services in securing Israel's flank, Israel might not even be.

Israel with it's treatment of the Palestinian people is gravely miscalculating. Palestinians are not Australia's Aboriginals or Native Americans or even descendants of enslaved Africans. Nor is there some sort of apocalyptic redemption that will in Hitlerite fashion genocidally exterminate the Palestinians so the blame game which Israel, Frat boy like pursues futilely only postpones the inevitable: The affirmative co-existence with Palestinians.

By Apropos

We Are

We are "The Wretched of the Earth",
the suffers of injustice,
the bearers of the yoke of oppression.

We are the down-trodden,
the exploited,
the repressed and we can always rest assured to be manipulated and compromised.

We are The People,
The Populations, The Masses. We build civilizations, we construct edifices and structures attesting to the creativity, ingenuity, and expression of humanity.

We are the basis and foundation that prosperity, wealth, and stability are built on. We surmount the insurmountable. We labor as "Beast of Burden" and the rule is we do all this in the pursuit of anothers interest. We always place anothers welfare above ours. We compromise our lives and settle for wretched existence in consequences of our pursuits of alien ideas.

We are Human Beings. Yet we settle for Civil Rights instead of Human Rights. Some of us claim ignorance as a justifiable reason for subjugated, subservient existence we call our Human Condition.

Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is an exchange of labor for Capital, meaning the dictated means of acquiring and attaining the necessities of life: water, food, shelter, and clothing, experience it's consequences as an inequity of their material realization, an inability to attain that maximal realization of their Human potential.

Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is allegiance to the state, garners you the basics in life experience the injustices and inability of the state to contend and deal with the frailties, whims and caprices of it's human elements, those petty tyrants who at every inch of the way exhibit that rat like frenzy of rats abandoning a sinking ship, grasping and grabbing what their placement within the state machine allows as the wretched masses once again look on
stupefied--- our blood was shed for this?

Those of us who exist in societies that the rule is fiat of theocracy, experience the hypocrisy of human sensuality and sentience totally at odds with the sapient potential of human realization. we persistently encounter that infantile inability of the theological basis to come to terms with the profane cause-effect of the material basis defining and determining that exponential parameter of our lives and condition, which as a result repress and alienates us the masses from our humanness---which in effect produces that one dimensional Human Being we all know so well.

We, "The Wretched of the Earth" have the obligation of understanding that all these factors and conditions that bring us so much despair, grief and anger have no other solution than ourselves. We hold in our hands the turn of our destiny and the relative means to direct our lives upon that path of maximal realization of which the legacy of humanness is our inheritance. The progression of humanness lies with us because we are humanity.

We are the People,
The Populations, The Masses. The frustrations we revel in permitting our articulation of that defeatist slogan "that's the system and that's the way it is", illustrates our continued submission to an existence that takes everything out of us and puts nothing back. It drains us of our humanness and replaces it with the illogical and a humanistic urge of oblivion under the guise of redemption.

By Apropos

Walter Williams, Colonialism and the Black Apologist Dynamic

Walter Williams, Professor of Economics wrote:

"I'll never make an argument for Colonialism but the fact of business is that the average African was better off under Colonialism..."

I have a problem with it and find it extremely irresponsible and criminal that such utter nonsense is spouted under the guise of responsible scholarship.

The fact is the imperialistic designs and Colonial intentions of the Portuguese, Dutch, British, French, Belgian and Italian Colonizers and the conferees of the Berlin Conference , retarded and voided the very essence of the Colonized Africans. Not only are conclusions as Walter Williams derisive of self-determination, but are the death rattle gasp of the Racist paternalist and in this instance Apologist collaborator-lackey.

Prior to the European Colonization of Africa, were the Africans in social and political disarray? Were not the Africans in most parts able to put protracted and in some instances successful resistance and the logistics and psychological effort it demanded a reflection of the well structured polity it represented? Post independent, have the Neo-Colonialist, former Colonies been allowed to chart their own destiny, without meddling from one or all of their former Colonial masters under the Geo-Political logic of "spheres of influence".

Much is always said of how the European Colonizers of Africa, developed comprehensively the infrastructure and organized the Political Economical structures of their respective Colonies and as such matters always are, it's either an outright lie or a well maintained myth.

European Colonizers didn't Colonize Africa because of benevolent intent. Their first order of Business was first and foremost , plunder and exploit. Consequently any and all organizing and infrastructural development was simply that which would facilitate and expedite their business of plunder and looting. Everything and all within the Colonies was organized and structured to maximize the pillage of resources. Naturally the Colonizers had to rigorously and vigorously destroy any and all forms of opposition, which in principle was any conflicting ideas and intentions against their plunder imperative.

This is the back drop in true form to lackey analysis. Walter Williams writes:

"The legacy of Colonialism, used so often as an excuse by Africans is a sham that can't hold waste. After all some of the worlds richest countries like the U.S. Canada, Australia, and N. Zealand ---were Colonies as was Hong Kong, whats true about those ex-Colonies that's untrue about Africa?

