The court of Justice Antonin Scalia, " Let Them Eat Cake" and the Immunity Contradiction Within the What is Government Formulations

Should we, 7,000 years after Black Nubians gave the Human Condition by the way of their Egyptian cousins dialectics and the materialist analysis of history and objective truth.  Should we, 2,000 years after the purported "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's" and it's idealism.  Should we, 200 years after the practice of the Jacobin Club, after the inquisition of Rousseaus Social Contract--- find ourselves contending with the mediocrity, the tautological sophistry of the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice Antonin Scalia and it's butchery and reactionary revision of the immunity contradiction within the what is government formulation and it's synthesis?

Our forebear's struggled to synthesize the contradictions presented by the immunity formulation within the idea of a Constitutional Republic being born out of the antagonisms of Monarch Rule.  The Human Condition is not omniscient nor does one human, even a group of humans presume to monopolize cognition and it's relative certainties.  Historically American jurisprudence has struggled with formulating the question of immunity for those who act formally for the republic within the Progressive motive with intellectual seriousness and maturity.

Recently the court of Justice Antonin Scalia blinded by Antoinetteism  and it's fatal "Let Them Eat Cake" has for the most petulance of attitudes expressed it's will at the expense of progress with it's reactionary revision of the immunity contradiction within the what is government formulation.  The question of immunity is already a tenuous construct when the social-contract denys the citizen to plead ignorance of the law as defense.  So it has become a byzantine comedy of sorts to see the Court of Justice Antonin Scalia take the reactionary attitude that the question of immunity for officials of the Republic requires an Intellectual-Liberal formulation.  One that laughably and assuming without a wink and a nod permits public officials to plead specific ignorance and utility specifics relative to laws, the objectivity of their office demands.

By Apropos