The Anti-Social Security argument perpetually made by Conservatism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism that for every dollar paid by wage earners into the Social Security Fund, three or more dollars are extracted or paid out unearned. Has nothing to do with "what is money" and Political-Economy fact but everything to do with the idealistic Conservative impetus and it's Intellectual-Liberalism of controlling the Political-Economy illiterate majority.
If each dollar paid into the government trust fund of Social Security isn't value appreciating parallel with the nations GDP (Gross Domestic Products). Why then is the same dollar, privately speculated by it's critics, the idealistic Conservative impetus and it's Intellectual-Liberalism, appreciating in it's stock market activity?
By Apropos
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Sunday, March 17, 2013
"What Do Women Want," Dialectical-Materialism, The Daughter-Relationship and Value Speculation
Idealism poses the question: "What Do Women Want" and responds with it's typical one dimensional impetuous hubris, "Let the Woman decide".
Materialism on the other hand, specifically dialectical-materialism ignores the question and instead observes the subjectivity of it's organic fact, that the response is at the expense of the fact, the quality of the daughter-relationship determines what daughter as Woman will want.
The daughter-relationship more than any other social relationship has within it's circumscription the tensions of immature contradictions and the mature antagonisms of human Political--Economy as organic base. Irrespective of class and nationality.
Recently, the daughter-relationship dialectic has again been examined in a new book "Lean In" by Sheryl Sandberg of Facebook and as expected of a nation flailing under the fog of idealism and the Intellectual-Liberalism of it's conservative ideation, it was welcomed apoplectically.
Dialectical-Materialism reminds us that the vacuous nature of idealism and the Intellectual-Liberalism of it's Conservative ideation would have us observe social relationships and human Political-Economy as existing in a vacuum or biologic inconsistencies and suppositions of cultural biases. We at Apropos in defense of dialectical-materialism reject that.
We at Apropos state it bluntly: The Daughter-Relationship dialectic and it's "What do Women Want" question is fundamentally that of value and it's speculation.
By Apropos
Materialism on the other hand, specifically dialectical-materialism ignores the question and instead observes the subjectivity of it's organic fact, that the response is at the expense of the fact, the quality of the daughter-relationship determines what daughter as Woman will want.
The daughter-relationship more than any other social relationship has within it's circumscription the tensions of immature contradictions and the mature antagonisms of human Political--Economy as organic base. Irrespective of class and nationality.
Recently, the daughter-relationship dialectic has again been examined in a new book "Lean In" by Sheryl Sandberg of Facebook and as expected of a nation flailing under the fog of idealism and the Intellectual-Liberalism of it's conservative ideation, it was welcomed apoplectically.
Dialectical-Materialism reminds us that the vacuous nature of idealism and the Intellectual-Liberalism of it's Conservative ideation would have us observe social relationships and human Political-Economy as existing in a vacuum or biologic inconsistencies and suppositions of cultural biases. We at Apropos in defense of dialectical-materialism reject that.
We at Apropos state it bluntly: The Daughter-Relationship dialectic and it's "What do Women Want" question is fundamentally that of value and it's speculation.
By Apropos
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Barack Obama, Nat Turner, Steve Harvey, "Hoodlum" And The American Experience
From Barack Obama, President of the United States, honoring Nat Turner in his 2/22/12; speech at the African-American Museum to Steve Harvey's the talk show host recognition of his father. Who Steve Harvey unflappably describes as a "Hoodlum" as being the motive force in his life who inculcated and instilled work ethic in him, to quote "Being a Man," there is a dynamic unfettered in contemporary society that at it's heart has the thrust of the Black Experience on it's own terms, without that axiomatic, apologetic taint of eurocentric understudy.
The usual narrative of the Black Experience meaning it's distortions by eurocentrisim is a pacified, defanged and caricaturized one. Where a Nat Turner or a "Hoodlum" are valueless and not invaluable as the recognition by Barack Obama, President of the United States and Steve Harvey a successful talk show host imply.
That the Nat Turner, the "Hoodlum," facts of the Black Experience are invaluably on equal terms with all other facts of the American Experience.
If Thomas Jefferson, an owner of Slaves, trader of Slaves is redeemed. Then we must grasp the one-dimensional nature of all critique hurled at the Black Experience at the idealistic expense of it's organic base the American Experience.
By Apropos
The usual narrative of the Black Experience meaning it's distortions by eurocentrisim is a pacified, defanged and caricaturized one. Where a Nat Turner or a "Hoodlum" are valueless and not invaluable as the recognition by Barack Obama, President of the United States and Steve Harvey a successful talk show host imply.
That the Nat Turner, the "Hoodlum," facts of the Black Experience are invaluably on equal terms with all other facts of the American Experience.
If Thomas Jefferson, an owner of Slaves, trader of Slaves is redeemed. Then we must grasp the one-dimensional nature of all critique hurled at the Black Experience at the idealistic expense of it's organic base the American Experience.
By Apropos
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
