Sunday, September 15, 2024

AMERICAN PROGRESSIVISM AND PATERNALISM By William Thorpe

I begin with contrasting THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT OF THE BLACK AMERICAN EXPERIENCE with THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT ATTACKING PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN along with THE CLIMATE and PROGRESSIVISM OF THE UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE MOVEMENTS. The context of The Uncommitted, Climate and Universal Health Care movements are PATERNALISTIC. What I mean by the paternalistic anticipations of these three current, non-civil rights movements is this: Instead of The Uncommitted, Climate and Universal Health Care movements actually creating and structuring an organized front, independent of Political Parties, polemicizing and advancing their objectives on their own particular terms, they are relying on tactics of pressuring, in this case THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY who they presume is amenable to their cause and objective. So in the case of THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT and the relative blackmail of President Joe BIDEN, to now include Vice-President Kamala Harris. What we see is a singular focus on President Joe Biden as a paternalistic figure, responsible for a specific politics that is at odds with the objectives of and is offensive to the anticipations of THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT and its defense of The Palestinian People being exterminated by U.S supplied armaments and materiel to the execution of Zionist objectives of the Israeli Government of Benjamin Netanyahu. Now here is a pivotal omission by THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT in its critique, demanding a cease of U.S support of Benjamin Netanyahu's Zionist objectives. Joe Biden isnt the author and progenitor of American-Israel policy.Yes he supports,endorses and defends it comprehensively to the fullest and currently embodies it as an American President. But thats not the point,the issue is America's support for Israel is general, its woven into the fabric of the National narrative as such to elevate the Palestinian part of the dialectic with its undeniable humanness requires a movement comparable to The Civil Rights Movement of The Black American Experience. In other words the sort of parachute in practice of THE UNCOMMITTED Folks, is not only lazy political action but malpractice or the sort of idealistic intellectualism frowned on and castigated by all practical movements.THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT OF THE BLACK AMERICAN EXPERIENCE is a corollary, a proper continuum of America's history and existence. It is an accurate observation and characterization of history being the, account of production and its means.Whether its various formulations and struggles generally polemicized its self-cognition as fact of the nature of production and its means is besides the point, which then makes it applicable to a robust organizing pursuit by THE UNCOMMITTED MOVEMENT were it to glean, then respect, appreciate and learn from the hard won truths of THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT. Criticisms by "progressives" against The Democratic Party establishment on issues of THE CLIMATE and UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, Despite being more mature, developed and practical still have a hint of the indulgence ailing THE UNCOMMITTED, meaning both movements share a pursuit on a reliance on the speculated paternalistic provisions and accommodations of the expected amenability of THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. In so many words, if Government is active speech, a bullhorn available to us all, despite its zero sum dictatorship, then the acceptance that stability and civilization are stipulations of the simple basic relevance of history and its study is the only measure.

By William Thorpe

Friday, September 6, 2024

YES MICHAEL HARRIOT AND JASON JOHNSON WE ALL KNOW THAT CHARLEMAGNE THA GOD, STEPHEN A. SMITH E.T.C ARE "DABBLERS" AND COLLABORATOR'S By William Thorpe

