CRITIQUING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS RARELY BEEN FROM THE RECOGNITION THAT CONTRARY TO THE ELITIST CHARACTERIZATION FROM ITS ENEMIES, IT ISNT By William Thorpe

The American Democratic Party once upon a time, as recently as The 1950's represented the interests of the Nations political-economy, meaning it pursued and maintained the necessary marginalizing relations and terms of exploitation that has determined and supported the Nation, till those, (contrary to conventional speculations,) non-ideological dictates of money and its realization became honest enough or should I say mature enough or progressive enough to grasp that its historical marginalizing formulations had instead become impediments, as such required reform and its with this reformative transition did The Democratic Party as currently constituted emerge. Before I continue, let me state this, The American Republican Party, despite its current assertiveness is of an inert and torpid value, as such is conservative and reactionary. In other words it has illogically become that impediment, money and its realization is maturing from. Nonetheless to talk about The Democratic Party and Democrats is also a recognition of the idealistic desperation of The Republican Party and its cling to the archaic immaturity of the Nations formulating political-economy, on whose speculative terms Democrats and The Democratic Party are currently critiqued. The Democratic Party, because of the existence of The Republican Party, isn't critiqued in search of illuminating details that will advance and break that historical cycle of National decline and destruction which all history of our human condition instructs as per course, instead criticism of The Democratic Party is a catalyst, ensuring that this American experiment version of our human condition with its stupendous toll on human life, in all its psychological, emotional, spiritual and physical devastation will simply be that, abject destruction without account, a selfish and stupid enterprise of cataclysmic and apocalyptic indefensible acts. Considering that selfishness is always a value for itself, we understand it in the context that its the default nature and value of our human condition, which as soon as there is social recognition, there is, irrespective of consciousness resistance and it is this resistance The Democratic Party represents. 

 As all things organic, which the Nation and its Social Contract is, its constituent parts and composing details impel, restrain, implode then reappear in their former states or emerge as novel or a new synthesis with an entirely new character, which is what this contemporary Democratic Party is, since shedding its former status quo utility upon claim by its subjective objects and as such its subsequent redirection a death knell to its former function. Nonetheless, there have been two sorts of critiques and attacks lobbed at Democrats and Their Party by its enemies and the natural occurring organizational critique from within its ranks, both lines of critique however are again, expected and anticipated, because they are reflective, regardless of quality, of that inexorable and inevitable struggle between reaction and progress. So firstly we have had the "elitist" attack from enemies of The Democratic Party, which basically is a repurposing of that childish and nothing seems to work so I'll accuse them of being snobs futility. But what this work deals with is the combination of the "elitist" critique and its impact in shaping that natural occurring organizational rank and file introspection. There isn't any debate or dispute that historically the Democratic Party represented, asserted, pursued, supported and defended that quintessential exploitation of fellow human on which the Nations political-economy was structured, a political-economy that in its maturation became mired in suppositions that fundamentally were at odds with and impeded the development of money. Consequently as the development of money imposed its implacable dicta on political-economy, the Republican Party, who had initially been the medium and mechanism for the conveyance of the dicta and the maturation and development of money, in turn and for speculative reasons surrendered their purpose and became that which it initially opposed and struggled against, which The Democratic Party naturally replaced.

