Yaa Asantewaa

 SHE LIVES!

Yaa Asantewaa

The U.S. Constitution Is Silent On Abortion Viz Health By William Thorpe

The Idiot Justice Clarence Thomas with the Typical forked tongue conservatism and it's Republican intellectual-liberalism claimed that the U.S. Constitution is silent on abortion viz health.

Really?

[The Constitution of the United States of America]

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." [My emphasis]

Article I Section 8; 

"The Congress shall have power to.....Provide for the.....General Welfare of the United States....."

Black's Law Dictionary Defines;

General Welfare: The publics health, peace, morals, and safety.

Public Health:

(1) The health of the community at large

(2) The healthful of the sanitary condition of the general body of people or the community en masse; esp. the methods of maintaining the health of the community, as by preventative medicine and organized care for the sick.

Health:            

(1) The state of being sound or whole in body, mind, or soul

(2) Freedom from pain or sickness

Abortion is Materially a Health Issue

The entire abortion question is one of health. The Woman's health. Regardless of its formulation abortion remains a health issue. Whether or not the state recognizes its practice or renders it illicit, Women will do it as eve taught them to [yes for you Evangelicals kooks, because if as you believe that Eve as Genesis 3:6-7 narrates, became like God, knowing, then it goes to say abortion and it's how to was the first order of Buisness]

The Federalist Society in its "useful idiot" role can make it's bigoted and one-dimensional assertions about the Constitution all it wants and it cannot change nor distort the "General Welfare" text of the Constitution. The Clarence Thomases and Samuel Alito's will scheme and pervert and consequently, we will mock them and relegate them as in 2020 America status are toppled without as much a requiem.

By William Thorpe

What Is Going On In Uganda That Humans Are On The Chimpanzee Menu and Diet?

What is going on in Uganda that humans are on the chimpanzee menu and diet? Chimpanzees in Uganda are allowed to prey on children, disembowel, and eat their kidneys without response from the government.

What is the purpose of the Ugandan government if it is incapable of protecting its citizens from monstrous maurading Chimpanzees. In a typical voyeuristic National Geographic essay titled "I am scared all the time." In its August 2020 issue, we are reminded of the indifference and dismissiveness by Western Imperialist of Black and African village life. Imagine this Apology from the writer, David Quammen: 

"Most cases involve chimps that are reckless at one fateful moment, not repeatedly" [NG - 8/20 pp131]

Really? We are told by Mr. David Quammen and his National Geographic enablers that over the past decades over forty (40) Chimpanzee attacks on children have not only happened but tolerated with the casual and sterile characterization of:  

"Many more reported attacks are unverified" [ibid  pp130]

Now let's imagine wolves in America's Yellowstone National Park preying on children and National Geographic dismissively characterization the predation as: 

"Most cases involved [Wolves] that are reckless at one fateful moment, not repeatedly."

People behave strangely. A British Biologist Matt Mclennan who has been in Uganda among the monstrous children eating Chimpanzees describes children eating Ugandan Chimpanzees as:

"The chimps at Bulindi are coping - for now." [ibio]

So disemboweling children, smashing children's heads in, ripping children's arms off  are calmly described as "coping."

Mr. David Quammen along with his National Geographic enablers tells us:

"Sometimes the Bulindi Chimps carry higher levels of stess-related hormones.....Does that mean their piratical way of life, staying close to humans and foraging for their food is inherently stressful? [ibid pp 134-136]

This is head-scratching. Chimps are disemboweling Black children, eating their Kidney's and National Geographic is telling us about Chimp stress-related hormones? Preying on children is euphemistically characterized as: 

"A piratical way of life?"

