To The God Believers, the only approximate absolute is organic needs. To emprio-science the only approximate absolute is cause and effect. With this in mind why do we tolerate the narrative of specific-interest as analysis of our relationship with the general principle when the consequences are final and organically irreversible?Why do we on one hand proclaim the sovereignty of the individual, then abridge it in the next breath with the idealism of for example Erin Burnett of CNN and her specific-interest value speculation narrative?
To the Erin Burnett's who quake at the prospect of a type of resolve, settling accounts with specific interest, the Human Condition isn't the sum of superlative distortions, conveniently presented at the behest of schizophrenic greed masquerading as progress.
By Apropos