The casual and antiseptic descriptive of my former 'The Democratic Party naturally replaced' belies and cloaks the horrific events and metamorphic process of the descriptive 'The Democratic Party naturally replaced'. A lot of people were murdered, a horrendous amount of folks died, lives were ruined, existence was overturned and dramatically altered---the process itself embodied, what I earlier stated as The Democratic Party became the 'resistance', because in its assumptive function of realizing the maturation terms of money, it naturally and consequently opposed the perversions and distortions of The Nation's founding mythology. To explain, regardless of a civilization, the human condition is "social", meaning it is the objectification of expressions and relationships as value and its exchange. The Nation in its creation applied the most oppressive and regressive form of that '.....objectification of expressions and relationships as value and its exchange', notwithstanding its founding precepts and mythology. The point being, despite the negation in practice of those founding precepts, what couldn't be ignored was the essential sophisticated development of  'value and its exchange', commonly known and understood as money, which regardless of the delusions underpinning that 'negation in practice of those founding precepts', that implacable urgings of money demanded and required social honesty, in other words National progress was contingent on the emergence of opposition to those underpinning delusions, which The Democratic Party became. The emergence of The Democratic Party as that accountability medium didn't in itself indicate or imply that reason and enlightenment had suddenly slayed reaction and its delusions, but what it established was that mathematical fact and its proof of the inexorability of progress. As such its enemies in otherwords those embodying the delusions of the Nations archaic and incipient political-economy, incapable of recognizing that the progressive budding and burgeoning direction, were the organic demands of money, that same value they claimed its defense. 

If the highest function of the Human Being or The People of a Social Contract is that 'objectification of expressions and relationships as value and its exchange', then its most realizing means notwithstanding asserted precepts and foundational mythologies, is that colloquial, Progress, its determination and pursuit. In other words, once upon a time, Money stood on the Gold and Silver Standard as definition of our collective grasp, cognition and acceptance of that 'objectification of expressions and relationships as value and its exchange', till we recognized it was analogous and accordingly idealistic in its capture and definition. Still a significant amount of people, despite enjoying the rewards of money's progressive evolution from its analog definitions haplessly maintain the analog narrative, thus rendering them susceptible, a virtual gullibility to the opportunistic and naive criticisms and philistine arguments opposing the evolved definition of what is money, despite the tremendous benefits and this is aptly exemplary of The Democratic Party.As The Democratic Party assumed opposition to the Nations archaic political-economy and its reaction, it became the embodiment of the Human objects, subjects of the oppression of that initial political-economy, subsequently anticipations and expectations of systemic change naturally developed and grew, meaning those newly liberated subjects of the Nations archaic political-economy had intense anticipations of actual and real life existence changes and were demanding it from Democrats and The Democratic Party, while ignoring the fact, (which is what then transformed into that critique from within The Party's ranks) that they were The Democrats, they were The Democratic Party they demanded action of, as such it was themselves they demanded action from and this inability and unwillingness to hold themselves accountable to this recognition, reveals and exposes the fact that despite the "elitist" critique lobbed against The Party by its reactionary enemies who are incapable of contending with the evolution of money and its liberating progression, this static 'inability and unwillingness to hold themselves accountable' to this incontrovertible fact is what ironically enables the "elitist" critique,with the irony being that 'The Democratic Party is made up of the 'newly liberated subjects of the Nations archaic political-economy' who sure as hell are not elite,and this is the basis of this work.Which is, the psychology that permitted their subjugation during'the Nations archaic political-economy' continued