Climate Change, Global Warming and A God We Can't See

The so-called climate change, Global Warming debate encapsulates all that is schizophrenic about human ability to reason

Conservatives and their Intellectual-Liberalism who profess to believe in a God they can't see deny deny facts of a climate change, Global Warming on the basis they can't see it.

Progressives and their materialistic-common sense who disbelief a God they can't see at the expense of religiosity and it's logic believe in a climate change, Global Warming they can't see.

By Apropos

The Charity Business Demanding "Need" For Existence As Police Demand Crime, It's Activity For Existence

Isn't it odd or even cynically weird that despite all the various government safety net programs, all the Constitutionally mandated welfare programs, the infinitude of ubiquitous charities across the nation, churches, various religious groups claiming to provide charity to those on hard times---there is still "Need"?

And most importantly the charity business is an industry demanding "Need" for it's existence just as the organized violence of police demand crime and it's activity for existence.

By Apropos

Brian Stelter, Don Lemon, Andrew Wallenstein and A Debutante-Like Conversation on the ethics Of Publishing The Hacked Sony Internal Emails

On 12/14/14; Brian Stelter host of CNN's Reliable Sources was his usual confused self struggling to make us think. Along for the ride he had the inferiority complexed CNN Anchor Don Lemon and the profile in irrelevance Andrew Wallenstein Co-Editor of Variety Magazine engaging in a debutante-like conversation on the ethics of publishing the hacked Sony Internal Emails.  Typical of what passes for contemporary mental labor, what Brian Stelter, Don Lemon and Andrew Wallenstein exposed us to was the bankruptcy of passe' reasoning and the stale nature of their world view.


The incredulity of debating the ethics of publishing the contents of hacked Sony internal emails as if the activity of publishing the Sony internal emails is different from if the contents of those emails had been scooped by a journalist from a disgruntled source and published---so what then is the ethical dilemma and question?  The contents of the hacked Sony emails are specifically valuable because it exposes the hypocrisy and sanctimony of those who would claim status quo realization over the rest of us. Whatever claims to privacy is proximity-relative.  So besides the epic embarrassment of hollywood elites,  What is the ethical issue.

By Apropos

On C.I.A. Torture Program and Atrocities Post 9/11

As we marvel at the level of unprecedented accountability exhibited by the U.S. Government in it's 12/11/14; C.I.A. Director John Brennan's press confab on C.I.A. atrocities post 9/11 and it's uniqueness in the world and community nations.

Lets not forget nor  diminish the fact that a Progressive-Democratic President  Barack Obama and Democratic Senator Diane Feinstein made made it possible and were it up to Republicans and their reactionary inclinations, we would never have learned of the Spanish Inquisition like extent of the C.I.A. Torture Program and it's post 9/11 atrocities.

By Apropos

On Injustice

No. 50 The Seven Vices: Injustice (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Injustice exists and is pervasive because it's prey and victims rarely respond in that conclusive and commensurate manner that would give pause to the machinery and medium of injustice.

By Apropos

Violence Against Women and There Really Is A First Time

Office on Violence Against Women logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The violence against Women critique of, if he beat her now he must have beat her in the past, as directive to abused and assaulted Women to get out of negative and unwholesome relationships is lazy reasoning cloaked as commonsensical deductions.  Because the reality is there is always a first time when violence and brutality is expressed in a relationship.

Unless we are saying that there isn't any redemption for perpetrators of violence is a relationship and once that rubicon is crossed the only recourse is the dissolution of the relationship.  Then the practical thing we should do is listen to minds that instruct us that the first and fundamental taboo in an society even taking precedence over the taboo of homicide is:  The male, a Man should never ever under any circumstance assault, batter or dehumanize a female or Women.

By Apropos

Whoopi Goldberg Isn't On The View Because Of Her Insight and Her Bojangles

Whoopi Goldberg isn't on The View because of her insight, wit or commonsense.  Whoopi Goldberg is on The View to represent, ignorance, provincialism, presumptions of the simpleton and the inferiority-complex of the reactionary.

