THE UNCOMMITTED ANTI - JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS ARE ACTUALLY ROMANTICIZING PALESTINIAN EXTERMINATION By William Thorpe

Recently at a Kamala Harris event, in response to anti-Palestinian extermination hecklers, she retorted, and I paraphrase, if you want Trump to win, say so otherwise I'm talking. Look of course there are people who support Palestinian extermination and to show how perverse it is, I'm in solitary confinement and all I hear around me is Israel should wipe Palestinians off the face of the Earth and one reason for this is, its the point of view and advocacy pushed by the donated content on the White-Evangelical "religious" Pando app on the Securus tablet. Of course, so called Conservative Christianity has its own bias in its support for Israel and its specific political-economic reasons, which is simply stating the obvious. Our ancestors have instructed that "History" is the tale of production and its means. In otherwards history of the human condition is of all tales the most uncomplicated. So, when its unwinding becomes a dilemma and intractable we don't accuse the history, but we examine who is spooling it. So here we are in 2024 with Zionism revealing it's for itself inexorable inevitability, in otherwords,a spooling of a tale. A tale which by the way the Jeffersonian "candid world" bore witness to when The United States of America was, first to recognize the State of Israel. Is this Planet based on cruelties and barbarities, hell you don't have to theorize anything to me, I'm a Black Man. But besides that, let's find a Tasmanian to discuss extermination with, oh they experienced it, so let's find any of the thousands of Nations and their people who were "the free", who were "the brave "on these vast Americas, including the Caribbean Islands to theorize extermination, oh it was practiced on them. Now let's have a real uplifting discussion on extermination with all of those African tribes people, from Sudan, through The Congo, The Namib, South Africa, back through Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Angola, Kenya, Biafra, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Mauritania and let's not leave out Spanish Sahara who are not even materially constituted to have the luxury of indulging. The point being as humans we are a cruelty contagion. So how is it that The Uncommitted anti-Joe Biden, Kamala Harris movement are sabotaging and self-defeating their anticipations. There are infinitely myriad ways to approach this, but the most basic is this, their analysis and action for this period is wrong and incoherent. Once, a revolutionary stalwart who actually practiced castigated anarchist as "infantilist". The Uncommitted movement hasn't established the necessary alliances, the practical organizational work, the identification of its opponents and how to polemicize the obvious antagonisms. The Uncommitted movement doesn't seem to have learnt from the wealth of mistakes, recent and historical and to attempt a wedge between the natural allies of the Palestinian people proper is, even if its agent provocateurism short sighted. What didn't the Uncommitted movement learn from the recent anti-China, Hong Kong protest? Now let's contrast, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Egypt, and Syria and has anyone actually gave thought to why Somalia is controlled and stabilized by chaos? Of course, for The Uncommitted movement their focus is on Palestine, but this is 2024. You don't have Irish Women workers kick starting a boycott apartheid South Africa, you don't have the work of Randall Robinson rallying anti-apartheid grads on the Univ. of Virginia. Simply resurrecting the treachery of Michigan's Macomb County Reagan Democrats which enabled the disassembling of the Nation to date, with Michigan's, Dearborn 2024 Uncommitted movement isn't the colloquial history repeating itself, but clearly symmetric.

By William Thorpe

ON SAFIYA SINCLAIR, author of HOW TO SAY BABYLON A MEMOIR By William Thorpe

There is nothing unique about a hot in the ass 19 year old teenage girl rebelling against her Dad, The family and in extension the entire society, culture and political-economy that constructed and determined the existence of the Father-object of the teenage rebellion. Our human condition is replete with it. First of all this isn't umbrage, I make no bones about Sistah Safiya Sinclair, I applaud her Professorship and scholarly realization. Nonetheless there is a contradiction in the presented critique of her rebellion against her upbringing and development, which despite its negative basis has matured into an exploited qualitative valuation, as she has monetized as all things of our human condition is to be expected and its to that contradiction, which isn't specific to Sistah Safiya to which she can lay no claim, but is experientially general, to Blackness and its to that I speak, under the exegesis, as formulated by our revolutionary French Brethren, 'that even the Sun had to justify it's existence at the court of Dialectics' and to put it bluntly as social beings no critique is unique and exceptional which synthesis and resolution as purpose of the expression reveals and exposes a continuum that can either fork antagonistically or contradictorily and we find both in Sistah Safiya's work. Sistah Safiya was born into a Jamaican Rastafarian household and she rebelled. Then she gave us its account in, HOW TO SAY BABYLON,A MEMOIR. My reaction to her work is, her expressed and articulated reasons, which she concisely gave us in her FRESH AIR interview begs this: Those contradictions that necessitated her rebellion against her Dad, exist here in these United States as full blown antagonisms, in society and the political-economy as human redemption and realization bane. So my ask of Sistah Safiya Sinclair is, simply this, will she direct her perception, ability and will at critiquing these American antagonisms just as she critiqued her Dads contradictions on Fresh Air? As I've stated, this isn't ad hominem, but we have to mature into the acceptance that, for example, the legitimate passion of "The Color Purple", critique, which Sistah Safiya's work is subject, is a utilitarian declaration that the ills of Patriarchy, the antagonisms of authoritarianism and totalitarianism, isn't just relegated and limited to a scape-goated, corrupted Black masculinity, but is firstly human and secondly an aggravated dehumanizing consequence of those barbaric conditions that gives rise to Sistah Safiya's Dads' Rastafarianism as existential resistance. Solzhenitsyn gave us his "Gulag Archipelago", as if injustice and suppression were only endemic to the Soviet Union, then as he lived and existed in good ole Vermont he got reacquainted to disillusionment and the reminder that the narrative he gave us in " Gulag..."knew no borders and was also American. Or what about the pitiful Ayn Rand and her hypocrisy even as she pathetically tried to replicate the authoritarianism she, critiqued in her relations with her dumbstruck acoloytes. I cite these two Europeans to make the point that the grass is greener on the other side idealistic critique of our human behavior isn't limited to the inferiority complex of the marginalized. Because as citizens of The Soviet Union, Solzhenitsyn and Rand were in a more political-economic privileged position than Sistah Safiya and her Rastafarian family were in Jamaica still they found cause to call on The United States to bear witness, just as in 1776 the Great schizophrenic in Chief, Thomas Jefferson called on a "candid world" to bear witness to his woes even as he yoked woes on enslaved Black People.

By William Thorpe