To all those "Gone With the Wind" and "Birth of a Nation" sympathizer legatees moonlighting as Non-Partisan critics of Obama's Economic thought and it's practice. If as they giddily put it that Obama is saddling generations 4 and 5 removed in the future with the yoke of unfathomable debt because of Deficit spending.
The argument is misplaced, misdirected, idealistic and does nothing to move forward and advance the analysis of how to discern and correct the inherent abstraction and antagonism upon human life of the objectivity of value and it's expressed medium as money.
Critics of deficit spending think the invocation of the idea of futuristic generations paying for the sins of their parents spending wins them the argument conclusively. They are wrong and it only reveals that after millennia of mans efforts, attempts and labor at realizing a medium of value expression that doesn't distort the value expression and it's transactional-relationship, Man's propensity for and instinctual ignorance has only managed to maintain a system that has nothing to do with the circumstance of the human condition and it's objective need for value expression.
The entire construct of Political-Economy and it's money expression assumes a premise, a presupposition that value and it's practicality is relegated to the basics of what is necessary for the re-creation of the human condition. The idea however that the human condition is based on re-creation is correct. But the critique of it's value expression has been and is wrong and has actively been at odds with the re-creation dynamic of the human condition.
The un-stated premise of the Obama Presidency is American Political-Economy has tilted so severely, on the side of speculation and Imperialism and it's antagonisms that nothing short of it's re-start holds any promise for the survivability of the union. This is the backdrop which to some seems as Apocalyptic sums of money are being printed saddling their Grandkids with debt. The reality is they are wrong. Deficit spending or it's absence has nothing to do with the quality of life anticipated by future generations.
.
By Apropos
Monday, August 31, 2009
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Traditions, Culture and the Anti-Progress Critique
There is this classical false premise assertion that archaic traditions and cultural habits and practices cannot and should not be examined and criticized on the merits, lest the critic and polemicist comes across as elitist and imperialist in all the various critical forms. So the consequences is a sort of manipulative collusion by international and the specific nation status quo with on the one hand reactionary and anti-progress traditions and culture are defended and tolerated as national pride for the subjects as a means of defiance against their lot, while on the other the internationalist on both sides of the dynamic conveniently exploit the rewards of progress under the guise of facilitating the means of business.
There is a typical refrain in the so-called under-developed Third-World as it clings to reactionary traditions and cultural-impracticalities as Polemic against the industrialized West and it's legacy of stunting, stymying and retarding the self-deterministic dynamic of the Third World: That anything Western is wrong and any member of it's citizenry pursuing Western applications is a national traitor.
This mindset and it's dynamic is the dialectical bane of the Human-Condition on both sides of it's determination. Because it conditionalizes progress in a manner that not only is it anti-but it supports backwardness and it's myriad expressions of prejudice in a manner that enables Imperialism and it's exploitation.
By Apropos
There is a typical refrain in the so-called under-developed Third-World as it clings to reactionary traditions and cultural-impracticalities as Polemic against the industrialized West and it's legacy of stunting, stymying and retarding the self-deterministic dynamic of the Third World: That anything Western is wrong and any member of it's citizenry pursuing Western applications is a national traitor.
This mindset and it's dynamic is the dialectical bane of the Human-Condition on both sides of it's determination. Because it conditionalizes progress in a manner that not only is it anti-but it supports backwardness and it's myriad expressions of prejudice in a manner that enables Imperialism and it's exploitation.
By Apropos
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Town Halls of 2009, Ignorance, Bigotry and Republican-Conservatism
Liberals, Progressives, Practical-Minded People, Empiricist, Dialectical-Materialist Theorist and Democrats have all in one form or the other expressed disdain and outrage at the ignorance and Intellectual-Liberalism expressed exhibited and on full display during these Town Halls of 2009 and the sessions of Open Political-Activity of the Health Care Reform struggle.
Its as if half of the nation awakened one morning to the stupefying spectacle of ruddy faced adults displaying the most base form of ignorance, that of illiteracy and bigotry. It's as if the classical period of Enlightenment and the Renaissance was hypothesis in a Liberal-Arts curriculum and an entire one-half of the American population never realized that something as facts exist and regardless of objective, Facts are Bias Neutral.
