If millions of jobs had been lost prior to the passage of Health Care Reform of 2010.
If company's and small business were not even employing or hiring workers prior to the passage of Health Care Reform of 2010; but were instead laying off worker's, out sourcing jobs and downsizing operations and employment opportunities.
What then is the basis for the Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism critique that Health Care Reform of 2010 kills jobs, impedes employment and is the polemical scape goat for the nations economic ills?
By Apropos
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Republican-Conservatism / Tea Partyism, The Tucson, Arizona Shooting of 1/8/11; and Revisionist Narrative
For Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism to push back as forcefully as it has against the argument, that it's polemic catalyzed the Tucson, Arizona Shooting 1/8/11; underscores it's awareness of the correctness and justness of the argument.
American Jails and Prisons are full of persons ascribed motives of less circumstantial facts than those presented us by the 1/8/11; Tucson shooter. Yet Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism and Corporate Media are pathetically, disingenuously and panic strickenly doing everything they can demanding that, "We The People" suspend and lay low our reason at the expense of preponderance of circumstantial context surrounding the mind state and focus of the 1/8/11; Tucson shooter.
The 1/8/11; Tucson shooter was preoccupied with the nations Political-Economy, from allegedly burning Old Glory to delusions about the Gold Standard. The Tucson shooter targeted and shot a politician in broad day light, a Democrat politician and female. The shooting was a political statement and no amount of revisionary distortions will conceal it.
"We The People" are once again up against our historical nemesis: Which is revisionist narrative in the pursuit of short term goals, coming at the expense of objective facts and it's redemptive narrative.
By Apropos
American Jails and Prisons are full of persons ascribed motives of less circumstantial facts than those presented us by the 1/8/11; Tucson shooter. Yet Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism and Corporate Media are pathetically, disingenuously and panic strickenly doing everything they can demanding that, "We The People" suspend and lay low our reason at the expense of preponderance of circumstantial context surrounding the mind state and focus of the 1/8/11; Tucson shooter.
The 1/8/11; Tucson shooter was preoccupied with the nations Political-Economy, from allegedly burning Old Glory to delusions about the Gold Standard. The Tucson shooter targeted and shot a politician in broad day light, a Democrat politician and female. The shooting was a political statement and no amount of revisionary distortions will conceal it.
"We The People" are once again up against our historical nemesis: Which is revisionist narrative in the pursuit of short term goals, coming at the expense of objective facts and it's redemptive narrative.
By Apropos
Monday, January 24, 2011
Uncivil Disclosure, Republican-Conservatism / Tea Partyism Reaction and Capitulation of Democrats
To Describe as uncivil the nations public discourse pre the Tucson Shooting of 1/8/11; we have to accept the stark reality of the environment that permitted it.
If the nation pursued it's Political-Economy as an efficient realization of the maximum development of the human condition, we would be spared the pit-falls and distortions of idealism and it's uncivil and marginalization discourse tendencies.
If we are to accept the premise and allow a type of media-practice which is primarily for profit and monetary gain to be the arbiter and gate keeper of the nations cognition. Then there shouldn't be any hesitancy to squarely define and describe the media's corporate bias as an opportunistic enabler.
As the nation embarks on another spin of the return civility to discourse wheel. The antagonistic seeds of the contradiction of it's environmental reality has already been sown. Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism reaction is being rewarded because it has effectively employed the tools of uncivil discourse to attain it's speculative political power ends as the Congressional Election of 2010 showed and by the capitulation of Democrats by seeking a civil discourse it assures Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism reaction that Democrats will not meet reactionary suppositions with the stern counter-resistance of uncivil discourse.
By Apropos
If the nation pursued it's Political-Economy as an efficient realization of the maximum development of the human condition, we would be spared the pit-falls and distortions of idealism and it's uncivil and marginalization discourse tendencies.
If we are to accept the premise and allow a type of media-practice which is primarily for profit and monetary gain to be the arbiter and gate keeper of the nations cognition. Then there shouldn't be any hesitancy to squarely define and describe the media's corporate bias as an opportunistic enabler.
As the nation embarks on another spin of the return civility to discourse wheel. The antagonistic seeds of the contradiction of it's environmental reality has already been sown. Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism reaction is being rewarded because it has effectively employed the tools of uncivil discourse to attain it's speculative political power ends as the Congressional Election of 2010 showed and by the capitulation of Democrats by seeking a civil discourse it assures Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism reaction that Democrats will not meet reactionary suppositions with the stern counter-resistance of uncivil discourse.
By Apropos
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Israeli and Islamic Caliphate Historicity
Is the irony missed? Israeli historicity critiquing Islamic caliphate historicity?
By Apropos
By Apropos
Saturday, January 15, 2011
The Biggest Political Lie of 2010 and Corporate Media
If as PolitiFact pointed out on 12/16/10; that the Republican-Conservatism/Tea Partyism claim, Health Care Reform of 2010 was a government take over of Health Care was the biggest lie of 2010. What then does it say about Corporate Media and it's Wolf Blitzer who enabled the lie?
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Gene Simmons of The Rock Group KISS, Intellectual-Liberalism, Barack Obama and Auto-Mockery
So Gene Simmons of the rock group KISS is pretentious and has evidence of Intellectual-Liberalism in his world view. Despite the arrogance of his Man's barbarity critique beginning and ending with his Jewish identity and the historicity of the Jewish experience. Gene Simmons can only lay claim to the idealism of his Intellectual-Liberalism upon the base-opportunity of crass Conservatism and it's reaction.
