MAN WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO CRITIQUE OF THE SOCIAL CONTRACT? By William Thorpe

Let me begin by disabusing us of the strawmanesque charade of a political middle or center,which critique of the Social Contract typically and fraudulently purports.So let's use the simple everyday existence of interactions and its terms of value exchange,which is the only honest and practical denominator of speaking to and describing human behavior and terms and relations of a Social Contract,which to economize brain storage space,we categorize and characterize it,"political-economy".So with that said when you the reader are hungry,is there a middle ground? or when you're in a store where stuff are sold and bought,is there a middle ground on whether you have the means to acquire anything,isn't it the either or of whether you can or not? I'm positing these rudimentary and profane examples to compel clarity on what we mean by "middle",because notwithstanding acknowledging the mechanics of any decision making process,"middle" as political critique is an insidious and destructive tactic,which to put and state bluntly is traitorous to that progressive motive-force of our Human Condition and its Social Contract medium and mechanism.So now let's confront what the strawmanesque charade of a middle or center as political analysis and critique has wrought.Before we as people and humans have and assume assignation,as value realization and its maturation in the terms and relations of a Social Contract and its political-economy,we are what,just The People.Then value realization and its maturation begins its inexorable compulsion and dictatorial emergence,as process of our education and functional literacy of the terms and relations of the Social Contract,we are birthed in,or in otherwords we begin to study learn, understand and attain the cognition of what we'll need in doing the business of being human,according to the gleaned,held dearly means and methods of the Society as,THE CULTURE and TRADITIONS,which by the way,again notwithstanding the approximate utility and purpose of agency or that deflective,distractive and delusional pull yourself up by your bootstrap, "meritocracy" critique, we had nothing to do with.So as we develop with and in the cognitive Cultural and Traditions, necessities for the business of being human,we begin to realize that we are now apart from the people,despite the fact that analytically we still and always are,that dynamic of THE PEOPLE, but and because of what we have come to understand and how we have come to it of the culture and traditions of the Society,its Social Contract and political-economy that we are birthed in,we begin to have a no middle ground or center with it,because we have our particular interest and along with such interest development,according to its relative attitude and effect on its realization we then critique the entire construct of the Social Contract,that,even as our Parents,members of the Society birthed us,it in turn births our realization and need of our no middle ground, interest based critique.Okay so all of this brings us to this contemporary moment in our American Social Contract,where we are specifically, not in general terms,but specifically confronted with the consequences of all of those past moments of the political middle critique and center analysis,which are now unveiled and exposed as nothing more than space that permitted,enabled and gave cover to REACTION in its most historic form to exist and maintain its intellectual-liberalism and psychosis. Because we compromised the Progressive critique and analysis for that farcical wink and nod of a delusional CENTER.