What is quite amusing about the spectacle of illiteracy on display at the Town-Halls of 2009 is how synonymous Republican-Conservatism has become with ignorance and bigotry. The task facing the nation and it's Progressive imperative is applying zero-tolerance for the sort of ignorance, Republican-Conservatism seems to instigate and revel in.
By Apropos
Its as if half of the nation awakened one morning to the stupefying spectacle of ruddy faced adults displaying the most base form of ignorance, that of illiteracy and bigotry. It's as if the classical period of Enlightenment and the Renaissance was hypothesis in a Liberal-Arts curriculum and an entire one-half of the American population never realized that something as facts exist and regardless of objective, Facts are Bias Neutral.
What is quite amusing about the spectacle of illiteracy on display at the Town-Halls of 2009 is how synonymous Republican-Conservatism has become with ignorance and bigotry. The task facing the nation and it's Progressive imperative is applying zero-tolerance for the sort of ignorance, Republican-Conservatism seems to instigate and revel in.
By Apropos
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Republican-Conservatism: It's Anti-Big Government Spending Polemics and Nancy Pelosi
Republican-Conservatism and it's pathological practice of disinformation and demagoguery never shys away from exploiting it's tried and proven weapon: it's historical anti-big Government spending polemic. The irony is it historically supports the type of Governmental spending that necessitates and inflates the printing of money, that of the military-industrial symbiosis and it's exploitation.
The continued success of the anti-big Government spending and it's deficit money polemic is simple: the masses of the human condition and it's American Political-Economy variant are amazingly ignorant to the application of speculative-value and it's Venetian money dynamic.
So arguments like the nation is in debt and the Chinese will stop loaning money, suffice to brow beat ignorance into the middle-class and the working poor that their insufferable lot is due to Nancy Pelosi and her "San Francisco" Big Government spending ways while omitting the fact, that "San Francisco" Liberals and their Progressive values liberates the nations creativity and technological ingenuity, providing the necessary jobs for the middle-class, the working poor and their Reagan Democrats gullible receptiveness to Conservative Polemics and it's reaction.
By Apropos
The continued success of the anti-big Government spending and it's deficit money polemic is simple: the masses of the human condition and it's American Political-Economy variant are amazingly ignorant to the application of speculative-value and it's Venetian money dynamic.
So arguments like the nation is in debt and the Chinese will stop loaning money, suffice to brow beat ignorance into the middle-class and the working poor that their insufferable lot is due to Nancy Pelosi and her "San Francisco" Big Government spending ways while omitting the fact, that "San Francisco" Liberals and their Progressive values liberates the nations creativity and technological ingenuity, providing the necessary jobs for the middle-class, the working poor and their Reagan Democrats gullible receptiveness to Conservative Polemics and it's reaction.
By Apropos
Sunday, August 16, 2009
What is Invaluable Satisfaction, What is the Money Dynamic and Mediocrity
Invaluable Satisfaction is the innately-objective human state of firstly, cognition, secondly creativity and industriousness and money as the sole approximate expression of this value dialectic has been a ploy foisted on the Human Condition by less creative, less industrious minds in the attempt at fettering it's art and physics to their mediocrity.
Are there not two classes of human work? The first class is creativity and inventiveness. The second is the replication and mass production of invention as a practical fact.
If the Invaluable Satisfaction of both classes of work is unique to it's activity isn't it then an antagonistic contradiction to assume the money dynamic by it's mere convenience as mode of expression should then assume fiat like dicta ursurping the apriori of Invaluable Satisfaction?
By Apropos
Are there not two classes of human work? The first class is creativity and inventiveness. The second is the replication and mass production of invention as a practical fact.
If the Invaluable Satisfaction of both classes of work is unique to it's activity isn't it then an antagonistic contradiction to assume the money dynamic by it's mere convenience as mode of expression should then assume fiat like dicta ursurping the apriori of Invaluable Satisfaction?
By Apropos
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Hostages, Captives and the Contradiction of the Prisoner Dialectic
On the average Tens of Thousands of Prisoners held in American Jails and Prisons under relatively similar conditions as hostages and captives are released yearly without an assessment of their experience within the linguistic and critical framework of released hostages and captives. This begs this question is inhumane, and barbaric treatment of a detained human being in all it's sensory deprivation and physical mistreatment dependent only on the clinical and academic distinction of legal and illegal?