Gene Simmons has revealed that he voted for Barack Obama specifically because of it's first Black this or that novelty. Then Gene Simmons goes on to express buyers remorse on the grounds that Barack Obama was not qualified, because he had never run a business. We (Apropos) challenge Gene Simmons on his affiliation with that thought. That idealistic narrative specific for U.S. Presidency, that only business leaders are qualified. The Intellectual-Liberalism of Gene Simmons world view, typically ignores the devil is in the details unity of opposites objective fact of phenomena. So Gene Simmons and his ilk trapped in their suppositions only have anticipations that reinforce their Intellectual-Liberalism.
There is a tension held by a business leader with society at large that is antagonistic due to the value speculation dynamic and it's alienation. To reduce historical appreciation of economy of thought and it's leadership potential to narratives which if we are to accept as objective is to surrender the very process of democracy that enables the criticism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism.
So to the Gene Simmons of the world and their reaction. There isn't a vantage specific that endows the organic condition of humanness omnipotent sapience, such a reality were to exist would be auto-mockery and the reinvention of the wheel dynamic of Intellectual-Liberalism.
By Apropos
Gene Simmons has revealed that he voted for Barack Obama specifically because of it's first Black this or that novelty. Then Gene Simmons goes on to express buyers remorse on the grounds that Barack Obama was not qualified, because he had never run a business. We (Apropos) challenge Gene Simmons on his affiliation with that thought. That idealistic narrative specific for U.S. Presidency, that only business leaders are qualified. The Intellectual-Liberalism of Gene Simmons world view, typically ignores the devil is in the details unity of opposites objective fact of phenomena. So Gene Simmons and his ilk trapped in their suppositions only have anticipations that reinforce their Intellectual-Liberalism.
There is a tension held by a business leader with society at large that is antagonistic due to the value speculation dynamic and it's alienation. To reduce historical appreciation of economy of thought and it's leadership potential to narratives which if we are to accept as objective is to surrender the very process of democracy that enables the criticism and it's Intellectual-Liberalism.
So to the Gene Simmons of the world and their reaction. There isn't a vantage specific that endows the organic condition of humanness omnipotent sapience, such a reality were to exist would be auto-mockery and the reinvention of the wheel dynamic of Intellectual-Liberalism.
By Apropos
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Republican-Conservatism Right-Wing Fascism and Democratic-Liberal Leftist-Progressive Thought
In a world of ideas where the alienative and competitive extremes are between Republican-Conservatism Right-Wing Fascism and Democratic-Liberal Leftist-Progressive thought. One has to be a cynic and misanthrope of the worst type to accept the proposition that given this choice, the American people will side with the Intellectual-Liberalism and misery loves company dialectic of Republican-Conservatism Right-Wing Fascism.
Yet the not so strange fact, considering the American people are just that people, is, the American people have when presented with this choice picked the reaction and Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism Right-Wing Fascism and it's misery loves company dialectic historically at the expense of the industriousness and redemption of Democratic-Liberal Leftist-Progressive thought.
By Apropos
Yet the not so strange fact, considering the American people are just that people, is, the American people have when presented with this choice picked the reaction and Intellectual-Liberalism of Republican-Conservatism Right-Wing Fascism and it's misery loves company dialectic historically at the expense of the industriousness and redemption of Democratic-Liberal Leftist-Progressive thought.
By Apropos
Thursday, January 6, 2011
The Question: What Is Important Money or Happiness and Class War
The Question: What is important money or happiness which is commonly presented as a rhetorical polemic implies a fundamental ignorance of what is money and a presumptuousness towards what is happiness.
The Question: What is important money or happiness stands on it's head when it is asked of original, ancestral man, who never suffered it as polemic, did happiness come into it's historical existence upon the discovery of value aka money?
The Question: What is important money or happiness is not intellectual curiosity but instead an insidious weapon in the historical struggle of value speculation realized as the drama of class war.
By Apropos
The Question: What is important money or happiness stands on it's head when it is asked of original, ancestral man, who never suffered it as polemic, did happiness come into it's historical existence upon the discovery of value aka money?
The Question: What is important money or happiness is not intellectual curiosity but instead an insidious weapon in the historical struggle of value speculation realized as the drama of class war.
By Apropos
Monday, January 3, 2011
Free Speech, Google, Carla Franklin and the Courts
If the issue is Free Speech, the recent ruling by a Federal Court Judge against Google in the case of the disparaging anonymous You Tube video comments against Cara Franklin when contrasted with the the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United, where the court ruled corporations have anonymous Free Speech--goes to show the extreme exertion to simply get it wrong.
The correct thing for the courts to establish and affirm is: the fundamental question of speech in the human condition and it's Political-Economy is speech is always human and singular. Thus singular anonymous speech, as a singular epithet hurled anonymously from a crowd is protected speech.
The courts idealistically answer the Free Speech question in the Google, Carla Franklin incident with the implicit abstraction that the right lies with to know and that quite frankly is an idealistic perversion.
By Apropos
The correct thing for the courts to establish and affirm is: the fundamental question of speech in the human condition and it's Political-Economy is speech is always human and singular. Thus singular anonymous speech, as a singular epithet hurled anonymously from a crowd is protected speech.
The courts idealistically answer the Free Speech question in the Google, Carla Franklin incident with the implicit abstraction that the right lies with to know and that quite frankly is an idealistic perversion.
By Apropos
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