In a talk with Jason Johnson host of SLATES' A WORD, and THE GRIOS' Michael Harriot over the issue of Black Media providing, The Black Communities existential foes i.e Candace Owens, Nikki Haley e.t.c a platform to keep at the American establishments great work of maintaining the subordination of Black People to its feudalistic political-economy. The interview settled on the critique of the appropriation and exploitation of Black Culture and Heritage by Black people who have historically provided the function of collaborator and in this present and contemporary incarnation, as media personalities. Contextually, man the brothers are right, yes Bro. Jason and Michael are right and the critique is old as the human condition. Societies have always had corrupted members, anomalies who have betrayed their patrimony. The level to which the community is betrayed by the collaboration is perversely and convexly revealed by the saturation of internalized inferiority, once again we all know this. But what I want to instead focus on isn't the low hanging fruit of collaborator critique but rather what Brothers as Jason Johnson and Michael Harriot with the means and ability should reorient their focus and mature critique on. Let me unequivocally state that yes, our Politicians, Legislators and Judiciary have practical or applied power of, and life and death authority over "We The People "but also its speculative shell when they refuse to exercise it in benefit of the Social good and Contract because " We The People "have been sold out for and to the usual suspects. But these components that I've listed above which we were taught in classrooms is the Government are not the full story and its to that rest of the story or, the real American Government that my ask that our Bros, Jason and Michael focus on is directed. We have all heard of the nefarious document, PROJECT 2025 that has as its singular focus a nullification of the gains on the Battle fields of The Civil War. Some of us are askantly aware of some weirdly named private entities, as the HERITAGE FOUNDATION that are associated with its creation and production. Likewise some of us are also slightly aware of another private group, THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY that has everything to do with those wacky and idealistic pronouncements, perennially assaulting us from The Supreme Court of The United States, because they, the group, cultivated, supplied and provided the majority of those megalomaniacs posing as its judges. Let me say this as emphasis, there is a Supreme court ruling, part of the Nations jurisprudential canon, titled DRED SCOTT and it is reviled, yet almost every single court ruling foisted on the Nation by FEDERALIST SOCIETY Judges, is not only pining for its resurrection but actively working for its malevolence. There are a couple of more groups I need to mention as I make the point of what is our "real" government. The AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL is the group responsible for all the laws that impede our dignity and progress. Then to close the loop you have the AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE with its pursuit of Liege political-economy. Individually we have people like Christopher Rufo and Edward Blum who earn a living warring against Black People and challenging any and all arguments we provide and assert as negative impacts of THE BLACK AMERICAN EXPERIENCE. So what I say to Bros. Jason, Michael and those with ability, instead of simply pointing out and exposing those collaborators among us, also expose and polemicize against these Billionaire funded groups and Think Tanks who only scape goat BLACK PEOPLE.

By William Thorpe

Friday, August 23, 2024

THE UNCOMMITTED ANTI - JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS ARE ACTUALLY ROMANTICIZING PALESTINIAN EXTERMINATION By William Thorpe

Recently at a Kamala Harris event, in response to anti-Palestinian extermination hecklers, she retorted, and I paraphrase, if you want Trump to win, say so otherwise I'm talking. Look of course there are people who support Palestinian extermination and to show how perverse it is, I'm in solitary confinement and all I hear around me is Israel should wipe Palestinians off the face of the Earth and one reason for this is, its the point of view and advocacy pushed by the donated content on the White-Evangelical "religious" Pando app on the Securus tablet. Of course, so called Conservative Christianity has its own bias in its support for Israel and its specific political-economic reasons, which is simply stating the obvious. Our ancestors have instructed that "History" is the tale of production and its means. In otherwards history of the human condition is of all tales the most uncomplicated. So, when its unwinding becomes a dilemma and intractable we don't accuse the history, but we examine who is spooling it. So here we are in 2024 with Zionism revealing it's for itself inexorable inevitability, in otherwords,a spooling of a tale. A tale which by the way the Jeffersonian "candid world" bore witness to when The United States of America was, first to recognize the State of Israel. Is this Planet based on cruelties and barbarities, hell you don't have to theorize anything to me, I'm a Black Man. But besides that, let's find a Tasmanian to discuss extermination with, oh they experienced it, so let's find any of the thousands of Nations and their people who were "the free", who were "the brave "on these vast Americas, including the Caribbean Islands to theorize extermination, oh it was practiced on them. Now let's have a real uplifting discussion on extermination with all of those African tribes people, from Sudan, through The Congo, The Namib, South Africa, back through Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Angola, Kenya, Biafra, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Mauritania and let's not leave out Spanish Sahara who are not even materially constituted to have the luxury of indulging. The point being as humans we are a cruelty contagion. So how is it that The Uncommitted anti-Joe Biden, Kamala Harris movement are sabotaging and self-defeating their anticipations. There are infinitely myriad ways to approach this, but the most basic is this, their analysis and action for this period is wrong and incoherent. Once, a revolutionary stalwart who actually practiced castigated anarchist as "infantilist". The Uncommitted movement hasn't established the necessary alliances, the practical organizational work, the identification of its opponents and how to polemicize the obvious antagonisms. The Uncommitted movement doesn't seem to have learnt from the wealth of mistakes, recent and historical and to attempt a wedge between the natural allies of the Palestinian people proper is, even if its agent provocateurism short sighted. What didn't the Uncommitted movement learn from the recent anti-China, Hong Kong protest? Now let's contrast, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Egypt, and Syria and has anyone actually gave thought to why Somalia is controlled and stabilized by chaos? Of course, for The Uncommitted movement their focus is on Palestine, but this is 2024. You don't have Irish Women workers kick starting a boycott apartheid South Africa, you don't have the work of Randall Robinson rallying anti-apartheid grads on the Univ. of Virginia. Simply resurrecting the treachery of Michigan's Macomb County Reagan Democrats which enabled the disassembling of the Nation to date, with Michigan's, Dearborn 2024 Uncommitted movement isn't the colloquial history repeating itself, but clearly symmetric.