Is the existential reality of the detained subjects experience of injustice, inhumanness, and barbarity a contradiction mitigated or aggravated by the mere means of it's procedural application?
By Apropos
Monday, August 10, 2009
The Iran Nuclear Program, The Obama Presidency and Agent Provocateurs
If there isn't a cabal that is conspiratorially-molelike, laboring , undermining whatever potential might exist for a form of resolution to the Iran Nuclear Program by the Obama Presidency that will allow Iran to enter the Nuclear Club, there should be. Because since commencement of the Obama Presidency and the realization by Israel, it's sympathizers, Zionism and it's cabal that the Obama Presidency would allow Iran membership into the Nuclear Club. The world has been introduced to all sorts of ploys, gimmicks and gambits wielded by those opposing Iran's possession of Nuclear technology with their efforts at sabotaging Iranian institutions, infrastructure, stirring and supporting Political instability in Iran. Everything is being done to muddy the waters, so to speak, discrediting any means and opportunity available to the Obama Presidency on the Iran Nuclear program.
This latest episode of Three Semitic-Americans arrested in Iran for violating it's borders is interestingly-Bizarre. Are we to accept that there are supposedly reasonably minded Americans who are down right stupid and reckless enough to place themselves on the Iranian border?
The only logical conclusion is the three Semitic-Americans are Agent Provocateurs destined by their arrest to create an International incident that will further discredit maneuvering by the Obama Presidency on the Iran Nuclear Program question.
If the ploy is bizarre it only reveals the desperation of the cabal that instigated it.
By Apropos
This latest episode of Three Semitic-Americans arrested in Iran for violating it's borders is interestingly-Bizarre. Are we to accept that there are supposedly reasonably minded Americans who are down right stupid and reckless enough to place themselves on the Iranian border?
The only logical conclusion is the three Semitic-Americans are Agent Provocateurs destined by their arrest to create an International incident that will further discredit maneuvering by the Obama Presidency on the Iran Nuclear Program question.
If the ploy is bizarre it only reveals the desperation of the cabal that instigated it.
By Apropos
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Deflationary, Recessionary, High-Unemployment Economy and Republican-Conservatism: Governmental Spending and Invaluable Satisfaction
What exactly does Republican critique against Governmental spending in a deflationary, recessionary high unemployment economy mean? It simply means the middle class rationalizes thrift and the working poor-underclass rededicate theirself to the theological dicta of suffering in principle and in deed.
The idea that in a deflationary, recessionary, high-unemployment economy, governmental spending distorts and increases inflation by deflating value is an insidious mischaracterization, a misrepresentation of empirical circumstances and an outright lie intended to satisfy political opportunity.
If as Republican anti-governmental spending economic thought goes that compelling people to spend what money they are holding, by withholding the government purse is how to reawaken a stagnant economy it then ignores the reality that it is an unconscionable and needless hardship which serves no other purpose than the pursuit of theological ideas and a human conditional historicity that is based in ignorance.
Thrift in a deflationary, recessionary, high-unemployment economy is another means of removing money from the retail function of the economy and making it accessible to the speculative-derivative paradigm of risk as a capitalist function. What matters is there has to be a positive circulation of money regardless of source. Republican-Conservatism and it's resentment-judgemental coefficient would rather people suffered needlessly under archaic empirical distortion of suffering as dialectical truism of the human condition and it's political economy, a dialectical synthesis which as a historical attribute must be embraced or else fire and brimstone will fall from the Heavens. But with the dialectical-materialist anticipation of Value and it's money medium of which governmental spending enables the redemptive realization of mans invaluable satisfaction. Governmental spending attempts to achieve and does accomplish the potential of man's creative realizations and in the socialized industries of the worlds developed economies we see the existence of pockets of this reality.
By Apropos
The idea that in a deflationary, recessionary, high-unemployment economy, governmental spending distorts and increases inflation by deflating value is an insidious mischaracterization, a misrepresentation of empirical circumstances and an outright lie intended to satisfy political opportunity.
If as Republican anti-governmental spending economic thought goes that compelling people to spend what money they are holding, by withholding the government purse is how to reawaken a stagnant economy it then ignores the reality that it is an unconscionable and needless hardship which serves no other purpose than the pursuit of theological ideas and a human conditional historicity that is based in ignorance.