and continues through this post 1950's transformed Democratic Party. What I'm stating is, the current mainstream leadership of the Democratic Party is incapable of asserting itself in that Jacksonian manner and fashion that supported, pushed and defended its then constituencies politics and emphasis on the issue of their day, which was, "Preemption and Squatters" rights to access Land,and its passage of the "Log Cabin Bill" of 1841. The constituents and composition of Andrew Jackson's Democratic Party of the 19th century, which pursued the log cabin bill granting land to the "deplorables" of that time were "white" and were subsequently critiqued as, "Those untethered from the land, who formed the ever expanding population of landless squatters heading into the trans-Appalachian West, unleashed mixed feelings. To many minds, the migrant poor represented the United States' re-creation of Britain's most despised and impoverished class vagrants. During the Revolution, under the Articles of Confederation (the first founding document before the Constitution was adopted), Congress drew a sharp line between those entitled to the privileges of citizenship and the "paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice" who stood outside the national community".[excerpted from White Trash by Nancy Isenberg, quoting John R. Van Atta, SECURING THE WEST:POLITICS, PUBLIC LANDS,AND THE FATE OF THE OLD REPUBLIC, 1785-1850.In so many words what we see is a constant, which is when it suits a particular interest, which is that of maintaining political-economy, critique is formulated to attack whatever existing medium or Political Party at the time thats seeking to assert changes to terms of Social Contract. So when 19th century non-privileged and under privileged outside of mainstream "white" people wanted land they were labeled "vagabonds "and consequently this modern or contemporary composition of the Democratic Party of Working Class and Black Women, Men, Hispanic Women, Men, Native Americans, to specify its major groups, [and the reason I distinguish, Black, Hispanic and Native Americans from the real and organic class group Working Class is because they possess and have distinct interest apart from the generalities of the Working Class due to the type of political-economic forces and its tactics that formed and defined them], then the culturally oppressed and members of the Naturalized citizenry and first generation scions of émigrés are cognitive dissonantly criticized as "elitist" and not real Americans as means to dismiss and mock their inevitable demands of a rearrangement of those dishonest and dismissive terms of The Social Contract. So The Democratic Party despite being a major American political Party, representing an electoral majority of the American Population and citizenry, as that Lion in the Wizard of Oz that forgets its a Lion, responds to criticism from its Republican Party enemies and internal critique from its rank and file with that disassembling phenomena, "imposter syndrome" because of my earlier posit that these new constituents, of The Democratic Party, former subjects of the Nations archaic political-economy are still flummoxed and subordinate to the psychology that enabled the subjugation and as such collectively respond to the criticism of their "belonging" with the neurosis of acting and behaving as if the ensuing political conditions are not existentially abject. Despite the fact a sizable amount of Democrats are not necessarily of the subjugated group of the Nations archaic political-economy, still they are also muted and neutered in their assertiveness, as if there is a constant second guessing of whether their analysis and campaigns for that necessary National progress, if the Nation won't be as all those other defunct civilizations, will be embraced by non-Democratic voters. So The Party despite being on the correct and practical side of progress is relatively tepid in its presentation. I started this work with the unequivocal and unambiguous statement that the Democratic Party, contrary to its neo-feudalist insidious critics is anything but "elitist". Then I continued to show how subjugative psychology ails its rank and file from the recognition and its accountability of they are the Democratic Party and their criticism is that craven fools errand and its paternalistic finger pointing a la, Charlemagne Tha God of the Nationally syndicated Radio show, The Breakfast Club at Democratic leadership or its other extreme evidenced by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson in their recent book ABUNDANCE, both purporting critique of National Politics as if it exist independent of reaction.