By William Thorpe

Tuesday, August 20, 2024

ON SAFIYA SINCLAIR, author of HOW TO SAY BABYLON A MEMOIR By William Thorpe

There is nothing unique about a hot in the ass 19 year old teenage girl rebelling against her Dad, The family and in extension the entire society, culture and political-economy that constructed and determined the existence of the Father-object of the teenage rebellion. Our human condition is replete with it. First of all this isn't umbrage, I make no bones about Sistah Safiya Sinclair, I applaud her Professorship and scholarly realization. Nonetheless there is a contradiction in the presented critique of her rebellion against her upbringing and development, which despite its negative basis has matured into an exploited qualitative valuation, as she has monetized as all things of our human condition is to be expected and its to that contradiction, which isn't specific to Sistah Safiya to which she can lay no claim, but is experientially general, to Blackness and its to that I speak, under the exegesis, as formulated by our revolutionary French Brethren, 'that even the Sun had to justify it's existence at the court of Dialectics' and to put it bluntly as social beings no critique is unique and exceptional which synthesis and resolution as purpose of the expression reveals and exposes a continuum that can either fork antagonistically or contradictorily and we find both in Sistah Safiya's work. Sistah Safiya was born into a Jamaican Rastafarian household and she rebelled. Then she gave us its account in, HOW TO SAY BABYLON,A MEMOIR. My reaction to her work is, her expressed and articulated reasons, which she concisely gave us in her FRESH AIR interview begs this: Those contradictions that necessitated her rebellion against her Dad, exist here in these United States as full blown antagonisms, in society and the political-economy as human redemption and realization bane. So my ask of Sistah Safiya Sinclair is, simply this, will she direct her perception, ability and will at critiquing these American antagonisms just as she critiqued her Dads contradictions on Fresh Air? As I've stated, this isn't ad hominem, but we have to mature into the acceptance that, for example, the legitimate passion of "The Color Purple", critique, which Sistah Safiya's work is subject, is a utilitarian declaration that the ills of Patriarchy, the antagonisms of authoritarianism and totalitarianism, isn't just relegated and limited to a scape-goated, corrupted Black masculinity, but is firstly human and secondly an aggravated dehumanizing consequence of those barbaric conditions that gives rise to Sistah Safiya's Dads' Rastafarianism as existential resistance. Solzhenitsyn gave us his "Gulag Archipelago", as if injustice and suppression were only endemic to the Soviet Union, then as he lived and existed in good ole Vermont he got reacquainted to disillusionment and the reminder that the narrative he gave us in " Gulag..."knew no borders and was also American. Or what about the pitiful Ayn Rand and her hypocrisy even as she pathetically tried to replicate the authoritarianism she, critiqued in her relations with her dumbstruck acoloytes. I cite these two Europeans to make the point that the grass is greener on the other side idealistic critique of our human behavior isn't limited to the inferiority complex of the marginalized. Because as citizens of The Soviet Union, Solzhenitsyn and Rand were in a more political-economic privileged position than Sistah Safiya and her Rastafarian family were in Jamaica still they found cause to call on The United States to bear witness, just as in 1776 the Great schizophrenic in Chief, Thomas Jefferson called on a "candid world" to bear witness to his woes even as he yoked woes on enslaved Black People.