Thrift in a deflationary, recessionary, high-unemployment economy is another means of removing money from the retail function of the economy and making it accessible to the speculative-derivative paradigm of risk as a capitalist function. What matters is there has to be a positive circulation of money regardless of source. Republican-Conservatism and it's resentment-judgemental coefficient would rather people suffered needlessly under archaic empirical distortion of suffering as dialectical truism of the human condition and it's political economy, a dialectical synthesis which as a historical attribute must be embraced or else fire and brimstone will fall from the Heavens. But with the dialectical-materialist anticipation of Value and it's money medium of which governmental spending enables the redemptive realization of mans invaluable satisfaction. Governmental spending attempts to achieve and does accomplish the potential of man's creative realizations and in the socialized industries of the worlds developed economies we see the existence of pockets of this reality.
By Apropos
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Michael Eric Dyson, Larry Elder and The Black Security Guard of Nixonian-Republican Criminality
The guest on the 7/29/09; Larry King Live on CNN were: Larry Elder, Ben Stein, Joe Brown and Michael Eric Dyson. The topic was Race Relations and American Police, specifically the Henry Louis Gates arrest of 2009.
Michael Eric Dyson reiterated his encapsulating illustration that were Barack Obama, a White President and were Henry Louis Gates the tottering Henry Kissinger who is a White academician and the arresting Police Officer, a Black Officer, the outcome, storyline and narrative of the Henry Louis Gates arrest of 2009 would be different.
Larry Elder true to his status-quo collaborator-apologist inclination protested Michael Eric Dyson's illustration, and I paraphrase: Eric Dyson cannot say that because it hasn't happened. But as it normally is with the work of the collaborator-apologist, revision and outright misinformation is the operative.
I want to remind Larry Elder, that it has already happened. The Watergate Scandal which exposed a sitting President Richard Nixon as another petty-criminal opportunist thus causing his disgraceful resignation and exit from office was caused and initiated by a Black security guard who chanced upon the break-in at the Watergate Hotel. Anticipating Michael Eric Dyson's polemics: That Black security guard because of his actions at the Watergate Hotel, exposing Nixonian-Republican criminality has been relegated imperpetuity beyond the pale of history. That Black security guard lost this job, became homeless, was persecuted because he dared apply law to the status-quo. That Black security guard is the historical refutation to that time worn collaborator-apologist function of the Larry Elders and their one-dimensional critique, which dialectically in turn affirms Michael Eric Dyson's polemic.
By Apropos
Michael Eric Dyson reiterated his encapsulating illustration that were Barack Obama, a White President and were Henry Louis Gates the tottering Henry Kissinger who is a White academician and the arresting Police Officer, a Black Officer, the outcome, storyline and narrative of the Henry Louis Gates arrest of 2009 would be different.
Larry Elder true to his status-quo collaborator-apologist inclination protested Michael Eric Dyson's illustration, and I paraphrase: Eric Dyson cannot say that because it hasn't happened. But as it normally is with the work of the collaborator-apologist, revision and outright misinformation is the operative.
I want to remind Larry Elder, that it has already happened. The Watergate Scandal which exposed a sitting President Richard Nixon as another petty-criminal opportunist thus causing his disgraceful resignation and exit from office was caused and initiated by a Black security guard who chanced upon the break-in at the Watergate Hotel. Anticipating Michael Eric Dyson's polemics: That Black security guard because of his actions at the Watergate Hotel, exposing Nixonian-Republican criminality has been relegated imperpetuity beyond the pale of history. That Black security guard lost this job, became homeless, was persecuted because he dared apply law to the status-quo. That Black security guard is the historical refutation to that time worn collaborator-apologist function of the Larry Elders and their one-dimensional critique, which dialectically in turn affirms Michael Eric Dyson's polemic.
By Apropos
Sunday, August 2, 2009
George F. Will and His Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism is Wrong, Taxes and the Invaluable-Satisfaction Dialectic
What is wrong with George F. Will? So he writes trite columns for a living, that only establishes he has the necessary objectivity to feed himself. Besides that, his illiteracy under the cloak of Conservatism isn't simply appalling it is insidiously-audacious in the specific sense of it's wormy insinuation into the historical questions of American Political-Economy. George F. Will is wrong on two fronts: Intellectually and philosophically. Conservatism and it's American variant is simply wrong and historically-reactionary.