By William Thorpe

AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM AND PATERNALISM By William Thorpe

I begin with contrasting THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT OF THE BLACK AMERICAN EXPERIENCE with THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT ATTACKING PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN along with THE CLIMATE and PROGRESSIVISM OF THE UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE MOVEMENTS. The context of The Uncommitted, Climate and Universal Health Care movements are PATERNALISTIC. What I mean by the paternalistic anticipations of these three current, non-civil rights movements is this: Instead of The Uncommitted, Climate and Universal Health Care movements actually creating and structuring an organized front, independent of Political Parties, polemicizing and advancing their objectives on their own particular terms, they are relying on tactics of pressuring, in this case THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY who they presume is amenable to their cause and objective. So in the case of THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT and the relative blackmail of President Joe BIDEN, to now include Vice-President Kamala Harris. What we see is a singular focus on President Joe Biden as a paternalistic figure, responsible for a specific politics that is at odds with the objectives of and is offensive to the anticipations of THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT and its defense of The Palestinian People being exterminated by U.S supplied armaments and materiel to the execution of Zionist objectives of the Israeli Government of Benjamin Netanyahu. Now here is a pivotal omission by THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT in its critique, demanding a cease of U.S support of Benjamin Netanyahu's Zionist objectives. Joe Biden isnt the author and progenitor of American-Israel policy.Yes he supports,endorses and defends it comprehensively to the fullest and currently embodies it as an American President. But thats not the point,the issue is America's support for Israel is general, its woven into the fabric of the National narrative as such to elevate the Palestinian part of the dialectic with its undeniable humanness requires a movement comparable to The Civil Rights Movement of The Black American Experience. In other words the sort of parachute in practice of THE UNCOMMITTED Folks, is not only lazy political action but malpractice or the sort of idealistic intellectualism frowned on and castigated by all practical movements.THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT OF THE BLACK AMERICAN EXPERIENCE is a corollary, a proper continuum of America's history and existence. It is an accurate observation and characterization of history being the, account of production and its means.Whether its various formulations and struggles generally polemicized its self-cognition as fact of the nature of production and its means is besides the point, which then makes it applicable to a robust organizing pursuit by THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT were it to glean, then respect, appreciate and learn from the hard won truths of THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT. Criticisms by "progressives" against The Democratic Party establishment on issues of THE CLIMATE and UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, Despite being more mature, developed and practical still have a hint of the indulgence ailing THE UNCOMMITTED, meaning both movements share a pursuit on a reliance on the speculated paternalistic provisions and accommodations of the expected amenability of THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. In so many words, if Government is active speech, a bullhorn available to us all, despite its zero sum dictatorship, then the acceptance that stability and civilization are stipulations of the simple basic relevance of history and its study is the only measure.

By William Thorpe

YES MICHAEL HARRIOT AND JASON JOHNSON WE ALL KNOW THAT CHARLEMAGNE THA GOD, STEPHEN A. SMITH E.T.C ARE "DABBLERS" AND COLLABORATOR'S By William Thorpe

In a talk with Jason Johnson host of SLATES' A WORD, and THE GRIOS' Michael Harriot over the issue of Black Media providing, The Black Communities existential foes i.e Candace Owens, Nikki Haley e.t.c a platform to keep at the American establishments great work of maintaining the subordination of Black People to its feudalistic political-economy. The interview settled on the critique of the appropriation and exploitation of Black Culture and Heritage by Black people who have historically provided the function of collaborator and in this present and contemporary incarnation, as media personalities. Contextually, man the brothers are right, yes Bro. Jason and Michael are right and the critique is old as the human condition. Societies have always had corrupted members, anomalies who have betrayed their patrimony. The level to which the community is betrayed by the collaboration is perversely and convexly revealed by the saturation of internalized inferiority, once again we all know this. But what I want to instead focus on isn't the low hanging fruit of collaborator critique but rather what Brothers as Jason Johnson and Michael Harriot with the means and ability should reorient their focus and mature critique on. Let me unequivocally state that yes, our Politicians, Legislators and Judiciary have practical or applied power of, and life and death authority over "We The People "but also its speculative shell when they refuse to exercise it in benefit of the Social good and Contract because " We The People "have been sold out for and to the usual suspects. But these components that I've listed above which we were taught in classrooms is the Government are not the full story and its to that rest of the story or, the real American Government that my ask that our Bros, Jason and Michael focus on is directed. We have all heard of the nefarious document, PROJECT 2025 that has as its singular focus a nullification of the gains on the Battle fields of The Civil War. Some of us are askantly aware of some weirdly named private entities, as the HERITAGE FOUNDATION that are associated with its creation and production. Likewise some of us are also slightly aware of another private group, THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY that has everything to do with those wacky and idealistic pronouncements, perennially assaulting us from The Supreme Court of The United States, because they, the group, cultivated, supplied and provided the majority of those megalomaniacs posing as its judges. Let me say this as emphasis, there is a Supreme court ruling, part of the Nations jurisprudential canon, titled DRED SCOTT and it is reviled, yet almost every single court ruling foisted on the Nation by FEDERALIST SOCIETY Judges, is not only pining for its resurrection but actively working for its malevolence. There are a couple of more groups I need to mention as I make the point of what is our "real" government. The AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL is the group responsible for all the laws that impede our dignity and progress. Then to close the loop you have the AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE with its pursuit of Liege political-economy. Individually we have people like Christopher Rufo and Edward Blum who earn a living warring against Black People and challenging any and all arguments we provide and assert as negative impacts of THE BLACK AMERICAN EXPERIENCE. So what I say to Bros. Jason, Michael and those with ability, instead of simply pointing out and exposing those collaborators among us, also expose and polemicize against these Billionaire funded groups and Think Tanks who only scape goat BLACK PEOPLE.