By William Thorpe

Friday, July 19, 2024

BIRTH RIGHT? TURNING POINT USA's CHARLIE KIRK By William Thorpe

Of course since The Republican Party, traded places with The Democratic Party, after Democrats under Lyndon B. Johnson, in the 1960's nationalized Black American access to the ballot box, with passage of the Voting Rights Act, hence losing neo-enslavers in its ranks to the misanthropic embrace of The Republican Party as last refuge and haven for reaction and all neo-confederate reactionaries. Its Conventions have always introduced us to another new one from under that proverbial rock, which Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA during this 2024 Republican Convention is the latest rock crawler. Charlie's indentation of SOIL under that rock, which he reminded us is BIRTHRIGHT during his feeble speech is perplexing, because, let's just start with this 21st century. Since 2000 here are BIRTHRIGHT markers, which I doubt Charlie Kirk considered. We've had mass shootings and killings in CHURCHES, SYNAGOGUES, HOSPITALS,  K-12 SCHOOLS, SCHOOLS AND MORE SCHOOLS, UNIVERSITIES, WALMART STORES AND OTHER GROCERY STORES, WARE HOUSES, BASE BALL GAMES AND OTHER ATHLETIC EVENTS,YOGA STUDIOS AND OTHER STUDIOS, NEWSPAPER COMPANIES, PEOPLE ENGAGING IN PUBLIC PROTEST BY MARCHING IN THE STREETS, MALLS, POLITICIANS HAVE BEEN GUNNED DOWN AT CONSTITUENT ACCESSIBILITY EVENTS, INCLUDING DONALD TRUMP'S EXPERIENCE, MOVIE THEATERS, POST OFFICES, now this is our BIRTHRIGHT.

By William Thorpe

Thursday, July 18, 2024

REALLY, REALLY CHIP ROY (R), VICE-PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS IS A DEI (DIVERSITY, EQUITY INCLUSION) HIRE? By William Thorpe

The thing with racism and the racist is those filled with it would rather go to hell and back, than simply say you damn right I am. So they gas light themselves with, I'm not against Black Lives Matter but all lives matter or hell, blue lives matters which is to say Cops lives matter. Now the declaration, Black Lives Matter didn't simply appear because some squirmy, demented brain decided to state an obvious, which is if in our human condition, for whatever reason which doesn't factor much into this work, humans are labeled, so the assertion Black Lives Matter is simply, affirming the obvious. As such the question is what the hell is going on in the environment determining Black Life, that the obvious has and must be stated, that Black Lives Matters? Which as declarative, is a mechanism intended to, remove its necessity and within this intention we encounter myriad forms, a one after the other variations of it, equal to all the pretzel twist the racist contort their psyche in its denial. The profane nature of racism is so abjectly self-negating that in its incorrigibility it seeks refuge in the delusional sophistry of euphemisms. Beginning with "supremacy", which then morphs into the racist, playing out a Monty Python skit or a la Don Quixote reduced to attacking, the anti-racism conceptual mechanisms as windmills. Which brings us to the insanity of Chip Roy, a Texas Republican hurling "a DEI hire" (which is one of the anti-racism conceptual mechanisms) as epithet against Vice-President Kamala Harris, who is a Black Woman. Because Chip Roy by attacking DEI wants to be spared the effort and exertion of realizing his humanness by "thinking".Because were he to think he'd realize that the Black American experiential anti-racism critique embodied in DEI isn't an ephemeral idealistic pursuit of retribution, but is a symbiotic revelatory mechanism highlighting the sickness of the mental labor expended in constructing it's expectant paranoia anticipating DEI. Now the DEI apoplexy just as critical race theory that are dually consuming Texas Congressman Chip Roy, including Chris Rufo and their FOX News perdition, reveals something else, which is what is lacking not only domestically but internationally in the Black World is the dearth of INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM for Black people by Black people. People like Chip Roy, Chris Rufo, Ron DeSantis, Donald Trump, Jason Miyares, Glenn Youngkin, Gregg Abbot, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Paul Weyrich, Rick Santelli, Leonard Leo, Dinesh D'Souza, Edward Blum, 50cent (rapper), Jay-Z (rapper), Charlemagne Tha God (radio personality), Steve Harvey (comedian), Terry Crews (actor), just to name a few are the minds and hearts who either actively oppose Black political-economic assertiveness internationally and domestically, along with those who enable the opposition. Investigative journalism will give us the necessary information needed to understand what is what. Let's take the State of Texas, with the largest grouping of Black People, I pose a simple rhetorical question has anyone studied its politics and to what extent is it even playing along that its Black people are visible to it. So it isn't surprising that a Texas politician, Chip Roy dare insults The Vice-President of These United States, Kamala Harris, with the so silly on so many levels that it isn't even original racist epithet of a DEI hire.