George F. Will writes in his "The "Tax the Rich!" "Reflex" 7/27/09; essay for Newsweek Magazine...
"tap a typical Democrat... on the knee with a rubber hammer and he or she will say "Tax the Rich!". Well this proposition naturally has it's antithesis, "Tap a typical Republican-Conservative on the with a rubber hammer and he or she will say "Tax Cut". The nature of taxes as George F. Will and his Conservative compatriots see it is the sum total of the Political-Economy dialectic and that closes their intellectual-loop and philosophical circuitry.
American-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism represented by it's George F. Will, Charles Krauthammer, William Kristol and Rush Limbaugh cabal and pantheon misses the question-crux of the human condition and it's Political-Economy which is invaluable-satisfaction. Invaluable-satisfaction, it's means of realization is the Political-Economy dialectic and to reduce it to the taxation irrelevancy reveals quite starkly an ignorance naivete that is flabbergasting.
The question has nothing to do with George F. Will's gibberish verbosity of his 7/27/09 essay which can easily be explained with the simple unfettered idealism. But the question is, does Conservatism and it's Intellectualism posses the requisite auto-criticism to realize that Richard Nixon's abandonment of the Gold Standard and it's paradigm has enabled the revelation of quintessential value. It has anticipated digital-technology and it's productivity and the maturation of speculation despite it's strain again on a sector of the economy has only underscored the fact that the Conservative Political-Economy narrative with it's rote like fixation on taxes, is simply incapable of capturing the invaluable-satisfaction dialectic intrinsic to the human condition. George F. Will and Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism can continue indulgence in the farcial exercise into a nature of the human condition that held true when theology and it's dichotomy held sway with it's dicta that man suffered, because of preordination and not the judgemental resentment of conservative-ignorance and it's reaction. But it is at the expense of contemporary creativity and technological productivity which utterly refutes Conservatism and its Intellectualism and despite George F. Will's assertions that Liberalism and it's intellectual-labor fetters man, the opposite is true and invaluable-satisfaction not taxes is the dynamic.
By Apropos
George F. Will writes in his "The "Tax the Rich!" "Reflex" 7/27/09; essay for Newsweek Magazine...
"tap a typical Democrat... on the knee with a rubber hammer and he or she will say "Tax the Rich!". Well this proposition naturally has it's antithesis, "Tap a typical Republican-Conservative on the with a rubber hammer and he or she will say "Tax Cut". The nature of taxes as George F. Will and his Conservative compatriots see it is the sum total of the Political-Economy dialectic and that closes their intellectual-loop and philosophical circuitry.
American-Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism represented by it's George F. Will, Charles Krauthammer, William Kristol and Rush Limbaugh cabal and pantheon misses the question-crux of the human condition and it's Political-Economy which is invaluable-satisfaction. Invaluable-satisfaction, it's means of realization is the Political-Economy dialectic and to reduce it to the taxation irrelevancy reveals quite starkly an ignorance naivete that is flabbergasting.
The question has nothing to do with George F. Will's gibberish verbosity of his 7/27/09 essay which can easily be explained with the simple unfettered idealism. But the question is, does Conservatism and it's Intellectualism posses the requisite auto-criticism to realize that Richard Nixon's abandonment of the Gold Standard and it's paradigm has enabled the revelation of quintessential value. It has anticipated digital-technology and it's productivity and the maturation of speculation despite it's strain again on a sector of the economy has only underscored the fact that the Conservative Political-Economy narrative with it's rote like fixation on taxes, is simply incapable of capturing the invaluable-satisfaction dialectic intrinsic to the human condition. George F. Will and Conservative Intellectual-Liberalism can continue indulgence in the farcial exercise into a nature of the human condition that held true when theology and it's dichotomy held sway with it's dicta that man suffered, because of preordination and not the judgemental resentment of conservative-ignorance and it's reaction. But it is at the expense of contemporary creativity and technological productivity which utterly refutes Conservatism and its Intellectualism and despite George F. Will's assertions that Liberalism and it's intellectual-labor fetters man, the opposite is true and invaluable-satisfaction not taxes is the dynamic.
By Apropos
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