By William Thorpe

THE UNCOMMITTED ANTI - JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS ARE ACTUALLY ROMANTICIZING PALESTINIAN EXTERMINATION By William Thorpe

Recently at a Kamala Harris event, in response to anti-Palestinian extermination hecklers, she retorted, and I paraphrase, if you want Trump to win, say so otherwise I'm talking. Look of course there are people who support Palestinian extermination and to show how perverse it is, I'm in solitary confinement and all I hear around me is Israel should wipe Palestinians off the face of the Earth and one reason for this is, its the point of view and advocacy pushed by the donated content on the White-Evangelical "religious" Pando app on the Securus tablet. Of course, so called Conservative Christianity has its own bias in its support for Israel and its specific political-economic reasons, which is simply stating the obvious. Our ancestors have instructed that "History" is the tale of production and its means. In otherwards history of the human condition is of all tales the most uncomplicated. So, when its unwinding becomes a dilemma and intractable we don't accuse the history, but we examine who is spooling it. So here we are in 2024 with Zionism revealing it's for itself inexorable inevitability, in otherwords,a spooling of a tale. A tale which by the way the Jeffersonian "candid world" bore witness to when The United States of America was, first to recognize the State of Israel. Is this Planet based on cruelties and barbarities, hell you don't have to theorize anything to me, I'm a Black Man. But besides that, let's find a Tasmanian to discuss extermination with, oh they experienced it, so let's find any of the thousands of Nations and their people who were "the free", who were "the brave "on these vast Americas, including the Caribbean Islands to theorize extermination, oh it was practiced on them. Now let's have a real uplifting discussion on extermination with all of those African tribes people, from Sudan, through The Congo, The Namib, South Africa, back through Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Angola, Kenya, Biafra, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Mauritania and let's not leave out Spanish Sahara who are not even materially constituted to have the luxury of indulging. The point being as humans we are a cruelty contagion. So how is it that The Uncommitted anti-Joe Biden, Kamala Harris movement are sabotaging and self-defeating their anticipations. There are infinitely myriad ways to approach this, but the most basic is this, their analysis and action for this period is wrong and incoherent. Once, a revolutionary stalwart who actually practiced castigated anarchist as "infantilist". The Uncommitted movement hasn't established the necessary alliances, the practical organizational work, the identification of its opponents and how to polemicize the obvious antagonisms. The Uncommitted movement doesn't seem to have learnt from the wealth of mistakes, recent and historical and to attempt a wedge between the natural allies of the Palestinian people proper is, even if its agent provocateurism short sighted. What didn't the Uncommitted movement learn from the recent anti-China, Hong Kong protest? Now let's contrast, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Egypt, and Syria and has anyone actually gave thought to why Somalia is controlled and stabilized by chaos? Of course, for The Uncommitted movement their focus is on Palestine, but this is 2024. You don't have Irish Women workers kick starting a boycott apartheid South Africa, you don't have the work of Randall Robinson rallying anti-apartheid grads on the Univ. of Virginia. Simply resurrecting the treachery of Michigan's Macomb County Reagan Democrats which enabled the disassembling of the Nation to date, with Michigan's, Dearborn 2024 Uncommitted movement isn't the colloquial history repeating itself, but clearly symmetric.