By William Thorpe

Wednesday, July 17, 2024

IN 999 AD SPANISH WARRIORS HAD ENOUGH MOTIVE FORCE TO TIE EL CID, THEIR DEAD KING TO HIS HORSE, TO LEAD THEM VICTORIOUS IN BATTLE OVER THEIR ENEMIES..... WHILE IN 2024 A TYPE OF DEMOCRAT IS MAKING ILL-THOUGHT ARGUMENTS REJECTING THEIR ALIVE LEADER, PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN By William Thorpe

Okay, where should I start, is it with the astoundingly unstated proposition that millions of Americans who claim to hate crime will glibly vote for an individual who has been adjudged a rapist and is a 34 count convicted felon, Yeah the former President of The United States, Donald J.Trump. An unprecedented two-time impeached President during an open and shut one 4yr.term.Which also included an insurrection, the construction of a scaffold to execute members of the Nations Government and an attack on The U.S Congress, because that is what Democrats as Adam Smith, Michael Bennett to name a few under the leadership of the instigator in chief, the insidious NEW YORK TIMES are hard at work implying. I mean it isn't that any of this are strange and peculiar occurrences in our human condition. But the context reeks, which is simply this, The Democratic Party is craven for all sorts of reasons that I can easily defend my stating such. The Democratic Party, plyed the most childish of moves, it exploited a circumstance that had always existed, then it embellished the metric of exploitation, forgetting that, yes as people we are stupid, but our stupidity is complex. So for example, we might not dig too deep into why for example The New York Times has dusted off the same play book it deployed against the ex-Barry Goldwater gal, Hillary Clinton, during her bid for the Presidency, by yapping incessantly about her alleged misuse of a private computer server. By again hammering at Joe Biden's CNN hosted and shopped 6/27/24 debate performance. To which right on cue Meerkat-like Democrats emerged with pointy noses and chinless jowels, to unconscionably tell us that The President's debate performance was so beyond the pale that, excuse the pun, it trumped the fact that President Joe Biden's opponent on the debate stage was a criminal, not metaphorically but literally and the way the President spoke so whispery is the crime and not Donald J. Trump, whom the State of New York has spent millions prosecuting for his craven crimes. Now what do I mean by those meerkat-democrats exploited a situation that had always existed Biden didn't just turn 81, during the CNN 6/27/24 debate, nor did he just start eating his words, the man has historically been making word salads. Hell has anyone listened to how the lot of politicians talk, hell not just politicians even those propagandist slaving for The New York Times, all they do is talk in circles because they obfuscate, if they ain't talking to us as if we're Gerber kids, they talk to us with the dumbing down qualifier of, "I don't want to get into the weeds" or,"this is inside the belt way, Washington talk, folks in the heartland, are not concerned with this". Well if we don't care, if it's in the weeds, if its beltway talk, then what the hell are we basing our votes on? Now this is what is violently insulting, as a matter of fact, assaultive. The New York Times and its Democratic stooges, its useful idiots, have assumed they have the right to veto the imperative and will of all those millions of primary voters who expended their motive force voting for Biden-Harris as the only elements worthy of representing them. Those primary voters knew that Joe Biden is 81yrs, they had seen all the anti-Biden psy-ops memes ,they had encountered all of the Biden bashing propaganda, while giving the convicted felon Trump, a pass. Yet they voted for him in the primaries and now The New York Times is dismissing their votes, their motive force?

By William Thorpe
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...