A status quo and it's reactionaries always explains away at the expense of the narrative of it's existence.
So we can have a Thomas Jefferson penning articles of liberty at the expense of depriving human beings he held as slaves, theirs.
The idealism of the
reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld always suppose that the detail and approximate specificity is at odds with the general approximation so instead of the rule, what the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld idealistically instruct is the suppositions of the exception.
The work of idealism and it's mental labor is always that of foolishly distorting empiricism. Because what the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld conveniently and with intellectual dishonesty glibly ignore is: achieving the American "dream" or economic stability isn't affirmative critique of the national Political-Economy narrative in itself, which still has the question of genocide, slavery and presumptive discrimination to resolve. But it is simply a statement that the functioning element has submitted to the status quo narrative bias and the idealism of the reactionaries Amy Chua and Jed Reubenfeld is it's indulgence.
By Apropos