By William Thorpe

ON SAFIYA SINCLAIR, author of HOW TO SAY BABYLON A MEMOIR By William Thorpe

There is nothing unique about a hot in the ass 19 year old teenage girl rebelling against her Dad, The family and in extension the entire society, culture and political-economy that constructed and determined the existence of the Father-object of the teenage rebellion. Our human condition is replete with it. First of all this isn't umbrage, I make no bones about Sistah Safiya Sinclair, I applaud her Professorship and scholarly realization. Nonetheless there is a contradiction in the presented critique of her rebellion against her upbringing and development, which despite its negative basis has matured into an exploited qualitative valuation, as she has monetized as all things of our human condition is to be expected and its to that contradiction, which isn't specific to Sistah Safiya to which she can lay no claim, but is experientially general, to Blackness and its to that I speak, under the exegesis, as formulated by our revolutionary French Brethren, 'that even the Sun had to justify it's existence at the court of Dialectics' and to put it bluntly as social beings no critique is unique and exceptional which synthesis and resolution as purpose of the expression reveals and exposes a continuum that can either fork antagonistically or contradictorily and we find both in Sistah Safiya's work. Sistah Safiya was born into a Jamaican Rastafarian household and she rebelled. Then she gave us its account in, HOW TO SAY BABYLON,A MEMOIR. My reaction to her work is, her expressed and articulated reasons, which she concisely gave us in her FRESH AIR interview begs this: Those contradictions that necessitated her rebellion against her Dad, exist here in these United States as full blown antagonisms, in society and the political-economy as human redemption and realization bane. So my ask of Sistah Safiya Sinclair is, simply this, will she direct her perception, ability and will at critiquing these American antagonisms just as she critiqued her Dads contradictions on Fresh Air? As I've stated, this isn't ad hominem, but we have to mature into the acceptance that, for example, the legitimate passion of "The Color Purple", critique, which Sistah Safiya's work is subject, is a utilitarian declaration that the ills of Patriarchy, the antagonisms of authoritarianism and totalitarianism, isn't just relegated and limited to a scape-goated, corrupted Black masculinity, but is firstly human and secondly an aggravated dehumanizing consequence of those barbaric conditions that gives rise to Sistah Safiya's Dads' Rastafarianism as existential resistance. Solzhenitsyn gave us his "Gulag Archipelago", as if injustice and suppression were only endemic to the Soviet Union, then as he lived and existed in good ole Vermont he got reacquainted to disillusionment and the reminder that the narrative he gave us in " Gulag..."knew no borders and was also American. Or what about the pitiful Ayn Rand and her hypocrisy even as she pathetically tried to replicate the authoritarianism she, critiqued in her relations with her dumbstruck acoloytes. I cite these two Europeans to make the point that the grass is greener on the other side idealistic critique of our human behavior isn't limited to the inferiority complex of the marginalized. Because as citizens of The Soviet Union, Solzhenitsyn and Rand were in a more political-economic privileged position than Sistah Safiya and her Rastafarian family were in Jamaica still they found cause to call on The United States to bear witness, just as in 1776 the Great schizophrenic in Chief, Thomas Jefferson called on a "candid world" to bear witness to his woes even as he yoked woes on enslaved Black People.