Williams as Professor of Economics should answer his own question. I find it profoundly pathetic at the lengths Black collaborator-lackey and Apologist for Colonialism and it's "White Mans burden" dialectic go to in defense of Euro-centric logic. Professor Walter Williams is no different than those historical Wheatley's who pathetically celebrated their enslavement as enlightenment.

Irrespective of Barack Obama's 7/11/09; speech to Ghana's Parliament and it's admonishment. Africans Political-Economy cannot be analysed absent the stench of it's history.

By Apropos

Hugo Chavez, Political Activity, United States, The Honduran Crisis, The Reactionary Dialectic and Henry Ford

Who and what is Hugo Chavez. So the United States and it's imperative (whatever that is) finds Hugo Chavez and his type of Political activity offensive. The obvious conclusion is if the United States, it's imperative and type of Political activity responded and refuted the Polemics and dialectics of Hugo Chavez and his Political activity and imperative, the Chavez circumstance would collapse upon the weight of it's specific and general contradictions.

Simply reducing the Honduran Presidential crisis and it's conditional-coup to the stale , old and tired Neo-Colonial paradigm and it's critique of Communist vs. Capitalist, Left vs. Right, Hugo Chavez as meddler. Lacks the idea of developmental progress and it's consequensential realization of Political-Economy in it's true sense.

The United States, it's imperative and Political activity has historically played a reactionary role in South America. Again the Honduran Coup and the Hugo Chavez dialectic is enabling a reconstitution of United States reaction and it's imperative, despite the fact, this time it is on the side of the legally elected Honduran President, Manuel Zelaya.

The reality for Honduras, The United States if simple: Poverty, Repression, Marginalization, it's dialectics, contradictions and antagonisms never occurs in a vacuum. True to the irrationality of the Human brain it historically requires extreme measures for the practicality of Henry Ford and his $5 maxim to grab the imagination of the petty-reactionary minds who have in their hands the reins of power.

By Apropos

CNN, Iranian Election, Israel and Covert Activities

Listening to the British Spy David Miliband on CNN's GPS with Fareed Zakaria,
go through structured disinformation attempting to stem the Iranian Government's narrative that the recent Election protest on Tehran's streets are results of British Intelligence and Zionist machinations was humorous. For one the British and Zionist are squirming because if the protest reflects a unity of perspective in Iran then the Ayatollahs have no ears for their narrative to fall on.

If the Election was stolen as CNN and the multitudes rioting in Tehran speak with their coverage and actions, even to the theatrics of the U.S. President Barack Obama expressing "outrage" at the level of response from the Iranian Government which is not even comparable to the wanton Israeli destruction upon hapless Palestinians to which by the way none of the imposter's on the global stage express outrage at. Then the breech in Iranian Political civility with the election protest, is the necessary activity that sweeps away the Iranian theocratic apparatus and it's status quo.

To the contrary events in Iran are anything but clear. Were the protest indigenous and organic as it's well-fed sympathizers and supporters ensconced in their Twittering criminal naivete at the machinations unfolding on their high definition screens with the classically duped face of CNN's Christiane Amanpour reporting are made to believe. There would not be the need for the intense sorts of denials from U.S. and British Intelligence complicit with the dare not say anything Israel Mossad.

What is obvious is Israel, desperate to stem the inevitability of it's historicity along with the fifth column activities of disgruntled and gullible Urban Iranians has under the guise of election fraud engaged in covert activities and sabotage against Iranian military and Nuclear facilities in preparation for overt attacks on Iran's Nuclear program.

By Apropos

History It's Repeating ARC, Lebanon, The Iraq War and Ronald Reagan

What will the narrative be. When American forces reposed on their Iraqi bases experience history and it's repeating ARC, as their Marine comrades and brethren during Ronald Reagan's Lebanon adventurism intended as Political-contrast of Republican robustness with the impotence of the preceding Democratic Carter.

Will there be sanctimonious howls of rage and synthetic grief when those sitting duck G.I.'s on their Iraqi bases suffer a blow equal to the truck bombing of the Marine base at Lebanon?

Will there be the irrelevantly typical and idealistic Polemic against Democrats and their mythical National Security Deficit from a Republican Party that hasn't won any meaningful Military undertaking contrary to it's farcial bellicosity since Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War?

Iraq once again is revealing how robustly naive is the legacy of Ronald Reagan.

By Apropos

Democrats and Governmental Deficit Spending

What is wrong with Congressional Democrats, Democratic Analyst and Democratic Polemicist with their tame, weak and effeminate characterization and defense of Governmental Deficit spending?

The Polemic and it's defense is simple and matter of fact straight forward. In the absence of universal employment, universal Political-Economic access of All functioning citizens, Governmental deficit sending is the only progressively practical medium of the social-contract.

By Apropos