Whoopi Goldberg is the "what the cat dragged in" spectacle on The View--relic from Bojangles speakeasy milieu of entertainment and contrary to whoopi Goldberg's cartoonish declarations.  There are only two Black Women on The View: The indomitable Rosie Perez and the Defiant Rosie O'Donnell.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Whoopi Goldberg, Her Naive and Foolish Opportunity Polemic
• Aunt Jemima's Like Wendy Williams, The Talk Show Host and Her "Well Spoken" Black Critique
• Star Jones, Kimberly Keller, Two Examples, Miley Cyrus and Trayvon Martin
• Surprise: Rosie Perez Off THE VIEW

Whoopi Goldberg, Her Naive and Foolish Opportunity Polemic

Even as Whoopi Goldberg rants about how she worked hard for her money and anyone and everyone else has the same opportunity.  Whoopi Goldberg is naive, foolish and forgetful of the fact that she's been employed by someone else her entire life.

The contradictory fact to Whoopi Goldberg's simplistic opportunity polemic is her existence is based on, contingent on and depends on someone, an employer giving her wages.

Whoopi Goldberg doesn't create value.  She only realizes the valuation of her employer.  So for the specific meaning and utility of working hard, Whoopi Goldberg is no more no less a factory machine producing a certain set of facts.

By Apropos

The American Status Quo, It's Policing Organized Violence, Black Masculinity, Cooperation and Control

The Idea that the American status quo and it's policing organized violence is fearful and threatened by Black masculinity isn't wholly accurate and can be disproven by the level of injustice the American status quo and it's policing organized violence metes out to Black masculinity.  Because if the American status quo and it's policing organized violence was fearful and threatened by Black masculinity, it would be cautious and circumspective in it's blatant and overt practice of injustice, because the prospect of retaliation and retibution would loom large in it's Conservative imperative, but as the murderous practices of it's policing organized violence shows us, it's oblivious.

What however is accurate and correct is Black masculinity, in the calculus of the American status quo is to be controlled and as much as the American status quo and it's policing organized violence denigrates and dehumanizes Black masculinity it requires cooperation from Black masculinity to effect the control.  Meaning the American status quo and it's policing organized violence recognizes the humanity of Black masculinity as a comprehending medium even as it propagandizes the dehumanization of Black masculinity, a recognition that exposes the petty base nature of the controlling dynamic.

By Apropos

Related articles

• Emily Good of Rochester, N.Y; Police Officers, Organized Violence and When Atypical Is Typical
• Police Departments, Fire Departments and The Right To Privacy Argument As Defense Against Their Law Violating Activites
• On Benjamin Watson, The New Orleans Saints Tight End and His Idealistic Posting On Sin, Law and Ferguson, Missouri

Black On Black Crime, 9/11 And Chasing Al Qaeda All Over The Planet

When White Conservatives and their Black stooges respond to the Black community's polemic against White police officers killing Black people---with Black people don't protest Black on Black crime.  The Black community must respond with: On 9/11/01; Al Qaeda attacked the United States and killed over 3,000 + persons, a number today which is but a drop, a blip in the yearly national rate of killing in this interesting nation of ours.

A tremendous amount of treasure and American lives have been spent exacting justice from the ideology that wrought 9/11.  No one has made the argument:  Why are we chasing Al Qaeda all over the planet at the expense of dealing with our yearly outrageous national body count and no one will make such an idealistic argument because even though we kill each other at rates Al Qaeda can only dream of achieving, it is our National Contradiction to resolve.

By Apropos

Jeff Roorda, The St. Louis Rams, Free Speech and The Killing of Michael Brown

The disdain and contempt Jeff Roorda and the St. Louis Police Officers Association hold and have for the St. Louis and Ferguson Black Community is downright psychotically apoplectic that it's seemingly blinded them into making unlawful and unconstitutional demands on a private business enterprise, the St. Louis Rams football team and the NFL.

On 11/30/14; five St. Louis Rams players expressed their lawful and constitutional protected First Amendment Free Speech Right by being in solidarity with the hands up don't shoot movement protesting the killing of the unarmed teenager Michael Brown by Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson.  In response Jeff Roorda and the St. Louis Police Officers Association demanded that the St. Louis Rams and the NFL Punish the five players who were clearly exercising a lawful and constitutionally protected act.

Now should we deduce from this response by Jeff Roorda and the St. Louis Officers Association that the associations blatant disregard for what is clearly a constitutionally protected act by the five St.Louis Rams players is indicative of the lawlessness of police officers daily interactions with the St Louis and Ferguson Black Community and the killing of Michael Brown is its consequential fact.

By Apropos