By William Thorpe

BIRTH RIGHT? TURNING POINT USA's CHARLIE KIRK By William Thorpe

Of course since The Republican Party, traded places with The Democratic Party, after Democrats under Lyndon B. Johnson, in the 1960's nationalized Black American access to the ballot box, with passage of the Voting Rights Act, hence losing neo-enslavers in its ranks to the misanthropic embrace of The Republican Party as last refuge and haven for reaction and all neo-confederate reactionaries. Its Conventions have always introduced us to another new one from under that proverbial rock, which Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA during this 2024 Republican Convention is the latest rock crawler. Charlie's indentation of SOIL under that rock, which he reminded us is BIRTHRIGHT during his feeble speech is perplexing, because, let's just start with this 21st century. Since 2000 here are BIRTHRIGHT markers, which I doubt Charlie Kirk considered. We've had mass shootings and killings in CHURCHES, SYNAGOGUES, HOSPITALS,  K-12 SCHOOLS, SCHOOLS AND MORE SCHOOLS, UNIVERSITIES, WALMART STORES AND OTHER GROCERY STORES, WARE HOUSES, BASE BALL GAMES AND OTHER ATHLETIC EVENTS,YOGA STUDIOS AND OTHER STUDIOS, NEWSPAPER COMPANIES, PEOPLE ENGAGING IN PUBLIC PROTEST BY MARCHING IN THE STREETS, MALLS, POLITICIANS HAVE BEEN GUNNED DOWN AT CONSTITUENT ACCESSIBILITY EVENTS, INCLUDING DONALD TRUMP'S EXPERIENCE, MOVIE THEATERS, POST OFFICES, now this is our BIRTHRIGHT.

By William Thorpe

REALLY, REALLY CHIP ROY (R), VICE-PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS IS A DEI (DIVERSITY, EQUITY INCLUSION) HIRE? By William Thorpe

The thing with racism and the racist is those filled with it would rather go to hell and back, than simply say you damn right I am. So they gas light themselves with, I'm not against Black Lives Matter but all lives matter or hell, blue lives matters which is to say Cops lives matter. Now the declaration, Black Lives Matter didn't simply appear because some squirmy, demented brain decided to state an obvious, which is if in our human condition, for whatever reason which doesn't factor much into this work, humans are labeled, so the assertion Black Lives Matter is simply, affirming the obvious. As such the question is what the hell is going on in the environment determining Black Life, that the obvious has and must be stated, that Black Lives Matters? Which as declarative, is a mechanism intended to, remove its necessity and within this intention we encounter myriad forms, a one after the other variations of it, equal to all the pretzel twist the racist contort their psyche in its denial. The profane nature of racism is so abjectly self-negating that in its incorrigibility it seeks refuge in the delusional sophistry of euphemisms. Beginning with "supremacy", which then morphs into the racist, playing out a Monty Python skit or a la Don Quixote reduced to attacking, the anti-racism conceptual mechanisms as windmills. Which brings us to the insanity of Chip Roy, a Texas Republican hurling "a DEI hire" (which is one of the anti-racism conceptual mechanisms) as epithet against Vice-President Kamala Harris, who is a Black Woman. Because Chip Roy by attacking DEI wants to be spared the effort and exertion of realizing his humanness by "thinking".Because were he to think he'd realize that the Black American experiential anti-racism critique embodied in DEI isn't an ephemeral idealistic pursuit of retribution, but is a symbiotic revelatory mechanism highlighting the sickness of the mental labor expended in constructing it's expectant paranoia anticipating DEI. Now the DEI apoplexy just as critical race theory that are dually consuming Texas Congressman Chip Roy, including Chris Rufo and their FOX News perdition, reveals something else, which is what is lacking not only domestically but internationally in the Black World is the dearth of INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM for Black people by Black people. People like Chip Roy, Chris Rufo, Ron DeSantis, Donald Trump, Jason Miyares, Glenn Youngkin, Gregg Abbot, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Paul Weyrich, Rick Santelli, Leonard Leo, Dinesh D'Souza, Edward Blum, 50cent (rapper), Jay-Z (rapper), Charlemagne Tha God (radio personality), Steve Harvey (comedian), Terry Crews (actor), just to name a few are the minds and hearts who either actively oppose Black political-economic assertiveness internationally and domestically, along with those who enable the opposition. Investigative journalism will give us the necessary information needed to understand what is what. Let's take the State of Texas, with the largest grouping of Black People, I pose a simple rhetorical question has anyone studied its politics and to what extent is it even playing along that its Black people are visible to it. So it isn't surprising that a Texas politician, Chip Roy dare insults The Vice-President of These United States, Kamala Harris, with the so silly on so many levels that it isn't even original racist epithet of a DEI hire.

By William Thorpe