And we are given delusional comments by shell-shocked minds as Ms. Lillian Tinkasimire as an insidious attempt at normalizing the unconscionable occurrences when Mr. David Quammen finds it necessary to introduce us to:

"Lillian Tinkasimire, an amiable matriarch whose little redbrick house is graced with Mango tree in front and a Fig tree behind, both of which attract Chimpanzees, takes a steady view. "The chimps are very clever," she said. "If you don't chase them, they will be your friend. If you chase them, you will see fire." Tinkasiimire has preserved much of her forest. Her attitude is, let the chimps live here, let them be, let them visit." [ibid pp136]

 She "takes a steady view"? A steady view, that chimps who have developed a taste for the kidney's of Ugandan children is "let the chimps live there let them be, let them visit"? A steady view that conveniently supports and is sympathetic of the imperialistic - patriarchial view advanced by the speculative International Union for Conservation of Nature, which is primarily a dismissal of the non-white push for political-economic development. So instead of Africans themselves determining responses to monstrous behavior by predatory chimpanzees. White imperialist with lackey-collaborationist, after having exterminated their wildlife in Europe, North-American, Australia, Tasmania and New Zeland demand that feckless African governments of which Uganda is a pathetic example protect children eating Chimpanzees than the traumatized and terrorized Ugandan mother, picking up what pieces her feckless government has deserted her with after her child was hunted stalked, preyed on kidneys ripped out and eaten.

Are there ways Chimpanzees and the varied classes of wild life in Africa, in Uganda can exist, not co-exist, but exist with human existence and development - yes. But it depends firstly, firmly, and primarily on a Black political-economic development and not the clownish, satirical, and idealistic "ecotourism" that we find collaborationist African bureaucrats as the current Ugandan government foist on barefeet African villages in a kowtowing, sniveling display of sucking up to western Imperialist speculations of wild life having dominion and preeminence over the "wretched" African villagers lot. 

In its April 2018 issue, Susan Goldberg, Editor in Chief of National Geographic discussed the magazine's historic and historical challenges with non-white stories and concerns. Affections of supremacy and elitism contrary to convention and irrespective of pattern really isn't an affliction of biology but is a result of economic realities that in an idealistic and undisciplined perception births chauvinism and it's imperial delusions. So instead of resisting the urge, National Geographic, David Quammen, Matt Mclennan, Lillian Tinkasiimire all succumbed to the indulgence of Anthromorphizing the Ugandan Chimpanzees reality of human expansionism and the magazine and its Imperialist pinings chose to sacrifice Black children in extension Black historicity.

By William Thorpe

 

Voter Suppression Is Worse Than Drug Dealing and Catherine Englebrecht By William Thorpe

If Christopher Hooks "What if they held an election and everyone came" article in the November 2020 Texas Monthly Magazine is factually accurate and what he raises against Catherine Englebrecht, to wit others, is correct then it's clearly a prima facie expose' of voter suppression and conspiracy to commit voter suppression and it must be investigated and Catherine Englebrecht held to account.

Secondly, the same November 2020 Texas Monthly carrying the Hooks voter suppression in Texas expose' has 90 pages listing the creme de la creme of Texas Attorney's, Texan legal mind, who more than others understand Hook's declaration that:

"If the health of a democracy can be measured by how many citizens participate in the political process Texas has Lupus....."

         AND       

..."The Declaration of Independence avers that a government is only legitimate if it enjoys the"consent of the governed," but for much of the U.S. history, it worked that way

So why then are we assaulted and insulted with 90 pages of smiling predominantly white lawyers proffering a base of social legitimacy whom if Hooks is correct in his voter suppression expose' per virtue of their professional existence have clearly abrogated their civic, ethical and moral duty to call out, disavow and get on the right side of humanness by repudiating the elemental crime and tyranny of voter suppression that taints their very existence as Texan social beings and the unjust privilege, it bestows.

Thirdly, why hasn't texas Black intelligentsia demanded that the likes of Catherine Engelbrecht are investigated. If what Hooks exposes in his is article correct, Engelbrecht then is nothing more than a pining extra from Birth of a Nation a holdover from its stylized supremacist futility. which consequently is more depraved than the activity of a drug dealer whose social existence is effected by the intellectual-liberalism of the likes of Englebrecht and their voter suppression pursuits.

If the vote and the act of voting, in principle and its practice, is the determinant of society and it's basis then anything that violates it is more than anything else criminality of the first degree and highest order and its high time elements as Catherine Englebrecht, if hooks expose pans out are labeled as petty criminals that they are, lower than the drug dealer reprobate

By William Thorpe